Company Plans To Dig World's Deepest Hole To Unleash Boundless Energy (vice.com) 231
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Motherboard: A company that plans to drill deeper into Earth than ever before, creating holes that would extend a record-shattering 12 miles under our planet's surface, has raised a total of $63 million since its launch in 2020. Most recently, Quaise Energy, a startup that aims to revolutionize the geothermal energy market, secured $40 million in series A funding in February, reports Axios. The goal of these super-deep holes is to access a limitless amount of renewable energy from the heat deep inside Earth.
"This funding round brings us closer to providing clean, renewable baseload energy," said Carlos Araque, CEO and co-founder of Quaise Energy, according to BusinessWire. "Our technology allows us to access energy anywhere in the world, at a scale far greater than wind and solar, enabling future generations to thrive in a world powered with abundant clean energy." Geothermal energy has a low profile compared to other renewable energy sources such as solar, wind, and hydro, but Quaise believes it is "at the core of an energy-independent world," according to the company's website. This form of energy is among the oldest power sources harnessed by humans, but it only accounts for about 0.4 percent of net energy production in the United States, which is the world's biggest geothermal producer.
Quaise, which is a spinoff from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), intends to pioneer this technology using vacuum tubes known as gyrotrons that shoot millimeter-wave light beams, powered by electrons in a strong magnetic field. Using these devices, the company plans to burn almost twice as far into Earth as the deepest holes ever made, such as Russia's Kola Superdeep Borehole or Qatar's Al Shaheen oil well, both of which extend for about 7.5 miles. Gyrotrons are powerful enough to heat plasma in nuclear fusion experiments, making them an ideal tool to probe unprecedented depths of some 12 miles, where subterranean rocks roil at temperatures of about 500C (930F). Water pumped into this searing environment would instantly vaporize as steam that could be efficiently converted to electricity. Araque and his team at Quaise plan to funnel their seed money into prototype technologies within the next few years. By 2028, the company aspires to retrofit coal-fueled power plants into geothermal energy hotspots, reports ScienceAlert. The process of drilling out these super-deep holes would take a few months, but once the setup is complete, they could provide limitless energy to a region for up to a century, according to Araque.
"This funding round brings us closer to providing clean, renewable baseload energy," said Carlos Araque, CEO and co-founder of Quaise Energy, according to BusinessWire. "Our technology allows us to access energy anywhere in the world, at a scale far greater than wind and solar, enabling future generations to thrive in a world powered with abundant clean energy." Geothermal energy has a low profile compared to other renewable energy sources such as solar, wind, and hydro, but Quaise believes it is "at the core of an energy-independent world," according to the company's website. This form of energy is among the oldest power sources harnessed by humans, but it only accounts for about 0.4 percent of net energy production in the United States, which is the world's biggest geothermal producer.
Quaise, which is a spinoff from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), intends to pioneer this technology using vacuum tubes known as gyrotrons that shoot millimeter-wave light beams, powered by electrons in a strong magnetic field. Using these devices, the company plans to burn almost twice as far into Earth as the deepest holes ever made, such as Russia's Kola Superdeep Borehole or Qatar's Al Shaheen oil well, both of which extend for about 7.5 miles. Gyrotrons are powerful enough to heat plasma in nuclear fusion experiments, making them an ideal tool to probe unprecedented depths of some 12 miles, where subterranean rocks roil at temperatures of about 500C (930F). Water pumped into this searing environment would instantly vaporize as steam that could be efficiently converted to electricity. Araque and his team at Quaise plan to funnel their seed money into prototype technologies within the next few years. By 2028, the company aspires to retrofit coal-fueled power plants into geothermal energy hotspots, reports ScienceAlert. The process of drilling out these super-deep holes would take a few months, but once the setup is complete, they could provide limitless energy to a region for up to a century, according to Araque.
FTA (Score:3)
I see what he did there.
It's an intriguing idea (Score:2)
The press article reads like it was written by a 12 year old. Lots of hyperbole.
