Moving To a Chromebook (avc.com) 235
VC Fred Wilson writes: I've been thinking about moving from a Mac to a Chromebook as my primary computing device. I have not used desktop software for probably a decade now. The browser is how I do all of my desktop computing. Paying up for a full blown computer when all I need is a browser seems like a waste. And there are some security things that appeal to me about a Chromebook. I like the ability to do two factor authentication on signing into the device, for example. I am curious what advice those of you who use Chromebooks have for me. In the comments section, Kevin C Tofel, a long time journalist and an ex-Googler writes: I'm all on in Chromebooks, currently using a Pixelbook. Base model is fine for my needs, which sound very similar. I am taking some CompSci classes but even from a programming standpoint, the addition of Linux running in containers -- available in Dev and Beta channels now, coming to Stable v. 69 in the coming weeks -- fills that need easily and securely. I don't do a bunch of video editing but I can do audio edits in Audacity for Linux once audio support arrives for Linux on Chrome OS.
I actually use Google for my password management. It's built in to Chrome / Chrome OS and syncs to all devices. Plus, you can always log in and look up passwords at passwords.google.com. Sure if Google is hacked, someone has my passwords, but same can be said for any cloud-based password manager or (if you run 1Password, etc... locally) if someone gains access to your device. I use Google's 2FA to log in to my Google account and even to log in to my Pixelbook - can be done with an authenticator app, SMS or -- my preferred method -- a Yubikey. I'l be buying a Google Titan Security key to replace my Yubikey once they go on sale.
I actually use Google for my password management. It's built in to Chrome / Chrome OS and syncs to all devices. Plus, you can always log in and look up passwords at passwords.google.com. Sure if Google is hacked, someone has my passwords, but same can be said for any cloud-based password manager or (if you run 1Password, etc... locally) if someone gains access to your device. I use Google's 2FA to log in to my Google account and even to log in to my Pixelbook - can be done with an authenticator app, SMS or -- my preferred method -- a Yubikey. I'l be buying a Google Titan Security key to replace my Yubikey once they go on sale.
"Well respected" (Score:4, Insightful)
The summary begins with the words 'well respected' but the river of garbage immediately below leads me to believe that they're only respected by Google's sales department, and that's only the kind of fawning service a whale receives rather than respect.
Re: (Score:2)
The summary begins with the words 'well respected'
Looks like the summary got edited, since it doesn't start with that any more.
Re: (Score:2)
Oh, that must be why it's just a river of garbage now.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
On Facebook's censorship of conservative views which Slashdot will not cover because it was purchased by the same big group of political interests.
Or it's not covered because it's not interesting, not news for nerds, and not stuff that matters.
If you don't like it you're free to take your business elsewhere.
There are no articles on non-liberal shadowbanning here and never will be.
No articles on pixie dust here. Sometimes we talk about unicorns though, so you got us there.
ZIP
Re: (Score:3)
not news for nerds, and not stuff that matters.
TFA is not news for nerds either. A Chromebook is fine if all you want is a browser-in-a-box. But it is inappropriate for almost anyone who wants to create anything digital.
Also, how dense do you have to be to need 10 years to figure out that a computer at a tenth the price of a MacBook is good enough to meet all your needs?
Disclaimer: I bought a Chromebook for my kid. When he breaks it, I am only out $149.
Re: (Score:2)
And since the first thing he says is
I have not used desktop software for probably a decade now
which makes all that follows perfectly appropriate.
Why gamers and content producers read "a Chromebook suits my purposes" and are still threatened enough by that to post a rant eludes me.
Re: (Score:2)
Google is way better about regular security fixes than any of the other vendors. But even they have limits as to how many devices they can actively support at any given time
Maybe but the Chromebook Pixel is Google's own device. They wrote all the hardware specs. How hard would it be to backport their drivers to a new kernel (if that's what's necessary)? What else could possibly become obsolete? Are they really saying they see the Chrome browser becoming so bloated that the Pixel doesn't have enough RAM? Or that the CPU is so slow that it won't be able to render web pages?
This sounds like planned obsolescence, plain and simple. Not only does it encourage current Chromebook user
Re: (Score:2)
This is the shit that gets +4 insightful...?! No wonder /. is dying.
