US Navy Bans Vaping On Ships (go.com) 230
The U.S. Navy announced today that it will no longer allow sailors to use electronic cigarettes on ships, following several reports of explosives and injuries. ABC News reports: Naval commanders said in a statement Friday that the temporary electronic cigarette policy aims to protect sailors and the fleet. It starts next month. Officials cited overheated batteries in vaping equipment as the problem. Explosions have led to fires, first-degree burns and facial disfigurement. During a recent eight-month stretch, 12 incidents put sailors out of work for a combined 77 days. Injuries also restricted some to light duty for a total of five months.
They should be "frying" bigger fish... (Score:2, Redundant)
The bigger fish they should be frying should be the "crippling construction defects" affecting their newer ships [consortiumnews.com]other than focusing on minor issues like vaping in my opinion.
Re:They should be "frying" bigger fish... (Score:5, Insightful)
Cancer is a bigger health problem than hemorrhoids. Does that mean you want big pharma to stop working on hemorrhoids cream and focus all their energy on cancer?
Maybe there's room for common sense and picking low-hanging fruit is part of it.
Re: (Score:2)
Because if you ain't got a big enough pan, you end up with only a big pile of spoiled inedible fish instead of all of them.
Re: (Score:3)
The bigger fish they should be frying should be the "crippling construction defects"
I may be going way out on a limb here, but maybe ship construction and health issues are handled by different people.
Re:They should be "frying" bigger fish... (Score:4, Funny)
The bigger fish they should be frying should be the "crippling construction defects"
I may be going way out on a limb here, but maybe ship construction and health issues are handled by different people.
I'm pretty sure it's just this guy doing everything:
http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_eosG... [blogspot.com]
Re: (Score:2)
The bigger fish they should be frying
This story is about banning a persistent fire/explosion hazard on a warship housing high explosives. The Navy is addressing a safety issue to prevent frying fish.
If you enlist, you take orders, PERIOD. (Score:2, Informative)
There is no military draft right now.
That means that 100% of the personnel in the Navy are in the Navy because they
CHOSE to be in the navy.
If you fuckers in the Navy don't like being told what you cannot do, you shouldn't have enlisted.
What a bunch of pussies. If you were being shot at, you'd quit whining about vaping damned quick.
Leadership is more than giving and taking orders. (Score:2)
As you did, one can easily state that giving and taking orders is the prime mode of operation in leadership, and in the meantime it is.
However especially in times of crisis you need soft skills, you need to have leadership to build up a working team a unit of individuals that works seamlessly, is mentally stable.
A crisis situation will draw out the real personality of a human and a solid team will stick together and control the extremes.
And part of that is team building encouragement and a certain amount of
Re: (Score:2)
The Navy is only banning vaping on shippings and I can see the reasoning for it. While vaping may be better for your health long term the situation on board a ship is a bit different. First of all, you're on a ship. You don't have access to expert medical facilities so while vape devices have thus far only caused 77 days worth of injuries, they've been minor enough that they could be handled by the ship's medbay. There's likely a concern here regarding a more severe injury and the isolation from higher qual
Re: (Score:2, Flamebait)
I laugh when I hear twerps like you talking shit you absolutely do not and never will have
the courage to back up. Go play some video games, you pathetic child.
Can you explain how being drafted makes you an expert about courage? You didn't enlist, you were forced to go to war. You're like a single mom or a cancer kid; you faced a challenging situation but that situation by itself doesn't grant you courage automatically.
Maybe the other guy is a twerp, and maybe you are a veteran, but in the context of this thread neither of you has provided any information that would give an edge in your pissing contest.
Re: (Score:2)
"Can you explain how being drafted makes you an expert about courage?"
Well, unlike the assholes who dodged the draft like fucking cowards who didn't want to lose their money and privilege, this person sucked it up and went and kicked some ass and survived.
So they know more about courage than those draft dodgers, and obviously knows more about courage than you since you lack even the most basic critical thinking capability to have come to such a goddamned simple conclusion.
Re: (Score:2)
and obviously knows more about courage than you since you lack even the most basic critical thinking capability
Critical thinking is the opposite of that emotional outburst you're making.
When you say that people who didn't run from the draft showed courage, you're insulting people who volunteered.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe. But the guy said this:
I laugh when I hear twerps like you talking shit you absolutely do not and never will have the courage to back up
That's not a philosophical argument. That's someone using his military background as a trump card to shut the other person up. It shows neither bravery or wisdom, it's a pissing contest pure and simple, and if the person decides to use the fact that he was drafted as evidence of his courage, it's more than fair game to challenge it.
