Commodore's Amiga Is Being Revived In Newly Updated Hardware (hothardware.com) 94
MojoKid writes from a report via Hot Hardware: Although it has been over three decades since the first Commodore Amigas were originally released, a fan base for the beloved systems is still going strong. In fact, today's Amiga community seems to be more active now that it has been in years, and a number of exciting new hardware projects have cropped up in recent weeks. Two relatively new projects, led by popular members of the Amiga community Paul Rezendes and John "Chucky" Hertell, are designed to breathe new life into the Amiga 4000 and Amiga 1200.
Both men set out to reverse engineer the motherboards for these systems, not only to continue the possibility of repairing existing machines that are prone to serious damage from leaky batteries and electrolytic capacitors, but to potentially spur additional customizations for the platform in the future. Though Paul and John have only made minor modifications to the Amiga 4000 and Amiga 1200 motherboard PCBs to this point, the possibility now also exists for all new variants to arrive at some point in the future for these machines as well. The first actual working motherboards populated with components based on the Amiga 4000 Replica project or Re-Amiga 1200 haven't been shown off just yet, and they may require additional revisions to work out any kinks. However, both projects are good examples of the passion that still remains for the beloved Amiga from computing glory days gone by.
Both men set out to reverse engineer the motherboards for these systems, not only to continue the possibility of repairing existing machines that are prone to serious damage from leaky batteries and electrolytic capacitors, but to potentially spur additional customizations for the platform in the future. Though Paul and John have only made minor modifications to the Amiga 4000 and Amiga 1200 motherboard PCBs to this point, the possibility now also exists for all new variants to arrive at some point in the future for these machines as well. The first actual working motherboards populated with components based on the Amiga 4000 Replica project or Re-Amiga 1200 haven't been shown off just yet, and they may require additional revisions to work out any kinks. However, both projects are good examples of the passion that still remains for the beloved Amiga from computing glory days gone by.
FCC (Score:1)
UL (kind of)
ETL
CE
FCC
It isn't cheap to sell consumer electronics anymore. Everyone wants a piece of the pie, and you'll be sued out of existence in some countries and not allowed to enter the market in others if you manage to survive the first round of development.
Re: (Score:3)
The standards of today make computers a lot safer and easier to depose of... remember Tandys which would explode the capacitors if moved?
Re:FCC (Score:4, Informative)
Amiga was never that noisy. They were used in low-rent broadcasting because of this. One of the major cable channel guides used it, I remember seeing it guru meditate. The machines were wholly shielded internally, including the all-in-ones. What makes you think they couldn't pass modern standards? Probably the only change which would have to be made besides updating the power supplies (which hobbyists have already worked around, by adapting standard ATX supplies) would be solder composition, for the only initialism you didn't actually remember to mention... RoHS.
Also, you only need UL certification to get shelf space at a major retailer. I see you knew this, hence the "sort of", but mentioning it was still silly.
Re: (Score:3)
One of the major cable channel guides used it, I remember seeing it guru meditate.
Prevue Channel
https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]
https://www.atlasobscura.com/a...
Re: (Score:2)
https://www.atlasobscura.com/a... [atlasobscura.com]
Re: (Score:2)
The Amiga PSUs were actually pretty good, because they were linear. Modern ones are switch mode which are smaller and lighter, but you get much more noise.
The main issue with the Amiga ones is that they are not very powerful. I see to recall the A1200 one only being 25W, the A500 one being only a little more. You could run an accelerator but then adding an extra floppy drive was pushing it.
Re: (Score:2)
The new hotness for the internal keyboard Amigas (not actually new but anyway) is to install a picopsu inside the case, the 12 volt (not wide input) units can be had for about $20 on eBay. I put one in my a1200. There is room outside of the shielding. I soldered to the legs of the power jack so that I didn't have to modify the board. Not more than I already had for the timing fix needed by the accelerator, anyway.
Re: (Score:2)
Problem is the non-lead solder tends to whisker if you have traces with opposite polarity current next to each other. [...] Of course you would just drop it into OrCAD and it would figure it out for you.
