Cricut Decides To Charge Rent For People To Fully Use the Cutting Machines They Already Own (hackaday.com) 174
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Hackaday: Probably the best known brand of cutter comes from Cricut, and that company has dropped a bombshell in the form of an update to the web-based design software that leaves their now very annoyed users with a monthly upload limit of 20 new designs unless they sign up for a Cricut Access Plan that costs $9.99 on monthly payments. Worse still, a screenshot is circulating online purporting to be from a communication with a Cricut employee attempting to clarify matters, in which it is suggested that machines sold as second-hand will be bricked by the company.
We'd like to think that given the reaction from their online community the subscription plan will backfire, but unlike the world of 3D printing their market is not necessarily an online-savvy one. A crafter who buys a Cricut from a bricks-and-mortar warehouse store and uses it with Cricut cartridges may not balk at being required to pay rent to use hardware that's already paid for in the same way a member of our community with a 3D printer would. After all, Cricut have always tried to make their software a walled garden. However if the stories about second-hand models being bricked turn out to bear fruit that might be a different matter. UPDATE 3/18/21: Cricut has decided to reverse its decision and allow every member to upload an unlimited number of images and patterns for free.
"Right now, every member can upload an unlimited number of images and patterns to Design Space for free, and we have no intention to change this policy," a Cricut spokesperson told us in an email. "This is true whether you're a current Cricut member or are thinking about joining the Cricut family before or after December 31, 2021."
They addressed these changes in a letter to the Cricut community, which you can read here.
We'd like to think that given the reaction from their online community the subscription plan will backfire, but unlike the world of 3D printing their market is not necessarily an online-savvy one. A crafter who buys a Cricut from a bricks-and-mortar warehouse store and uses it with Cricut cartridges may not balk at being required to pay rent to use hardware that's already paid for in the same way a member of our community with a 3D printer would. After all, Cricut have always tried to make their software a walled garden. However if the stories about second-hand models being bricked turn out to bear fruit that might be a different matter. UPDATE 3/18/21: Cricut has decided to reverse its decision and allow every member to upload an unlimited number of images and patterns for free.
"Right now, every member can upload an unlimited number of images and patterns to Design Space for free, and we have no intention to change this policy," a Cricut spokesperson told us in an email. "This is true whether you're a current Cricut member or are thinking about joining the Cricut family before or after December 31, 2021."
They addressed these changes in a letter to the Cricut community, which you can read here.
What is a cutting machine? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:What is a cutting machine? (Score:5, Interesting)
Also vinyl sheets for making decals, which I'd wager is one of the most popular uses for these machines.
Also, this isn't just scummy, it's bordering on criminal. Literally extortion. "That's a nice machine you bought, be a real shame if something were to happen to it. Real shame..."
=Smidge=
Re: (Score:3)
I suspect that this would be a direct violation of the implied warranty of merchantability.
Re: (Score:2)
That implied warranty can be easily disclaimed in any EULA.
Re: (Score:2)
So it's not "criminal". It's bad business and
Re: What is a cutting machine? (Score:5, Interesting)
That's not so clear yet, and depends on a lot of facts we don't know. The criminal laws potentially at issue here would relate to fraud. Cricut's business practice has been to sell hardware, and encumber that hardware with restrictions which compel buyers to spend more money to keep using what they already bought. This isn't uncommon, and isn't fraudulent by itself - but it can be dangerous territory. This new change which reduces the functionality of hardware already sold, compelling owners to spend more money just to continue using functionality which was previously free, could be a real problem depending on the details. For example, hypothetically, this change could have been planned in advance when the hardware was first designed, but kept secret from buyers. If that were the case, there is an argument to be made that the initial sales involved fraud in the failure to disclose that a subscription would later be required to use the equipment. That type of consumer fraud (if that were to occur) may be a violation of criminal laws in some states, and if it's done in interstate commerce (especially with any aspect involving mail) then federal statutes may also apply. So there are some possible factual scenarios where this could end up being a criminal matter, depending on the details.
Re: What is a cutting machine? (Score:2)
I'd also note that I'm pretty sure these aren't UCC transactions. I'm not seeing any aspect that would put them within it's scope, unless I'm missing something.
Re: What is a cutting machine? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
If I had one of these machines and they bricked it I would be suing them in small claims for the cost of the unit plus my court costs immediately. Odds are wildly against them responding.
Re:What is a cutting machine? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3)
The misleading (OK, lying) story says they will 'brick machines' and 'make you pay rent to use hardware you own'. Neither is true.
Neither is true? Citation needed.