Re: (Score:2)
When you say that people who didn't run from the draft showed courage, you're insulting people who volunteered.
Whatever his actions, your extreme stance isn't the right approach. Regardless of your intent, your statement insults both drafted and enlisted. It implies that enlisted people feel they're superior to drafted men and that they feel insulted when drafted men take pride in serving when called upon. You're also saying drafted men shouldn't take pride in serving when called upon. While I cannot speak from experience, I doubt that enlisted vs drafted is their biggest concern during a war.
get off your high horse (Score:2)
Regardless of your intent, your statement insults both drafted and enlisted.
No they don't, and there's no point in you in being offended on their behalf. Veterans are not fragile children that must be protected from possibly controversial discussions, they're normal people who happened to have been to war. If a veteran comes here and start using his military background to support his accusation of cowardice aimed at other users, he's opening the door to questioning his own courage. This is not disrespectful of military service, don't SJW-ize it.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
"If a veteran comes here and start using his military background to support his accusation of cowardice aimed at other users, he's opening the door to questioning his own courage."
Sounds like you think I'm a veteran. I'm not. I'm the grandchild of a very fucking high-level veteran (Lt. Colonel) who fought everything from WWII to Korea and Vietnam. He knows what real humans are composed of. You very obviously do not.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm the grandchild of a very fucking high-level veteran (Lt. Colonel) who fought everything from WWII to Korea and Vietnam.
I see. That totally makes you a valid spokeperson for the military in general.
Re: (Score:2)
I think you lost your reading comprehension skills. You'd obviously not be fit for combat duty.
Re: (Score:3)
child abuse is not a sexual orientation (Score:1, Offtopic)
Because they aren't Catholic priests
I may be wrong, but I don't think those sexual abuse cases were about being gay. I think they were about being in proximity of vulnerable children and teenagers, most of which were males.
Look at what just came out about that Connecticut boarding school. Decades of abuse but since it was coed, many of the victims were girls.
Dumb (Score:5, Insightful)
Why not, I dunno, sell government approved vape pens in the commissary? From what I've read, most of the incidents with vaping are from people trying to "soup up" their vape machines. This amounts to banning Honda Civics on base because a few ill informed morons cause them to ignite by modifying them in ways they don't really understand.
Re:Dumb (Score:5, Interesting)
My guess is that it's a result of the endless race to see who can pump the most watts into a sub-ohm coil with the cheapest cells they can find. There's a point at which it turns into something like shorting out a lithium battery.
Re: (Score:1)
No, they are just holding them wrong.
Re: (Score:2)
No, they are just holding them wrong.
Don't try to blame this on Apple. Those vape pen are running Samsung firmware, those sailors must have accidentally activated 'incendiary grenade mode'.
Re: (Score:3)
Nah, they were made by Zorg Industries right alongside their (in)famous ZF-1 infantry weapon systems, complete with the little red button.
No, of course the OP is right, every similar vaping incident I've heard about was ultimately the result of ignorant and stupid people doing Tim Allen/'Tool Time' impersonations trying to "give it more *power*! ugh-ugh!" with their vaping gear.
Instead of throwing FDA regulations at the vaping industry to try to cripple it because it thr
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm sort of willing to grant them leeway on the batteries, especially if its a mod that uses 18650s. Finding legitimate ones isn't easy. I actually bite the bullet and buy them from established brick and mortar vape shops because of all the fakes.
But even with the fixed batteries most common in the 50-100 watt regulated mods I'm sorta skeptical, especially with vape gear brand identity kind of sketchy outside of a handful of brands that have been around (Kanger, Smok, etc).
Re: (Score:1)
There's a point at which someone wins that race, and is rewarded with spectacular effects... /sarcasm
Beside the unlucky vapers who don't have a clue what they're doing but -indeed- chose the cheapest gear they could find (especially batteries).
Re: (Score:3)
My guess is that it's a result of the endless race to see who can pump the most watts into a sub-ohm coil with the cheapest cells they can find.
By people who wouldn't know an Ohm if a Volt kicked them in the ass.
Re: (Score:2)
More like they don't want a lithium battery fire on a billion dollar carrier.
Re: (Score:2)
So... they should remove all ordnance from the ship as well.
Re: (Score:2)
Ordnance and its handling procedures are designed to be safe. Vaping devices are designed to be cheap.
