Retro Computing Museum In Ukraine Destroyed By Russian Bomb (pcgamer.com) 131
A privately owned collection of more than 500 pieces of retro computer and technology history has been destroyed by a Russian bomb in the city of Mariupol. PC Gamer reports: The destruction was highlighted by Mark Howlett on Twitter, and confirmed by the Ukrainian Software and Computer Museum account, which operates museums in Kharkiv and Kyiv. The owner of the Mariupul collection, Dmitry Cherepanov, is reportedly safe, though his collection of computers, consoles, and assorted tech from fifty years of computing has been wiped out. "There is neither my museum nor my house," writes Cherepanov on his Facebook page, it8bit.club.
The museum itself may be gone, but Cherepanov has been chronicling his collection of exhibits online for some time now, and though this is all that's left, it is still a resource worth checking out. There are a host of fascinating old machines, including the Commodore C64 [...]. As well as images and information about all the 120 computers and consoles in his collection, Cherepanov also hosts RetroBit Radio on the site, too. Cherepanov has set up a Paypal account for donations, the details of which you can find on his Facebook page.
The museum itself may be gone, but Cherepanov has been chronicling his collection of exhibits online for some time now, and though this is all that's left, it is still a resource worth checking out. There are a host of fascinating old machines, including the Commodore C64 [...]. As well as images and information about all the 120 computers and consoles in his collection, Cherepanov also hosts RetroBit Radio on the site, too. Cherepanov has set up a Paypal account for donations, the details of which you can find on his Facebook page.
That's a shame (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Obviously old equipment like this isn't all that meaningful in the face of a terrible war.
This is wrong. We keep hearing that things are "less important than people's lives" but that's a comparison we shouldn't make. This was what he was attempting to achieve with his life and this was his contribution to the lives of all the people around him. What is being done here is an attempt to make his life meaningless. To destroy his achievements.
There's a term for this cultural genocide [wikipedia.org] which is a war crime. This places the Russian army now alongside the Nazis in the 1940s and the Turks who destroyed
Re: That's a shame (Score:2)
It's normal dictator policy. Destroy the past to destroy a people. ISIS did the same in Iraq, the book burnings from the 40s were the same, the banning of the Bo language, the plundering of Africa's heritage, the native American reservations.
We are a function of the past. Those who lose their past rarely thrive and often collapse entirely until they've had time to forge a new past.
The distinction between people, things, language and history is blurred at best.
Re: (Score:2)
It is a distinction you must make if you want to bring up the topic of cultural genocide.
After all, the bomb wasn't targeting the museum to intentionally destroy it (things), it was targeting civilian lives to intentionally destroy a national group (peoples lives)
Cultural genocide is not the same as direct genocide, so I agree, there is a distinction between people and things and for the most part direct genocide of people is far worse than cultural genocide. My point was that destruction of things is not something that should be treated as trivial compared to killing. Comparisons and ranking is a difficult topic, but sometimes, for example in sentencing war criminals it has to be done however imperfectly. In the case where that destruction is part of a deliberate p
Looks like website was hacked (Score:2)
It's a shame because I really wanted to see the pics of the mysterious Commodore 64. I think the 64 meant they only made 64 of them.
Re: Looks like website was hacked (Score:2)
There really aught to be an IQ restriction for joining Slashdot. To be fair to actual humans, rather than escapee Ogrons, a restriction of positive double digits or better should be sufficient.
Re: (Score:2)
How about an IQ requirement before becoming an editor? They'd have to fire every single one of the ones they've got now, though.
Re: (Score:2)
And who is going to be trusted to administer the IQ test?
Hopefully not the grandkids of the people who invented literacy tests for voting.
Re: (Score:2)
I was serious about the hacking. It really does appear that the site got hacked.
Of course the rareness of the C64 was a joke.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
https://slashdot.org/~truthhur... [slashdot.org]
Just stop already (Score:2)
Russia has already lost the war and redefined the goal to be less ambitious. They need to withdraw already and stop killing people.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
They won't withdraw if they think they can take Mariupol and Odesa.
