ASUS' ZenBook 3 Is Thinner, Lighter and Faster Than the MacBook (engadget.com) 209
At the ongoing Computex trade show in China, Asus unveiled the ZenBook 3 laptop. The ZenBook 3's chassis measures 11.9mm while the whole body weighs 910g. At the event, the company's executive said that ZenBook 3 is better than both MacBook Air and the 12-inch MacBook. As for the specifications, the ZenBook 3, which is crafted from aerospace-grade aluminum alloy, sports a 12.5-inch full-HD display (1920x1080 pixels), and offers up to Core i7 processor, 16GB of 2133MHz RAM, up to a 1TB PCIe Gen 3 x4 SSD, a next-gen USB Type-C port (for power and data transfer), powerful quad-speaker audio by Harman Kardon, and a fingerprint scanner. Do note that there is only one USB port on the device. The entry-level variant featuring Core i5 processor, 256GB of SSD and 4GB of RAM is priced at 999, while the top-of-the-line model will set you back by $1,999. Asus also had nice things to say about the keyboard, though Engadget's reporter was not impressed. More details here.
At this rate (Score:5, Funny)
Looking out how the great shrink has been progressing, I predict that that 12 inch MacBook Pro will completely disappear from this Universe in about a decade. You can still go out an buy it however since it will be infinitely thin and light, you won't be able see or use it.
You'll just have to take Tim's word for it.
Re: (Score:3)
They're actually going for convergence with razorblades.
Prediction time!
In 2030, you'll have The Gillette X-treem PRO hypersonic, the only ultimate shaving system (R) for men with 16 laptops for a smoother, closer shave (TM).
Re: (Score:2)
Will they team up with IBM (or have they sold that part of the business to Lenovo yet?) for the blades?
Thinner and lighter is not always desirable... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
>Thinner and lighter are fine qualities for a cellphone but not for a laptop.
My shoulder disagrees.
Re: (Score:2)
My shoulder disagrees.
I haven't used a laptop as a laptop in 15 years. I got a laptop on my desk at home and a laptop on my desk at work. My iPhone is my portable computer between desks.
Re: (Score:2)
I hate to be that guy that says you're doing it wrong but... :)
Re: (Score:2)
I hate to be that guy that says you're doing it wrong but... :)
My employer got it wrong by getting a 15" Dell laptop that weighs six-pounds. I locked the laptop in the docking station and threw away the combination. No way I'm going to drag that back and forth between home and work.
Re: (Score:2)
Understood, I'm just pointing out that laptops are often bound to a cubicle desk all day.
I consulted at a place where 20 odd contractors on a project were each encouraged to BYO laptop. But rather than 'hot desk', they all ended up purchasing dual monitors, full size keyboards and mice. So a small form factor PC like a NUC, Brix or Mac mini would have been better since they never used the internal screens, cramped keyboards or trackpad. (And the workflow didn't (often) involve taking a computer to a meeting
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
If carrying a 4 pound laptop is a physical issue for you, then you got some serious, SERIOUS health problems to address...
Actually . . . yeah, personally my back is terrible (a combination of a childhood accident and mild scoliosis), but it's honestly quite fine as long as I don't spend long periods of time with my spine in a non-straight position or carry things for very long. I walk everywhere, and my Pixel C (which is a bit less than 1 Kg with both it and its keyboard) combined with a few other things in a bag are starting to reach the limit where it'll cause issues for me, but I'm fine as long as I keep things at that. A n
Re: (Score:2)
It was a heavy laptop, a shoulder bag, the charger, various travel documents, phone charger, pens and other bag cruft. Placing an asymmetric load like that on your shoulder for a long time is not good.
Re: (Score:2)
If I was homeless I would agree.
I lug a laptop on my shoulder every day. I travel a lot. Once laptops got light enough, the asymmetric pain in my shoulder went away. This is a good thing.
Re:Thinner and lighter is not always desirable... (Score:5, Interesting)
Dot buy new. go find a used 2012 and get the best macbook pro ever made.
My 2012 is as fast as anything sold today. and it is faster than the Piece of shit Lenovo 5th gen i7 laptop work bought me. Sad that lenovo only makes garbage now.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Introduce a feature that prevents an apple device from becoming obsolete??? Doesn't that go against almost every design principal? I mean someone at Apple is probably printing off the original post right now as reinforcement as to why they should never make such design decisions again! They will compare the 2012 MacBook Pro to the 1994 Toyota Corolla
Re: (Score:2)
Thinner and lighter are fine qualities for a cellphone but not for a laptop.
Gotta agree. When work approved a new laptop recently, I went with a MacBook Pro - it's still plenty light (a touch under 3.5 lbs / 1.6 kg), but hasn't totally removed all the ports. I'm a bit annoyed that I have to use a USB dongle when I want wired Ethernet, though.