Per TFS they are making people pay for advertised features that used to be free. That is a rent-seeking behavior. It is in fact making people pay rent to use hardware they own... in the manner in which they expected to use it.
So now we know that to be true... do you have any counter-citation for the claim that they will brick units?
Re:What is a cutting machine? (Score:5, Informative)
> do you have any counter-citation for the claim that they will brick units?
From the Hackaday article:
"UPDATE: Hackaday was contacted by a PR company claiming to represent Cricut. They clarified that machines are not deactivated upon resale, but the new owner will need to set up their own online account."
Could have been a misunderstanding from the start, or could be back-tracking/damage control. Either way, the bricking claim is *currently* not supported.
=Smidge=
Re: (Score:2)
OK, thanks.
So they're not bricking, only taking away "free" (READ: already paid for) features.
This both decreases the value of the machines as well as decreasing their value to users who are using those features, by the cost of getting those features back multiplied by the expected life span of the units. That may well drive their value into the negative numbers...
Re: (Score:2)
Looks like there's room for a hack involving a raspberry pi or arduino to control the machine and get around the manufacturer limitations.
Re: (Score:2)
I'd give better than even odds there's already an arduino in the thing, and even odds it's an open source design. Bet you could just upload some firmware to it and go on your way.
Re: (Score:3)
I had a quick look as well, this is the company that did the Cuttlebug, an incredibly overpriced plastic die cutting machine of a kind that's been around for decades. Cricut discontinued it. Then they added a motor, jacked up the price, and because it was based on Flash, discontinued it. Now they've got their current version, which isn't discontinued yet (but just wait...), however they're turning it into ransomware.
So I ask you: Given their history, and the fact that you can buy these things from any n
Re: (Score:2)
So they're something like the Google of their industry?
Re: (Score:2)
Try Apple of their industry instead.
Re: (Score:2)
What's a plastic die-cutting machine? That sounds like it already requires a powerful motor, if it's cutting molds to make plastic things with! It sounds really interesting to make molds and pour plastic for limited edition runs fo things.
Re: (Score:2)
They want you to throw away the machine instead of selling it. That way they make more money in the short term.
Of course, losing a customer for life loses them a pile of money in the long term, but when have executives every done anything other than chase short term profit.
They will likely reverse direction on this after the public backlash, then pat themselves on the back on how generous they are.
Re: (Score:2)
Cutting Machines, 3D Printers, Laser Etchers, CNC machine... 2 or 3 stepper motors that move an arm with some type of tool in 2 or 3 dimensions. A lot of people make these with a Raspberry Pi kit. So being a dick about your product, just doesn't seem like a good plan.
Re: (Score:2)
Not the trash bin - it would be sent with the cheapest possible freight alternative to the manufacturer - filled with something sticky like silicone oil so it comes out everywhere when they open it.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Wife: Can I get one of these Cricut machines?
Thelasko: That's cool! How do you program it?
Wife: You buy these special catridges, or use proprietary software.
Thelasko: It doesn't use G-code? [wikipedia.org] Why would you want that?
Wife: *Angry stare*
Thelasko: You can have one, but only if you let me try to hack it to run G-code.
Wife: Forget it!
Re:What is a cutting machine? (Score:5, Informative)
Funny you should mention printers, because HP already did this with theirs.
https://mashable.com/article/h... [mashable.com]
People paid for "free ink for life", and then HP cancelled it.
Re: (Score:2)
Bricking sold machines isn't happening - it was a rumor that the company denied. As for limiting a free resource - well, it does rely on a webservice, and as we all know web services don't really have any kind of ownership or stability like if you own the hardware.
If you want to toss one out, please give it to me. I'm willing to bet this backfires and I can get a fully unlocked opensource driver next week for a better machine than what they originally sold.
Re: (Score:2)
Sounds like someone needs to make a retrofit controller module for it.
Re: (Score:2)
" If my laser printer did this it would be in the trash bin within minutes."
If it gets bricked it will end there anywhere, even if it is not a laser printer, without any decision of yours.
Re: (Score:2)
My Wink device ended up in the egarbage bin after their BS. Plus ça change ...
Re:What is a cutting machine? (Score:5, Funny)
What is a cutting machine?
I assume it's for performing circumcisions.
Yes, but it's difficult to make momey that way because you only get tips.
Re: (Score:2)
I assume it's for performing circumcisions.
... it's difficult to make momey (sp) that way because you only get tips.
Ouch!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
While I 100% agree cricut is being dumb with this new limit and really lame, it was really nice to buy a $160 cutting machine that made it super easy to make designs.
