First EV With Lithium-Free Sodium Battery Hits the Road In January (carnewschina.com) 67
Deliveries of the world's first mass-produced electric vehicle equipped with a sodium-ion battery will begin in January 2024. According to CarNewsChina, they're being produced by JAC Motors, a Volkswagen-backed Chinese automaker, through its new Yiwei EV brand. From the report: The Yiwei EV hatchback will have a cylindrical sodium-ion pack from Beijing-based HiNa Battery and adopt JAC's UE (Unitized Encapsulation) module technology. UE is also known as a honeycomb design because of its appearance. It is another battery structure concept like CATL's CTP (cell-to-pack) or BYD's Blade battery. Yiwei is a new EV brand under Anhui Jianghuai Automobile (JAC), established in 2023. JAC's parent company, Anhui Jianghuai Automobile Group Holdings (JAG), is 50% state-owned, and 50% belongs to Volkswagen Group. The German automotive giant acquired its stake in 2020 in an unprecedented move to invest in China's state-owned car maker.
[...] In February 2023, JAC announced they were the first automaker to put the lithium-free sodium-ion battery on an electric vehicle. That EV was a Sehol E10X hatchback, and the Na+ battery had the following specifications: 25 kWh capacity, 120 Wh/kg energy density (single cell 140 Wh/kg), 3C to 4C charging (10% - 80% in 20 minutes), 252 km (157 miles) range for E10X, and HiNa NaCR32140 cell. Sehol was a brand under Volkswagen Anhui JV, which VW transferred to JAC in 2021. When the Yiwei brand was launched in May 2023, JAC announced that it would ditch the Sehol brand, and all vehicles are being rebadged to JAC or Yiwei. The pictures JAC released today tell us that the new sodium-ion-powered EV is the Sehol E10X. JAC hasn't yet confirmed the name of the new car under the Yiwei brand; it could be Yiwei E10X, but we have to wait for JAC's confirmation.
JAC recently pushed a lot into sodium-ion batteries R&D. During the Shanghai Auto Show in April 2023, the company showcased its first car under the Yiwei brand called Yiwei 3, which was equipped with a sodium-ion battery. However, the EV launched later in June, only with a classic LFP lithium battery, and promised the Na+ variant would come later. The Yiwei 3 is a compact hatchback that competes with Wuling Bingo, BYD Seagull, or ORA Funky Cat. It has two power train options, both front-wheel drive: 70 kW and 100 kW motor. The maximum cruising range is 505 km CLTC with a 51.5 kWh battery.
[...] In February 2023, JAC announced they were the first automaker to put the lithium-free sodium-ion battery on an electric vehicle. That EV was a Sehol E10X hatchback, and the Na+ battery had the following specifications: 25 kWh capacity, 120 Wh/kg energy density (single cell 140 Wh/kg), 3C to 4C charging (10% - 80% in 20 minutes), 252 km (157 miles) range for E10X, and HiNa NaCR32140 cell. Sehol was a brand under Volkswagen Anhui JV, which VW transferred to JAC in 2021. When the Yiwei brand was launched in May 2023, JAC announced that it would ditch the Sehol brand, and all vehicles are being rebadged to JAC or Yiwei. The pictures JAC released today tell us that the new sodium-ion-powered EV is the Sehol E10X. JAC hasn't yet confirmed the name of the new car under the Yiwei brand; it could be Yiwei E10X, but we have to wait for JAC's confirmation.
JAC recently pushed a lot into sodium-ion batteries R&D. During the Shanghai Auto Show in April 2023, the company showcased its first car under the Yiwei brand called Yiwei 3, which was equipped with a sodium-ion battery. However, the EV launched later in June, only with a classic LFP lithium battery, and promised the Na+ variant would come later. The Yiwei 3 is a compact hatchback that competes with Wuling Bingo, BYD Seagull, or ORA Funky Cat. It has two power train options, both front-wheel drive: 70 kW and 100 kW motor. The maximum cruising range is 505 km CLTC with a 51.5 kWh battery.