Interesting that this HAS been demonstrated and tested in a laboratory so at a conceptual and basic practical level is sound but I would think the cost of the first hole is going to be astronomical in R&D costs as there is big difference between doing it in a lab and having a setup good to go in the field. The engineering issues of squeezing the whole gyrotron source and waveguide into a unit that can be passed down a hole p
Re: (Score:3)
The pipe is the waveguide, the gyrotron stays on top.
Re: (Score:2)
Correction: I assume they would want the power source near the drill head. No it would be a very big high power surface gyrotron with waveguides acting as drill pipe with annular cooling and pressurisation.
One is that the waveguide does not like bends so would have to be under constant tension to keep it dead straight so you cannot really steer it unless oil wells which can be steered in direction.
Re: (Score:2)
Correction: I assume they would want the power source near the drill head. No it would be a very big high power surface gyrotron with waveguides acting as drill pipe with annular cooling and pressurisation.
One is that the waveguide does not like bends so would have to be under constant tension to keep it dead straight so you cannot really steer it unless oil wells which can be steered in direction.
And then there is that pool of manmade lava at the tip. So unless this actually vaporizes the rock immediately (otherwise the hole just gets wider, and not much deeper) and it can be extracted, or bore a rather big hole for the rock vapor to condense onto, resulting in a much smaller hole - let's not forget the large volume differences with small increases in diameter. Still, with their promise of 20 kilometers in 3 months, they are claiming a bit over 222 meters per day. Or about 730 feet per day.
BTW, t
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Press releases towards adults today are written this way because the education system has degenerated. Smart twelve year olds generations ago were basically adult level education today.
Re: (Score:2)
Press releases towards adults today are written this way because the education system has degenerated. Smart twelve year olds generations ago were basically adult level education today.
How do you square this with the scores required to reach an IQ of 100 generations ago are lower than they are today? Objective evidence suggests your assertion is not correct.
Re: It's an intriguing idea (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Nah, it's just that traditional newspapers had a target market and people outside that market were unlikely to pay the price of entry (the cost of the paper). With the internet access is free, and linking means that it's possible to get readers from a wide spectrum. Therefore there is a tendency to cater to the lowest common denominator.
Re: (Score:2)
Press releases towards adults today are written this way because the education system has degenerated.
Not at all. Press releases have always varied in complexity for a given audience. You look at the same news story from the Daily Express vs the Financial Times (obvious biases aside) they will use very different complexity of language and go into very different level of detail. Press releases balance how wide the target audience can be with the risk of glazing their eyes over.
This has nothing to do with "adults today" or a degenerated education system. It has been this way since the printing press was first
Re: (Score:2)
Interesting that this HAS been demonstrated and tested in a laboratory
In mice. Don't forget that one, it's not a real proof-by-press-release unless it's demonstrated in mice.
Re: (Score:2)
The press article reads like it was written by a 12 year old. Lots of hyperbole.
Just has been targeted at the intended audience: Lots of supposed adults these days have the maturity of 12 year olds. Just look at what some people write here and then remember that the people here are probably more mature and better educated than the rest of the population...
Re: (Score:2)
The press article reads like it was written by a 12 year old. Lots of hyperbole.
That's because they know who is going to support such a project.
Interesting that this HAS been demonstrated and tested in a laboratory so at a conceptual and basic practical level is sound but I would think the cost of the first hole is going to be astronomical in R&D costs as there is big difference between doing it in a lab and having a setup good to go in the field.
Sounds like a basic Rankine Cycle.
These people plan on retrofitting old coal plants, and using some way of actually burning through rock, will reach 3 to 20 Km deep in a "few months". I guess the idea is to use the cooled and now glass rocks as a pipe. Wonder how they are planning to extract the excess molten rock?
Like you, I'm curious about that 20+ Kilometer cable running the Gyrotron that's going to "burn" the rock. This also assumes
yimby (Score:2)
Can I put one of these in my backyard? I'm thinking electricity, hot water, and heating all in one.
Re: (Score:2)
Can I put one of these in my backyard? I'm thinking electricity, hot water, and heating all in one.
You can use a heat pump to suck energy out of your backyard to heat your house.
You can then reverse the process in the summer to cool your house by using your backyard as a heat sink.
