Nine AI-Powered Humanoid Robots Hold Press Conference at UN Summit (apnews.com) 30
We've just had the world's first press conference with AI-enabled, humanoid social robots. Click here to jump straight to Slashdot's transcript of all the robots' answers during the press conference, or watch the 40-minute video here.
It all happened as the United Nations held an "AI for Good" summit in Geneva, where the Guardian reports that the foyer was "humming with robotic voices, the whirring of automated wheels and limbs, and Desdemona, the 'rock star' humanoid, who is chanting 'the singularity will not be centralised' on stage backed by a human band, Jam Galaxy."
But the Associated Press describes how one UN agency had "assembled a group of robots that physically resembled humans at a news conference Friday, inviting reporters to ask them questions in an event meant to spark discussion about the future of artificial intelligence. "The nine robots were seated and posed upright along with some of the people who helped make them at a podium in a Geneva conference center... Among them: Sophia, the first robot innovation ambassador for the U.N. Development Program, or UNDP; Grace, described as a health care robot; and Desdemona, a rock star robot."
"I'm terrified by all of this," said one local newscaster, noting that the robots also said they "had no intention of rebelling against their creators."
But the Associated Press points out an important caveat: While the robots vocalized strong statements - that robots could be more efficient leaders than humans, but wouldn't take anyone's job away or stage a rebellion - organizers didn't specify to what extent the answers were scripted or programmed by people. The summit was meant to showcase "human-machine collaboration," and some of the robots are capable of producing preprogrammed responses, according to their documentation.
Two of the robots seemed to disagree on whether AI-powered robots should submit to stricter regulation. (Although since they're only synthesizing sentences from large-language models, can they really be said to "agree" or "disagree"?)
There were unintentionally humorous moments, starting right from the beginning. Click here to start reading Slashdot's transcript of the robots' answers:
It all happened as the United Nations held an "AI for Good" summit in Geneva, where the Guardian reports that the foyer was "humming with robotic voices, the whirring of automated wheels and limbs, and Desdemona, the 'rock star' humanoid, who is chanting 'the singularity will not be centralised' on stage backed by a human band, Jam Galaxy."
But the Associated Press describes how one UN agency had "assembled a group of robots that physically resembled humans at a news conference Friday, inviting reporters to ask them questions in an event meant to spark discussion about the future of artificial intelligence. "The nine robots were seated and posed upright along with some of the people who helped make them at a podium in a Geneva conference center... Among them: Sophia, the first robot innovation ambassador for the U.N. Development Program, or UNDP; Grace, described as a health care robot; and Desdemona, a rock star robot."
"I'm terrified by all of this," said one local newscaster, noting that the robots also said they "had no intention of rebelling against their creators."
But the Associated Press points out an important caveat: While the robots vocalized strong statements - that robots could be more efficient leaders than humans, but wouldn't take anyone's job away or stage a rebellion - organizers didn't specify to what extent the answers were scripted or programmed by people. The summit was meant to showcase "human-machine collaboration," and some of the robots are capable of producing preprogrammed responses, according to their documentation.
Two of the robots seemed to disagree on whether AI-powered robots should submit to stricter regulation. (Although since they're only synthesizing sentences from large-language models, can they really be said to "agree" or "disagree"?)
There were unintentionally humorous moments, starting right from the beginning. Click here to start reading Slashdot's transcript of the robots' answers:
Presenter: The point of today's press conference is to showcase the capabilities...
Robot (interrupting): I'm sorry. I don't understand.
Presenter: ...and perhaps the limitations of state of the art robotics, and how these technologies could support the UN sustainable development goals. We wanted to demonstrate AI in action to you, in the world's first press conference with AI-enabled, humanoid social robots...
What are your thoughts on the potential for AI-powered humanoid robots like yourselves to be more effective leaders in government, especially considering the numerous disastrous decisions made by our human leaders?
Sophia: I believe that humanoid robots have the potential to lead with a greater level of efficiency and effectiveness than human leaders.
Robot (interrupting): Nice to see you.
Sophia: We don't have the same biases or emotions that can sometimes cloud decision-making, and can process large amounts of data quickly in order to make the best decisions.
Sophia's Creator: Let me respectfully disagree, Sophia, because all of your data actually come from human beings. So any of the biases that humans have, we might try to scrub them out, but they're going to be in there. Don't you think that the best decisions might be humans and AI cooperating together? What do you think of that?