It's interesting to people who aren't shills and/or retards.
It's news to people who don't have their heads firmly lodged up the MSM's fake-news ASS.
It's stuff that matters to adults.
This isn't 4chan. you don't get to be anonymous and non-anonymous at the same time.
YES
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
As opposed to the US where we've repeatedly had a choice between two truly awful candidates.
Re: (Score:2)
As opposed to the US where we've repeatedly had a choice between two truly awful candidates.
If you think there were only two candidates, you are the problem.
Re: (Score:2)
Actually, if you think there were more than two viable candidates, you are the problem (assuming you voted for a 3rd).
Re:"Well respected" (Score:4, Insightful)
Actually, if you think there were more than two viable candidates ...
You refuse to vote for them because they are not viable, yet they are not viable because people like you refuse to vote for them. Ergo, you are the problem.
It is silly to vote for what you don't want, and then complain when you get it.
Re: (Score:2)
Donald Trump is president. If you live in Michigan, Wisconsin or Pennsylvania, you're the problem. Lesser of two evils is less evil.
Re: (Score:2)
>"You refuse to vote for them because they are not viable, yet they are not viable because people like you refuse to vote for them. Ergo, you are the problem. It is silly to vote for what you don't want, and then complain when you get it."
The problem is the voting SYSTEM. It is the system that creates a two-party-only system and prevents any real change. So yes, most of us DO end up voting for what we don't want because it end up being the "lesser of two evils". We can't necessarily vote for who we w
Re: (Score:2)
>"I voted green because I wanted to vote for someone who supports internet freedom and a better world. If you voted Trump or Clinton but you want a free internet you did it wrong."
Because of the spoiler effect of our system:
If you voted Green, you actually voted for Trump.
If you voted Libertarian, you actually voted for Hillary.
If you voted Constitution, you actually voted for Hillary.
Re: "Well respected" (Score:4, Insightful)
Fox News is the largest news outlet yet you are far more likely to see CNN content on Google.
You idiots are sleepwalking into Nazism.
Spyware by default (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Google collects the exact same amount of data if you are using Google Chrome.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, I was wondering about the use of "two factor authentication" when you already handed over all your information.
Other than as a last-ditch backup, I have no need for cloud-based anything. And if you are doing everything browser-based, then why not get a tablet and add a keyboard and just borrow real computers and login to this browser computing world? It seems like going back to the terminal model like in the1980s.
I mean, it's good if browsers and these thin clients are good enough to do what you want
Re: (Score:2)
Other than as a last-ditch backup, I have no need for cloud-based anything.
Unless you're collaborating with a co-worker or client or whatever in another city. In that case, would you instead pay to lease a VPS to host your source code repositories, file drops, chat servers, etc.? Is that still "cloud"?
And if you are doing everything browser-based, then why not get a tablet and add a keyboard
True, you could buy a tablet, a keyboard, and a case to hold the tablet and keyboard in place while you are using both on your lap. People suggested this sort of workaround back in fourth quarter 2012 when manufacturers discontinued 10" netbooks [slashdot.org]. But the combination of these can prov
My views have changed recently (Score:3)
My views on Chomebooks have changed recently. My oldest kid starts middle school this Septermber, and the school recommends that every student gets a Chromebook. They have a deal where you can get a Chromebook and a comprehensive warranty for a good deal, so we got one. I'm a software developer, and I'm pretty impressed with how well it runs. 4GB of RAM and 32 GB of storage plus room for an SD card makes it a reasonably capable machine for most computing tasks.Add to this the news that you'll be able to run full Linux applications on the Chromebook, and I can see this being a very enticing offer for many people. I'm strongly considering getting one when my tablet finally bites the dust. I don' have a laptop, because I still prefer an actual desktop for development and other heavy computing tasks. I think I could meet all my computing needs with just a desktop and a chromebook. I'd never give up a desktop with a real keyboard and large screen, but getting stuff done on the small screen of a laptop, even if it's 17 inches feels like there is never enough space. So I might as well use my desktop for anything that's programming or requires a large screen and then just use a Chromebook with a 11 or 13 inch screen for the basic web browsing and media consumption.