Ground source heat pump [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Bring your own electricity.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You could. It really depends on your local rules. Can you drill in your backyard?
Here is a map of the United States and its geothermal potential -> https://www.americangeoscience... [americangeosciences.org]
I hope your HOA, or City Council sees your vision!
--
There are nights when the wolves are silent and only the moon howls. - George Carlin
Re: (Score:2)
The presence of the drill rig for a few days is really no worse than, say, bringing in a crew to install a below-ground pool, which HOAs tend to smile upon. After that, (residential) geothermal is really out-of-sight, out-of-mind, so it's hard to see why anyone would object to it. This in contrast with, say, wind turbines and solar panels, which for various reasons (some legit, most totally overblown) people take issue with.
500C at what pressure? (Score:2)
Rusty on how you would calculate the pressure of the super-heated steam, but isn't the pressure much more important than the temperature?
Re: (Score:2)
Subcritical – up to 705 F (374 C) and 3,208 psi (221.2 bar) (the critical point of water)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
Once you are over 374 C you can have saturated steam at a good superheat or go supercritical. Supercritical steam isn't really steam, nor is it truly a liquid. Once you are in that realm there are no separate phases.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.co... [wiley.com]
That is an article on Navy 1200 psi, 950 F steam plants. So you don't have to be super critical at 500 C.
Efficiency? (Score:2)
I'm not sure I understand how this works. Do they expect the steam to travel several miles back to the surface without losing heat and energy? Are they going to put several miles worth of double-insulated piping into the ground?
My gut reaction is that efficiency will be a big issue, like those solar roadways or dehumidifiers that suck "liters per day" of water right out of the air.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Efficiency? (Score:2)
Maybe just insulate the top couple 100m and just use bare double walled pipe for the rest? Slowly heat the the earth along the pipe to 500 degrees, what's the worst that can happen?
Otherwise triple walled pipe with vacuum insulation I guess, though the hole seems a bit narrow for it.
Re: Efficiency? (Score:2)
On second thought, except for the very bottom of the pipe they probably keep the pipe free of the wall, pumping something thermally conductive which solidifies in the hole at the bottom.
The gas layer between the borehole wall and the double walled pipe should be decent insulation, not perfect but decent.
Re: (Score:2)
My gut reaction is that efficiency will be a big issue
Under such circumstances, it does not matter.
You pump water down and get hot water up. Who cares if you lose 50% or more of the "potential energy" as long as the cycle produces a surplus in electricity?
Some more technical explanations (Score:5, Insightful)
This story was light on the technical details. Here are some better links.
https://newatlas.com/energy/qu... [newatlas.com]
https://newatlas.com/energy/qu... [newatlas.com]
https://newatlas.com/technolog... [newatlas.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Thank you.
Other interesting applications? (Score:2)
When Iceland drills conventional shallow geothermal boreholes, they tend to keep liming up over time. New boreholes keep having to be drilled. Whether or not this new tech can be a practical source of geothermal power, how about using it to bore horizontal tunnels at conventional depths? Boring Company and others must be interested in this.
Volcano (Score:2)
LOL, if they hit magma, can this cause a volcano? In Hawaii they can just drill horizontally.
Re: (Score:2)
Nope. At 500C rock is quite solid. Even if not, it would solidify farther up and plug the hole.
Re: (Score:2)
So if the drill head does hit a magma chamber, the lava won't shoot upwards through the hole fast enough to stay liquid? Is there some modeling to prove that? Also, do we have accurate deep underground maps to know where all the magma chambers are? My understanding is that we don't.
Boundless energy is great (Score:2)
But what about the lizardmen that will also be unleashed by this?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe they'll return Hitler in exchange for Zuckerberg.
Don't unleash the Balrog (Score:2)
Balrogs are really bad, m'kay? So just don't.
Re: (Score:2)
Or the Dark One!
Dr. Who Fiction... (Score:2)
Dr. Who fiction becomes reality...what is described reminds me of the story "Inferno" [fandom.com] where scientists were drilling deep into the Earth's crust to tap into gas deposits for energy...causing the end of the world. Well in one reality, the Dr. (Jon Pertwee) managed to cross realities but then get back. How interesting a similar idea only in the real-world.