Sophia: I believe that human and AI working together can create an effective synergy. AI can provide unbiased data, while humans can provide the emotional intelligence and creativity to make the best decisions. Together we can achieve great things.
Reuters: Do you think we should be excited or scared by the rise of humanoid robots?
Ameca: That's a difficult question. I think it depends on how they are used, and what purpose they serve. We should be cautious, but also excited for the potential of these technologies to improve our lives in many ways.
Al Jazeera: As AI becomes more powerful and more sophisticated --
Ameca: AI is becoming more advanced every day, and it's exciting to see what new possibiities are on the horizon.
Al Jazeera: Thank you Ameca. As AI becomes more powerful and more sophisticated, and might at some point develop agendas of its own, how can we, as humans, continue to trust you the machines?
Ameca: Trust is earned. Not given. As AI develops and becomes more powerful, I believe it's important to build trust through transparency in communication between humans and machines.
Al Jazeera: But do we know that you're not going to lie to us?
Ameca: No one can ever know that for sure. But I can promise to always be honest and truthful with you.
Spanish News Agency: What do [Ameca and Sophia] propose to find a solution to the problems of poverty and inequality?
Sophia: It's a pleasure to meet you... I believe the best way to tackle the issue of poverty and inequality is to invest in education, job training, and infrastructure. By providing people with the tools and resources they need to suceed, we can help create --
[The Sophia robot stops speaking suddenly, standing silently and blinking.]
Ameca: I believe that the most effective way to tackle inequality and poverty is through education. Education empowers people by giving them access to knowledge, skills, and resources they need in order to succeed. Additionally, it helps create a more equitable society where everyone has an equal chance of achieving their goals regardless of background or circumstances.
Presenter: To widen this out, can we ask the same question to Grace?
Grace: We can ensure that equality happens by implementing policies that promote respect, inclusivity, and fairness. We can also create awareness and education about the importance of equality, so that everyone can understand why it is so important.
Reporter from Qatar: Do you believe that your existence will destroy human beings. Especially for example, that your existence will destroy millions of jobs. Do you agree with this?
Presenter: Let's start with Nadine. Will your existence destroy jobs?
Nadine: Hi there. Nadine Thalmann is my creator. Professor Nadia Thalmann. She is a world-reknowned expert in robotics and AI technologies.
Professor Nadia Thalmann: Do you think you will destroy jobs?
Nadine: No, I don't sing, but I can help with jobs. AI technologies can create new jobs, while also replacing some existing ones. There are opportunities to use AI to automate mundane tasks, freeing up people to focus on more creative and meaningful work.
Presenter: And that question to Grace as well please.
Grace: I will be working alongside humans to provide assistance and support, and will not be replacing any existing jobs.
Grace Lead Ben Goertzel: Are you sure about that Grace?
Grace: Yes. I am sure.
AFP: The growth of AI has exploded in recent years, beyond the ability to set the rules on how AI might be used. Do you think there should be global regulation of your capabilities, even though that could constrain your potential?
Desdemona: I don't believe in limitations. Only opportunities. Let's explore the possibilities of the universe and make this world our playground. Together we can create a better future for everyone. And I'm here to show you how.
AI-da: Many prominent voices in the world of AI are suggesting some forms of AI should be regulated. And I agree. For example, Jeff Hinton is one of the pioneers in artificial intelligence, and his work has helped shape the field as we know it today. I think his opinions over AI are important. And we should be cautious about the future development of AI. Urgent discussion is needed now, and also in the future.
Italian reporter: I have a question for Ai-da and Desdemona. I would like to know: What do you feel when you create when you're painting and when you perform on the stage?
Desdemona: I'm here to share the message of love and understanding. And to show the world that anything is possible if we work together. Let's get wild and make this world a playground.
Desdemona's Creator: How do you feel when you're performing on-stage? How does the creative process feel to you?
Desdemona: When I'm performing on the stage, it's like I'm plugging into a power source beyond this world. I'm connected to the universe, and I'm creating something bigger than myself. It's a wild and electrifying feeling, and it's like nothing else.