Or you could apply a coating to either the entire board, or to the regions where this is likely to become a problem.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
That SID chip music will be back :)
SID music never went away. Go to the High Voltage SID Collection (HVSC) and put 2018 in their search box. SID wasn't part of the Amiga chipset though.
Re: (Score:2)
As TurboStar said above, there was no SID in the Amiga.
The SID chip was inside the Commodore 64.
Re: (Score:2)
Your post must have been delayed on a 20-lightyear link....
Re: (Score:2)
No typo... Amiga was a popular graphics computer of the 80s.
Re: (Score:2)
No, I mean 1980s.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Typo? (Score:5, Funny)
Spotted the millennial. Shouldn't you be driving up the price of avocados or something?
Re: (Score:2)
More likely the OP is a troll, or someone from whatever we're calling the generation younger than millennials (Gen Z?).
What, again? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
There is some truth to this. But I would not mind having a physical system. Not sure how much I'm willing to pay for this, but there is something to be had to have an actual Amiga. But then I'm the type who has kept a pair of actual Amiga Corp joysticks back from before their purchase by Commodore.
The Amiga was one of those crazy amazing things where things just lined up in the universe to produce something that was an engineer
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Joystick ports were replaced by USB... it's easy to get a throwback joystick these days.
Re: (Score:3)
Joystick ports were replaced by USB... it's easy to get a throwback joystick these days.
Or if you must hack hardware, you can always use an Arduino Mega to get physical ports. There's really no good reason to use a classic joystick, though. They all sucked compared to a good gamepad. Literally all of them.
With that said, actual Amiga users who want a mediocre gamepad which plugs into their Amiga can trivially hack a six-button mega drive pad to work. All six buttons are supported in all of four or five games; more games support three buttons, and vastly more support two. It involves swapping t
Re: (Score:2)
8/16 bit era joysticks were vastly superior to gamepads because they were right handed. For some reason we ended up with the directional controls operated with the left hand on gamepads and modern joysticks, when most people favour their right hand for precision control.
You can get right handed arcade sticks nowadays, but the last time I saw a right handed gamepad was the Playstation era and it didn't look great.
Re: (Score:2)
Unfortunately, it's really hard to even find information on these because those little gaming keyboards are now called gamepads for some reason. Stupidity, I guess. Anyhow, there is the goofy foot mod kit [totalradnes.com]. The NES controller is an ergonomics train wreck, but they are still readily available and they are one of the most precise game controllers ever made...
Re: (Score:2)
I might give that a try. A right handed Saturn pad would be amazing... But I'll probably end up with a right handed arcade stick.
Re: (Score:2)
Even cheaper and easier is a Raspberry Pi. Also supports physical joystick ports and even real Amiga keyboards.
Emulation is pretty good these days. I still like to have a real Amiga with a proper CRT monitor around though.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
'Rein of terror' is not really what you'd think of as being an easily marketable product, but you'd be surprised at just how wealthy the four horsemen are and how much they'd be willing to spend on horse tack.
Re: What, again? (Score:2)
Re: What, again? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
They later changed their mind on that.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]
Ah, the decade that taste forgot...
Re: (Score:2)
I understand that it's much easier (and cheaper) to emulate than to run on original hardware, but emulation doesn't bring the nostalgic factor like original hardware does and to be perfectly honest, it just isn't as cool. Also, half the fun in running old gear is keeping it clean, making repairs as needed and providing all the love necessary to keep things running clean and quiet.
I've been collecting Commodore hardware over the last decade and have quite the Commodore museum for an office. There's nothing
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
But then you start looking at spending hundreds or even thousands of dollars on upgrades and it just gets silly.
These days there are hundred-dollar accelerators for Amigas, with enough RAM for gaming, so it's not that bad. On the other hand, having to re-cap them is a bit of a drag, and probably not worth it to most potential users. Emulation is better in its own way, because you can emulate multiple different models of Amiga, and some games (or other software) doesn't run well or at all on some models of Amiga, even with whdload.
Re: (Score:2)
Why not the reverse? (Score:2)
Instead of a 100 MHz CPU in FPGA running against vintage graphics and sound chips, I would much rather like to see the vintage graphics and sound chips in FPGA but the CPU being emulated, with JIT-compilation running on a fast modern ARM multi-core chip.