Re: (Score:2)
No, vaping devices are designed to be safe as well, if purchased from legit places, not fake and handled as they are supposed to be handled. Just like ordnance and everything else, really.
Re: (Score:3)
The problem is batteries. Choosing the right type isn't hard, and despite what someone lower in this thread said, there are lithium batteries that can safely source huge currents. Probably not a dead short, but >20 watts for sure.
The problem is getting the right batteries. Say you've selected a high current UR18650WX battery - where do you get it? Amazon? Good luck, half of those are counterfeits. eBay? Same, but maybe 75%. Random internet store? Eww. Local vape shop? Ha!
Oh, did I mention that
Re: (Score:2)
Did you sleep through the hundreds of stories in the last few years about phones and laptops with counterfeit batteries bursting into flames? Going to blame them on unregulated cellphone mods?
Re: (Score:2)
Why not, I dunno, sell government approved vape pens in the commissary? From what I've read, most of the incidents with vaping are from people trying to "soup up" their vape machines. This amounts to banning Honda Civics on base because a few ill informed morons cause them to ignite by modifying them in ways they don't really understand.
No, it's more like banning Ford Pinto's on a facility full of powerful conventional ordinance and nuclear weapons.
Re: (Score:2)
Why not, I dunno, sell government approved vape pens in the commissary? From what I've read, most of the incidents with vaping are from people trying to "soup up" their vape machines. This amounts to banning Honda Civics on base because a few ill informed morons cause them to ignite by modifying them in ways they don't really understand.
No, it's more like banning Ford Pinto's on a facility full of powerful conventional ordinance and nuclear weapons.
Actually, it's banning all wheeled conveyances with combustion engines because someone kept insisting on driving the Pinto. If they'd just ban the 'Pinto' equivalent but let people drive, er, use other reliable models without the inherent design flaws, no problem! Oh, and make modding them a bustable (brigable?) offense, since that shit makes even a trustworthy brand unreliable.
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe the Navy is also concerned about the health effects of nicotine vapors
Yes, I'm sure this is the reason...
or the effects of the vapors on sensitive gear.
The navy is concerned about minuscule amounts of water vapor on ships? We are totally fucked. Next you'll tell me they are running Windows on their battleships...
The Navy doesn't want vaping, and they don't have to justify it to you or anyone else.
They certainly don't have to justify it to me but, if I were knowingly sending kids off to their potential death, I'd sure as fuck let them engage in a calming activity that in no way affects their acute performance.
Re: Dumb (Score:5, Informative)
It's a dangerous and addictive habit that does, indeed, produce mild stimulation. People who are nervous or depressed have long reported positive, self-medicating effects with it.
Re: (Score:2)
When you need a nicotine hit you get calm when you get a nicotine hit. Quite simple really.
Re: (Score:1)
Actually, there was a story on Slashdot a few years ago (maybe a decade ago) that was about the Navy using Windows on its newest Battleships. We were collectively in shock but, apparently they have done a good job of covering up the hours of downtime from Patch Tuesday. Make no mistake though, North Korea will strike on a Tuesday and every sailors screen will read: "Windows is updating. Do not turn off your computer".
Re: (Score:1)
they don't have to justify it to you or anyone else
Actually, yes, they fucking do. We the people not only pay their salaries but as civilians we automatically outrank everyone in the military.
Re: (Score:1)
as civilians we automatically outrank everyone in the military
You must be one of those "customer is always right" people
Re: Dumb (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
You appear to be confused regarding the chain of command. The Joint Chiefs, branch commanders, and unified command commanders all report to the Secretary of Defense who reports to the President although the Joint Chiefs do directly advise the President. The current secretary of defense is an ex-military civilian but the position of Secretary of Defense has no requirement for previous military service and is very much a civilian position.
Re: (Score:2)
This amounts to banning Honda Civics on base because a few ill informed morons cause them to ignite by modifying them in ways they don't really understand.
What an idiotic analogy. It's not the same at all, and only an idiot would think it was.
In fact, it is almost exactly the same, with the caveat that some of these vapes are just garbage to begin with. If you buy the cheapest possible vape off eBay, you can expect it to have no or inadequate current or thermal protection, which makes it dangerous. And of the ones which do have any kind of protection, virtually none of them have caught on fire without being modified first.
Re: (Score:2)
The actual problem is extremely poor quality 18650 batteries, most of which have dangerously overrated markings on them. If you buy legit batteries that aren't Chinese knockoff rewraps, there shouldn't be a problem.
