A Coal Billionaire is Building the World's Biggest Clean Energy Plant - Five Times the Size of Paris (cnn.com) 79
An anonymous reader shared this report from CNN:
Five times the size of Paris. Visible from space. The world's biggest energy plant. Enough electricity to power Switzerland. The scale of the project transforming swathes of barren salt desert on the edge of western India into one of the most important sources of clean energy anywhere on the planet is so overwhelming that the man in charge can't keep up. "I don't even do the math any more," Sagar Adani told CNN in an interview last week.
Adani is executive director of Adani Green Energy Limited (AGEL). He's also the nephew of Gautam Adani, Asia's second richest man, whose $100 billion fortune stems from the Adani Group, India's biggest coal importer and a leading miner of the dirty fuel. Founded in 1988, the conglomerate has businesses in fields ranging from ports and thermal power plants to media and cements. Its clean energy unit AGEL is building the sprawling solar and wind power plant in the western Indian state of Gujarat at a cost of about $20 billion.
It will be the world's biggest renewable park when it is finished in about five years, and should generate enough clean electricity to power 16 million Indian homes... [T]he park will cover more than 200 square miles and be the planet's largest power plant regardless of the energy source, AGEL said.
CNN adds that the company "plans to invest $100 billion into energy transition over the next decade, with 70% of the investments ear-marked for clean energy."
Adani is executive director of Adani Green Energy Limited (AGEL). He's also the nephew of Gautam Adani, Asia's second richest man, whose $100 billion fortune stems from the Adani Group, India's biggest coal importer and a leading miner of the dirty fuel. Founded in 1988, the conglomerate has businesses in fields ranging from ports and thermal power plants to media and cements. Its clean energy unit AGEL is building the sprawling solar and wind power plant in the western Indian state of Gujarat at a cost of about $20 billion.
It will be the world's biggest renewable park when it is finished in about five years, and should generate enough clean electricity to power 16 million Indian homes... [T]he park will cover more than 200 square miles and be the planet's largest power plant regardless of the energy source, AGEL said.
CNN adds that the company "plans to invest $100 billion into energy transition over the next decade, with 70% of the investments ear-marked for clean energy."
Boo. (Score:1)
Adani is bad news in Australia.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: Boo. (Score:2)
I came here to say this
I have to ask. (Score:4, Funny)
> "I don't even do the math any more," Sagar Adani told CNN in an interview
Someone did the math though... right?
Re: (Score:3)
Presumably. He is in the absurdity league of billionares. At that sort of wealth, theres no need to actually do anything , you just hire a guy.
Re:I have to ask. (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
They do not drink beer in those areas, my friend!
Re:I have to ask. (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
You don't even need to hire a guy, you just go ahead and do it, whether it makes sense or not, because you've got the money. Look at the various lunatic projects the oil states have been engaging in for the last decade or two, where two beers worth of analysis would tell you it's not going to work before you even start.
It's a public company. I seriously doubt the guy is spending any of his own money on this thing. It would be like saying Elon is spending his money to build Tesla factories - he's not, Tesla sells shares/bonds to other suckers, I mean investors, to pay for that.
That's the thing about being rich, you don't even need to use your own money to get even richer.
FWIW the company trades at a P/E of 208 which seems frankly insane for a utility company in a moderately mature industry.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
I don't think he would have an answer about how any of it works unless one of his people has shown him a nice simple Powerpoint recently.
Re: (Score:3)
> "I don't even do the math any more," Sagar Adani told CNN in an interview
Someone did the math though... right?
It appears to be a publicly traded company, so I doubt he's even spending much of his own money. It's pretty insane that having the CEO of a business say they 'don't do the math' doesn't immediately result in the stock price collapsing and investors running for the hills. But hey-ho, apparently the efficiency of financial markets is unquestionable.
Which Paris? (Score:5, Informative)
In case you are wondering, this is "out to the end of the metro" (2.1m people in 41 sq mi.) rather than "out a long way on the RER" (10m people in 1100 sq mi.). Think Boulevard Périphérique.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Or it could be Paris, Kentucky. That would only be 8 mi^2...
Unit Avoidance (Score:5, Insightful)
This sounds more like bragging than useful numbers.
We are adults. We can handle numbers. How many square km/mi is that and how many MW?
Re: Unit Avoidance (Score:1)
Re: Unit Avoidance (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
the article doesn't seem accurate at all.
"agel" has allocated just about a third of the whole park, 19000ha (about 73sq/mi), where they produce 1.6gw (might be outdated) from 9.5gw expected.