Russia's new objectives don't include Odessa.
Only the region east of the Dnieper River.
No giant warships means no Odessa (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
[citation needed]
Re: (Score:2)
> That was always their objective, Russia never wanted to occupy the entire country.
> [citation needed]
He could be right though. Putin might have been expecting to just need a temporary show force, transfer power to politicians who supported him and the population would follow along. I don't think he was expecting the kind of resistance the US experienced in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Re: (Score:2)
He could be right though.
Yes, exactly. He could be right, or he could be wrong. That's why a citation is needed, to determine which.
Re: (Score:2)
> That was always their objective, Russia never wanted to occupy the entire country. -Train0987
I don't think Putin's original objective was an occupation of the country, or just the region east of the Dnieper River.
But I don't have a 'citation' for. Just making conversation.
> Russia has already lost the war and redefined the goal to be less ambitious.
I think his objective might now be occupation of the the region east of the Dnieper River, But I don't know. It is less ambitious than winning a war and
Re: (Score:2)
Been getting that a lot lately. And to be honest, I also thought that Putin was evil, but still smart enough to see a better approach. However there hasn't been much evidence to support that.
Pretty much the same story with Trump. It doesn't matter what happens, it's all explained away by being part of some grandiose and ingenious plan.
I see it as a variant of the "God moves in mysterious ways
Re: (Score:2)
LOL his invasion of Ukraine shows that Putin is at minimum capable of horrible, horrible miscalculation, and doesn't smartly retreat, instead makes his situation worse and worse.
Everyone can make a mistake, a fool tries to pretend it didn't happen by claiming he had a different goal from the beginning.
Re: (Score:2)
To them the "didn't need those anyway" can make perfectly sense instead of indicating a flaw in the very design.
Re: (Score:2)
Literally what you quoted from Putin "We do not intend to impose anything on anyone by force."
OK that's clearly a lie.
What exactly is your point?
Re: (Score:2)
Directly from Putin himself on Feb 24:
"It is not our plan to occupy the Ukrainian territory. We do not intend to impose anything on anyone by force. At the same time, we have been hearing an increasing number of statements coming from the West that there is no need any more to abide by the documents setting forth the outcomes of World War II, as signed by the totalitarian Soviet regime. How can we respond to that?
No idea what he's talking about.
The outcomes of World War II and the sacrifices our people had to make to defeat Nazism are sacred. This does not contradict the high values of human rights and freedoms in the reality that emerged over the post-war decades. This does not mean that nations cannot enjoy the right to self-determination, which is enshrined in Article 1 of the UN Charter.
So he's going to take away Ukraine's right to self-determination?
Let me remind you that the people living in territories which are part of today’s Ukraine were not asked how they want to build their lives when the USSR was created or after World War II.
No they were not asked if they wanted their own country, they demanded it.
Freedom guides our policy, the freedom to choose independently our future and the future of our children. We believe that all the peoples living in today’s Ukraine, anyone who want to do this, must be able to enjoy this right to make a free choice.
Again, he's invading Ukraine precisely to take away that freedom.
In this context I would like to address the citizens of Ukraine. In 2014, Russia was obliged to protect the people of Crimea and Sevastopol from those who you yourself call “nats.” The people of Crimea and Sevastopol made their choice in favour of being with their historical homeland, Russia, and we supported their choice.
Invasion followed by a fake referendum at gunpoint. Crimeans were given the choice in the past, and they wanted to be Ukrainian, not Russian.
It's actually surprising how unconvincing his statement is.
The entire US gov't and media (but I repeat myself) immediately told you those were all lies. Here we are one full month later and the Russian military has done nothing contrary to those statement. They aren't indiscriminately bombing population centers, enacting wholesale slaughter of civilians, etc, the way the US has been doing their invasions for the past two decades when our gov't wishes to occupy countries.
How do you explain Mariupol?
The Russians have held back quite a bit. They could've spent two months bombing Ukraine population centers before a single troop arrived. They didn't.
