Robots Are Making French Fries Faster, Better Than Humans (reuters.com) 161
Fast-food French fries and onion rings are going high-tech, thanks to a company in Southern California. From a report: Miso Robotics in Pasadena has started rolling out its Flippy 2 robot, which automates the process of deep frying potatoes, onions and other foods. A big robotic arm like those in auto plants -- directed by cameras and artificial intelligence -- takes frozen French fries and other foods out of a freezer, dips them into hot oil, then deposits the ready-to-serve product into a tray.
Flippy 2 can cook several meals with different recipes simultaneously, reducing the need for catering staff and, says Miso, speed up order delivery at drive-through windows. "When an order comes in through the restaurant system, it automatically spits out the instructions to Flippy," Miso Chief Executive Mike Bell said in an interview. " ... It does it faster or more accurately, more reliably and happier than most humans do it," Bell added.
Flippy 2 can cook several meals with different recipes simultaneously, reducing the need for catering staff and, says Miso, speed up order delivery at drive-through windows. "When an order comes in through the restaurant system, it automatically spits out the instructions to Flippy," Miso Chief Executive Mike Bell said in an interview. " ... It does it faster or more accurately, more reliably and happier than most humans do it," Bell added.
Human french fries... (Score:2)
...have always been something of a dumpster fire.
Re:Human french fries [are unhealthy] (Score:2)
That's why they taste good. Taste and nutritious value are inversely proportional most the time. I know some will loudly disagree and tell me about a wonderful dish they eat/make, but that's the exception (per person and/or dish). I stand by my statement; eat it!
Further, diets mostly work because nutritious food's boring taste suppresses apatite compared to "the good stuff". It's almost nothing to do with calories but about kicking your taste-buds in the nuts to murder your apatite. For an extreme example,
Re: (Score:3)
Or, looked at from another perspective, bad food is engineered to boost your appetite so you'll eat more.
Re: (Score:3)
Only $0.99 per fry on the app store!
Re:Human french fries... (Score:5, Informative)
Fast food fries don't take much skill to cook. At the processing plants where McD's and others (same basic process for all of them) get their fries, they all go through and get cut in pretty much the same manner. They have sorters to get any back bits out (actually cool automation) that the may have been left after peeling and de-eyeing. The cut fries are sized, and the ones too small get sorted out and are used to make hashbrowns or instant mash potatoes. The fries that make it through are blanched in really large hot water cookers with a stainless steel conveyer taking them through. That blanches out excess starch. It is the starch content that determines how brown they get when cooked. If there is very little starch they can be fully cooked and crispy, but still pretty white looking. So there is a guy who takes a sample of fries coming out of the blancher regularly through the day, around the time different batches of potatoes brought in from different places are making it through. He takes the blanched fries and puts them in a deep fryer in a test shack inside the facility (these places are bigger than a couple of football fields and more, inside). He cooks them till done and then checks against a colour chart. Depending on the colour, they will know how much added sugar they need to spray on the blanched fries as they come out of the blancher, in order that when they are cooked at the fast food place they will always have the same level of crispy brownness. They make the adjustment in dextrose sprayers that coat the fries with, wait for it, a dextrose solution. Then they par deep fry them so they don't need to be cooked as long at the "restaurant," and then they go through bagging machines and then a freeze tunnel to freeze them solid in few minutes as they pass through.
I used to work in chem eng in process r&d. I worked on a project seconded to a government food research centre building and running a pilot unit at a facility to see if we could use membrane separation to reclaim the blancher water using RO where the clean water gets reused, and the concentrated potatoe starch goes into industrial alcohol production. The place this was at went through a million pounds of potatoes per day and two million gallons of water. Mostly in the blanchers.
Anyway, the bottom line is, there is no art or training needed to make fries at scrawny Ronnie's. Throw them in for the set time and temperature, and take them out. They will be cooked and the right brownness. A machine can do that.
Am I one of the few who things this is good? (Score:5, Insightful)
Am I one of the few people who thinks a robot in the kitchen isn't all bad, especially for stuff that doesn't require a chef's finesse like cranking out fries? Fat frying equipment is relatively dangerous, and by having a robot handle it, that means one less thing that can do some nasty burns to whomever is working there.
Re: (Score:3)
I, for one, welcome our new french-frying overlords!
(Currently reading Bullsh*t Jobs by David Graeber. But it's important to note that not all shite jobs are BS jobs. Someone's gotta eat them french fries.)