30gw is the expected output for the whole park, which involves at least 5 other developers.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2)
That's very helpful. As opposed to "Switzerland" I might mention for my US peeps that the total power production for TVA, the largest power producer in the United States, is 34 GW, so this is about the same. Source: https://www.eia.gov/todayinene... [eia.gov]
Re: (Score:3)
We are adults. We can handle numbers.
Exactly. Give us units that are useful to grown-ups!
So how many football fields is this? How about Libraries of Congress?
Re: (Score:3)
Don't be silly, neither of those units describe electric power. You were thinking of "AA batteries per fortnight".
Re: (Score:2)
I want it converted to number of encyclopedias or number of Library of Congresses. :)
Re: (Score:2)
What about amounts of horsepower? That works for Americans too!
Re: (Score:2)
Cool. Can we calculate the thermal energy released from burning your average library book - then we can compute the total output of setting the Library of Congress on fire, and we can make a comparison...
Re: (Score:3)
This sounds more like bragging than useful numbers.
Who is bragging? Adani's press release doesn't mention Paris, or Space, or Switzerland. And as far as I can see CNN doesn't get anything from these claims so that doesn't fit the term bragging either.
Welcome to modern reporting. It's not targeted at engineers.
Re: (Score:3)
726 km^2 and 30GW, although it's not clear if that's nameplate or expected average output.
It will be a mixture of solar and wind, with some storage.
Re: (Score:3)
We are adults. We can handle numbers.
I like your optimism but have you conversed with many Average Joes? There's now two entire generations of people who struggle to add, subtract, divide or multiply two double digit figures without a calculator or putting the question into Google. There are graduates leaving university so innumerate they're incapable of working out how much fuel is in a tank of gas when the gauge shows 1/4 full.
Re: (Score:2)
Possibly. But these would have even less of an idea how large paris is or how much energy Switzerland consumes. Hence this bogus size reporting makes even less sense.
Re: (Score:1)
It is not really plausible that Switzerland only has a load of 30GW anyway.
https://www.bfe.admin.ch/bfe/e... [admin.ch]
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, and in some cases, big isn't even better. Occupying as much land area as "Paris" doesn't seem like a feature, it's more like a problem.
And does "enough to power Switzerland" include whatever industrial users are there? Or is it just enough power to power the homes of the population of Switzerland?
Re: (Score:2)
We are slashdot.
If you're not reporting it in Libraries of Congress or Olympic Swimming Pools, you can fuck right off.
Re: (Score:2)
I prefer Wales. How many mWales is it? 125 or so?
Re: (Score:2)
348 square feet per person.
To power all of India, 20,000 square miles (if I didn't slip a digit).
If any of we peons proposed such mass environmental destruction, even of the middle of nothing and nowhere, we'd be jailed.
"Coal billionare" from India? (Score:1)
Smells like 100% corruption and grift, most of it by way of inheritance. Why are we subject to the output of this thing's PR department again?
Re: (Score:2)
No surprises...
From millionaire by government contract to criminal conspiracy charges, to the suppression of those by friendly courts, to mutually beneficial "friendship" with Modi at the expense of the Indian state, all marks of success are present.
Re: (Score:2)
Sounds like a great plan, suck up a $100 billion dollars of green energy funds and fail to deliver .. thereby securing coal dependency. A win-win. Ok, a win-lose.
Re: (Score:2)
Not his first successful scheme, as far as I can glean from a quick look.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Nope. Just ended up being in the right place at the right time. Sure his company is known for corruption and dodgy deals with governments, along with pollution, destroying the world, etc. etc. But he didn't inherit his billions.
Why are we subject to the output of this thing's PR department again?
Why not? Interesting stories about large scale green projects are right up Slashdot's alleyway. Just because you don't like the douchebag who runs the company doesn't change the subject matter. If you disagree with the subject matter, a different website may be more fitting for you.
200 square miles? (Score:2)
Sounds absurd. I'm sure that whatever it actually is, it's BS.
Just build nuclear - clean. done.
Re: (Score:2)
Well they say it's a 'desert' but I wonder how much of that land could be restored via modern farming practices.
From the photo, some vegetation does appear to be growing between the rows of panels.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:200 square miles? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
The land isn't "damaged" and probably has many unusual desert plants and animals. There isn't exactly such a thing as a "barren" desert. That's marketing-speak for "don't you dare consider an environmental impact study".
Re: (Score:1)
There are.
Negev, death valley, Center of Sahara or Gobi, Atacama.
Just because at the edges is some life, does not mean in the middle is.
