Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Printer Transportation

GM 3D Prints 60,000 Parts to Keep Producing SUVs (cnet.com) 57

General Motors couldn't produce the component it needed for its 2022 SUV, the Chevrolet Tahoe, reports CNET. So the company's engineers "turned to a novel solution: 3D printing..." GM made a major investment in the tech in 2020, dedicating 15,000 square feet of space to a facility dubbed the Additive Industralization Center, then filling it with HP Multi Jet Fusion 3D printers, among others.... A year later, GM's big investment paid off. Chevrolet engineers made a late change to the 2022 Tahoe's design, necessitating the creation of an additional part: A new, flexible "spoiler closeout seal" fills a gap at the rear of the big SUV. Developing the tooling to injection-mold the things would have taken too long, delaying the delivery of 30,000 vehicles.

Enter 3D printing. Engineers were able to quickly design and print the components using a flexible material that met GM's criteria. They even used a process called vapor polishing to give the parts a perfect shine... Since each Tahoe requires two seals, Chevrolet needed a whopping 60,000 of them. From design to completion took just five weeks. That's less than half the time going the injection-molding route would have taken, which got all those SUVs out the door on time.

CNET calls it "almost certainly the largest deployment of additive tech in a production car" — and "an interesting preview of what's to come."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

GM 3D Prints 60,000 Parts to Keep Producing SUVs

Comments Filter:
  • At what cost? Also, does GM design first for robotic assembly and manufacture or do they come up with a design and then figure out how best to manufacture it?

    • Re:Cost? (Score:5, Insightful)

      by mmell ( 832646 ) on Saturday June 11, 2022 @03:49PM (#62612092)
      Apparently, a lot less than the cost of waiting for conventional technologies to fill the need. Trust me, GM isn't into giving away money.
    • Robotic assembly is for the big stuff. Most of those small components are still placed by hand. Even Tesla had to back off their plans for using robots. 8 fingers, 2 thumbs, 2 binocular eyes, all powered by a massively optimized biological adaptive neural network. Still better than silicon for a lot of tasks.
      • That's why the question was, do they have have software/tools in the design process so that they design for manufacture from the start instead of requiring handle assembly? Tesla did have to back off on their plans, but even who knows to what extent they prioritize robotic manufacture in the design process.

  • The Tahoe seems to have a re all every month or two. One of which is a faulty seal that allows exhaust to accumulate and enter the cabin to kill the passengers. That has always been the issue with SUV. Dirty vehicles.
    • Re:Recalls (Score:4, Funny)

      by fahrbot-bot ( 874524 ) on Saturday June 11, 2022 @04:08PM (#62612126)

      The Tahoe seems to have a re all every month or two.

      Looks like they've gotten to the "c" ... :-)

    • I used to have a Yukon (GMC version of the Tahoe) and it was an excellent vehicle. Recalls happen to everyone now and then. They fix it and life goes on.
    • I was under the impression that for quite some time now emission controls systems have been so good youd have to spend all day gassing yourself with a car exhaust to actually get carbon monoxide poisoning. Youd probably die quicker of simple suffocation as it displaced all the oxygen

      • by nasch ( 598556 )

        "The typical catalytic converter found on most newer cars and trucks combines oxygen with carbon monoxide to form non-poisonous carbon dioxide (CO2) reducing the high concentrations in the exhaust manifold (typically 30,000 ppm or more) to low concentrations (typically below 1,000 ppm after the catalytic converter)."

        https://www.abe.iastate.edu/ex... [iastate.edu]

        "As CO levels increase and remain above 70 ppm, symptoms become more noticeable and can include headache, fatigue and nausea. At sustained CO concentrations abov

  • by OpenSourced ( 323149 ) on Saturday June 11, 2022 @04:25PM (#62612160) Journal

    They printed one part, sixty thousand times.

    • by mmell ( 832646 )
      No, I'm pretty sure they've parallelized it. They probably printed one hundred fifty parts four hundred times.
    • Hopefully they printed enough extra to stock replacements for the next 10 years.

      I'd hate to need that spare part just to find they custom printed it during manufacturing using materials that they no longer have in stock with finishing techniques that were unique to that part, and to fix my "spoiler closeout seal" someone has to run to Home Depot and find some weather seal that can be shoehorned in as a stop-gap (pun intended) measure.

      --
      New sig on back order.

  • There are several additive 3d printing technologies I'm aware of, as well as multiple subtractive technologies (including conventional CAD/CAM). I could conceive of a future where a factory is stocked with raw materials and then programmed to manufacture [whatever]. Appropriate monitoring and maintenance (either human or robotic) would still be needed, but it would make retooling an assembly line an almost obsolete process.
    • I don't plant anything. I just pull up or cut down the plants I don't want.

  • This is off topic but pumping out all those SUVs on time is nothing to cheer about. The 3D manufacturing aspect is cool I admit.

    SUVs second largest contributor to global emissions [theguardian.com]

    • Did they just add up the emissions of new SUV's sold?

      Or did they correct for the vehicles they replaced, which in some cases may have worse gas mileage owing to improvements in fuel economy, even for large vehicles"

  • Tesla needed retention brackets for cooling systems so they took their credit card to Home Depot and got them in no time

  • Yeah and all it needed was 15,000 square feet filled with $200,000 3D printers. So it's still a tradeoff in terms of expense and effort vs time.
  • by dsgrntlxmply ( 610492 ) on Saturday June 11, 2022 @09:24PM (#62612516)
    Vapor polishing sounds like, but is not, crypto promotion. During pre-vaccine Covid time, I needed some eyeglass changes but had to wait for vaccination. I found an old pair of glasses with a prescription usable for what I needed (glasses to wear with a mask at the grocery store), but with scratches and peeling lens coating. I was able to grind out the scratches and bad coating with a succession of on-hand abrasives, auto polish, and toothpaste. This left foggy lenses. I happened to have some dichloromethane from the 70s, and tried vapor polishing the lenses, after first experimenting on scrap plastic. It worked amazingly well.
  • to see if 3d printed parts can hold up as well over time as traditionally- produced parts.

  • by robi5 ( 1261542 )

    > GM 3D Prints 60,000 Parts to Keep Producing SUVs

    Every technology can be used for good or evil.

    For example, 3D printing can be used for good, such as printing artificial heart valves or wind turbine components.

    Or for evil, such as printing parts for guns or SUVs.

    The world doesn't need no more fucking SUVs

We are each entitled to our own opinion, but no one is entitled to his own facts. -- Patrick Moynihan

Working...