My boss' boss has the MacBook, and I've used it... but I find the keyboard sub-optimal, and you have to use a dongle for everything.
Re: (Score:2)
Thinner and lighter are fine qualities for a cellphone but not for a laptop.
Ha, the funny thing is, I bought an Otterbox Defender for my iPhone 6s in order to fatten it up and make it a little heavier.
Yeah, I'm a little crazy... :-)
Don't want a thinner laptop (Score:5, Interesting)
Personally I think laptops are thin enough, maybe too thin. I like the slightly thicker laptops because I find them easier to handle, plunk down, and open the lid. The macbook air amost requires a fingernail to open. Why not make the laptop 1/2" thick and stick a bigger battery in it? Thinness seems to be the latest trend in ADD fashion.
I also don't want my phones to get any thinner. I always buy a case for my phones these days not because I need to protect the phone, but I want to make it a bit thicker so it's easier to handle and use.
Re: (Score:2)
The macbook air amost requires a fingernail to open.
Did they remove the cutout, center bottom at the front of the case, right below the trackpad? It provided a convenient place to use your fingertip to lift the screen.
Re: (Score:2)
Still has the cutout, thank goodness. But still sometimes is a bit of a challenge for those with less dexterity to open. I use my fingernail in that cutout.
Re: (Score:2)
That's the entire point of the cutout, actually. I'm sure Apple would love to save the step of machining it, but they DO realize it's a required part of the case to make it easier to open.
So no, the cutout's not going anywhere, short of Jony Ive being supreme dictator of the world. (The only alternative would be a button or a slider to unlock, but that h
Re: (Score:2)
And my point is the cutout and the required fingernail is the reason things are too thin to be usable. I much prefer my thicker Thinkpad that I can open with just a thumb against the screen. I very much agree with the earlier comment that thinness is overrated but weight is not. Thicker and lighter is far better than thinner and lighter for my purposes.
And yes the keyboards are starting to really suck on those thin laptops. That was the first thing my parents noticed with their new Macbook Air a few mon
Re: (Score:2)
I'm with you. I want my mobile phone to last as long as possible, so I changed the 2.200 mAh battery for a 7.200 mAh (Anker battery case on Samsung S2) and I get about 6 days out of it. I see 35% in the morning I know I'm still good for the day. And I buy laptops based on their speed, not appearance. Core i7 with four cores is my standard requirement. I also like 17" screens, so I know I'm looking at at least 2.5kg.
But can it run... (Score:2, Funny)
Not the point (Score:5, Interesting)
The MacBook already has mediocre battery life, and its case is pretty much solid battery except for the tiny logic board.
So ASUS comes along, shrinks the case and puts in bigger and more power hungry CPU / RAM / SSD plus extra components like the mini CPU fan and Thunderbolt controller. Guess what's gonna give?
It sounds like the original MacBook Air; great on paper but in reality a bunch of overpowered components packed in too little space, leading to crappy battery life, overheating and throttling.
I realize everyone wants ultra-mobile devices these days, but if you're tethered to a charger it's not so mobile anymore, is it?
Re: (Score:2)
I realize everyone wants ultra-mobile devices these days, but if you're tethered to a charger it's not so mobile anymore, is it?
That would depend entirely on your use case now wouldn't it. I have a device which the manufacturer claims 10 hours battery life, reviewers claim 7h30min, and me .... well if you ask me I'd say it lasts 4 days because that's how frequently I go between plugging it in.
Not everyone who wants ultra portable also needs always on. In fact I'd borderline suggest that if you're using the device often enough that the battery life is a problem then an ultra portable probably isn't the most .... ergonomic choice for
Re: (Score:2)
Fuck this one port trend (Score:5, Insightful)
If skinny eliminates all but one USB port, fuck right off.
I have the previous Zenbook and it has 3 ports. Too skinny for an Ethernet Jack, but I was willing to live with that. One USB port isn't enough.
Re: (Score:2)
From the pictures it's just a headphone jack on one side, and USB 3 on the other, so that's the charge port too.
Absolutely ridiculous. Especially since the battery is likely so tiny you'll have the thing hooked up to a charger most of the time.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
If skinny eliminates all but one USB port, fuck right off.
I have the previous Zenbook and it has 3 ports. Too skinny for an Ethernet Jack, but I was willing to live with that. One USB port isn't enough.
Exactly. And yes, I apply that standard to the MacBook and the Pixel, too.
For one thing, it instantly means you can count on purchasing a Port Replacer Docking Station to the tune of about $200, and then either dragging it around with you everywhere, or suffering the pain and embarrassment of not having a critical port available when on the road. And the Power connector shouldn't be shared with ANYTHING, period, full stop.
Say what you will about the MBA, but at least it has 2 USB 3.0 ports, a dedicated
Pixel has far more than one port (Score:2)
If skinny eliminates all but one USB port, fuck right off.