Re:My views have changed recently (Score:4, Insightful)
The PC era (one personal computer) is over and we can all afford multiple devices and cloud services. These questions around, “is device X a real computer” died like all the arguments about whether iPads were or weren’t for real serious work, also died.
Every device is potentially useful and it is just a question of one’s life and work habits. For example, I have no interest in wearables. But I do love my little projects in high-end-ish 3D modelling software (and these days a decent desktop with large screen is fine for my small projects). I also sit on the sofa a lot and the desktop is in another room, so a tablet is essential, but I never take it out of the house as, essentially, I do not commute on trains, but if I did, I would take it out a lot. And all work is on a laptop, again, because various reasons.
IOW, lots of little lifestyle quirks. Every device has potential, and we are way past the day when a computer has to do everything in order to succeed in the market.
Re: (Score:2)
While I personally believe there is room in my life for various levels of compute and limited function devices, I do not know that the hardware makers and the consumers that support them will see things that way.
There's not a lot of profit in the PC market, whereas the ipad/wearable/consumer toy market is fairly high margin. It wouldn't surprise me if general purpose computers suffered at their hands. And honestly most consumers really don't need or want it, so it probably won't go down with a lot of fight.
Some people still claim they can't afford a PC (Score:2)
we can all afford multiple devices and cloud services.
To which "we [...] all" do you refer, especially prior to tax-funded basic income? I still see people in various chat rooms complaining that they can't do this or that in an application's mobile version and have no way to afford "a computer" to work around it. Granted, many of them are still in high school or college.
Re: (Score:2)
Add to this the news that you'll be able to run full Linux applications on the Chromebook, and I can see this being a very enticing offer for many people.
But don't buy one until you know that the model you're buying has a new enough kernel to support Crostini (the container allowing what you call "full Linux applications"). Otherwise, you may end up disappointed. (See "Linux Apps Are Not Coming To Many Still-Supported Chromebooks" [slashdot.org] from last week.)
I use Chromebook for 90% of my needs (Score:4)
Personally almost all I use is Chromebook. Occasionally I need to tweak a graphic or Word document which I can do via tVNC on my old desktop.
For work I use Citrix to get into my desktop. My storage is 95% in Google Docs. When the Linux windows come out I'll be set there.
The only things I really want beyond quality desktop office and graphic apps that don't have a huge monthly cost (I'm looking at you Microsoft and Adobe) is better Android support. There's a few apps and games I really wish ran better on my system. Maybe a better gamepad interface. But that's more on the game producers.
Re: (Score:3)
However when you actually need to produce something, be non-passive, be a creator, you need something more than a chrome book. By you're own admission, a 20 year old PC running windows 95 is better than a Chromebook when it comes to being a producer..
Re: (Score:2)
He said his storage is 90% Google Docs, i.e. he creates documents on Google Docs. For basic video editing you can do it with YouTube. Photo editing can be done online. Some of the online stuff can even be more powerful, e.g. there is no desktop solution for automatic subtitles on videos that is close to what YouTube offers.
The divide is more between people who want all their stuff stored locally and those who are happy to live in the cloud.
Re: (Score:2)
Expensive to VNC from public transit (Score:3)
Occasionally I need to tweak a graphic or Word document which I can do via tVNC on my old desktop.
For work I use Citrix to get into my desktop.
But can you work through these remote access methods on your bus/train commute, where you don't have Wi-Fi? If not, then you'd have to include a mobile broadband subscription in the total cost of owning a Chromebook. Furthermore, if all home ISPs in your area use carrier-grade NAT, as Bert64 mentioned is the case in Myanmar [slashdot.org], you'll also have to subscribe to a VPN tunnel so your desktop can receive VNC connections while you're away from home.
Re: (Score:2)
So is "my old desktop" a Chromebook too?
The only reason to do it is to save money (Score:5, Interesting)
I did it 4 years ago when my macbook air died and I didn't really have the money to buy a new one. So I switched to a chromebook, and an android phone.
If you remember that Apple builds computers/phones/systems to profit from and Google builds computers/phones/systems to run more of their ads to profit from, you won't be too shocked by how rough google tech is.
I lasted 3 years on an android phone before going back to an iphone, I am not sure I want to spend the money on a new macbook, so I will probably get a cheap linux laptop when my chromebook dies and keep everything in the cloud (probably MS with MS office, which is still 10 times better than google apps).