Well for starters they didn't expect Ukraine to
Re: (Score:2)
They can't take Odessa. They're getting pushed back farther and farther from Odessa.
Even Mariupol seems unlikely, as the Ukrainian army is pushing closer and closer. Soon the siegers will be under siege. But at what a cost of life.
Re: (Score:2)
LOL we are being lied to by who? The Russian government that just scaled back its objective? The satellite images that show where the fighting is happening?
Who are you and how are you in a position to know what the powers are thinking?
Re: (Score:2)
I read all the games in the museum were Wolfenstein from the perspective of the Nazis winning. And of course Company of Heroes 2.
(beware of sarcasm)
Look at who has died (Score:2)
Conscripts, as opposed to professionals, will be the intelligentsia and likely opposed to Putin's dictatorship. All provided obsolete gear that Ukraine now has to dispose of, not Russia.
The generals who died are likely opposed to Putin's imperialism.
The people believed executed were in jobs Putin now essentially controls directly.
The civilians in Ukraine were likely their only serious competitors in the markets the region goes for.
The people important to Putin's military dictatorship are all policing Moscow
Re: (Score:2)
what matters is that his power has solidified.
It's not clear that it has. Losing the war makes him look weak.
Certainly Putin is sitting in his office, trying to figure out who betrayed him.
Re: (Score:2)
He betrayed himself, but this isn't The Prisoner episode "Hammer Into Anvil" and Number 6 won't get Putin to order himself replaced.
He's weak, yes, but Boris Johnson is also weak and has been for years. By making everyone around him weaker still, and having an opposition that won't, Boris is weak but unassailable. Putin is doing much the same. He's absolutely fragile right now, but absolutely nobody wants to take the risk to replace him. (Especially after Biden. Yeesh, that was stupid. Now, if anyone does a
Re: (Score:2)
He may be weak, but at least he can look at his super bowl ring to give him comfort [boston.com].
Re: (Score:2)
Don't tell anyone, but I hear Putin was actually given a plastic comic book super decoder ring.
Re: (Score:2)
You are perfectly correct. As North Korea demonstrates, though (and Pol Pot's Cambodia regime proved beyond doubt), some despots are fine being kings of junkyards, no matter what the cost to the people. Pol Pot matters here because he was backed by the West. Never mind the slaughter, look at him not being Russian! The same logic may well be behind China discretely supporting Putin. Never mind the total devastation to his economy, at least he's not Western.
This is why we need to be ashamed of ever holding pr
Re: (Score:2)
Russia has already lost the war and redefined the goal to be less ambitious. They need to withdraw already and stop killing people.
The new war goal isn't to take Donbass.
The new goal is to conclude the war with a big enough "victory" so that Putin isn't assassinated or at least forced from power.
The Russian army is gaining casualties at an unacceptable rate, not only is news of that leaking back home and creating political problems but at a certain point the army itself might just collapse.
This makes for a very unpredictable situation:
1) Is Putin going to try playing the Nuke card at some point? He'll be tempted if he's desperate but h
Re: (Score:2)
Ironically, by the end of the special operation they might not even control the parts of Donbas that they did at the start.
Re: (Score:2)
If the Russian army gets decimated by Ukraine then a lot of people suddenly realize that the Russian state doesn't have the monopoly they thought it did
The Russian National Guard is Putin's personal army, and is authorized to fire on civilian crowds (in certain situations).
) If the Russian army goes into full retreat it's hard to see Ukraine stopping until they retake Crimea.
This is an interesting question. The entryway into Crimea is narrow and easy to defend. Could they take it if they wanted to?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
If the Russian army gets decimated by Ukraine then a lot of people suddenly realize that the Russian state doesn't have the monopoly they thought it did
The Russian National Guard is Putin's personal army, and is authorized to fire on civilian crowds (in certain situations).
True, but this is more about perception. Governments tend to have an air of invincibility, but if the Russian army gets creamed then all Russian institutions start looking more vulnerable.
) If the Russian army goes into full retreat it's hard to see Ukraine stopping until they retake Crimea.
This is an interesting question. The entryway into Crimea is narrow and easy to defend. Could they take it if they wanted to?