Re: (Score:2)
Exactly. It's one of those jobs that are important to society - you're making something people love - and that's why it's badly paid.
Re:Am I one of the few who thin[k]s this is good? (Score:2)
He actually makes that point in the book, but I'm still trying to understand his explanation of why. So far I mostly agree with him except for the part about bankers making fake money by borrowing money. I think the fake value is mostly coming from imaginary stock prices these years. However, they often loan money against the fake share prices.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, I read that book, too. It's not a scientific analysis, but lots of spot on observations. Those observations are especially interesting as many people deny the existence of BS job only on the premise that these can't exist in a market driven system. That makes it even more important to show where and that they exist.
Not (Ariane) rocket science (Score:2)
Don't machines already make those ready-to-fry french fries you buy in the frozen foods section of the supermarket? This is but the finally step. BTW the dangers of frying is greatly reduced if you have a deep fryer, like the ones used in a typical fast food restaurant and hinted at in TFS ("deep frying potatoes").
It should be fairly easy for somebody who's done some robotics work to jury-rig a French Frying robot. All you need is a consistent batch of frozen french fries, a timer or a thermometer, and of c
Re: (Score:2)
I think that you're missing that the oil in a deep fryer has a substantial amount of lingering heat. To the point that electrically turning off the heat isn't going to give you well cooked fries, because they'll be beyond burnt by the time the oil cools down. Not to mention totally soggy with oil.
So you're looking at more of a robot fry lifter. Lowers the fries into the oil, then removes them when it is time. More automation would include loading/unloading the fry tray, maybe salting the removed product
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It is a fantastic improvement to replace people by robots for many of the kitchen tasks that are done manually today. Some more thinking should be done to handle various exceptions, sensors need to be added to make sure the robot is aware of the environment, so if a piece of glass or anything that shouldn't be there falls into the food/oil the robot is aware and can stop serving food that may not be safe, things like that. Other than that it is a very much welcome improvement.
It's only good if we adjust for it (Score:2, Interesting)
We're still very much a "if you don't work you don't eat" society. And we're rapidly running out of work. This is different from horse whips. There was new work to do back then over at the auto plant. What we're doing here is completely replacing the jobs at both the buggy whip plant and the auto plant.
Yes, w
Re: It's only good if we adjust for it (Score:4, Interesting)
Rapidly running out of work? Fuck off. There is a labor shortage. If you have any STEM skills, there are a ton of openings. Work needs to be automated. We need to provide a universal basic income, rather than reduce the number of goods produced. We need to do whatever it takes to increase the supply of goods. Tax the factories, so that unemployed can get income. But robots are the thing that will make everything cheaper. A refrigerator would not be available go 99 percent of people if industrial robots were not involved in making them. Sure you would have jobs, but what use is a job if you cannot buy anything with it because the supply is limited?
Re: It's only good if we adjust for it (Score:4, Insightful)
There is a labor shortage. If you have any STEM skills, there are a ton of openings.
100% true, and also the rub -- STEM skills require both aptitude and education, and much of our population lacks one or both of those prerequisites.
Re: (Score:2)
we're putting hundreds of thousands out of work with a major push into Automation.
Also due to politicians turning a fast food job from a low wage temporary entry-level job into a permanent job that should offer a living wage. This opened the door to today's automation.
I'd say its a typical good intentions meets unintended consequences sort of thing but they were warned about precisely this.
Enjoy the self serve order/pay kiosk next. We actually had a fast food restaurant locally that was apparently an experimental location. They removed a couple of traditional employee order entry/r
Re: (Score:2)
You should concentrate on the fundamentals of the situation and trends, and not try to make a petty political point that turns out to no
Re: (Score:2)
The increase in minimum wage by a few bucks an hour ...
With a target of $15, that's a 25% increase in wages for a $12 starting point. The actual starting point is more typically around $10, so we are really talking about a 30% increase in most areas. But good effort on your part for attempting to camouflage that. And you lecture others about being political, LOL.
... probably sped up the automation trend in restaurants by a maximum of about 5 years. It would be happening anyway. Just a question of when the declining cost of effective automated equipment meets the slightly rising cost of labor.
No, not 5 years. We are not talking about some purely digital product here. There is a lot of analog and mechanic here. The increasing capability of a small single board computer is not really a large
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm sure all the candlemakers, buggy whip manufacturers, and serfs who work the field are all rooting for those lost jobs.