Finally... (Score:5, Funny)
We could remove dependency on Chinese lithium, by switching the Beijing-based HiNa Battery!
Re: (Score:2)
The USA is so rich in mineral reseources that it would be nearly impossible for some outside force to cripple the American economy for long by denying imports.
Maybe some of the highest of highest technological parts could be difficult to source but there's going to be replacements found built in the USA in a matter of weeks to years. In the mean time there's a considerable stockpile of older but still functional equipment from the last 30 ro 40 years to draw from.
This could mean dusting off some old gear
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
Aww, your BDS is strong, triggered little dickless far right weenie.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
holy shit reading this gave me flashbacks to my adolescence and listening to limbaugh or other conservative radio crank. just replace trans people with gay people and the message is the same as 30 years ago.
you notice how there's nothing positive in this message? just fear. fear of immigrants, fear of technology, fear of knowledge, fear of tolerance all boiled down to fear of other people.
why should we entrust our future to a pack of angry nihilists with no vision, no message, no ideas.
you guys better get
Re: (Score:2)
Anonymous Coward so angry!
Re: (Score:3)
Well obviously it would hurt our all important auto manufacturers if we could just buy cheap imports. 157 mile range with a 25kwh battery that charges in 20 minutes would be doable for the average city dwellers daily commute. I know I go about 39 miles per work day and there are chargers at or near my work.
So basically every 3 days I would need to spend 20 minutes charging to get to and from work. Since it's only 25 kwh battery, it wouldn't cost hardly anything to charge.
They didn't mention what they cost b
Re: Finally... (Score:2)
Just a data point re charging costs.. the charging points which I have seen here in UK are 86p ($1.10) per kwh.
80% charge of your 25kW/h car would be $22 or so.
Re:Finally... (Score:5, Informative)
We could remove dependency on Chinese lithium
We don't depend on China for lithium. Australia and Chile produce far more lithium than China.
China is a net importer of lithium.
List of countries by lithium production [wikipedia.org]
by switching the Beijing-based HiNa Battery!
Believe it or not, China does not have a lock on the world's sodium supply.
Sodium batteries make a lot of sense for static applications, such as grid-scale energy storage and UPSes, but make less sense for mobile applications.
Re:Finally... (Score:4, Interesting)
I'm curious on the charging cycles of sodium batteries. If they can handle as many cycles as NiFe batteries can, those would be perfect for storage batteries where weight isn't as big a concern. For example, 25kwh might be good enough for a day or two of A/C use in a Texas summer.
One of the biggest points with storage batteries is they need to have a charge cycle count. NiFe batteries have a practically unlimited cycle count, although they need watered constantly. If someone can make a battery chemistry that can handle that, and is relatively maintenance free, it would be a great boon, especially for small scale, static uses.
Calendar lifetime (Score:2)
In addition to charging cycles, an important metric is how many years can it hold up, even if lightly used.
Re: (Score:3)
Japan has been using various sodium based batteries for a couple of decades at grid scale.
Re:Finally... (Score:5, Insightful)
If they're less expensive, even with higher mass and lower capacity they're still an option for a city car. Not every car needs to be able to go over 500km on a charge.
Re: (Score:2)
Note that there are different types of sodium batteries. The kind most are familiar with (if they're aware of sodium batteries at all) is a molten salt type with an alumina separator. These need to be kept at rather high temperatures and are not suitable for mobile applications at all, not even vehicles, but have seen large scale adoption in mass/grid storage for decades.
The type discussed in this article are a sodium ion chemistry, which is very similar to lithium-ion batteries but not quite as energy dens
Re: (Score:2)
You seriously lack sarcasm.
Re: (Score:2)
Dude, my comment was meant to be a joke. Get a life.
Lithium [Re:Finally...] (Score:5, Informative)
We could remove dependency on Chinese lithium
We don't depend on China for lithium. Australia and Chile produce far more lithium than China. China is a net importer of lithium. List of countries by lithium production [wikipedia.org]
Yes and no.
Lithium isn't mined in China, but China has the vast majority of the refineries that turn it from ore into usable form.