That's also not a problem if you just don't hot-rod your vape.
Re: (Score:2)
If you buy anything vape related, you are a fool.
FTFY
And if you buy anything coffee related you are a bigger fool.
Oh wait, did I trample on a harmless activity that you enjoy that some asswhack nutbags take unfounded offense to? Golly gee, sorry about that!
At Work (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:At Work (Score:4, Insightful)
Only if you consider yourself to be smoking coffee if you can smell it.
Re: (Score:2)
Vaping people don't smell like coffee, the ones I know smell like strawberry bubble gum and other chemicals.
Re:At Work (Score:5, Insightful)
>"Vaping people don't smell like coffee, the ones I know smell like strawberry bubble gum and other chemicals."
And food doesn't smell like chocolate but like pig and fish and other chemicals. (Highly offensive to a vegetarian)
See how silly that sounds? It depends on what people are vaping. There are lots that have almost no smell. Being annoying is not the fault of vaping, it is the fault of what they select. So instruct people to not use stupid smelling stuff. I have been around both types before (smelly and non-smelly) so I know there are differences.
Cars with illegally modified exhaust systems are loud and annoying. Ban all cars.
Some motorcycle drivers speed recklessly and weave between cars without using turn signals or leaving adequate clearance. Ban all motorcycles.
People blasting rap "music" is loud and annoying. Ban all stereos.
People wearing lots of perfume is horrible and annoying. Ban all toiletries.
Light pollution destroys the night sky and is annoying. Ban all lights.
People that walk into traffic looking at phones is unsafe and dangerous. Ban all phones.
Drunk people who pee on walls is gross and annoying. Ban all alcohol.
Guns are sometimes used by some bad people to illegally hurt other people (usually bad people), unlike 99.9999% of good gun owners. Ban all guns.
I could go on, but I think my point is made. There is always a small minority of people that will ruin ANYTHING for everyone else. So back to the actual topic....
A small fraction of people vaping modify their equipment with cheap crap to do things that are unsafe and stupid. And a small percent of THOSE people cause negative incidents (which is no surprise). That is not a good reason to ban all vaping.
Re: (Score:2)
That depends on their choice of vape. I have a coffee vape that I like. The biggest danger of it is people get their hopes up only to find that there is no coffee available.
Do you also get upset when someone walking by is chewing artificially flavored strawberry bubblegum?
Re: (Score:2)
Exactly. Which is why I said it's more akin to smelling coffee than it is to smoking tobacco. I vape BTW.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
And you thought vape aerosol can't be a health risk for some of the bystanders? Or even just a plain nuisance for everyone?
If you like it, do it in your backyard.
Re: (Score:2)
You list all of those things as if we wouldn't be super happy with our noses not being assaulted on a daily basis by shit smells.
Re: (Score:2)
A doctor basically said once that vaping was to smoking like jumping out of a 5th story window was to jumping out of a 10th story window!
That's so cool you know a celebrity! Say 'hi' to Dr. Nick for me, could you?
Good (Score:1)
None of my friends vape, and I'll never be friends with a vaper.
Then again, I'm 58 and have yet to run into a vaper over 30. Don't trust anyone under 30 someone famous almost said 40 years ago.
Re: (Score:2)
Congratulations, you have just run into a vaper over 30.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:3)
You must have a very limited circle of acquaintances.
I know vapers of all ages, from 18 to 80, quite literally.
"I'll never be friends with a vaper" makes you sound retarded, because the reason you provide is retarded.
Re: (Score:2)
Vaping weed provides wayyyy less offence to most around you. Vape pens are the new normal in dispensary land.
Re:Good (Score:4, Insightful)
The primary antisocial aspects of smoking have nothing to do with health effects and are still very present in vaping.
The primary antisocial aspect of smoking is the risk of cancer from second hand smoke. While the risk is very small, it is really not acceptable to raise some other person's cancer risk simply to feed one's addiction. It's not even for convenience! Just stupidity. The secondary antisocial aspect is the odor that others have to put up with. While I know intellectually that they have all kinds of scented bullshit for people to vape, I have never actually smelled any of it, and I see people vaping all the time. So unless you have some evidence that second-hand vaping is measurably carcinogenic, no, the primary antisocial aspects of smoking are not "very" present in vaping.
ObDisclaimer: I do not vape nicotine juice. I have never vaped in public.
Re: (Score:2)
The primary antisocial aspect of smoking is the risk of cancer from second hand smoke.