And: if you have a 100 million square miles desert: you certainly do not need an environmental study if you want to cover one promille of it with solar panels. Facepalm!
Re: (Score:2)
Just build nuclear - clean. done.
Oh yo. I'm with you there. You happen to have $30 billion on you by chance?
Every time someone mentions the "clean" of nuclear, I need to remind them that, I'm not anti-nuclear, I'm just a realist on price tag. 1GWh nuclear is around $20B to $30B and 1 GWh solar comes in around $780M. At least for face plate values. I'm not joking in that we could literally build a 5 GWh LFP battery for about a quarter the cost of the nuke, and in three to five years that price tag for the battery will be about half. S
Re: (Score:2)
Plant output is not measured in GWh, it's measured in GW - it's instantaneous power. If you don't get that simple detail right, why trust the rest of your analysis?
Re: (Score:2)
That's why you don't want to have Americans or European building them. Bring in South Koreans to get the latest nuclear designs done fast and at low cost.
Re: (Score:2)
200 Sq miles isn't much in the grand scheme of things. Green energy takes space.
Just build nuclear - clean. done.
2 things: Firstly this facility will have produced green energy (not at full scale though) likely before construction has even broken ground on your nuclear plant. We need solutions for today, not fantasies for 2040.
Secondly. Adani is the *LAST* company in the world I'd trust to touch anything nuclear. Somehow I think even their solar panels will end up polluting the environment and killing their workers along with the local pop
Re: (Score:2)
Well, both of your statements are equally stupid.
"Visible from space" (Score:3)
That has to be the most useless metric ever. Give me back football fields, libraries of congress, rhode islands, quarters, or even bananas.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Indeed. It's easier to understand how much bananas it would power up.
Re: (Score:2)
I prefer mWales.
A terrifying tightrope walk (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3)
embrace working together to better everyone's lives
Unfortunately we're dealing with humans here.
Re: (Score:2)
All we need to do is turn away from the edge of the cliff and embrace working together to better everyone's lives and assure our future... or we can fall off it, into a chasm of authoritarianism, horror and death that will destroy society
LOL, you don't get to choose and we already know how it will all work out in the end. We just don't know HOW it will end... but it will definitely end.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
"Insane footprint"? As compared to, say, mountaintop removal? Or the waste from coal power plants?
On a calm evening? (Score:3)
"....should generate enough clean electricity to power 16 million Indian homes... "
On a calm, dark evening? Its called intermittency.
It may generate enough in aggregate, but the question is whether it generates it in line with demand. And if not, how much storage and of what kind is being proposed to make it usable for the purpose.
Re: (Score:3)
I have news for you: nobody relies on a single fossil fuel plant for all their energy either. Instead, many of them all contribute to a "grid", that delivers energy from where it is generated to where it is used. If one plant goes down, say because of a fault, the others can take up the slack.
In the same way, by having more than one source of renewable energy, intermittency isn't a big problem.
Re:On a calm evening? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
India on per capita basis uses 1/10th the energy of an average westerner so there is a lot of growth needed in energy sources. India is not choosing renewable over non-renewable; its building everything because it needs the power to bring people out of poverty.
This will never happen. Hitler was a symptom of a deep disease within the 'society' that leads us. Eugenics is here to stay as a philosophy and billions of the living will die from their twisted view of eugenics. (to untwist it, think of births rather than deaths, but not with this death cult in charge of the West)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
"Yes, it's me! How can I assist you today?"
Ignore my rant about the inequities of societal issues. India has just as good a chance as America at doing something for their people. In my estimation, that number is as close to zero as possible, but if you want ignore reality, then it is very likely that something will be done equitably.
Are the billionaire grifters the best managers? (Score:2)
https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/... [www.cbc.ca]
I believe the Adani Group have a bit of a questionable relationship to good governance.
Rooftops? (Score:2)
And why again are we unable as a species to organize to put solar on our rooftops in a way that is beneficial to the property owners rather than breaking new ground?
Hell, even farmers are experimenting with solar panels as fencing, and they're finding that east-west orientation for panels that can generate electricity from either side are working out well. Seems like there's a whole lot of infill possibilities available to us without tearing up a bunch of pristine (as in untouched) land in the process.
Wind
5x the size of Paris in 5 years??? (Score:2)
He couldn't build a business park that size in 5 years, much less an energy plant.
"The numbers have gotten away from me" No shit!!
Question (Score:3)
Please be gentle, I'm asking in ignorance.
What's the IR albedo difference between solar panels and the native salt flats? Is this plant large enough to create a significant microclimate?