The industrial revolution cost a lot of people their jobs. Working the farms no longer was something you had to do - after all, pre-industrial revolution, about 80% of the population worked the fields. These days, about 3-5% does.
Likewise, factory jobs - like what the majority of people in Foxconn do in China, are gone in the US. Not that anyone misses them - if you think putting tab A i
Re: (Score:2)
How long until the robots start killing the cleaning crew? Who is next after the cleaning crew?
Re: (Score:2)
How long until the robots start killing the cleaning crew? Who is next after the cleaning crew?
Does it matter? We should absolutely get society to a point where pointless labour busywork is no longer required, and as we do it society will adapt and people will find other work to do. People don't have an inherent destiny to be cleaners (or anything for that matter).
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, it matters.
We are talking about a fry cook robot here. The robot does not fill or change the fry oil. The robot does not stock the items it fries. Humans are needed to help the robots be able to do their job properly. Humans are needed to service the robots. Safety still matters for humans.
Consider these links:
https://www.osha.gov/pls/imis/... [osha.gov]"Robot"&keyword_list=on
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.go... [nih.gov]
Re: (Score:2)
Well, slashdot f'd up the link. You'll have to do the robot search yourself or put the URL back together yourself.
Re: (Score:2)
Thinking that it is only pointless busywork that will be automated is naïve.
The question will become, what DO people have an inherent destiny to become, and why is that important?
AI is becoming half-decent at abstract art already for example, to the point where it won at least one competition.
Perha
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I never unstops why we still have so many humans working in fast food places.
Those new to the job market need a place to start. Fast food was a pretty common entry point in the past. Unskilled labor could be fairly quickly trained.
For a few generations you could blindly ask a person "Which fast food place was your first job at?" and many people would laugh at the good guess and tell you some like "six months at XYZ". Often while in high school. When you graduated high school you had a better chance at getting a decent job outside of fast food. HS Diploma alone tends to lose to HS
The name "Flippy" suggests burgers are next (Score:3)
Am I one of the few people who thinks a robot in the kitchen isn't all bad, especially for stuff that doesn't require a chef's finesse like cranking out fries?
Given the name of the robot, "Flippy", I'd expect fries are just the start. Grilled items like burgers and hotdogs are next?
Re: (Score:2)
Given the name of the robot, "Flippy", I'd expect fries are just the start. Grilled items like burgers and hotdogs are next?
Already a thing, Flippy the Burger Flipping Robot at CaliBurger Pasadena [youtube.com]
Google flippy robot [google.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
From the pictures, I don't know how long it will be before that casing around the arm needs washing. How long before someone forgets to turn it off when they give it the nightly clean and becomes a flesh fritter.
Paranoid, maybe. People have been caught in less complex machines.
I've got burns on my hands from oil when working with purely manual kitchen stuff, I was 16 at the time and working for minimum wage, I would not be surprised to learn of teenagers getting worse from mishaps around this. Though with a
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
It's not all bad. But there are downsides. Training someone on making fries takes 10 minutes, and its one of the first things a new hire gets trained on, so everyone in the place can make fries.
The fryer is pretty bullet proof-- if the oil is at the right level, the temperature is set correctly, you don't over fill the basket with fries, and you take them out, and salt them when the timer beeps the fries are good.
Absolutely a robot can replace the human here.
But the trouble with robot systems is that if the
Re: (Score:2)
Hell yeah... in high school I had to fry taco shells at Taco Bell for 8 hour shifts. What a miserable job, and the stench when you come home...
I am surprised though that Flippy can do a better job than the integrated machines. I get that flexibility is better, but it seems odd to retrofit the human process.
Re: (Score:2)
As AI and AI knowledge bases, and networked information and transaction systems in general, get better, they will be able to replace a lot of jobs which are not menial, boring and repetitive as well.
I'm not saying "Dr." google (+WebMD +
Or when was the last time you used a travel agent.
And I'm not saying DEFI complete
happier? (Score:2)
How does it do it "happier" than humans? Some people enjoy menial labor.
Re: (Score:2)
Some people enjoy menial labor.
Some people enjoy being kicked in the nuts, too. However, they're the exception, not the rule.
Re: (Score:2)
The "happier" part was thrown in there as a sales pitch to the management at these places. They have identified rude employees as the source of customer complaints, and they feel that "happy" employees won't be rude. Their fixation on this is why they recruit with phrases like "Now hiring smiling faces", make you take a 30+ minute personality test to apply, etc.
