iFixit Pulls Galaxy Fold Teardown At Samsung's Request (theverge.com) 76
An anonymous reader quotes a report from The Verge: What in the world is going on over at Samsung in the wake of the Galaxy Fold delay? The whole situation keeps refusing to normalize, and instead gets weirder nearly every day. The latest is that iFixit has decided to honor a Samsung request to pull its Galaxy Fold teardown off the internet, even though Samsung apparently didn't ask iFixit to do so directly. This oddity follows AT&T's seemingly arbitrary decision to email a potential ship date for the Galaxy Fold despite the fact that Samsung hasn't officially set a new release date. By requesting that iFixit pull the teardown, Samsung is apparently willing to risk the Streisand effect when it comes to people clamoring to see the innards of its device. Here's what iFixit has to say on the matter: "We were provided our Galaxy Fold unit by a trusted partner. Samsung has requested, through that partner, that iFixit remove its teardown. We are under no obligation to remove our analysis, legal or otherwise. But out of respect for this partner, whom we consider an ally in making devices more repairable, we are choosing to withdraw our story until we can purchase a Galaxy Fold at retail."
no Streisand effect. (Score:4, Informative)
The Streisand effect is triggered by perceived bad faith demands. Since only a request was made, there is little chance of this being contorted into a Streisand affair.
Re: (Score:3)
Are you worried that you can't repair an unreleased product? The page will be irrelevant for the new iteration (that will also fail - don't get me wrong). And they'll need to get new press for the new teardown.
Make no mistake, the main reason they do teardowns is for right to repair advocacy - not circuit porn.
Re: no Streisand effect. (Score:1)
That
Re:no Streisand effect. (Score:5, Insightful)
They agreed because their partner violated an agreement with Samsung. Although iFixit isn't a party to this agreement, this partner is a friend that could be sued by Samsung - iFixit is helping out a friend.
Re:no Streisand effect. (Score:4, Interesting)
And it sounds like they reached out to that partner rather than iFixit as sort of a "We know it was you" statement.
Re:no Streisand effect. (Score:4)
Why exactly didn't they say FU to Samsung?
Because they weren't in conversation with Samsung. They were instead engaged with someone whose reputation and trust they chose not to betray.
I respect that, and indeed feel it demonstrates more integrity, quite the opposite of
anything from them going forward should be considered suspect
You are Wrong (Score:2)
Re: You are Wrong (Score:1)
The only people who got these phones were journalists and reviewers. None have been sold to paying customers.
Re: (Score:2)
I don't know. I generally don't have any interest in Samsung phones because I hate Android and would never buy a phone running it. Now, however, I want more than anything to see the inside of a Galaxy Fold. Dammit!
Mirror ... (Score:2)
So ... anyone has a mirror of that page ?
Re:Mirror ... (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Nice try, but they've only mirrored the takedown notice. Or the older version has been removed there.
Re: (Score:2)
The link worked for me
Re: (Score:2)
Must only be working intermittently. I got "Got an HTTP 307 response at crawl time" the last time I tried, but it did work right now.
Re: (Score:2)
I wonder how long that will last. :P
Re: (Score:1)
This is good - it allows them time to fix their device.
A teardown of the device after the issue is resolved should happen.
It's the right thing to do (Score:5, Insightful)
Agreed (Score:1)
I think it would be more of an issue if it were a released product, but since it was a pre-release I don't see a problem with it.
Re: (Score:2)
While Samsung obviously goofed, I'm glad iFixit honored the request. There is such a thing as honor.
Now could someone just crack iFixit and steal the research? Isn't that the crux of the late Glen Frey's "Dirty Laundry"? Is the head dead yet?
Re: (Score:2)
I'm glad iFixit honored the request. There is such a thing as honor.
If they had that, I somehow bet they wouldn't have sent out review units. I just can't imagine that they realistically tested this internally.
Re: (Score:2)
The race to be first has time-honored results. Bypassing QA to be first is hugely tempting, the damage done.
Will the competition learn from this mistake? Certainly. Will we see what iFixit and the journalists saw? Never. Making the same mistake twice under these circumstances would be suicidal. Each subsequent release will be scrutinized with a microscopic examination, and rightly so.
Re: (Score:2)
Sure, I guess. They were the first ones to start the hype over it - if they hadn't started hyping the idea so much there wouldn't even be a race. The fact that Huawei will likely be first to market - and with a better product makes it all a joke. But I have strong doubts that folding phones are any more than a very short-lived fad.
Re: (Score:2)
We agree. The next foldables will take root, however. Gone will be magazines and newspapers, and we'll become swipers like nothing before.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The same Apple that doesn't put strain relief on power cords because it doesn't look pretty? Yes. But Apple would just pretend the problem didn't exist and release it to the public anyway.