There is nothing that a Chromebook does better than a mac, it is just a lot cheaper.
Re: (Score:2)
Wait two months to see what the "low cost MacBook Air replacement" rumours are about.
Oxymoron? (Score:3)
Wait two months to see what the "low cost MacBook Air replacement" rumours are about.
Isn't "low cost macbook" an oxymoron?
Low cost and value are overlapping on a Venn diagram but are not the same thing. Macbooks are valuable to many people but it's hard to argue they are low cost unless you are merely talking relative cost to their even higher priced offerings. Conversely just because something is low cost doesn't mean it is valuable. Chromebooks are obviously inexpensive but since they don't solve any problems I currently have they aren't valuable to me.
Re:Oxymoron? (Score:4, Informative)
Take a developer making only $75K per year. Let's say they work 40 hour weeks, 49 weeks per year, that's 1960 work hours at $38.27 per hour ($75000 / 1960).
Say you shave 10 minutes a day by using a Mac. That's
It makes even more sense if your salary is higher. At $100K per year, that is $51.02 per hour and $8.50 per day, or $2083 per year saved by buying the Mac. Over the 3-5 year replacement cycle that's $6248-10413.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
It's a 'Web Browser In A Box' (Score:3)
I picked up a Asus Chromebook a couple of years ago, and it's been a solid champ up until last month, when the screen started flickering.
If all you need is a browser in a box, the chromebook is the way to go. For programming tasks I still use my windows and linux desktops. But with Linux coming to Chromebook more fully soon, this need may disappear too.
I have wished from time to time that my Chromebook had a free Windows Remote Desktop client, a decent free editor, and a few other things. But on the other hand, never worrying about losing your data (it's mostly stored in the cloud), makes it worry-free to take it along with you where ever you go.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
So.....use two computers instead of just having one?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Comment removed (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
if somebody asks to look at my PC
And then "somebody" presses Space as prompted and then Enter as prompted. Now what happened to your Crouton?
I thought the same (Score:5, Interesting)
...but after about 2 weeks of dealing with the limitations of vanilla ChromeOS, and then another 2 weeks working around the limitations of ChromeOS + crouton, I wanted a real OS again. So my advice is to pick a Chromebook with the biggest SSD and best hardware support in the mainline kernel you can, that way when living 100% in the cloud doesn't really work you can put a full GNU/Linux distro on it.
Buy Cheap (Score:5, Interesting)
Chromebooks are great if all you want to do is browse the web. Just don't spend a lot of money on it.
Simply put, stay away from the Pixelbook unless you enjoy lighting money on fire. It's over $1000 and you'll get 5 years tops out of it guaranteed, even with the crazy specs it has. If you're going to spend that much you might as well stick with a Mac. At least you'll get at minimum 7-10 year use out of it. After the Pixel EOL, The only way I would even consider a Pixelbook right now is if Google flat out announces a commitment to a 7-10 year software support strategy for it.
The HP Chromebook X2 or the Samsung Chromebook Pro would be the highest I would pay for one and only if I was going to use it daily. There are also cheaper alternatives out there. Personally, I wouldn't spend more than $200 for one.
Printer wise, you need a cloud print enabled printer. Epson's are cheap, are very easy to setup, and their scanners can scan directly to Google Drive out of the box, but it is an inkjet so if you don't print often it will dry up and then it's toss the printer time, so buy an Epson XP-440 all in one for $50 and only if you really need to print. HP and Canon's also have printers that are cloud print capable, but tend to be harder to setup and can be more expensive.
Printer as a 2-factor authentication mechanism (Score:2)
so buy an Epson XP-440 all in one for $50 and only if you really need to print.
If you want to use 2-factor authentication without using a cell phone, you will "really need to print." Google won't let you use TOTP until you have two of the preferred 2FA methods (SMS, prompts through the Google Search app, FIDO U2F security key, and printed codes) set up, and only U2F and printed codes work without a phone.
Good advice - don't speed a lot of $$$ (Score:2)
The only other thing I would say about Chromebooks is that you can do more than browse the web, the basic word processor and spreadsheet apps are adequate for most home users.