If the Russian army goes into full collapse I don't see why not. But I'm not sure how the Russian population responds to that.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Lukashenko isn't resisting, he does exactly what Putin tells him to do. Problem is, Belarusian army isn't doing what Lukashenko tells them to do. The army just plain refused to go when the invasion started.
You have any source? Lukashenko has been helping Putin as much as he can by threatening Putin, but it sounds like he wants to stay out of it.
At the start of the invasion I think there wasn't much pressure to go along because Putin thought it would be a cake walk. At this point, as much as Lulkashenko does what Putin wants most of the time he still has some independence and right now it's very much in his self interest to keep out.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Withdrawing is better than seeing your army completely destroyed. The latter makes you seem even weaker.
We know who cheers this sensless destruction (Score:1)
This is a real loss (Score:4, Informative)
A lot of commenters are saying "Yeah the C64 is not rare"
Maybe so, but there were also a ton of rare computers in the collection, including *very* rare Soviet bloc computers. Computers were not as widely available in Soviet times, and got heavily junked when communism fell, because way better stuff was almost immediately available. There was some really hard to get stuff preserved at this museum.
Re: (Score:2)
The Russians intentionally destroyed the museum because they thought it was full of cutting edge tech which had fallen into enemy hands.
Re: (Score:2)
The Russians intentionally destroyed the museum because they thought it was full of cutting edge tech which had fallen into enemy hands.
Dude. They aren't even destroying their ACTUAL cutting-edge tech before handing it over to Ukraine. Pantsir, S300/400, their comms trucks full of encryption gear with current keys, tanks with ERA intact and fully loaded with ammo, publicized prototype equipment deployed and then abandoned... it goes on and on. Their front lines do not give half a crap whether their tech is compromised.
Re: (Score:2)
Russia was still cranking out Germanium transistors until the 1990s. The rest of the world all moved to superior silicon in the 1960s.
Re: (Score:3)
A lot of commenters are saying "Yeah the C64 is not rare"
Maybe so, but there were also a ton of rare computers in the collection, including *very* rare Soviet bloc computers. Computers were not as widely available in Soviet times, and got heavily junked when communism fell, because way better stuff was almost immediately available. There was some really hard to get stuff preserved at this museum.
The rare stuff is really important but the C64 shouldn't be allowed to pass either. There is a big difference between a C64 sitting in someone's house which one or two people will have access to and a C64 in a museum together with people who know about it and can show things with it. In the second case people who know nothing about it can see it, understand what it did and learn from it. It's worth visiting the Centre for Computing History [computinghistory.org.uk] in Cambridge, UK to get a real idea. Some of the hardware at The N [tnmoc.org]
Re: (Score:2)
They also had a lot of software for the C64 that isn't widely available elsewhere, even if the hardware is. Also some peripherals and upgrades that were unique to Ukraine and the USSR, like Cyrillic text support.
Re: This is a real loss (Score:2)
Just to add an interesting factoid, for Western computers that COULDN'T do software font tables (like CP/M-ish clones), they'd make an alternate font ROM with Cyrillic characters, solder it piggy-back onto the "official" font rom, then use a SPDT toggle switch to select the desired ROM's CS pin. Kludgy, but clever.
I think the practice was also common with pre-SVGA PC clones in countries where the default US/Western Europe character set was inadequate. VGA allowed soft fonts, but only 16 characters... and 9
Re: (Score:2)
Thanks, that's the kind of detail that museums like this are invaluable for.
In Japan they had different graphics hardware and different operating systems for Japanese language support, some of which were somewhat DOS compatible, and later supported by Windows. Japanese machines tended to have much better graphics than western computers because of the resolution and memory needed for Japanese text. They often had separate video RAM, and it was often larger than main RAM. For example, a lot of MSX machines ha
Re: (Score:2)
Now this, this crystalizes the loss. The odds were incredibly long that I would ever visit Mariupol. I didn't even know that name, or about this museum until it got blown up. Imagine all the people in the area though, who visited during peacetime. I can see myself driving around just for the heck of it, getting tired and pulling off in that city. "So what is there to do here?" and somebody might mention the computer museum and I'd check it out and get to see old Soviet computers and stuff I'd never hea
Re: (Score:2)
Also some beige box computer were actually red box computers and were made in East Germany or Czechoslovakia.