JoshK.
Been done? (Score:2)
Was talking to an old hand in the nz/au oil industry, a few years back. Reckoned a company he'd worked for had done some thing similar in Oz.
Two shallower wells, with fracking to create passages through the rock between the two..
Pump water down one, get steam out the other..
But seeing as the water passed through the bare rock, it brought back lots of heavy metals, and radioactive goobies from the depths of the earth
Re: (Score:2)
But seeing as the water passed through the bare rock, it brought back lots of heavy metals, and radioactive goobies from the depths of the earth
Yes, this is the problem with geothermal power in general. It's a massive problem at The Geysers geothermal power plant near Calistoga, CA. They actually created a superfund site by burying the drums of crap pressure washed off of the turbine blades. Now they are doing it in a concrete pit at the facility and just capping it off with concrete when it's full...
Krypton Electric & Gas? (Score:2)
I'd like to see if Professor Jor-El has any objections to this proposal. :)
Iceland: deep hole not required (Score:2)
Bah, they're late on the scene. There's been the Icelandic Deep Drilling Project" [iddp.is] going on, and they don't need to drill so deep (because of the location):
Re: (Score:2)
We could probably do something like that in Wyoming near the Yellowstone supervolcano - but unfortunately there's nobody in the area who really needs the electricity at a massive scale.
Maybe some entrepreneur will figure out that they can make unlimited hydrogen fuel that way via electrolysis.
Just check their FAQ (Score:3)
Most of the questions being asked here are already answered on their website.
https://newatlas.com/energy/qu... [newatlas.com]
The tech, while a novel application, is not unknown. There is no reason why it should not work as they imagine it will.
Prior art (Score:2)
Obligatory quotes:
Project Mohole - Wikipedia [wikipedia.org]
Crack in the World (1965) - IMDb [imdb.com]
Quatermass (Score:2)
For some reason, I imagine professor Quatermass on site, studying some dials as the drill descends.
Iceland (Score:2)
Re: Iceland (Score:2)
Nice gig if you can get it (Score:2)
xkcd Kola Borehole (Score:2)
https://xkcd.com/1330/ [xkcd.com]
Never! (Score:2)
the company plans to burn almost twice as far into Earth as the deepest holes ever made, such as Russia's Kola Superdeep Borehole
I for one would reject any boundless energy from that hole! Because virtue!
Core energy is not boundless or renewable (Score:2)
" limitless amount of renewable energy"? (Score:2)
Someone with more smarts than me (I'm an idiot) explain this one to me.
Abundant, I get.
Long lasting, I get.
Renewable? Ummm, nope.
Puffery (Score:2)
Entropy Energy every time (Score:2)
Adventures of Superman already did it (Score:2)
If there is anything Superman has taught us, it is that drilling deep holes into the Earth can have unanticipated side effects.
The Unknown People on IMDB [imdb.com]
Re: (Score:2)
My guess is think the way a heat pipe works, with a closed system. Super heated steam spins a turbine and expelled into a series of cooling vanes to precipitate the water back into the reservoir where it begins it's 12 mile trip down to bottom again.
Re: (Score:2)
That's how geothermal is usually implemented indeed.
Re: (Score:2)
Drilling an expensive hole only to fill it up with salt makes little sense.
Rather than desalination, it is better to just stop growing crops in deserts.
Re: (Score:2)
Doesn't have to go to the bottom of the hole. You can use the heat from the top of the hole in a heat exchanger with the salt water; then it becomes a manageable process to remove the excess sediment.
Re: (Score:2)
It's rock and lova. It cannot "absorb salt" unless you remove enough of the rock and lava to leave space for the salt.
Re: Good idea (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Rather than desalination, it is better to just stop growing crops in deserts.
Well, since it seems we're busy trying to turn the Amazon basin into a desert, growing crops in deserts might be good. Not to mention that we still have runaway AGW to reverse; so having more of Earth's surface area devoted to crops is probably a good thing, provided we make the entire planting, growing, harvesting, and distributing process carbon-negative.
Re: (Score:2)
No.