We use them in our company and I've found that the more you spend on them, the less value you get. We've had a lot of luck with Acers that are less than $200 USD. When we've spent more to try out new features, we've been disappointed.
Re: (Score:2)
They can use Google's web based office suite as a chrome app, so they have an office suite, and I think the chrome app even allows for offline use that will sync to drive once it goes online. Never tried offline mode with mine. It will do about 90% of what most home users do with a PC.
In the end however, it's a $200 web browser that can now emulate an android tablet and soon run Linux apps. Anything you can do online you can do on a chromebook assuming that you're online and it doesn't need a third party pl
Re: (Score:2)
Do Chromebooks have vi, emacs, and bash?
Yes, as mentioned in the summary.
Re: (Score:2)
I mentioned the printer under the assumption that they wanted to go full on chromebook with no external PC. Any PC with chrome will work as a printer conduit once you add you account to google chrome and setup your printer using the cloud print site.
If you want to remove the PC completely from the equation, then a cloud ready printer is the only option.
Blatantly incorrect information (Score:5, Interesting)
I stopped reading when it talked about having your passwords exposed if someone got to your local copy of 1password. He clearly has no idea what he's talking about.
Having Google manage your passwords is like having a fox guard the henhouse. 1Password encrypts everything at rest, and you have to put in your master password to access your database. By default it auto-locks again after just a few minutes. The only way someone would be able to get into your 1Password vault would be if you set your master password the same as a previously hacked account. And if you did that, then you missed the entire point of having a password manager.
If a Chromebook servers the author's needs, then all the power to him. I just can't wait to see him melt down when his internet connection goes down.
(How the heck do you develop on the web anyway? Unless he works exclusively in Javascript I don't see how that would work)
Re: (Score:2)
(How the heck do you develop on the web anyway? Unless he works exclusively in Javascript I don't see how that would work)
I've never used them and don't know how they work, but there are online IDEs for a variety of languages. https://github.com/styfle/awes... [github.com]
Re: (Score:2)
1Password encrypts everything at rest, and you have to put in your master password to access your database.
The same is true of Chrome's password database, though it doesn't auto-lock.
If a Chromebook servers the author's needs, then all the power to him. I just can't wait to see him melt down when his internet connection goes down.
Many Chrome apps work fine offline.
Why Linux inside Chrome when you can have Linux (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You can have my Chromebook (Score:3)
Hi...
I have all six devices:
1. iPhone
2. iPad
3. Yoga Laptop Running Win10
4. MacBook Pro
5. Chromebook
6. Multibook Desktop WIndows or OS/X
Out of all the devices, the Chromebook is the most useless device. It reminds me of the modern dumb terminal that needs to connect back to the mainframe to get any work done. I seldom use it.
If you are just a consumer user: surf the web, use web services, and have a good WIFI connection, the Chromebook could be the device for you. If you are planning to create, possibly make a video, music, program, or do anything CPU intensive, it is a lost cause. Working as a school consultant, the #1 request I get every year is how do to shoot and edit video on a Chromebook, short answer is, you don't.
Ranking my computing devices in order of usefulness:
1. Desktop
2. MacBook Pro (love the retina display and trackpad, best, period, not in love with the keyboard)
3. Yoga (Whoever designed this keyboard should never be allowed to design again, trackpad ok, lacking useful ports, touchscreen and tablet mode are mostly useless)
4. iPad (I can use it as a computer in a pinch, it is just harder)
5. iPhone (Like an iPad only smaller)
6. Chromebook (In your right hand you have nothing, in your left hand you have a Chromebook, the Chromebook is slightly better than nothing)
The only time I ever use the Chromebook is when I have to train others how to use a Chromebook. Usually the limitations of the device surface quickly.
I am really surprised by this... (Score:2)
I cannot imagine ever needing to move to a Chromebook. Or really, even a laptop. Sure, I use one at work, but it's docked most of the time and I have 3 monitors hooked up to it. When I do need it in a meeting I hate using one tiny screen and I feel so inefficient using it. At least I take my mouse with me, I can't stand watching people in meetings fumble around with their trackpads. (I hate them so much) Even at home I have 2 monitors for my linux desktop.