We've used it for Christmas cards two years in a row (we do at least 50 cards a year, minimum). We've also used it to print off some decals and some iron on graphics.
The 20 design limit will likely be okay for us as we really don't use it that often, but I agree it's shady on their part. Really, they should of released desktop software to run t
So full of bugs too (Score:2)
Their software is already so full of bugs, I’m amazed anyone can use their products anyways.
Cartridges (Score:5, Informative)
This doesn't effect the old cutting machines that use cartridges. It only effects the newer machines that download patterns from the web, or if you use the new software to do that with the old machines. The solution is not to use the new software with the old machines. My sister-in-law has both.
Jitters (Score:2)
You have to do that when the bottom of the cut gets all jittery :)
Misleading (Score:2)
Nowhere does it say anything about having to 'pay rent to use hardware they already own'. It says they have to buy a plan to be able to use their service to DESIGN more than 20 plans a month. You can use your 'hardware you already own' as much as you want.
At least they already updated TFA to say that sales of machines are NOT prohibited, but the new purchaser will need to buy their own plan.
Re: (Score:2)
To use the machine you have to upload designs to their cloud service. What else would you call them charging a fee to use hardware you already paid for?
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Another vote for Silhouette. I've had my Cameo for years, and it still is going strong cutting vinyl & other assorted materials. There's not much in the way of vendor lock-in - even replacement blades are widely available from third parties at a substantial discount from the Silhouette-branded parts.
Re: (Score:2)
There are lots of other options. This stuff used to be done on bog-standard plotters with a knife attachment replacing the pen. You can also laser-cut paper.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Misleading (Score:4, Informative)
Other sources are saying that there is no offline way to design things anymore, so you have to pay to use it because they don't offer a way to do designs and load offline.
It's one of the many many companies going to 'software as a service' to move from transactional income that will dry up as their target market saturates to recurring revenue to force their customers to keep paying.
Re: (Score:2)
Other sources are saying that there is no offline way to design things anymore, so you have to pay to use it because they don't offer a way to do designs and load offline.
It's one of the many many companies going to 'software as a service' to move from transactional income that will dry up as their target market saturates to recurring revenue to force their customers to keep paying.
Cricut has the name recognition but there are alternatives that are far less closed.
Time for an charge back (Score:2)
Time for an charge back
Bait and switch (Score:4, Informative)
I expect they will loose a class action suit pretty soon over this. Bait and Switch marketing like this is not going to sit well with the courts
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
You mean their $5-off coupon on their next purchase of a Cricut product. Because what I really wanna do is buy more products from someone I just had to sue.
Taking a lesson from HP printers (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I do not like drm but you mischaracterise instant ink as some count is carried forward per month.
The cartridges supplied in instant ink are larger than the ones you can buy. - not defending it
Re: (Score:3)
Sell the customers an ink subscription service based on their guess of how many pages they print per month. If they go over that limit, stick them with a big bill. If they're way under the limit, don't give them any page credits that they can carry-forward.
With HP, you can either buy the ink cartridges in stores that will work until they run out of ink or dry up OR you can buy a subscription where they send you cartridges every month with DRM to only work on X number of pages printed or until a certain date. Buy cartridges from the store and you'll be fine.
If this article is true, Cricut allows people to upload a maximum of 20 designs per month without a subscription. The subscription does give rights to some copyrighted material (such as Avengers) which migh
Just rename it... (Score:2)
They could get Cardi B. to do some marketing for them.
You've always needed an account (Score:3)
I bought one of their cutters and when I first tried to use it, it became apparent that one needed to use their software which required creating an account on their systems. No thanks. I returned it.
I'm so glad I returned mine the minute it arrived! (Score:2)
"At Cricut th
A Great Way To Kill a Product (Score:2)
I guess they don't understand the concept of ownership and product sales with regular use.
This will easily make people pirate their own legally owned product, or jail-break them.
Then there's the pirate source sites that will pop up.
All in all, it will leave a bad taste in peoples' mouths over that attempt to rent back something already paid for and owned.
Sounds like bait-and-switch to me (Score:2)
Same old story (Score:4, Interesting)
Guy loves girl, dragon kidnaps girl... Sorry, wrong story...
Company releases product, consumers love the product, company realizes they are a monopoly, and decides to seek rent from sales.
So many variations:
Romance: This nice Photoshop you use here. Would be a shame if you don't pay us $20/month, and no longer continue your photography business?
Action: This nice gaming console you bought from us. Would you want to be able to play online games, you know the ones free on the PC? We are generous, just $5/month would do it.
Suspense: This nice Tesla is a good looking car. Maybe you can pay us $10,000 up front for our beta software. You know, we will make it a monthly payment in the future, right?