Re: (Score:1)
Pissing on a partner over a minor issue would be short-sighted.
I agree that this is the right thing for iFixit to do.
But I really have to wonder what boneheaded idiocy was going through the brain of whomever at this "trusted partner", that a hardware device given to iFixit, wouldn't end up posted on iFixit!
What possible other options did they think would happen? What could possibly have been said to make them think this wouldn't happen?
There is literally one alternative possible here, and that would be for the partner to explicitly ask iFixit to not do what iFixit doe
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
This seems strangely reasonable (Score:5, Insightful)
"We don't have to do it, but we want to so one of our friends (and perhaps ultimately us) doesn't get screwed."
You rarely see behavior that reasonable these days.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, it's weird that eminently reasonable, dare I say polite, behavior seems so out of the ordinary nowadays. I was already prepped for a barrage of knee-jerk extremists posts, the requisite politics posts, and other nonsense. Well done iFixit.
Re:This seems strangely reasonable (Score:5, Insightful)
Option 1: "we've been asked by a third party to take down our article. NFW!! They'll have to screw us with lawyers first!!! NEVAR!!!"
Result: Lawyers get involved, DMCA, C&D, and lots of other acronyms. IFixit and their partner maybe go out of business since Samsung has vastly deeper pockets. Ugly all around. No one wins.
Option 2: Samsung issues C&D letter without prior notice.
Result: again, bad.
Option 3: Samsung asks nicely. iFixit responds reasonably.
Result: Samsung gets a chance to have its actual product reviewed rather than a pre-release version; iFixit strengthens its relationship with the unnamed 3rd party *as well as* Samsung; Unnamed 3rd party doesn't get egg on its face; the right to repair movement remains strong and perhaps gets stronger through more PR. Everyone wins in a civil exchange.
Moral of the story --- in business, as with much of life, start out with a friendly inquiry before reaching for the nuclear option.
Re: (Score:2)
Except I think the third party has screwed their relationship with Samsung. They won't be getting pre-release devices to test ever again. All this means is they won't get sued to oblivion for violating their NDA.
Re: (Score:2)
"We don't have to do it, but we want to so one of our friends (and perhaps ultimately us) doesn't get screwed."
You rarely see behavior that reasonable these days.
You could argue that it would be reasonable for iFixit to take it down even without the request. Since it's unlikely that Samsung will now release it in the state that they tore down, it could just serve to muddy the waters once/if it is actually released.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I specifically buy Samsung for their innovation. And specifically their modifications to android.
So you love largely useless bloatware that you cannot uninstall taking up a good chunk of storage in your phone. Okay.
Predicting a Huge Flop (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It's going to be a flop because they're absolutely in denial that their flexible screen tech will ever make sense in a folding screen. It simply won't work well that way. They invented curved TVs just because they had to find some excuse for the existence of their flexible display panels when they hadn't created their folding device yet. With the TV, all it did was distort the picture when viewed head-on and catch glare from more angles than ever. Very few people bought big enough TVs and sat close enou
Re: (Score:2)
To your list, I would add capacitor plague and T-Con board failures. :-/
Re: (Score:2)
It's always been the case that the complex mechanical bits that are used daily wear out fast. This was the case with old flip phones, stretching a semi-rigid crystalline structure is bound to break, if nothing else it will eventually fatigue and snap. That's why the iPhone was partially such a huge success.
First hand reasoning on iFixit's website (Score:5, Informative)
After two days of intense public interest, iFixit has removed our teardown of Samsung’s Galaxy Fold. That analysis supported our suspicions that the device provided insufficient protection from debris damaging the screen.
We were provided our Galaxy Fold unit by a trusted partner. Samsung has requested, through that partner, that iFixit remove its teardown. We are under no obligation to remove our analysis, legal or otherwise. But out of respect for this partner, whom we consider an ally in making devices more repairable, we are choosing to withdraw our story until we can purchase a Galaxy Fold at retail.
Our team appreciated the chance to look inside this ambitious device. All new products face challenges—this one perhaps more than most. We’re grateful to have shared a glimpse of how Samsung’s engineers addressed some of those challenges, and we look forward to sharing more as soon as possible.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Compromised (Score:4, Insightful)
Really? It sounds like they found a fatal flaw in a pre-release product and have withdrawn the post until the manufacture releases the fixed product at a delayed launch date. This is fair considering if what they found causes the manufacture to redesign part of the product then the tear down article can't serve it's intended purpose of showing how to work on the product. Now they are not only supplying you with accurate information for repairs they are also forcing manufactures to build better products.
Re: (Score:2)
Streisung (Score:2)
Respect gained (Score:1)
Samsung gains some respect from me for not trying to get legal on this thing.
iFixit gains some respect from me for being respectful, polite, and considerate.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Nice gesture (Score:1)