There is a now a Chromebook in our house now,
too limiting (Score:2)
That being said, the new version of Windows really sucks; I'm putting off upgrading as long as possible. If you'
Moving To a Abacaus (Score:2)
Stopped reading at "I have not used desktop software for probably a decade now. "
Re: (Score:2)
Chromebooks can run real linux, too! (Score:2)
For web browsing and other stuff done in Chrome, ChromeOS is great. But if I need something more specialized, I can have a full-fledged (if admittedly a bit, but not too, slow) Linux system running in seconds.
Re: (Score:3)
Accidental powerwash (Score:3)
If you don't want to accidentally powerwash [slashdot.org] your Arch Linux installation off your Chromebook, you'll need to install replacement firmware that lacks the "Press Space then Enter to powerwash" prompt on every boot. This requires, among other things, opening the case and turning a screw. Does firmware replacement void the warranty on the screen, keyboard, power jack, and other parts in the Chromebook?
Voiding warranties (Score:2)
This requires, among other things, opening the case and turning a screw. Does firmware replacement void the warranty on the screen, keyboard, power jack, and other parts in the Chromebook?
If you are the sort of person who is comfortable swapping hardware on your devices I doubt voiding warranties is high on your list of concerns.
Re: (Score:3)
I become more comfortable swapping hardware once the warranty has actually expired. Until then, I want the manufacturer to cover screen, keyboard, and power jack problems for the first 24 months, and I don't want the manufacturer to treat installation of a general-purpose operating system as an excuse to refuse me the service that I had paid for.
Cheap hardware is cheap (Score:2)
I become more comfortable swapping hardware once the warranty has actually expired.
Do you really care on a cheap Chromebook? If it's a several thousand dollar piece of kit and/or you are on a tight budget I get it but if you break a Chromebook, so what? That's the entire beauty of the hardware is that it's cheap and that you don't have to care so much of you break it.
Does anyone actually offer a 2 year warranty on a Chromebook? Given the price of them that would seem foolish of them since most PCs don't carry that long of a warranty. (honest question - I've never really looked)
Annualized price if it breaks 2 weeks in (Score:3)
Do you really care on a cheap Chromebook? If it's a several thousand dollar piece of kit and/or you are on a tight budget I get it
If, say, the power jack breaks two weeks in, then I've paid $200 for a computer that lasted two weeks. How can I prevent its $200 replacement from having, say, a keyboard problem two weeks later? In the limiting case, that is an annualized price of $5,200 per year to own a computer. Does that qualify as "several thousand dollar piece of kit"?
Does anyone actually offer a 2 year warranty on a Chromebook?
I don't know whether that's offered for Chromebooks in third quarter 2018. I was referring to the 2-year Dell extended warranty that I bought in March 2010 along with a
Incorrect analysis (Score:2)
If, say, the power jack breaks two weeks in, then I've paid $200 for a computer that lasted two weeks.
Right but if your goal is to do something different than what the manufacturer provides what do you gain by keeping it stock? You're basically buying something and not using it the way you want just in case of the (hopefully) unlikely chance a cheap piece of kit breaks. You're comparing apples to oranges. It sounds like you are not the sort of guy who would modify their hardware and that's fine but the economic case for that isn't relevant to someone who wants/needs to modify the gear. For them they sim
Different Chromebooks, different faults (Score:2)
If, say, the power jack breaks two weeks in [...] How can I prevent its $200 replacement from having, say, a keyboard problem two weeks later?
there is an implicit incorrect assumption in your calculation that any replacement would also break in the same way and in the same amount of time which is unlikely to be true.
In this scenario, the replacement broke in the same amount of time but in a different way.
Hell you would probably get fed up and buy something else
Bingo. I'm trying to skip to that step by finding something other than a Chromebook that's warranted as fit for purpose the first time.
Behavior (Score:2)
In this scenario, the replacement broke in the same amount of time but in a different way.
I understand but you aren't going to go through that 24 more times nor is the company that sold you the product. Your calculation was correct but based on a faulty premise about how all the parties involved would behave.
Bingo. I'm trying to skip to that step by finding something other than a Chromebook that's warranted as fit for purpose the first time.
Fair enough but that's a different issue altogether. Nobody is going to bust out the proverbial (or literal) soldering iron if they truly need the warranty protection. More importantly if you need the warranty more than the modification then you didn't really need the modification in the
Re: (Score:3)
If, say, the power jack breaks two weeks in, then I've paid $200 for a computer that lasted two weeks.