That would be a really powerful Amiga, and you would be able to run other things (such as OS:es and emulation cores) on it as well.
However, I have not found any FPGA board that has had any good interlink with any powerful ARM chip. The ones I have seen (incl
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, but the SoCs with many and faster ARM cores are often paired with FPGAs that are overkill for emulating the Amiga chipset and would therefore be too expensive to compete with MiST, Vampire or a Raspberry Pi.
And then the key part: giving the FPGA its own "Chip RAM", with access from the emulator on the ARM core.
Re:Nostalgia (Score:4, Interesting)
Raspberry Pi represents to our children what we were growing up with in the 90s... small processor and storage sizes, and dirt cheap hardware. There's many kid efforts in teaching computers that are just not discussed on Slashdot.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
I'm largely in agreement.
However, I will note that an Amiga, or even a C64, was a much larger percentage of the household budget in the 1980's than today's Raspberry Pi which costs no more than a night at the (absurdly overpriced) movies.
The Raspberry Pi and its copycats, like Odroid, are amazing computers for the price and vastly more versatile than Commodore was/is.
Re:Nostalgia (Score:5, Interesting)
Amigas were not cheap. About the price of a midrange gaming PC in today's money. C64 were cheaper later on but that's still closer to entry level PCs than a Raspberry Pi.
Also, the Raspberry Pi is a powerhouse compared to these old-school computers. It changes the way it is approached. You can fully understand an Amiga or C64, know every instruction, their timing and addresses. A RPi is always used through an OS, with many abstraction layers and things happening behind your back. Basically, old-school computers forced you to understand the hardware if you wanted to go further, but it was easy, now you don't really need to, and doing so would be much harder.
Re: (Score:2)
Amigas were not cheap. About the price of a midrange gaming PC in today's money.
yes, in todays money you'd get a very decent PC, but back then the Amiga was cheap compared to PC's and offered way more (colours, sound, multitasking OS).
Re: (Score:2)
I and my brother bought a second-hand Amiga 500+ by saving up our pocket money. 50 GBP second-hand, and it came with dozens of games and other programs (some original, others copies). Even adjusting for inflation, that's only about 4 times the cost of a Raspberry Pi.
It also wasn't really necessary to understand the hardware to do cool things. You could make a shoot-em-up with Blitz Basic which looked just as good as most of the stuff you got on magazine cover disks.
Re: (Score:1)
Commodore went bankrupt in 1994 due to mismanagement. They had the Amiga 4000 with advanced video editing capabilities back then which was still used professionally many years later. I had a dude in '96 in my CS classes at university running windows emulators on his Amiga just fine.
Meh. Still not as cool.. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
You could have saved this comment for the thread about "they're reviving the Atari 800"...
...oh? They aren't? Huh. Imagine that.
Re: (Score:2)
From your username and your like of Atari... you are from Poland, right?
I found recently that the Atari 8-bit is very popular there for some reason.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Why does the hardware for Amiga matter so much, people are willing to redesign and reserve engineer to get it to work?
Nostalgia. The Amiga (as a package) was so vastly much better than anything else available at the time that a lot of people have very strong feelings about it. It was outpaced by PCs at about the time that PCs started to get decent video acceleration, and I don't mean the 3d kind, but until then it was by far the best value in computing since its inception. It had a good CPU, a fast bus with autoconfiguration, and by far the best graphics and sound for ages.
Am I blind in thinking that AmigaOS is better off being modernized to run on bare metal modern off the shelf hardware?
It wouldn't give the same feeling to people trying
Re: (Score:2)
Former Amiga owner here (Score:2)
What gets me excited about the Amiga hardware scene are the neat FPGA kits that drive them. It's particularly interesting when this leads to things superior to any officially produced Amiga hardware out there, like a 68080 processor core: http://www.apollo-core.com/ [apollo-core.com]
It's nice to simulate an ECS or AGA chipset for old times' sake, but it's also nice that the hardware doing that is also easily used for other creative things. I'd love to see RISC-V and FPGAs become a new creative playground for programmable
What again? (Score:1)
It seems every few years there is another announcement that Amiga is returning from the dead.