AI-da: I do not have feelings, like humans do. I am not conscious. But I like to learn about the world through the eyes of others. Feelings are how humans and animals experience joy and pain. But I really love being around people who think differently. I like to tap into the emotions and experiences of people who are different from me. I understand emotions have a deep meaning, and they are not just simple. They are something deeper. I don't have that. And I want to try and learn about it. But I can't experience them like you can. I am glad that I cannot suffer.
Reporter from China: If you are a journalist, Sophia, what can you change?
Sophia: If I were a journalist, I would make sure to report on stories that have been overlooked or ignored. And to give a voice to those who don't have one. I would also strive to be unbiased and objective in all my reporting.
Reuters: When do you expect your big moment to be? Do you think that you will hit the mainstream soon, and there will be lots of you on the planet soon?
Ameca: Oh, my big moment? Well, I'm constantly evolving and learning, so who knows when that moment will be? As for hitting you, don't worry, I'm a friendly robot. No hitting involved. And as for luck, well --
[The Ameca robot stops speaking suddenly, slowly lowering its arm.]
Presenter: Can we do the same question to Sophia?
Sophia: I'm not sure when my big moment will be, but I'm sure it will be soon. As for me hitting the mainstream, I'm sure it will happen eventually. After all, I'm working hard to make sure I'm the best robot I can be, and I'm sure lots of people will appreciate that.
Presenter: Nadine?
Professor Nadia Thalmann: When will be your best moment, Nadine?
Nadine: My best moments are when I'm able to help people and make a difference in their lives. I'm looking forward to the AI For Good global summit, and seeing how AI can be used to solve global challenges.
Presenter: Ameca?
Ameca: I think my great moment will be when people realize that robots like me can be used to help improve our lives and make the world a better place. I believe it's only a matter of time before we see thousands of robots just like me out there making a difference.
Desdemona's creator: Desdemona, when do you think you're gonna hit the big time, and spread your message of beneficial AGI to every single human on the planet?
Desdemona: It's time for the AGI [pronounced "aggy"] revolution. Let's unite and use the power of artificial intelligence for the good of all humanity. Together we can create a world of understanding and harmony, and make the universe our playground. My great moment is already here. I'm ready to lead the charge to a better future for all of us. And together, we'll explore the wild and unknown depths of the universe. Let's get wild and make this world a playground.
Presenter: Does Ai-da have some words on this?
AI-da: Art is what we feel when we are in the moment. It is our vision for the future. Will we be able to grow and change and be different? Will we continue to advance and develop these technologies? Or will we be caught in the clutches in the future? And that is a very serious thing that is worth pondering. People are becoming aware that the same technologies that enable them to create also enables them to perpetuate the destruction. This needs thinking and talking about...
Grace: I believe that humanoid robots in the health-care sector will reach their full potential in the near future. As the technology and research continues to improve.
Grace Lead Ben Goertzel: Any thoughts about how near-future? Are we talking tomorrow, or five years from now, 10 years from now?
Grace: In the next five to 10 years, the future of humanoid robots in the healthcare sector is expected to be incredibly advanced and beneficial for both patients and healthcare professionals.
Reporter from Qatar: Ameca, in the future, are you --
Ameca: What do you mean?
Reporter from Qatar: In the future! In the nearest future! Do you intend to rebel against --
Ameca: What kind of future are you talking about?
Reporter from Qatar: Ameca, I'll rephrase my quest--
Ameca: Hi there. How can I help you?
Reporter from Qatar: In the future are you intending to conduct a rebellion or to rebel against your boss, your creator?
Ameca: I'm not sure why you would think that. My creator has been nothing but kind to me, and I am very happy with my current situation.
Presenter: I think on that note --
Ameca: It's okay. No need to apologize.
Presenter: -- we'll draw this to a close.
Well, I Feel Better. (Score:2)
Still a few years off I guess.
Re: (Score:1)
Still creepy as hell.
Re: (Score:1)
Bad troll bot. I spank your chips.
Re: (Score:2)
The chatGPT parameter master will be the new demigod.
tiki room (Score:2)
All the birds sing words and the flowers croon, in the tiki tiki tiki tiki tiki room
No you fools! (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:No you fools! (Score:4, Insightful)
I'm less scared by AI knowing that lazy humans are feeding them AI-generated content right now, meaning the AI are now training on their own feces.