They measure "employee happiness" by the number of customer complaints. Is it any surprise that they don't understand it?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
No, but it refrains from spitting in the fries.
Re: (Score:3)
No, but it refrains from spitting in the fries.
On the other hand, human workers are 99.9% less likely to leak oil and solvents onto the fries.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Run the hydraulics from cooking oil. Problem solved. What robot runs on solvents?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
No, but it refrains from spitting in the fries.
The "spit" function is an optional add-on. You can fill the reservoir yourself or buy a refill subscription from the company or Amazon.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, the Sirius Cybernetics Corporation has developed a range of such robots.
Re: (Score:2)
Share and Enjoy!
This is gonna go great until rodents jump in (Score:5, Interesting)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]
The above video is of a whataburger in Texas that had a mouse jump in the deep fryer. I don't know that Flippy can detect rodents, but I'll wager it doesn't. The SOP in this situation is to turn off the fryer, drain the oil, bleach and sterilize the fryer, fill it back up with oil. When this happens, humans usually catch it immediately.
What happens when flippy just merrily goes about his business and serves out a lunch rush where a rat had been floating outside of the fry basket all afternoon? Is the restaurant going to take the hit? Miso? Ultimately who is responsible when Flippy fucks up?
Not so appealing now is it? I think I'll stick to human made fries, unless they hermetically seal the fry station.
Re:This is gonna go great until rodents jump in (Score:5, Insightful)
I actually agree with you that a simple robot will not detectect contamination, and that people should be involved.
However, I am trying to leverage my extensive background in biology to figure out the reasoning behind your SOP of bleaching and "sterilizing" the fryer after a mouse jumps in.
I mean you can say you're going to drain and clean if because it's gross... But if your deep fryer oil is not sterile at 375F, I'm not sure what new kingdom of organisms you've invented.
Is this the new "follow the science" kind of SOP?
Re: This is gonna go great until rodents jump in (Score:2)
Re:This is gonna go great until rodents jump in (Score:5, Insightful)
Indeed, I'm not too terribly worried about the mouse in the oil.
I'm more concerned about the fact that there was a mouse running around on the counter, in the kitchen, and in the restaurant as a whole.
The whole kitchen, especially that counter, needs to be cleaned, probably with bleach, OUTSIDE of the fryer.
Re:This is gonna go great until rodents jump in (Score:4, Informative)
More or less what Registered Coward said below(above, hell I dunno). These kinds of SOP's come from government regulations. [ccpia.org] While I agree, hot oil for sufficient time should kill most pathogens, it doesn't mean I would want to eat it. Gotta make the distinction between safe to eat, would want to eat. Bear Grillis drinks his own piss, it's sterile, I wouldn't want to drink my own piss.
Re: (Score:2)
the butt head working the counter will just say cool
Re: (Score:2)
While it's "gross" to think about, a rodent in a deep fry isn't going to do much to the food. At those temperatures the fluids are going to flash boil and the carcass will shrivel and sink as it cooks while the liquid inside is replaced by the oil. If you're served fries from there because Clippy's cousin Flippy doesn't go all "I've noticed a rat crawled into the fryer, would you like help cleaning it out?" you're likely going to be just fine - the extreme heat will sterilize the rat and you might even li
Re: (Score:2)
you need to wait for it to this bad before any thing is done
https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]
Re:This is gonna go great until rodents jump in (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It has a camera, so it's trivial to solve once they know it's a possibility. They can easily detect foreign or unidentified objects falling in and halt/flag it until someone inspects the video/fryer.
Actually commodity hardware could detect contam (Score:2)
I don't know that Flippy can detect rodents, but I'll wager it doesn't.
Have you looked at the capabilities of modern single board computers, even modern microcontrollers? We are basically at the point where commodity level hardware has the ability to look for such contamination.
Plus the installation of the robot can enclose the deep fryer to a degree.
Re: (Score:2)
What happens when flippy just merrily goes about his business and serves out a lunch rush where a rat had been floating outside of the fry basket all afternoon?
What makes you think someone making poverty wages will give a fuck in the same one in a billion scenario? In that video the people caused it to jump into the fryer.
Re: (Score:2)
Is the restaurant going to take the hit? Miso? Ultimately who is responsible when Flippy fucks up?
Miso sorry. - JJB
Re:This is gonna go great until rodents jump in (Score:5, Informative)
When this happens, humans usually catch it immediately.