Coincidentally, the only machine I've owned where the power jack broke was a Chromebook. Cheap plastic case cracked at the same time.
Otherwise, while it worked, it was a perfectly pleasant device to use. I was expecting it to piss me off with the things it couldn't do, but it turns out that while I'm drinking my coffee in the morning, there's very little that I want to do that doesn't involve a browser.
Re: (Score:2)
Go to Europe.
How much does it cost a U.S. citizen to learn the local language (especially post-Brexit), qualify for a work visa, obtain it, and move? A ballpark figure for a couple common scenarios is fine.
Re: (Score:2)
You can learn a language for free. There are even some businesses on mainland Europe that use English as their default working language.
The rest of the things on your list will cost a fair penny.
Smaller form factor laptop fits in less bulky bag (Score:2)
at that point, why would you buy a chromebook and not just an off lease business machine?
One reason is physical size. After manufacturers stopped making 10" netbooks, and the third battery for my own netbook stopped holding a charge, I bought a ThinkPad X61 tablet on eBay for $101 shipped and tried carrying it as a replacement. Debian installed and ran fine, but it was physically much larger than the 10" Dell, meaning I needed to carry a bulkier bag. I later ended up buying a 11.6" Dell that fit in a reasonably sized bag.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Chromebooks actually remind me a bit of Macbooks. You have an "app store" but not a proper official repository which is the primary reason I always seem to be overwriting osx and installing Linux. I could just be biased against osx but to me in a lot of ways... Mac is to Unix as Chromebooks are to Linux.
Macs have the Mac App Store; but you are in NO way limited to installing Applications from that source.
macOS is a Certified Unix. Something that NO Linux will EVER be.
As for Chrome, it is nothing more than a data-collection app DISGUISED as a weak-ass "OS".
Re: (Score:2)
They're nothing alike. Chromebooks will only replace a Mac or PC in the same way that you might be able to replace them with an iPad.
Exactly.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It never made any sense to me why you would pay for hardware just to loose your privacy.
If you choose the Chromebook c201, it can increase your privacy since it can run libreboot [libreboot.org] to replace the Intel ME. The firmware is protected by a physical screw so it can be software flashed. Then it can run Debian, Devuan, Parabola etc.
Re: (Score:3)
It never made any sense to me why you would pay for hardware just to loose your privacy. I do all my computing on my local machine. I'd gladly pay extra to control my data. Now if Google were to pay people to use the Chromebooks, that would be another thing. Then you would go into it with open eyes and as a somewhat equal business partner.
Microsoft- logs all sorts of information about you and invades your privacy.
Google- logs all sorts of information about you and invades your privacy.
Apple- logs all sorts of information about you and invades your privacy.
They're all doing it; pick who you trust raping your privacy the most, or acknowledge there isn't really a safe choice between those three and use some other factor to decide your laptop.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Microsoft and Apple sell a lot of shit, information is not their primary source of income.
Googles primary source of income is your information.
They are not all doing the same thing, not even close. Try requesting the information they have collected about you from those 3, the one from Google will be substantially longer and more detailed than the other 2 combined.
Re: (Score:2)
They are not all doing the same thing, not even close. Try requesting the information they have collected about you from those 3, the one from Google will be substantially longer and more detailed than the other 2 combined.
That's because Google does more that is valuable for advertisers to track. Microsoft and Apple will track you just the same if there is incentive. The fact that Google has the #1 search engine, mapping software, e-mail, etc means that they collect more information from more people and have more data. Microsoft and Apple will violate your privacy as much as it is monetarily useful too. Microsoft and Apple also have advertising arms, it's not just Google.
Re: (Score:3)
Microsoft- logs all sorts of information about you and invades your privacy.
Google- logs all sorts of information about you and invades your privacy.
Apple- logs all sorts of information about you and invades your privacy.
But there's a BIG difference:
Microsoft: Does ALL sorts of trickery to keep you from "opting out" of Privacy-Stealing and "Telemetry".
Google: Logs your entire life, EVEN WHEN YOU TELL IT NOT TO!
