Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Robotics United States

Tyson Bets On Robots To Tackle Meat Industry's Worker Shortage (bloomberg.com) 63

At Tyson's 26,000-square-foot, multi-million dollar Manufacturing Automation Center near its headquarters in Springdale, Arkansas, the company will apply the latest advances in machine learning to meat manufacturing, with the goal of eventually eliminating jobs that can be physically demanding, highly repetitive and at times dangerous. Bloomberg reports: Advances in technology are making it possible to make strides in automation. For example, machine vision is now accurate and speedy enough to apply to meat production, which is highly labor intensive compared with other food manufacturing. Also, a lot of washing and sanitizing occurs in a meat-packing plant, which has traditionally been difficult on robots, but now the machines are built to withstand that. At Tyson's new facility, a series of laboratories showcase different types of robots. Mechanical arms in glass cases use smart cameras to sort colorful objects or stack items. In another room, a larger machine called a palletizer performs stacking tasks. There's also a training space.

Many of the types of robots that a meatpacking plant would need are not on the market currently, so the company needs to innovate and collaborate with partners to create them, said Doug Foreman, a director in engineering at Tyson. But the technology is ready. The processing capabilities of cameras are "so advanced even from a few years ago," Foreman said. "Processing-speed-wise, it's there now for us."

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Tyson Bets On Robots To Tackle Meat Industry's Worker Shortage

Comments Filter:
  • I don't know, I think if we use robots for the meat industry it would take the cruelty out of it.

    A lot of the "meat is murder" nuts fail to consider that
    - what drives meat consumption is not the marketing, but the availability
    - if cheaper alternatives exist (Eg plant based meat, lab-grown meat), people would pick that over factory farmed meat only if it provides the same texture and taste as actual meat

    Humans are not designed to subsist only on vegetables, you can if you are really really good about what yo

    • by fermion ( 181285 )
      The current structure does provide cheap meat like product though anyone who says what you get from McDonalds or Chick-fil-A is meat clearly has never had real fresh meat. People are conditioned to accept this cheap available foodstuff as a reasonable facsimile

      Meat processing is a very hard job that is very dangerous People who can do other things or get welfare do so. That leaves immigrants.

    • Humans are not designed to subsist only on vegetables

      Uh wrong. We are omnivores. It is QUITE easy for us to be vegetarians. What is NOT easy is picking the right combination of veggies to make sure that you get all your amino acids, esp. in western markets.

      Sadly, the hardest job in this industry, is the kill floor and there is NO getting away from that. And those that work it, it tends to ..... change them. When you walk by these ppl, you KNOW who is working the kill floor. The look in the eyes spoke loudly.
      I have to wonder, how many Dexters are created

      • Bullshit.

        It is damn hard to be a veg-o-nut and be healthy. We are not meant to live on plants only. We are meant to have a well balanced diet that includes both meat and vegs.

        "Hardest job" is being an actual human that knows where there food comes from? Fuck off. That is half the problem with modern society and why we do not treat animals humanely. If we all had to kill at least some of our food every year the world would be a better place as we would not allow half the shit that big corps do for the sake o
        • Don't say "Bullshit" just because your world view is limited to your small corner of it. There are hundreds of millions of people in the world that are pure vegetarian. If we were talking about vegan or fruitarian there would be a point.

          But vegetarian is actually very easy! A good chuck of India easily subsides on wheat/rice, yogurt, beans, lentils, and leafy greens. Just pick 3 in there and you completed your body requirements. The last three of which are easy to grow.

          Even China, until 3 decades ago,

          • A good chuck of India easily subsides on wheat/rice, yogurt, beans, lentils, and leafy greens.

            And the insects that contaminate them, without which they'd suffer from pernicious anemia, a horrible, brain-damaging, deficiency of vitamin B-12.

            The problems for isn't just proteins. Vitamins are also all necessary, and B-12 is a particular problem. It is manufactured ONLY by bacteria and archaea (another class of not-quite-bacteria microbes) and humans don't get enough from their own intestinal flora or the tra

            • by orlanz ( 882574 )

              I think you are mixing up vegitarians and vegans. B12 deficiency is a general problem all around the world. Its especially bad in India, but not necessarily related to your diet group. More to do with nutrition issue in general, veg or non-veg. But vegans do have to keep an eye on it. Other nations have this issue too. The US solves this problem with lots of "fortified" foods; and that is the general recommendation all over the world. Rather than load up on excess of all the other vitamens, minerals,

            • And the insects that contaminate them, without which they'd suffer from pernicious anemia, a horrible, brain-damaging, deficiency of vitamin B-12.