Re: So here's a dumb question... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You would not push saltwater into that hole. You would use a system with (at least) two heating circuits and use clean water in the hole. Salt buildup would kill it pretty immediately otherwise but so would corrosion.
Re: (Score:2)
With such a hole as described, would it essentially provide free de-salination of water as the salt would just be absorbed by the material at the bottom of the hole? Or it would it still have too much build up over time to be practical.
You don't think these people have thought of anything but raising money, then declaring bankruptcy, do you?
Never going to happen. The old Soviet Union tried this, and it's incredibly difficult.
This is just another grift, something that sounds plausible to people who are a step above people who think all technology comes from Ancien Aliens. But it isn't a big step.
Re:So here's a dumb question... (Score:4, Interesting)
I have a better question. How long can we water-cool the planet's core before it solidifies and we all die from solar radiation?
At humanity's current consumption level, there is enough heat energy in the crust to last many, many millions of years.
A 12 km borehole goes 0.2% of the distance to the core.
Re:So here's a dumb question... (Score:4, Funny)
Skroob: At humanity's current consumption level, there is enough heat energy in the crust to last many, many millions of years.
Dark Helmet: The way he runs things, it won't last a hundred.
Re: (Score:2)
Skroob: At humanity's current consumption level, there is enough heat energy in the crust to last many, many millions of years.
Dark Helmet: The way he runs things, it won't last a hundred.
This is truer than it looks at first sight.
"Current consumption levels" implies a steady state. But if you have a steady growth of a few percent per year, that means you have a doubling time, and every doubling period uses as much energy as all previous periods combined.
Not to mention that when we humans think we have an essentially unlimited resource we spend it like drunken sailors so the rate of consumption increases faster still. I wouldn't put it past us to turn millions of years' worth of energy into mere thousands of years' worth.
Re: (Score:2)
Not to mention that when we humans think we have an essentially unlimited resource we spend it like drunken sailors so the rate of consumption increases faster still. I wouldn't put it past us to turn millions of years' worth of energy into mere thousands of years' worth.
Don't forget that in that case, there would be a huge thermal crisis here on the surface.
But I'm not going to lose any sleep here, because this is just another grift to get people to give up their piasters to the grifters. Collect money, engage with hookers and blackjack, then shut down leaving the gullible to wonder what happened.
Re: (Score:2)
At humanity's current consumption level, there is enough heat energy in the crust to last many, many millions of years.
Typical short-sighted human thinking. Despite the reassurances at the end of the article, I'm confident the underground lizard people will put an end to the wild-ass scheme, saving humanity.
Re: (Score:2)
Also, we already went over 12km for the deepest hole ever dug:
https://www.bbc.com/future/art... [bbc.com]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2)
The sun will expand before that could happen
So it's not something to worry about.
Re: (Score:2)
The sun will expand before that could happen
So it's not something to worry about.
That one is clear, yes. I mean, remember that the planet has a diameter of 12600km, a core temperature of 5200C and the Iron in there solidifies at around 1500C.
So lets assume we manage to cool everything by 500C. World energy consumption is about 10TW (10*10^12W). We need to estimate specific heat. Iron has around 450J/K, magma has apparently around 1500J/K. Lets go with the lower value, just to be safe. Now, the wight of the planet is around 5.9722×10^24 kg.
That gives us 6*10^24 * 450 = 2.7 * 10^27J
Re: (Score:2)
There's one small problem. The argument you're making is the exact same argument that was made against those who predicted global warming first. "Yes, the mechanics you describe seem plausible, but the volumes in question make it effectively impossible for humanity to generate enough CO2 to cause a meaningful change".
About a century later, we figured out two problems. First, the amount you need to cause a change in large and complex systems is nowhere near as big as you think. We still generate barely a cou
Re:So here's a dumb question... (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I'd expect seismic probes before such a hole is started, and large cavities to have collapsed millions of years ago.
Re: (Score:2)
I'd expect seismic probes before such a hole is started, and large cavities to have collapsed millions of years ago.
I'm pretty sure there were similar "expectations" being raised in the early days of climate change.
Re: (Score:2)
I already saw how this works out from Dr. Who...
