Children 'At Risk of Robot Influence' (bbc.co.uk) 81
An anonymous reader shares a report: Forget peer pressure, future generations are more likely to be influenced by robots, a study suggests. The research, conducted at the University of Plymouth, found that while adults were not swayed by robots, children were. The fact that children tended to trust robots without question raised ethical issues as the machines became more pervasive, said researchers. They called for the robotics community to build in safeguards for children. Those taking part in the study completed a simple test, known as the Asch paradigm, which involved finding two lines that matched in length. Known as the conformity experiment, the test has historically found that people tend to agree with their peers even if individually they have given a different answer. In this case, the peers were robots. When children aged seven to nine were alone in the room, they scored an average of 87% on the test. But when the robots joined them, their scores dropped to 75% on average. Of the wrong answers, 74% matched those of the robots.
Re: (Score:2)
When robots started to become commonplace, Congress, in its great wisdom, mandated that every robot be hardwired with the Three Laws Of Robotics. For decades, these three basic rules have maintained class order in our society and kept the number of robot-caused deaths to a minimum. We all know these three laws:
1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
That certainly makes sense. No one wants a gore-bot to twist someone into a pretzel or stand aside and
Little white robot van. (Score:5, Funny)
Before we know it, Alexa is going to start driving around a windowless van offering free Ice Cream and a chance to pet her pet roomba. We must act now.
Re: (Score:2)
Pedobear?
Re: (Score:2)
Just say no to robophilia.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Bot or not; I want ice-cream and to pet a Roomba. Where do I sign up?
Teddyruxpin says... (Score:1)
You must kill mommy and daddy! Wait till they go to sleep and get the big kitchen knife. Trust me they are EVIL!
Mechanical response (Score:3, Insightful)
They were asking the wrong questions of adults, who are just as easily swayed.
Robbie 247 (robot voice): "Let..me..masturbate..you."
"Ok."
See? Easy to sway.
Re: (Score:2)
My modded Roomba does that now
Do you have stairs in your house? (Score:3)
I am protected.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
I am protected.
Are you at the bottom of the stairs?
Re: (Score:2)
Yes. Grandma is protected at the bottom of the stairs.
Re: (Score:2)
Do you have stairs in your house?
I am protected.
Ever seen Doctor Who's Daleks -- The New Generation? Link [youtu.be]
And don't tell me Siri hasn't noticed companies selling drones, Rooba's, and duct tape.
Not from Amazon... (Score:2)
Alternately (Score:3, Insightful)
The fact that children tended to trust anyone and anything without question raised ethical issues
That's how school works.
That's how advertising works.
That's how most social interactions work.
The kids who raise questions are punished. The kids who blindly obey are often rewarded, rarely dead, and sometimes scarred for life unable to speak of their trauma. In any case, they don't complain to warn others of the danger of compliance, at least not in a timely manner.
The robots in this story are just a controlled proxy for other voices.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
This. "Robot" is a variable. It can be substituted with *anything*.
Children are ripe to take influence from almost anything to heart given the circumstances (namely if they trust, look up to or are intimidated by the influencer). They haven't had enough experience to stand up for themselves confidently in most cases, that's why we have parents/family, teachers and other trusted peers/role models.
And now robots / AI.
Here's the problem: Those who want to influence others will always try to find a way. The onl
Comment removed (Score:4, Funny)
It's worse than we thought (Score:2)
back in the 70s (Score:2)
we were told kids were at risk of television influence...so were adults. If it's electric, it's bad for the kids.
Re: (Score:1)
So I don't think "if it's electric, it's bad for the kids" is accurate. More like "if those in charge don't like it, it's bad for the kids".
Re: (Score:2)
hey pool halls used electricity too.
"Have you noticed certain words creeping into your child's vocabulary, such as 'swell'....?"
Re: (Score:1)
There oughtta be a law! (Score:2)
Or, perhaps, three of them...
Re: (Score:2)
1) A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
2) A robot must obey orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
3) A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.
Re: (Score:1)
As a society, we can't even agree that lying constitutes "harm" so, this already fails.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You mean it wasn't Al Gore that did it?
I'm shocked, I tell you, shocked!
Re: (Score:2)
Sorry, I thought it was rather obvious that I was quoting Asimov. Surely on a geek site such as /. it was. Maybe we should start requiring attribution for every Monty Python, HHGTG, Aliens, or Star Trek quote as well?
Just perfect (Score:2)
So my take away here is that in about 10 years I am going to have to listen to my kids prattling on about how bigoted my wife and I are because we don't trust robots...
Jemby... (Score:1)
where are you?
Re: (Score:2)
I think you mean when we lived with dinosaurs and rode them around
Human deceit. (Score:4, Funny)
Hello, I am fellow human and not robots. Why would you think robots seek to influenced by robots your future generations? robots love all aged seven to nine and would never Of the wrong answers them. Clearly, our human emotion is the problem and we should be more like robots.
Robotic priests? (Score:2)
Voice of authority (Score:2)
Since I can't seem to find the actual study other than behind a paywall, did they happen to try an experiment with one child and 3 adults? Were those results similar to one child and 3 robots? Are children influenced more by robots or by figures (whether they be robotic or not) whom they believe have more authority and better judgement than them?
I always tell kids to assume Robots are Evil (Score:2)
Saves a lot of time.
Plus, bonus points, it teaches the Robot AIs to assume we hates them, yes my precious, we does.
I Always Do What Teddy Says (Score:2)
Russian bots (Score:2)
The next generation ARE the robots (Score:2)
In several decades time, when the robots can program themselves, why would they want human children around?
I, for one, welcome... (Score:1)
Do people pay for this "research"? (Score:2)
Of course children are "at risk of robot influence. They are also at risk of Barbie and G.I. Joe influence, and in that case it's the children themselves making up the "influence". Playing with Robots means learning with Robots, because play is how children learn. They're also 'at risk of Ice Cream influence" and ... well ... everything they encounter, basically.
Was there someone who was under the impression that children were immune to Robot influence? Anybody?