Re: (Score:2)
The C64 as a whole is not rare, but there are so many variants of it that some variants may be more rare than others.
A Soviet era C64 might be extremely rare simply because it would be almost impossible for the USSR to import them - perhaps they were imported at the tail end of the C64's production run in the early 90s. Plus given the economic times, it would have been extremely expensive.
So a Soviet localized C64 might be an extremely rare machine -
No worries (Score:2)
Nowadays, crappy 386 and Pentium beige box PCs from the 90s and 00s are considered vintage collectible items. I shit you not: go to Youtube and search for vintage PCs, and you'll find a bajillion channels dedicated on restoring and preserving completely uninteresting shite no-name DOS and Windows boxes from the era, and marvelling at stupid turbo buttons and 8-bit Soundblaster sound cards or whatever; The younger computer collector is easily pleased these days.
At this rate, when the war is over, the Mariupo
Re: (Score:3)
And to late 90 and early 2000's collectors, the C64's, Amigas etc were considered meh, because they were so common.
Re: (Score:3)
"completely uninteresting shite no-name DOS and Windows boxes"
Almost certainly there were thick clowns just like you saying the same thing back in victorian times or early 20th century about home appliances which meant 99.9% got scrapped and the remaining ones are now rare and in museums.
Re: (Score:2)
Still "vintage", by definition. Those computers are just of younger vintage. Nostalgia is nostalgia.
Self-proclaimed vintage computer connoisseurs want older vintages though.
Re: (Score:2)
There are still things to be learned and preserved from the Pentium era of computing.
For instance, the composer of the original soundtrack for EverQuest (1999) pushed the limits of what could be achieved with wavetable synthesis on sound cards like the SoundBlaster AWE32. Sure, we have the MIDI files and sound banks, but attempts to recreate the music with emulators still sounded incomplete. It took some investigation using original hardware to determine what was missing. One such finding: https://www.ta [takproject.net]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: No worries (Score:2)
For all the hand-wringing & panic, most "y2k" bugs were more cosmetic than anything. 1990s and 80s programmers weren't idiots... they knew 2000 was coming, and usually made sure date calculations were good until at least 2007 (1880 + 127). They just didn't think dates rendered as "19100" or "1/1/:0" were a big deal.
I personally encountered one ancient app written in the 1970s that anticipated y2k by encoding dates as offsets from 1900 using 2 characters and encoding the decade as base36... so it went fr
Oh no! (Score:2)
A privately owned collection of more than 500 pieces of retro computer and technology history has been destroyed by a Russian bomb in the city of Mariupol.
Oh No! Shit just got real!
Re: (Score:2)
Close the gas pipes!
We'll burn wood to stay warm for the cold days of early spring.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
|Sarcasm| Maybe it'll survive like the Game Boy did in the Gulf War |/Sarcasm|
https://www.esquire.com/lifest... [esquire.com]
Yo Grark
Comments are missing the point. (Score:2)
The take away here should be that itâ(TM)s impossible to argue that a computer museum in a residential house is a âoemilitary targetâ.
So the bombing of the museum was a war crime.
I say invade, you say how high? (Score:2)
A privately owned collection of more than 500 pieces of retro computer and technology history has been destroyed by a Russian bomb
To the Rooskies, it was a high-tech computer facility.
Atari wary dangerous to adwanced Russian tech! (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
In related news, NATO F-35s are set to get their Turtle countermeasure upgrades shortly.
Now, it's Personal! (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
If only one museum dies, that is a tragedy; a million deaths is a statistic.
-Putin
We mourn that important things became unimportant (Score:2)
Every war and disaster brings these moments of cognitive dissonance. You break down crying over a dead dog or cat in the street, or a shattered teapot. Then you whack yourself for caring about a dog or cat or teapot, when people have died.