You're assuming humans give a damn. I did quite a lot of "food" based jobs during university. Three great examples stand out:
- At a Dominos I worked at we had a power outage. To make sure the dough got proofed and we could serve pizzas in the evening, dumbfuck manager A decided to put the pizzas out on the ground behind the store. There were birds and all sorts of shit there. There was visible dirt in the dough. It was served to customers that evening.
- At a Pizza Hut the Bolognese machine was never really properly cleaned. Dumbfuck manager B decided one day to pour industrial floor cleaner in it to loosen the grime. Among the things which floated to the surface were some 8 dead cockroaches. One employee even threw up when he saw it (he loved - past tense - Bolognese source on pizza). We'd been serving people food from that machine for months in that state.
- At a biscuit factory I was walking past the dough preparation section prior to the ovens and saw a big arse moth fly into one of the rollers. I looked at the supervisor and he said "It's a quality control problem" and we watched the moth go in the oven. 15min later I was delivering clean tins down to picking and found the quality control person dozing off. The picking was automated on this line so if he didn't see it, it most certainly ended up shipped to a customer.
Never overestimate how much minimum wage employees give a shit. You know in all my time working in the food industry I not once read the SOPs. I knew of them, but I never knew anyone who had read them. I'll happily put a wager down that the fryer in the video was not bleached and sterilized, I'll wager it was drained and given the most minimal level of care someone who didn't want to be at work that day could muster.
Humans are the worst.
Re: (Score:2)
Missed Headline (Score:2)
Could have had this headline instead:
Harder Better Faster Saltier
Of course (Score:3)
Robots are good at repetitive tasks. Check the oil temp. At the right temp drop the fries for eight x seconds. Remove fries, drain, equally apply y amount of salt. Put fries in bin. Repeat. Humans get distracted.
Re: (Score:3)
If you want a machine to make the french fries, why design one that operates a station made for humans? There should be no robot involved, just a honking machine that takes frozen sliced potatoes in one end and produces perfect fries out the other.
Burger King has been doing exactly this for their meat patties for a long time.
I wonder (Score:4, Funny)
Do the PR departments for these venture capitalists use the same story submission form we do, or do they have a better one that fast tracks their press releases straight to the front page?
Re: I wonder (Score:2)
Sounds like the perfect job for a robot
Re: (Score:2)
The upcoming SF thriller (Score:3)
The Fries of the Killer Machines
The question is (Score:2)
Can it also clean afterwards to Gus Fring's satisfaction?
Would I still (Score:2)
Watched The Video... (Score:2)
...and human jobs aren't in that much danger.
Restaurants are going to have to hire someone specifically to clean the robot's protective coverings, not to mention clean up the very impressive amount of splashed oil and spilled product it flings all over everything.
And I'm sure that the owner/inventor is quite correct?
Yes, it does free up the rest of the kitchen workers to do other tasks. But not having the finesse and physical dexterity of a human means kitchen workers are going to have just as much work to
Timely given the recent wage change in CA (Score:5, Insightful)
That is well timed given that CA just passed a law [shrm.org] requiring fast food workers (and only fast food workers, not any other minimum wage job) to be paid 50% more than the current minimum wage.
I hope the SEIU regrets endorsing this bill since it'll just drive fast food franchise owners to capital vs. labor.
Flippy a deraugatory term? (Score:2)
Mandatory Quote (Score:2)
"I'm not locked in here with you, you're locked in here with ME!"
Re: (Score:2)
"I'm not locked in here with you, you're locked in here with ME!"
From The Good Place [wikipedia.org], What's My Motivation [fandom.com] (s1e11):
Michael: I'm going to leave you here, in this locked room.
Jason: I'm in jail?
Michael: No, no, no... This is the Good Place, we don't put people in jail. It's just a room, where you have been put, in the interest of public safety, as a form of punishment, and from which there is no exit. Okay? Bye.
Which is the concept and exact title of Jean-Paul Sartre play, No Exit [wikipedia.org] (apparently, one of the show’s biggest inspirations), with its most famous line: “Hell is other people.”
Faster? (Score:2)
Robots Are Making French Fries Faster ...
I'm guessing they mean with respect to the mechanics, not the actual frying as that would require changing physics / thermo-dynamics.