Um, no. The primary antisocial aspect of smoking is it stinks. Smokers stink. The areas they smoke in stink. Add to that smokers tend to leave their butts anywhere and everywhere. They are fucking obnoxious, over half don't even get why non-smokers don't like them.
Re: (Score:2)
Um, no. The primary antisocial aspect of smoking is it stinks. Smokers stink.
Stink doesn't lead to a painful bed death, breathing through a ventilator. Maybe you should reconsider your priorities.
Re: (Score:2)
> The primary antisocial aspect of smoking is the risk of cancer from second hand smoke.
The secondary aspects are also problematic. I've acquaintances with asthma, and at my age, acquaintances with emphysema and with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Many of those cases were due to smoking, but fewer and fewer as time progresses and smoking has fallen out of favor. I still meet some, as I age and run into other people as old or older than myself, and I've been able to see their lives as easier witho
Re: (Score:3)
Cancer isn't the only dangerous thing smoking causes, although it is the most scary thing. Smoking can cause all sorts of respiratory distress and heart issues.
Re: (Score:2)
The primary antisocial aspect of smoking is LOOKING LIKE THE IDIOT THAT YOU ARE IF YOU SMOKE .
there I fixed it for you
No, that's completely wrong. Someone I can't even see can choke me with their smoke. I've been a smoker, but I haven't been one for years now (not even a cheat smoke, that's fucking gross) and now that I'm not accustomed to sucking smoke all the time, it sets off my asthma immediately.
Re: (Score:2)
A few days ago I was walking down the street when I saw a guy smoking a cigarette. It looked so dated and ridiculous. I actually felt pity for the poor, out-of-touch guy and I am someone who smoked for 20 years (but quit 8 years ago).
A few days ago I was walking down the street, when I caught a big lungful of smoke that some addict breathed out around a fucking corner from me, when I couldn't even see him. It left me wheezing for minutes. Someone with more severe asthma who had left their rescue inhaler at home might have died. I actually feel sorry for ACs all the time, for how bullshit they are. Guess how I feel right now?
Re: (Score:1)
The only assholes out there are the ones who seem to want to control what other people do. Whats next with you puritan nannies - alcohol, coffee, bubble gum?
If I drink alcohol that affects you how exactly, long as I don't drive (or post, I guess). Coffee? You wanna hang out in front of the urinal to write your app that will make you millions? Please. Bubble gum? Bubble gum under the table is nowhere near as obnoxious as smoke in the air that I breath.
Smokers and vapers are both scum that should somehow be turned into refugees sent into Syria, one to one, bringing a Syrian to the USA to rebuild their life.
Re: (Score:2)
If I drink alcohol that affects you how exactly, long as I don't drive (or post, I guess).
You gotta be kidding...
https://www.ncadd.org/about-ad... [ncadd.org]
Re: (Score:2)
So wait, it kills shit, so it's good to inhale into your body?
Re: (Score:2)
All medicine which goes into your body through a nebulizer kills shit and is good to inhale into your body.
Good ole cigarettes are better for you. (Score:1)
No surprise there. Also, you get the added benefit of not looking like a pussy.
Cheap Li-Ion batteries blow up (Score:2)
Wow (Score:4, Insightful)
I'm frankly very surprised by the extreme lack of any understanding of what vaping is, how electronic cigarettes work, in even the most general sense, or what's in e liquid or the vapor. There has been basically no correct information stated anywhere in this whole comment section, except that the actual cause of these injuries is cheap, low quality, Chinese batteries.
Vaping is a harm reduction activity, for people who have been unsuccessful trying to quit smoking. If you can't get off nicotine, better to get it from vaping than smoking. The Royal College of Physicians in the U.K. estimates vaping is approximately 95% less harmful than cigarettes. You can think what you want, but if you think it's just as bad as cigarettes, you are an idiot. It's also not water vapor being exhaled. I'm not sure where that ever came from, but in it's attempt to make vaping sound safe, it instead makes anyone who repeats it sound stupid. There's no reason for most people to care about vaping unless they know someone who does it, but just know, it's keeping someone from smoking, and that should be reason enough to be ok with at, as long as they don't blow it right in your face.
I agree that the young crowd who only want to blow huge clouds are ruining it for everyone else, but if it's keeping them off combustible cigarettes, it's still ok with me.
More dangerous than fire? (Score:1)
I think it's time to call it. Vaping industry at large is wholly incompetent.