Ah.. the stories..
Yuck (Score:2)
This is why I avoid cloud based services. Eventually they decide to monetize you. HP does it with printer ink now which is why we stopped buying HP at the business level
OK, time to switch to a laser cutter! (Score:2)
Guys, seriously... Don't buy cheap hardware. If it is cheap, it is either shit, or the company is selling at a loss and expecting to make up with that by the cost of consumables and/or software use.
Everything about their business model is awful (Score:5, Informative)
Vinyl cutters have been around for quite a while in the sign industry. Cricut just puts a "friendly" face on them and markets them toward home crafters. They don't look "industrial" and fit in a "craft room."
Even supplies for them are outrageously overpriced. You can buy small rolls of vinyl at the craft store that measure about a foot by three feet for more than I pay for a 10 yard roll of 15" vinyl from sign supply stores.
You can get an entry-level industrial vinyl cutter for about $400. That's more than the entry-level Cricut, but about the same as the fancier models. But, this machine will cut material much larger, and not be locked down to single owner only.
https://signwarehouse.com/prod... [signwarehouse.com]
It just won't look as "cute" sitting in the corner of your dining room.
We own one... (Score:2)
If my wife hits an issue like this, her response will be to throw it out and spend our money on a competing device. Our Cricut machine has been gathering dust for a while.
Don't trust the cloud. (Score:2)
There is no reason the cricut or it's software ever had to depend on the cloud other than that the manufacturer wanted it that way. It's not that the task at hand required more power than a typical desktop PC could muster, the process of translating a design into low level instructions to the machine (known as ripping in the old printing world or slicing in the 3D printing world) can easily be managed on the desktop without phoning home.
I believe TFA makes it amply clear WHY the wanted it that way, though h
Re:Default responses. (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
This is slashdot where people read neither the story or the summary. Complaining about "low effort" is rather ironic in that context. And the point wasn't about being incorrect. It's about being predictable.
Re: (Score:2)
You can predict nearly all the responses here. Anything about social media/Tesla/Apple or Elon Musk for that matter will be nothing but bitching and moaning. New technology is also met with complaints and responses about something being wrong, because some random slashdot commentor is surely an expert in the field. Now something from AMD will get a few responses and Intel will get more way more complaints no matter what its about. There was a story recently about the new hard drive line from Seagate and peo
Re: (Score:2)
Honest questions, from a fellow fan of Rothbard:
Would you consider fraud to be equivalent to, and/or a form of, coercion?
Also, if a state-chartered, limited-liability corporation initiates force and/or fraud, but is protected by the state from the natural consequences of having done so, does this also constitute fraud and/or coercion on the part of the state?
I believe Dr. Rothbard would have answered yes to both, and I would as well, but, since you seem to equate any protest over this state of affairs with
Re:Default responses. (Score:5, Funny)
This is Slashdot where the story is "Man bites dog".
Except, nobody was actually bitten.
And it was a cat.
Re:Default responses. (Score:5, Insightful)
This is slashdot...the point wasn't about being incorrect. It's about being predictable.
Well, a first post that contributed absolutely nothing to the discussion was indeed predictable.
Re: (Score:2)
This is slashdot where people read neither the story or the summary. Complaining about "low effort" is rather ironic in that context. And the point wasn't about being incorrect. It's about being predictable.
I read the story yesterday on Hackaday. It's not entirely clear what Cricut officially did, some of it is hearsay and a bit of panic/anger at the notion that Cricut would find a way to be an even more closed, proprietary system than they already are.
ever see the documentary "Runaway"? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Don't forget about "right to repair" and "right of first sale". I think Louis Rossman is working on a video now. :) I better email him.
Re: (Score:3)
I"m wondering how long till a hack is out that will allow you to bypass the motherships and get it to run...or someone sets up open source open access servers that serve as an alternate to the company one and allow you to use it as you please?
Re:Default responses. (Score:5, Funny)
*snert*
Re: (Score:2)
Corporations have become "The People" mentioned in the Constitution.
What does that make humans? The means of production.
All that is left to figure out is whether the government owns us, or if the corporations will just own us directly.
Re: (Score:2)
Changing the terms of (or not honoring) an agreement would be considered fraud, not Capitalism.
That's a nice theory, but almost every "agreement" has a clause stating that its terms can be changed at any time. So there is technically no fraud, and also there are effectively no "mutual benefits". The buyer is simply subject to the whims of the proprietor, who is the sole beneficiary of the "agreement".
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
"A day at the races"?
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Can "cutting machines" be used on corporate lawyers?