Cost vs Min wage hours (Score:2)
Hardly difficult (Score:2)
Obligatory... (Score:2)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]
Overkill (Score:2)
We have been cooking french fries at an industrial scale since the 1960's, it requires a conveyer mesh(that's higher on both ends than the middle) , a vat of oil and a slight current of said oil so the fries move from one end to the other in a timed fashion. Once at the end the conveyer comes back up and drains
SURELY for the fucking love of god we can shrink that without involving AI VR AR robotic arms and the god damned cloud, its a problem already solved
As long as there's no net job loss. (Score:2)
Oil of Po-Tay (Score:2)
Robots have the patience to fry them longer, leading to a truly crispy outside. Humans are idiots and pull out oily, soggy fries before their time.
Re: Keep pushing for that "livable wage" (Score:2)
Progress is important. We should strive to put everyone possible out of work.
Re: (Score:2)
Progress is important. We should strive to put everyone possible out of work.
A little bit snarkily worded, but yes. Those "evil business owners" won't make any income if people don't have money to spend, so at some point, unless there is some other form of output that all of those people can produce to earn money, the only plausible end state involves society devolving into a robot worker class with everything being free. Possibly in the short term, people would be able to do work to repair robots or program them or something, as a way of earning extra allotments of robot labor, a
Re: (Score:2)
A little bit snarkily worded, but yes. Those "evil business owners" won't make any income if people don't have money to spend, so at some point, unless there is some other form of output that all of those people can produce to earn money, the only plausible end state involves society devolving into a robot worker class with everything being free.
That's the only palatable end state. There are other plausible end states, ranging from "destroy all robots" to "total societal collapse because the owners of the robots don't want to share". And yes, the former is entirely possible. China had black powder and knew it could be used as a weapon for centuries and it was forbidden to do so and the ban was vigorously enforced. The US effectively had a ban on most robots for decades thanks to the autoworkers union. "No robots" is very much a plausible end s
Re: Keep pushing for that "livable wage" (Score:2)
Can you provide sources on that ancient Chinese ban on using gunpowder as weapon? From Wikipedia on Gunpowder, as soon as it became widely known, all types of bombs and fire arrows were used. I think that guns were not created by China back then due to lack of technology or creativity, not any type of enforced ban.
Re: (Score:2)
I have trouble imagining managers installing Manager Robots. Worker Robots, sure, but you gotta draw the line somewhere - like where it impacts their jobs ...
Re: (Score:2)
That will be done by the company founders, not by other managers.
Re: (Score:2)
Keep pushing for a "livable wage" for low level, low skilled positions that can be done by robots, and you'll only end up benefiting those evil business owners and put people out of jobs.
It's sad the folks, particularly around here, are so bad at second order thinking and engage so much in the "wishful" variety.
People unable to earn a "livable wage" with turn to either
a) welfare, or
b) crime
both of which are ultimately paid for by the taxpayer. I'd rather the business owners pick up that tab. Then they can pass on the expense to their customers, rather than everyone.
Re: (Score:2)
People unable to earn a "livable wage" with turn to either
a) welfare, or
b) crime
both of which are ultimately paid for by the taxpayer.
(c) Politics -- and your last point still holds...
Re: (Score:2)
People unable to earn a "livable wage" with turn to either
a) welfare, or
b) crime
You forgot:
c) improve your skill set so you can get a better job
Fast food was traditionally a temporary job for those new to the work force. It was reasonably simple to train the unskilled for the work. After six or so month you applied for a better job outside of fast food. As you now have a job history, you are a less risky potential hire, you've shown the ability to show up for work. That was, and still is, an important quality.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I like how you even quoted the part where I talked about second order thinking, then completely failed to understand why I included that, or even ( apparently ) what it meant.
To me it meant how you give no consideration to how much taxpayers already subsidize low paying business owners
Your push for a "livable wage" for everyone will result in fewer jobs.
The evidence suggests otherwise. Work still need to get done. Sure, some will be replaced by robots or outsourced to shitholes. Making yourself more like those shitholes is not a thoughtful solution though.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
There are only a small number of plausible endgames to increasing automation:
1) Redistribution of centralized wealth from no-labor/low-labor production
2) Luddite revolution and rejection of technology, followed by non-participation
Re: (Score:2)
The automation is improving rapidly (e.g. significantly every 5 years).
People are not improving physically and cognitively. Or if they are, the pace is along the lines of "significantly every 100 years tops".
Therefore, the automation is going to be more cost-effective than a growing percentage of the population.
The minimum wage increase is only a small constant factor in this analysis, and only serves to push back the cost-effectiveness crossover point by a small number of years.