China imports lithium ore from Australia and Chile, and exports refined lithium hydroxide or carbonate.
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/0... [nytimes.com]
Re: (Score:3)
You do depend on China for lithium batteries though.
The US and EU don't just depend on China for batteries, they depend on China for battery components as well. However, according to Bloomberg, the U.S. and Europe will have to invest $87 billion and $102 billion, respectively, to meet domestic battery demand with fully local supply chains by 2030. That sounds like a lot but not only does it spread out over seven years, the 2023 GDPs of the US and EU are projected to be USD 26.9 trillion and USD 18.35 trillion respectively so becoming self sufficient in batte
Re: (Score:1)
We could remove dependency on Chinese lithium
Well this is a stupid comment. China has a very limited supply of lithium. However, what they do have is a large number of lithium refineries which are cheap for businesses to use because China doesn't care about polluting their local ecosystem or their workers' health.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: Finally... (Score:2)
Low Range Ahoy! (Score:2)
25KWh is not a lot. That's what my 2015 leaf has and it's a major limitaiton.
If it doesn't degrade over time like lithium ion batteries, that would be a bonus but TFS doesn't give any important metrics other than the capacity.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
less than the equivalent of a gallon of gas
That's misleading. The gas tank to wheels efficiency of a gasoline ICE is typically about 20%, while a BEV is about 80%.
So while the energy content is about the same as a gallon of gasoline, the range is many times as far.
A good rule-of-thumb is that a kwh will move an EV about four miles or six kilometers.
So a 25 kwh battery has a range of a about 100 miles or 160 kilometers.
Disclaimer: My EV has an 80 kwh battery.
Re: (Score:3)
So a 25 kwh battery has a range of a about 100 miles or 160 kilometers.
Where can i sign up? I live in a big city, and the only time I need more than that in a day is when heading to the country for more than a weekend, once or twice a year. It is dead easy to rent a car for that, if it means a cheap-ish car with low running cost.
As it is, I don't drive anywhere near enough km/year to justify the high up-front cost of a Tesla.
Re: Low Range Ahoy! (Score:2)
Re: Low Range Ahoy! (Score:2)
Re:Low Range Ahoy! (Score:5, Informative)
It's more than a gallon of gas equivalent.
Sure, a gallon of gasoline has about 34 kWh of energy in it, which is certainly more than 24kWh, but consider when burned in a gasoline engine you dump roughly 75% of that overboard as heat and a gallon of gas only delivers you about 8.5 kWh of usable energy at the wheels.
Flipped another way, assuming an EV gets at least 3 mi/kwh, that's over 100 MPG equivalent.
=Smidge=
Re: (Score:3)
NaCR32140 cell
Usual life is 8000 charges. If that's what you're wondering. All Sodium cars are in-town cars, you'll note who this car is competing with.
Wuling Bingo, BYD Seagull, or ORA Funky Cat
None of these are marketed as heading out of town cars. The vehicle is looking to enter market at about a bit over half the others, so the Bingo comes in at $10k (USD equivalent), so I would assume they're looking to market at somewhere around $5k or $6k (USD equivalent) MSRP. Your Leaf marketed originally at like $30k MSRP roughly? That's like $38k today for inflati
Re: (Score:1)
Those cars will be marketed and sold all over the ASEAN area.
Re: (Score:2)
The Leaf was more than that early on, but I paid $15K because it was one of the glut of ex-lease cars coming to the market and prior to the EV scramble. The price of a new leaf was an early adopter tax.
I think people in the US would be well served with $10K EVs for commuting. The majority of people can't drop $40-90K on a currently popular EV.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
These ranges are not EPA ranges. Chinese drive cycles are... let's say "generous".
Re: (Score:2)
These ranges are not EPA ranges. Chinese drive cycles are... let's say "generous".
1000lbs less mass means 2/3 the curb weight, lower rolling resistance, a much smaller cross section and thus lowerwind resistance plus far less weight per person. I don’t think almost double range really sounds unreasonable.