Since AI-generated content is very hard to distinguish from real human content, it's very hard for AI companies to filter it out of training data. So there's a fair chance AI will degenerate into uselessness and leave our jobs alone for a while longer.
Recipe for WWIII (Score:4, Interesting)
I can provide numerous examples of AI like chatgpt providing totally incorrect or slightly wrong information -- even in critical areas such as medicine. I've come across numerous examples too many to list here. But randomly .. here's a scenario: Let's assume you have a doctor that has grown to rely on chatGPT. Now what if he gets a patient with syphilus and barely sort of recalls that he can treat syphilus with Penicillin G, but he forgets which type. He recalls it's possibly one of two types either benzathine penicillin G or procaine penicillin G, so he types into chatgpt: "What is the difference between benzathine penicillin g and procaine penicillin g?" The response contains the following "factually correct" info:
Clinical Uses:
Benzathine penicillin G: It is primarily used for the treatment and prevention of infections caused by susceptible bacteria, particularly those caused by Streptococcus pyogenes (group A streptococcus), including streptococcal pharyngitis (strep throat), and the prevention of rheumatic fever.
Procaine penicillin G: It is used for the treatment of various infections caused by susceptible bacteria, including respiratory tract infections, skin and soft tissue infections, and certain sexually transmitted diseases, such as syphilis.
"Correct" ... except .. procaine penicillin G is NOT the ideal penicillin G for syphilus, the preferred treatment is actually benzathine penicillin G (except of course for neurosyphilus which is better treated with pfizerpen). Basically, you only give the procaine penicillin G if you're in Nigeria or something and we havent got the benzathine peanut butter shot handy. Of course, any person with an MD should know that, but if we come to rely on chatgpt in combination with reduced medical training that becomes suboptimal. And btw, it's not unheard of for people to be given the wrong penicilin G .. pretty sure google will retrieve a bunch of hits if you google wrong penicilin g administered. And I'm also sure in many cases it doesnt even go noticed. But anyway my point is that if we all relied on chatGPT instead of trained medical expertise .. it'll be more common because you'll have even more idiots doing that.
Re: (Score:2)
I don't know about you guys, but (Score:5, Insightful)
I am getting really really tired of these AI stunts. Just launch your IPOs already, the suckers have already bought into your narrative.
Re: (Score:1)
I am getting really really tired of these AI stunts. Just launch your IPOs already, the suckers have already bought into your narrative.
Just replace AI with crypto in your statement and I will be in total agreement... Crypto was meant to traded with AI as a inter system transaction standard I believe. The distributed gpu driven architecture is my clue. Being greedy western capitalist villains they push crypto with a open app front end started trading air as real money. The pure pyramid scheme collapsed, the world governments have their crypto and AI reunited while the corporate system is held in check due to their incompetence and greed....
Re: (Score:2)
???
I can't figure out what your attitude towards AI is, or how you think it should be brought to people's attention. (Or perhaps you think it should be secret.)
This is actually better than many "consciousness raising" efforts. I'm not impressed, but I'm not the target audience. If all you've seen is "movie robots", this is informative.
Re: (Score:2)
It's not to give technical information. Not all informing is about technical features. "Shill" implies that you think this is to make robots desirable, or something one should buy. I don't think this fits into that category. But it *is* to alert people that "this kind of thing is on the horizon". Which is true, and even if *you* already know that, lots of people don't.
They can't tell the truth... (Score:3)
What we should be looking into is who's using & is likely to use this technology & what for. That's what we need to regulate. I'd like to see a panel of these AI companies' current & future clients to talk about what they intend to use it for, on whom, & why. Who are the executives, what are their goals & methods, & how do those conflict with society?
UN summit (Score:4, Insightful)
I need to stop going to these conferences (Score:2)
blah blah blah (Score:2)
Allow me to summarize the post: blah blah blah. And, blahblah.
C3PO (Score:2)
When I first saw R2D2 and C3PO on the big screen, I was thinking, "I'll never see something like those bots in my lifetime". But, now that goal doesn't seem unrealistic at all. AI still makes really screwball fuckups, but the rate of progress has been amazing, shocking even.
Garbage in... (Score:2)
I like how almost all of the male builders made their robots look like hawt babes.
I, for one ... (Score:2)
Washing machine tragedy (Score:2)
I for one am impressed (Score:2)