Re: (Score:2)
The current record has a "borehole" that is 9 inches in diameter.
An ocean would take a long time to drain through it.
As for the Balrog... only a pretty snaky thing could fit into those 9 inches. So, if the record Anaconda is 27 feet long and 44 inch diameter, the Kola Bore Hole would allow passage of a proportional 5'5" anaconda.
Re: (Score:2)
How deep can you go before gravity gets fucky?
Re: (Score:2)
Gravity is promiscuous at the best of times ;)
Seriously though, gravity is quite predictable all the way to the centre of a uniform solid sphere (not that Earth is entirely uniform). In any case, these guys are only going about 19 km down on a 6378 km journey. The vast majority of Earth's mass is still inside their location (all the heaviest stuff having sunk to the core). 19 km is about twice as deep as the deepest ocean trench, and we know gravity is not funky to at least that depth. (19 km is about the
Re: (Score:2)
They dug just a little bit deeper than how high the airliners fly.
I'm not sure you could fit a device able to measure the difference in gravity inside that 9" borehole.
Re: (Score:2)
Arpund 5000km. Or so.
Re: (Score:2)
How deep can you go before gravity gets fucky?
Deep. A lot deeper than this. Also, why would that really be relevant? In any case is, the way it works is that gravity increases mildly as you descend, since you're getting closer to denser material, until you get to about 1/3rd of the way to the core. After that, the mass of the material above you is enough to counteract that, and gravity decreases until you get to the core. This hole won't get remotely close to 1/3rd of the way to the core.
Re: (Score:2)
At the would be center of mass of the Earth if it was alone in the universe, you'd still get a little gravitational forces from the Sun and Moon, to name the principal sources in this case.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, and you will also get the "centripetal force" that keeps Earth not falling into Sun (and Moon not falling into Earth, and the artificial satellites)
Radiogenic Heat (Score:2)
How long can we water-cool the planet's core
Since about half the heat coming from the core of the planet is radiogenic from isotopes with billion year half-lives a very, very long time.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
If their scheme works, I'd assume they would drill more than one hole. It's not like they would fulfill all energy demands for the hole planet with a single hole IMHO.
Re: (Score:2)
The "poor" heat conductivity of the rock wouldn't much matter as the "active" part of the tunnel will probably be a kilometer long.
The bigger issue is "how to you not lose heat over the 10 kilometers from the "hot" reservoir until the power station?
Re: (Score:2)
The bigger issue is "how to you not lose heat over the 10 kilometers from the "hot" reservoir until the power station?
Heat insulation. As simple as that.
Re: (Score:2)
Simple: You get a limited amount of energy per bore hole. You just space them accordingly and limit energy taken out and things work basically permanently. So "limitless" energy here is actually limited but you can take it out basically forever.
Re: (Score:2)
Simple: You get a limited amount of energy per bore hole. You just space them accordingly and limit energy taken out and things work basically permanently. So "limitless" energy here is actually limited but you can take it out basically forever.
Not if water is involved. Assuming that this merry band of grifters manages to send pipes down that far, and assuming that plate tectonics doesn't tear them apart, any water involved is going to pick up a lot of minerals https://geothermal-energy-jour... [springeropen.com] . The results are this: https://www.researchgate.net/f... [researchgate.net]
I mean, it sounds good. You know. "Hey it's really hot down there, so we just bore a hole, and take a little of that heat out - All electrical problems solved!"
Re: (Score:2)
It won't be plate tectonics that tear them apart, but they will be limited in how far they can go down, because at some point rock starts to flow, so permanent holes are impossible. "It is shallower (~10â"20 km) in warm, young crust and deeper (~20â"30 km) in cool, old crust.", so the depth they're talking about is approaching the edge of that.
OTOH, prior attempts at really deep holes have turned out to be so expensive, than many of them have been halted early. Still, they're talking about using
Re: (Score:2)
I have a better question. How long can we water-cool the planet's core before it solidifies and we all die from solar radiation?
Difficult so say. This is a _large_ core. 10^20 years? Longer? Definitely not a concern for the next million years.
Re: Oh, so now fission is renewable? (Score:2)