              LOL. Thank you for the good laugh. Insects are NOT providing vegetarians with large amounts of B-12.
              HOWEVER, one thing about get a degree in Microbiology, is that you have to take lots of Food science (yogurt, beer, mead, cheese, wine, etc just to name a few). But, part of food science is knowing what you do NOT want in your food. Humorously, all those spices and teas that we obtain from poorer nations? ALL of them have rat droppings, insects, various pesticides, poisons, etc. Thankfully, it is small amou

          • A good chuck of India easily subsides on wheat/rice, yogurt, beans, lentils, and leafy greens. Just pick 3 in there and you completed your body requirements. The last three of which are easy to grow.

            Even China, until 3 decades ago, the vast majority lived primarily on non-animal foods.

            Life expectancy in India is #135 out of 191 countries.

            https://www.worldometers.info/... [worldometers.info]

            I'm sure it is not all down to diet, but it is a fair question to ask if a more diverse diet would make it better or worse. We need not even discuss life expectancy in the 1600s as most people died young enough that diet probably did not matter either way.

            • Let's not go down that path. Because the correlation actually leans toward vegetarians. But actual measurement of cause effect is heavily muddied by a ton of other factors.

              https://www.livestrong.com/art... [livestrong.com]

              Basically you can have perfectly healthy vegetarians and non-veg. Looking at the science, a vegetarian who eats greasy French fries all day isn't going to be healthy. A meat eater who doesn't offset his cholesterol intake with exercise is going to face a number of cancer and heart health risks.

              I would say

              • I skimmed the study under discussion.

                https://academic.oup.com/ajcn/... [oup.com]

                No question the fact that the countries with the highest life expectancies tend toward higher meat consumption and the lowest life expectancy countries tend toward less is much too simple and comparing meat eaters to non meat eaters in specific societies is a better methodology. However other studies have come to the opposite conclusions.

                https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/p... [nih.gov]

                There are so many factors to control for that I'm not sure I'd read

    • by thomst ( 1640045 )

      Kisai misstated:

      Humans are not designed to subsist only on vegetables ...

      Humans are not designed, period.

      We evolved as savannah-based omnivores - more specifically, as nomadic hunter-gatherers, well-adapted to eat anything that wasn't actively poisonous.

      Oh, and a diet of corn and beans - along with supplements to provide necessary trace elements - provides a human with all the essential amino acids needed to survive and thrive. The same is true of a diet that consists exclusively of whole-grain rice ...

  • by newslash.formatblows ( 2011678 ) on Friday July 10, 2020 @10:24PM (#60285364)
    Just me?
  • by Waffle Iron ( 339739 ) on Friday July 10, 2020 @10:41PM (#60285392)

    All will be well and good unless the robots start to take on an expansive interpretation of their jobs of producing meat. Then they might run amok and turn on their creators, slaughtering them all and turning them into cold cuts and sausages with ruthless efficiency.

  • ... machine vision is now accurate and speedy enough to apply to meat production

    In physics we have the spherical cow [briankoberlein.com]. So maybe to make things easier to process, Tyson is casting about looking for a normalized-sized triangular chicken?

  • Excellent! (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Gravis Zero ( 934156 ) on Friday July 10, 2020 @11:50PM (#60285502)

    Any job that can be done by a machine should be done by a machine.

    • Gravis Zero is secretly an advanced 'posting' AI at Google HQ. No need to worry; he'll be canceled at the next earnings release.

  • by h33t l4x0r ( 4107715 ) on Saturday July 11, 2020 @12:08AM (#60285542)
    Robots learning how to butcher and package organic life forms for consumption means we can now move on to that stage of the apocalypse.
  • Comment removed (Score:4, Insightful)

    by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Saturday July 11, 2020 @12:29AM (#60285594)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • They should just hire a bunch of expendable scabs like they do when people go on strike over shitty pay and shitty working conditions.
    • They can't hire scans. Trump has blocked all legal immigration and illegals have turned away.

      Europe is denying travel, next up so omeone will stop a lot traf r with us. As be we are to sick to trust.

      Then the economy folds and the world goes on without us.

    • Unions are funny. They once did a GREAT job/work in America. BUT, a good example of a fuckup was at Monfort's which allowed the union, and was paying $12-38/hr back in the early 80s. That $12 as a starting wage was above a minimum wage of $4.35. Nearly 3x the federal level. And yet, that was not good enough for the union. They wanted to increase the pay a great deal. That is why unions today kill themselves.
    • Why don't you go and sign up to work for them if you feel so strongly about it?

      The meat packing plants are some of the worst COVID-19 infection sites in the US and you're complaining about the workers demanding a safer workplace. The workers are dying because of their unsafe workplace and spreading the virus throughout the community. The POTUS has made them go back to work and given the plant owners immunity from liability. All so that you can have your steak or chicken wings like everything is normal.

      Peopl

  • No way! We can just forbid people to go to work, ban automation, and pass legislation that will make meat appear magically, to be bought by the magic stimulus dollars. Because that's how economics works!

    Anyone who objects is just a hateuh. Probably racist too, somehow.

Love may laugh at locksmiths, but he has a profound respect for money bags. -- Sidney Paternoster, "The Folly of the Wise"

Working...