Re: (Score:3)
As long as you flatten them first.
Re:Default responses. (Score:4, Funny)
( off to the Maker shop to build a Raspberry Pi-driven automated steamroller. . . .)
Re: (Score:2)
Don't forget you have to drain the liquids and dehydrate them a bit first.
Re: (Score:3)
Only on dissidents (Score:2)
Isn't there a Saudi prince who has licensed one of these machines?
Re: (Score:2)
Why would you need to cut ashes?
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Default responses. (Score:5, Interesting)
The Used market is good for the economy on the whole, however it is often trouble for the individual company.
After I left college, I worked for a consulting firm that specialized in deploying "Experience" (Aka Used) Sun Hardware. After the .COM bubble popped there was a lot of Good Sun Equipment (Really the gold standard for Enterprise hardware at the time) much of it never left the box, as the companies folded before they got to deploy the hardware. So they liquidated their hardware in which we would resell and offer professional consulting services around them. Sun Microsystems didn't care for that, as they would rather sell new hardware, and for some places they had changed their contracts to force them to dispose of good equipment vs reselling it.
If you are a company that makes products, you want to sell more of them. However for products there is often a longer life in the resell market. As a product which may not be useful for one person may be useful for someone else. This seems to them in their world view as a loss sale of a product. But it is more of a case where the person getting the Used Product probably wouldn't be getting your product new anyways,
Most companies are so focused on themselves, they are not looking at the bigger picture, and they are so obsessed with themselves that they fail to see that while people may like their products, not everyone likes it enough to buy it at full price.
Also If you want someone to buy the new product, let them resell it. So they may have the money to buy the new version, and the person who had gotten the cheaper product may decide to save up for a new one in the future.
Re:Default responses. (Score:5, Insightful)
I wonder how many of those Sun-discouraged/blocked used hardware sales wound up becoming Wintel companies (or were speeded along in that direction) because the price of new Sun gear wasn't cost effective for them anymore.
It sounds like Sun shrunk their own business footprint needlessly, thus hastening their own demise.
Really, no company is managed with a business horizon that doesn't boil down to the executive team's own short horizon personal compensation. And of course this becomes a race to the bottom that only seems to produce ever-shorter term thinking. Execs once OK with 5 or 3 year payouts now look for the biggest payout this year, next year be damned.
Re: (Score:2)
And that's why Apple phones can't be repaired by independent repair shops.
Re: (Score:2)
If it's cloud, that's going to happen (Score:3)
> running the cloud service for free forever isn't as profitable as they want.
Which is entirely predictable, by anyone thinking of buying a device. If you pay attention to that. Employing people to keep the service running well forever with little to no revenue just isn't sustainable.
Anything you're thinking of buying, if it requires the manufacturer's web site / web service in order to use it, it's going to go offline at some point. If the web service is free, it's probably going to go offline or becom
Re: If it's cloud, that's going to happen (Score:2)
What does this statement mean for those âoelifetimeââ(TM)online drive and vpn subscription services that are out there?
Re: (Score:2)
Well, "lifetime" must mean the lifetime of the offer/service, huh.
Because they aren't going to stay in business long once the cost of servicing those "lifetime" customers exceeds the revenue from new customers each month.
Will fail when exponential growth stops (Score:2)
Lwt me be more explicit.
Such a business model requires new sales each month to cover the monthly costs.*
That means each month they charge new "lifetime" subscribers.
That means costs increase each month.
That means each month they need a greater number of new subscriptions to cover the higher costs.
The business will be losing money and in the process of going out of business as soon as the rate of new subscriptions stops growing. The possible exception to that would be if their costs decrease each month desp
Re: (Score:2)
They didn't learn from other printer companies and they made the hardware too reliable. It's supposed to break down after just a few years to generate new hardware sales.
Re:Was just about to order one (Score:4, Informative)
Yeah, Silhouette would be the preferred brand for me. I've had a Silhouette Cameo for several years, and have been totally happy with it. Silhouette's software isn't the greatest, but it's serviceable, and for those that want to do a bit more with them, there's an Inkscape extension [github.com] to allow you to print to the cutter.
Re: (Score:2)
There are quite a few cutting machines out there, check out the supported device list for the open source InkCut (https://github.com/inkcut/inkcut):
https://www.codelv.com/project... [codelv.com]
Re: (Score:2)
That's really where all this breaks down. The cheaper machines are pretty awesome for crafting but once you start wanting to go business scale, you run into these kinds of issues. Likely the industrial versions of these machines cost 3x the price and essentially do the same thing but without forced Internet and SaaS designing tools.