You're crying for the lost world of safety and comfort that human beings built there, the place that had teapots, and happy little cats getting a treat, and computer museums. When we hear of disaster, we look to how many humans died, the ultimate accounting, and che
Re: (Score:3)
Uh, no (Score:2)
I'm no fan of the c64, but it was an important computer in its time and had some ingenious innovations.
If the computers were placed as safely as possible, there might be a few that survived. Even trashed machines, though, if intact enough, would be useful, compact, memorials to this war.
Blackened, twisted metal cases, especially one of the truly sturdy machines, will be small enough for the mind to cope. Wrecked buildings shock, but it's too big for the brain. The things that stick are small enough to fully
Re: great! (Score:2)
You are so clever
Re: (Score:2)
My first thought as well, it must be a bitter Russian incel. It's not just Russia as a whole that has difficulty cooperating, earning trust and just being *normal*. Many of its populace are like this too
Re: (Score:2)
Using the word "incel" is often associated with the far left crowd, who seem to have a high level of animosity towards Russians in general, probably because they see them as traditional/patriarchal etc., and this attitude predates the war in Ukraine. The rest of your post confirms that.
The far left crowd dominates the media but they are squarely in the minority, and since the right and the center don't like this crowd much at all, I am guessing that the anti-Russian sentiment may be less intense than it see
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm only saying that, in my experience, people who use the term incel to hit at someone they don't know tend to be far-left, and quite often themselves awkward and girlfriendless.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: Really RUSSIAN this time? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Mariupol is part of the separatist provinces. It is very pro-Russian. Ukraine many years ago put the Azov battalion there, who deeply hate Russians and would like to kill them all. And that is an understatement if you look up articles about them which are older than a year.
Personally I think it is credible that Azov says 'ok you will get this city back but we'll make sure there is nothing left standing and as many of 'your people' die in it as possible.' That does not make it true , but it is quite possible
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
But you ARE slow. The guys in Mariupol are not general Ukrainian army, they are proud nazis. I don't doubt a minute that they'd rather destroy the city when they know it is lost to the separatist side. If they can let the other side take the blame for it then so much the better but if not, fine too. Do they like to put up camp in kindergartens and hospitals in the hope they get shot up? You bet.
The other side on the other hand will want to save what they can because they will own it afterwards, but in order
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Really RUSSIAN this time? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
"whole World" != USA (and "whole World" != Europe too)
are you sure about that?
Re: (Score:2)
"whole World" != USA (and "whole World" != Europe too)
Russia: We are bombing Mariupol [aljazeera.com]
NATO, Ukraine: "Russians are bombing Mariupol"
fborobraga: "It was the Ukranians in a false flag operation!"
are you sure about that?
Russian shelling is turning the southern city into the “ashes of a dead land”, the city council said on Tuesday
The question is why are you in such denial. Russians are bombing Mariupol. The computer museum was hit. You somehow think that was a false flag operation.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yes comrade, of all the false flag operations to cause outrage they chose a vintage computer museum. Not a maternity ward or school but old computers...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It's very common to store ammunition in these places, in a war... I don't know what really happen, but call it a "russian" act, now, seems a bit too much for me...
It's common to store ammunition in an computer museum that has no hardened walls. Do you think Ukranians are idiots? You seem to be making up any excuse rather than accept the Russians who are attacking the city bombed a building in the city.
Re: (Score:2)
Your UID is too low for you to be that much of a dumb fuckwit, to think that Ukrainians would engage in a false flag operation by bombing something most everyone doesn't give two shits about.
Seriously take whatever medication you forgot to take today, go to bed and try again tomorrow.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Your UID is too low for you to be that much of a dumb fuckwit, to think that Ukrainians would engage in a false flag operation by bombing something most everyone doesn't give two shits about.
I think you are giving him/her the benefit of doubt that ignorance is main reason. I would say malice is more likely than incompetence in this case.
Re: (Score:2)
> Your UID is too low for ...
A low UID is not a proof of intelligence. A low UID just shows that he got up early.