Re:More dangerous than fire? (Score:4, Informative)
And yet, the industry continues to be outpaced by its addicts, asserting endless false claims about safety.
Flavorings often do horrible things to the lungs, sinuses, and nose - a great example, diacetyl causes "popcorn lung". Diacetyl is found in a lot of foods naturally - its what gives butter its flavor, after all. It's a natural product of fermentation, and shows up in everything from buttermilk to chardonnay.
Popcorn lung is a great example of what vaping can do - take a natural flavor, heat it with water to form steam, inhale, and cause permanent lung damage only treatable by organ transplant.
But, much like smoking was a few decades ago, it's users refuse to believe their addiction could possibly be harmful to themselves or others.
Re: (Score:2)
Oh the irony... I didn't actually think diacetyl would really be applicable for vape fluid (it was just an example from the food industry that I knew off the top of my head), but no, it apparently is a problem in vape fluid. A university study found that found many vape fluids have diacetyl, yet falsely claim they do not. [jsonline.com]
so now... (Score:3)
sailors will go back to cigarettes.... way to reduce the pension fund? After all, dead sailors dont cost anything, but the lung damage will cost a lot in their final few years of life. This is ridiculous, just set a mil spec standard, let the free market meet that demand, the majority of battery fires are due to cheap ass Chinese crap or as other posters said, heavy mods done incorrectly.
If they are that dangerous ... (Score:2)
maybe they should be used in Afghanistan. Cheaper than dropping that MOAB [bbc.co.uk]! :-)
Re: (Score:2)
Cheap for 70 years of relative world peace though.
Re: They have damage control parties... (Score:1)
This. They need the practice handling fires and burns so they're missing an opportunity.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: They have damage control parties... (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1)
Pull your heads out of your asses
I don't think they teach pulling out in Navy boot camp.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Nicotine isn't carginogenic, Einstein, the thousands of toxic organic compounds produced by combustion are. At least try to get your facts straight before spouting off this bullshit.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Nicotine isn't carginogenic, Einstein
Says you. Science, on the other hand, says otherwise.
Nicotine is a known risk factor for cancer development and has been shown to alter gene expression in cells and tissue upon exposure.
[...]
This study reveals previously unknown consequences of nicotine stress on the transcriptome of normal breast epithelial cells and provides insight into the underlying biological influence of nicotine on normal cells, marking the foundation for future studies.
Read the study here:
http://journals.plos.org/ploso... [plos.org]
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
You have fallen for lies and propoganda. Inform yourself:
http://www.ecigarette-politics.com/nicotine-propaganda.html
Re:Good (Score:4, Insightful)
You have fallen for lies and propoganda
Says the guy who provides a link to an e-cigarette lobbyist website
Re: (Score:2)
Replying to erase accidental moderation.
tinfoil hat much (Score:2)
Says the guy who believes in studies sponsored by the pharmaceutical industry.
Did you take a minute to check the link? This study was done at Virginia Tech.
This work was supported by the Medical Informatics and Systems Division director's fund at Virginia Bioinformatics Institute. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Re: (Score:2)
Cherry picking results to match your confirmation bias doesn't mean you're right.
The question here was not "is it right", it was "is it a study sponsored by the pharmaceutical industry".
Re: (Score:1)
You do know that nicotine is present in many foods (tomato, eggplant, potato, etc) right? Better stop eating those. While you're at it, give two other names for Vitamin B3 (not niacin). Yep, keep demonizing nicotine but keep on consuming it... hypocrite.
Re: (Score:1)
New information as of 2013, with no confirmation studies done to-date or meaningful news coverage.
Probably because it was published in a Brazillian journal of no significance that no one reads.
Can't really blame someone for not knowing about it. All other sources of study on nicotine indicates no carcinogenic properties. It's the other stuff in cigarettes that kill you.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Vaping juice contains mostly the same components as your average medical inhaler cartridge plus some food grade flavorings. There's health concerns if you're dealing with one of the cloud chaser types, but for the most part it's healthier than your average handful of potato chips.
Re: (Score:1)
Demoncrats put up Satan as Trump's opponent.
I don't think they did. I think Satan herself pulled the strings to make it happen. The same thing happened on the other side, except it was more public and less hypocritical.
I never liked Trump and like most people, I didn't see him coming. But now it's hard to tell if he's doing a good job or not because the big time liberal press, the leftists and the SJWs are crying wolf daily for the most mundane comment or event. It has come to a point where one has to watch Fox News and CNN, and read the NYT and Trum