Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Data Storage Science

Synthetic Brain Cells That Store 'Memories' Are Possible, New Model Reveals (livescience.com) 21

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Live Science: Scientists have created key parts of synthetic brain cells that can hold cellular "memories" for milliseconds. The achievement could one day lead to computers that work like the human brain. In the new study, published in the journal Science on Aug. 6, researchers at the Centre national de la recherche scientifique in Paris, France created a computer model of artificial neurons that could produce the same sort of electrical signals neurons use to transfer information in the brain; by sending ions through thin channels of water to mimic real ion channels, the researchers could produce these electrical spikes. And now, they have even created a physical model incorporating these channels as part of unpublished, ongoing research. At a finer level, the researchers created a system that mimics the process of generating action potentials -- spikes in electrical activity generated by neurons that are the basis of brain activity. To generate an action potential, a neuron starts to let in more positive ions, which are attracted to the negative ions inside of the cell. The electrical potential, or voltage across the cell membrane, causes doorways on the cell called voltage-gated ion channels to open, raising the charge even more before the cell reaches a peak and returns to normal a few milliseconds later. The signal is then transmitted to other cells, enabling information to travel in the brain.

To mimic voltage-gated ion channels, the researchers modeled a thin layer of water between sheets of graphene, which are extremely thin sheets of carbon. The water layers in the simulations were one, two, or three molecules in depth, which the researchers characterized as a quasi-two-dimension slit. [T]he researchers wanted to use this two-dimensional environment because particles tend to react much more strongly in two dimensions than in three, and they exhibit different properties in two dimensions, which the researchers thought might be useful for their experiment. Testing out the model in a computer simulation, the researchers found that when they applied an electric field to the channel, the ions in the water formed worm-like structures. As the team applied a greater electric field in the simulation, these structures would break up slowly enough to leave behind a "memory," or a hint of the elongated configuration.

When the researchers ran a simulation linking two channels and other components to mimic the behavior of a neuron, they found the model could generate spikes in electrical activity like action potentials, and that it "remembered" consistent properties in two different states -- one where ions conducted more electricity and one where they conducted less. In this simulation, the "memory" of the previous state of the ions lasted a few milliseconds, around the same time as it takes real neurons to produce an action potential and return to a resting state. This is quite a long time for ions, which usually operate on timescales of nanoseconds or less. In a real neuron, an action potential equates to a cellular memory in the neuron; our brains use the opening and closing of ion channels to create this kind of memory. The new model is a version of an electronic component called a memristor, or a memory resistor, which has the unique property of retaining information from its history. But existing memristors don't use liquid, as the brain does.

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Synthetic Brain Cells That Store 'Memories' Are Possible, New Model Reveals

Comments Filter:
  • My first reaction was..."hmmmm, organic memory for my computer that you can send a command to expand...." Not very imaginative.
  • by Petersko ( 564140 ) on Saturday August 07, 2021 @08:39AM (#61666731)

    Us: "You sure the event happened as you described?"

    Computer: "Yes!"

    Us: "You sure? You don't seem sure... maybe it didn't happen exactly that way.. maybe, a little more THIS way?"

    Computer: "Well... um..."

    Us: "Your computer friend Sally told us it happened this other way."

    Computer: "Sally said that? Um... yeah, okay. I seem to recall it that way now."

  • Models and simulations also suggest a computer-program-universe could be true.
  • by ITRambo ( 1467509 ) on Saturday August 07, 2021 @08:58AM (#61666775)
    A better way to steer this technology in development would be to focus, long term, on human brain interface for dementia patients that have had parts of their brains destroyed, and won't grow back. How awesome would it be to be able to have a living person with cognitive failure be able to build new memories, once the concept is fully realized? Too bad today's focus is typically to commercialize and make a quick buck and not on long term studies to learn how to perfect and use this to help people. No one gives a damn if a computer has synthetic brain cells.Work on a mammalian interface that eventually would help people that really need it.
  • by SchroedingersCat ( 583063 ) on Saturday August 07, 2021 @10:19AM (#61666921)
    When you go Rekall, you get nothing but first-class memories.
  • My grand, grand childrends will see what I'm doing now :)
  • by spaceman375 ( 780812 ) on Saturday August 07, 2021 @11:37AM (#61667087)
    This development has nothing to do with memory as the term is usually used. It's all about the changing electrical properties of water and ions at the nano scale on millisecond time spans. As in graphene sheets with 2 or 3 atoms of water distances between them. Barely a single piece of behavior that mimics how a neuron works in a very simple way. It has as much to do with memory in a brain as the sap from a rubber tree has to do with an engine gasket (car analogy!). Yet all the above comments assume we are close to making artificial brains as complex as a human's.

    I know it's de rigueur to not RTFA, but this is all in the summary. I weep for the shadow of intellect that slashdot has become.

    Can you tell I haven't had my morning coffee yet?(/rant)

    • While I agree with your general point about the hype around all of this stuff, and using memory in a somewhat misleading way, but neurons do exhibit local "memory" that is key to the overall function.

      For example, synapse strength is maintained by neuron dna histone modification. Anther interesting example is the purkinje cell (controls motor neurons) that has been shown to "learn" firing sequences (timing and strength) in isolation (not connected to other cells).

      A cell is a very complex machine, it's l
      • In your example about a 'purkinje cell', my first thought was that what you were describing could be modeled in electronics using a comparator with a variable reference voltage to set the threshold point, and an RC circuit on it's other input to control the response time.
    • Sap from a rubber tree often has a lot to do with gaskets.

    • Um.. I wasn't assuming that at all, my takeaway from at least the summary (haven't had time yet to read the actual article) is that at least some researchers based on the work they're doing are coming to understand that neurons don't at all work like digital logic, but I may be projecting my own thoughts on the subject onto this, too. I liken biological brains to be more like dynamically-reconfigurable analog computers than they'd ever be like digital computers.
  • Considering the inefficiencies and complete malleability of human memory that's absolutely a horrible idea for anything other than novelty.

    Human memory is totally unreliable, massively subject to change, and has lousy retention and long term recovery.

    Sure, we make do with it, and mostly don't realize when it's wrong because it's the only memory we've got, but just think about how many times somebody else remembers something differently than you do, and that's only the tip of the iceberg since you mostly don

Every nonzero finite dimensional inner product space has an orthonormal basis. It makes sense, when you don't think about it.

Working...