Re: (Score:2)
>Not exactly built for American distances but as a city car it’s likely just fine.
My 2015 leaf is ok for city driving. The range is down to about 60 miles and It won't get to the airport and back without a charge in between, but it handles the commute fine and the maintenance since I got it in 2017 has been for 1 set of tyres and a bottle of wiper fluid. So no complaints really. The offspring uses it now and I'm on my second Tesla for which the range is fine.
Re: (Score:2)
25KWh is not a lot. That's what my 2015 leaf has and it's a major limitaiton.
The car itself is not important but to be fair, you aren't comparing the range to other Chinese EVs. What is important is the battery technology which is far more impressive an appears to be on par with current lithium-ion batteries when it comes to weight to power ratio.
What will be more interesting is if how economical the battery can be. Frankly, I would be a lot more interested in small electronics (especially smartphones) switching to sodium-ion batteries to cheaper electronics recycling.
Re: (Score:2)
You call half the energy and power density "on par"?
Re: (Score:2)
You call half the energy and power density "on par"?
If it's also half the weight, then yes. Requiring more volume isn't great but it's hardly an issue if it resolves issues with overheating.
Re: (Score:2)
>What is important is the battery technology
That's why I was lamenting the lack of information on the battery properties. That's the information that is important.
Re: (Score:2)
It's not everything but I did post links to get more info here: https://slashdot.org/comments.... [slashdot.org]
Ions incoming (Score:3)
Battery info: (Score:2)
Here's a link with some better battery info: https://www.batterydesign.net/... [batterydesign.net]
Wikipedia has a general battery comparison: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
Overall, it's a surprisingly good battery technology which from all appearances could be a drop-in replacement for present-day lithium-ion batteries. I still think solid state lithium-ion batteries will be needed for long-range vehicles but this tech could drop the price of EVs.
Re: (Score:2)
Solid state batteries hit the roads in Chinese buses years ago, in low volumes. They also suck. Turns out that trying to move ions through a glass as well as you move them through a liquid (and trying to wet solid particles efficiently at the same time) kinda doesn't actually work well. And it's trying to solve a problem that there's dozens of other ways to solve.
Sodium-ion is being pursued because of the possibility that it could become cheaper (note: it's not cheaper now). Unlike solid state, there's
Re: (Score:2)
Just to reiterate: lithium makes up only 2-3% of the mass of a lithium-ion battery. And it's not rare.
Re: (Score:1)
"But I still have my doubts."
You mean it doesn't benefit Elon Musk yet.
"higher internal resistance, but that's already been resolved with "tabless" electrodes"
LOL, you mean the late and underperforming 4680 cell. You mean "resolved" by Elon Musk. Meanwhile, most of the BEV industry doesn't use cylindrical cells.
The air is fresher outside of Musk's ass, Rei.
Re: (Score:2)
Solid state batteries hit the roads in Chinese buses years ago
No, they didn't. There have been hybrids that are semi solid-state but none are actually solid-state.
Unlike solid state, there's actually a good amount of actual industry interest
Automakers don't want to have higher energy density, faster charging, thermal runaway immunity, and removing the need for complex battery cooling systems? Seems kinda dumb if that's true.
lithium prices shot up due to refining shortages recently,
Considering the shear amount of batteries we need, it would be wise to cultivate multiple chemistries.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Nah. [slashdot.org]
Re: (Score:2)
"...and nearly twice the weight."
The weight of the cell isn't the concern, the weight of the subsystem is. And while these batteries are not competitive with LiIon currently, they are nowhere near "twice the weight" as a subsystem and they ARE competitive with LiFePO4 batteries currently used in BEVs, including precious Teslas. They are suitable for applications where weight is a "limiting factor", as least as suitable as LiFePO4.
"Why the hell would you put this thing on a vehicle you are using energy to
Will look pretty in the carparks (Score:1, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Not true. Sodium ions give flames bright yellow color. It is copper ions which make it green.
Lithium on the way out? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Yeah, that's why you want to know. Why don't you just get on Rei's insider trading list?
Re: (Score:2)