Mega Heat Sinks 60
An anonymous reader submitted a stream of obscenities,
but amidst them was a link to this page
which is a sweet heat sink- in fact, it actually was able
to accumulate a quarter inch of frost. Could be useful with Intel's
track record of releasing chips that can double as
microwave ovens.
Many Peltier heat sinks (Score:1)
Of course, to get frost on the outside of such a device you'd have to use one which you can plug in backwards -- so the outside would chill while it heats up the processor chip...
Kryotech? (Score:1)
wow!! (Score:1)
I could really use one of these for my dtv-box. Its called Sagem and you could fry eggs on the mpeg2 chip in it, got a p133 fan in it now - but still it overheats now and then. Perhaps Sagem is really a Intel company??
Lame (Score:1)
Obviously a ploy by Intel aliens to get you to buy more Pentiums when your current one burns out from moisture.
Microwave? Uh, sure... Try "convectional" instead. It would sound like you knew what you were talking about...
This is a joke, right? (Score:1)
Microwave Oven? (Score:1)
?
1.2 GHz also (Score:1)
This is active cooling, not just a heatsink + fan! (Score:1)
Microwave Ovens - correct you loony. (Score:1)
Thermoelectric coolers (Score:1)
Where I work (for a major defence contractor) we use similar devices for cooling things where there's no possibility for airflow (i.e. the displays in an aircraft cockpit).
They're really not all that new technology, as I recall. The concept is simple, based somewhat on the idea of a Peltier Junction.
A Peltier Junction is formed when two dissimilar metals are physically bonded. If you put a current across this, heat is transferred from one side to the other. Thermoelectric coolers use a similar idea, but use massive arrays of specialised semiconductor diodes to achieve the same task much more efficiently.
We get ours from ITI-ferrotec [ferrotec-america.com] and they have a pretty good web site explaining the basic concepts, as well as how to use a thermoelectric cooler in certain applications. If you let one run uncontrolled, it could easily develop frost like the web page indicates. It's typical to see TEC's with a temperature differential above 40 degrees C.
Most applications where you want to avoid frosting your sensitive electronics require a controlled feedback loop where you can vary the current to the device based on its temperature. Just power cycling them (as with a standard thermostat) is fairly detrimental to their life-span, so in high-reliability applications (like the displays in aircraft cockpits) we have to use a specially programmed microcontroler driving a darlington power transistor to control the current, combined with a thermocouple sensor to monitor the temperature on both sides of the device.
Even more interesting is that if you reverse the power to the TEC, the heat flow will also reverse. Great for when you have to start up your F-16 on a really cold morning and the LCD has frozen up.
Crays had liquid freon cooling (Score:1)
Microwave Ovens (Score:1)
More experiments in refrigeration. (Score:1)
Microwave Ovens (Score:1)
The point of using microwaves, of course, is that such wavelengths are easily absorbed by water molecules, which tend to be prevalent in food. But that doesn't mean that any microwave radiation will cook food. Quantity, not just quality, counts.
Kythe
(Remove "x"'s from
Cold = absence of heat. (Score:1)
Slow, or slashdotted? (Score:1)
Arrgh!
Peltier heat sink.. (Score:1)
Ripping on Intel (Score:1)
Ripping on Intel (Score:1)
and it actually works? (Score:1)
Microwave Ovens (Score:1)
Microwave Ovens (Score:1)
Use some common sense. (Score:1)
Some folks mentioned Peltier heat sinks. I have never heard it by that name, but it sounds like a thermoelectric cooler [google.com]. Put the current one way, it's a cooler, switch the direction of the current and you have a heater. We use it all the time to cool detectors used in space applications.
Check out http://www.melcor.com/teccover.htm [melcor.com] if you really want one.
I think it's pretty bad that you would ever need active cooling for a CPU. That really has to hurt reliability.
~afniv
"Man könnte froh sein, wenn die Luft so rein wäre wie das Bier"
"We could be happy if the air was as pure as the beer"
Hey what about other chips? (Score:1)
Liquid nitrogen cooling. (Score:1)
This might have a tolerable cost if you made the liquid nitrogen on the fly. This isn't difficult.
More experiments in refrigeration. (Score:1)
I personally am using sandwich bags filled with water to cool my PS/2 Model P75 486. It has 24MB of memory in the form of 2MB SIMMs <shudder>. Its 486DX/33mHz also has a habit of overheating, which makes these interesting displays like ``??? 111'' when the parity checker catches the error, or if it doesn't, I get ``data modification'', which is IBM speak for random bit changings. That causes neat things like diskette copyings to suddenly fail, DHCP requests to come back with funny IP addresses, and the mouse pointer to suddenly morph into a strange shape. These are all things that have happened before I was watercooling.
Cheers,
Joshua.
Peltier Junction? (Score:1)
passive heatsinks (Score:1)
Frosty Heat-sink...? (Score:1)
sinks job is to help take heat FROM the processor, not to go frosty and cool it off... a sink which dissipated heat fast enough to freeze doesn't by itself make any sense...
Liquid Nitrogen a bit cheaper... for short term. (Score:1)
FROST GUARANTEED!!
Frosty HeatSinks? (Score:1)
Uhhh... (Score:1)
peltier fans ? (Score:1)
seems alot safer than putting condensation on my cpu and still alot more effective than just a normal fan. eh ?
This is a joke, right? (Score:1)
One question tho. Is having a cold surface like that on a chip ( questions of the moisture asside, at the moment ) actually going to cool it any better? I thought the idea of the heat sink was to transfer heat FROM the cpu, and dissipate it. Now, I'm not totally convinced that putting a colder surface on the CPU is really going to be able to cool it down any better ( you're still going to want your heat transfer and dissipation properties of the heatsink ). And yes, I realise that the object in question was definately a heat sink. The question being is the cold contact surface going to make it perform better than any other heatsink?
THEN we get to the question of whether or not you'd want something that produces moisture like that near our computers. I dont' know about the rest of you, but my answer to that is a big fat NO!