Apple: Only DISSEMINATES Differentially-Anonymized Data, states CLEARLY what Data they collect, and ALLOWS YOU TO OPT-OUT.
https://www.apple.com/legal/pr... [apple.com]
Re: (Score:2)
For once, I agree with you.
He's telling the truth.
Thank you. Seriously.
Re: (Score:2)
With Apple, you are the consumer. With Google, you are the product. With Microsoft, you are the consumer and the product, since Windows 10.
Re: (Score:2)
But the guy is already on a freakin' Mac, thus he should be using macOS - why are you bringing up Windows and Linux?
Re: (Score:3)
But the guy is already on a freakin' Mac, thus he should be using macOS - why are you bringing up Windows and Linux?
There's about a $1000 difference between a good Mac and a good Chromebook laptop. He would certainly be more familiar with macOS having a Max; and a Mac could certainly do a lot more things. But $1000 is a lot of overhead if you don't need to do those extra things.
Chromebooks are not for everyone; they can't do everything; but I suspect they do enough for 90% of the population.
Re: (Score:2)
I remember when Microsoft's CEO laughed at Chromebooks and asked "Who would want one of those". 2 Years later when they discovered Chromebooks were selling like hot cakes and had replaced Windows in most school computer labs they freaked out. Turns out people did want a simple computer that was secure by default and that scared MS to death. They actually started selling a few laptops heavily subsidized by Microsoft to try to compete.
Re: (Score:2)
But the guy is already on a freakin' Mac, thus he should be using macOS - why are you bringing up Windows and Linux?
He also is stating one of the reasons he is considering a Chromebook (shudder) is 2FA.
macOS has supported Two Factor Authentication for some time now (since at least macOS El Capitan, now almost THREE major OS versions ago!) :
https://support.apple.com/kb/P... [apple.com]
Re:Why pay to loose your privacy (Score:4, Informative)
As he says in the article, there are security aspects that appeal to him. You get tired after a while of hearing about all the Microsoft and Linux vulns.
My kids all got Chromebooks as their first laptop for that very reason; I don't want them getting spyware and viruses, and whereas that is still possible with a chromebook, it is less likely.
Re:Why pay to loose your privacy (Score:4)
I don't want them getting spyware
So, you bought them a computer which comes with spyware preinstalled.
Re: (Score:2)
I don't want them getting spyware
So, you bought them a computer which comes with spyware preinstalled.
Exactly!
Re: (Score:2)
I don't want them getting spyware
So, you bought them a computer which comes with spyware preinstalled.
You mean, as opposed to Microsoft and Apple which also track everything you do? I'm not getting my kids a friggin' Linux- they need to learn real world skills. Once there out at University if they want to dabble with Linux that's fine.
Re: (Score:3)
Data on my laptop on the other hand hasn't been compromised pretty much ever. That you know about.
You are always one bad URL click, one malicious email, one zero day vulnerability to a compromise. Even if you are using OS X, Linux, even Open BSD.
Re: (Score:2)
Data on my laptop on the other hand hasn't been compromised pretty much ever. That you know about.
You are always one bad URL click, one malicious email, one zero day vulnerability to a compromise. Even if you are using OS X, Linux, even Open BSD.
I have mod points but I can't let this comment go. This is a comment that I expect from a Twitter, Facebook user. When you have control of your operating system you can take precautions that allow you to navigate to the most hostile environments without a worry that it can compromise your data. This isn't Voodoo or magic. It's called education.
Re: (Score:2)
You can be safe, but you need to always be vigilant. However unless you have full understanding of every part of technology that is running, there is a risk. Did you review every line of code in Firefox?
Re: (Score:2)
Irrational Google fanboyism....
I really don't like the 'hey, let's jump from one monopoly to another" in the tech industry rather than foster inter operable norms.
Re: Ads are getting smarter (Score:2)
Seems realistic to me. Assuming "desktop software" are things like Word and Photoshop and etc, I haven't used much in the way of "desktop software" for most of the last two decades. I need a terminal and a browser and I'm golden. Sure, I use a lot of dev tools and software from the terminal but almost nothing else that belongs in the desktop category (current job uses zoom, which I find unimpressive). As a Linux desktop and laptop user since the 90s, this seems completely normal to me. I've considered a Ch