I have the previous Zenbook and it has 3 ports. Too skinny for an Ethernet Jack, but I was willing to live with that. One USB port isn't enough.
Exactly. And yes, I apply that standard to the MacBook and the Pixel, too. For one thing, it instantly means you can count on purchasing a Port Replacer Docking Station to the tune of about $200, and then either dragging it around with you everywhere, or suffering the pain and embarrassment of not having a critical port available when on the road. And the Power connector shouldn't be shared with ANYTHING, period, full stop. Say what you will about the MBA, but at least it has 2 USB 3.0 ports, a dedicated MagSafe power connector, AND a Tumderbolt port. Plus an audio out/in port and an SDXC card reader. Yes, it doesn't have an Ethernet port; but a $30 adapter takes care of that, when needed. To me, the MBA is what better describes a PRACTICAL minimum for Ports in a size-conscious laptop. NOT this ASUS POS, the Pixel, or even the new MacBook.
Huh? I'm not sure where you're getting your hate for the Chromebook Pixel in this case. The Pixel, in addition to two USB Type-C ports, has two USB 3.0 ports, a TRS jack, and an SDXC slot. By my count that puts it at the same connection count as the MBA, and I'd personally take two Type-C ports over a magsafe and a lightning port (but of course that's preference; if you're in the Apple ecosystem of devices already you might well prefer differently) which is the only difference in terms of ports and slots.
No
Re: (Score:2)
Isn't the newer Pixel some kind of Android variant of an Ipad Pro or Surface RT?
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Making the goal to produce a computer as thin as a stick of gum and then requiring that users plug in a honkin' dongle to make it usable defeats a significant purpose in having a notebook computer. Wifi doesn't hold a candle to gigabit Ethernet when the cable is an available option and all of my USB devices require a USB-A connector.
Re: (Score:3)
Why is it that the shittyest ideas seem to catch on and become trends, and good ideas fall by the wayside? The single combined charge/USB/thunderbold port is a great example, but also making it 0.1mm thinner every year, getting rid of SD card slots (on both phones and laptops), soldered in SSDs and RAM, super glossy screens you can't read, glued in batteries, track pads with hidden buttons, webcams without hardware shutters/disable switches...
Re: (Score:2)
I can only imagine that the MBAs ran financial models that said they'd save $3 per machine shaving off all the ports but the combi port and pick up on average $3 per machine in accessory sales due to the ridiculously sparse ports.
Maybe they even did some kind of study that showed that 75% of the people never used more than one port at a time and that 90% of the time people didn't connect anything to the USB port (I made those numbers up, but chances are so did some product manager who earned a bonus if they
Re: (Score:2)
Tim Cook once said on stage something to that effect - an internal study produced results similar to the ones you made up.
The Macbook and Air were responses to that study.
My original
Re: (Score:2)
If I used a laptop as a desktop in a generally fixed location, a dock or USB hub or something would make sense, but they're generally awful for portability, especially if you end up needing a power brick for them.
you're all chatting about a commercial (Score:5, Insightful)
enjoy your debate over paid advertising
I used to be into Macs (Score:4, Interesting)
People argue that Apple's whole lineup was and continues to grow stale. This is true, but I personally have no allegiance to brands that put out an OS, I have allegiance to the operating systems. As the first few years of my fling with Apple OS, X seemed to be getting better and better. Minor UI tweaks, smaller and smaller OS. I'm going to get to into because I'm not here to give a review but there was a point for me personally where I felt they just kinda fucked up the whole gui. I was out.
I am very particular of operating systems. I recently got a BlackBerry Classic (and yes I get maid fun of ) Everyone has asked why I didn't get the Priv. Then they are confused since I "Like BlackBerry" yet tell them if I was going to get an Android it would be a Samsung. I try to explain how it all about the os and what that means, but I only receive blank stares.
Re: (Score:2)
I still have no idea how I get quickly a PDF from my Mac to my iPad to mail it away via a cellular connection: because you simply can't do that.
The simplest thing is to just tether the mac to the ipad and send it straight from the mac. If you really want to transfer it first - airdrop.
Re: (Score:2)
My iPad is to old to teather (iPad 2) and has no AirDrop either.
Is that an App or a modern iOs feature?
Re: (Score:2)
Ah, I see. I forgot my Macs have 'Air Drop' ...
Heve to think if I upgrade to a newer iOs on my iPad, the actuall iOs is already one of the ugly ones, so it can't realy harm.
3 things (Score:5, Insightful)
One: the PC vs Mac spec war is basically meaningless, because people who buy Macs want OS X, and people who buy PCs don't want OS X or don't care, and never the twain shall meet.
Two: "At the event, the company's executive said that ZenBook 3 is better than both MacBook Air and the 12-inch MacBook... it sports a 12.5-inch full-HD display (1920x1080 pixels)..." -- OK then, it's NOT better than the 12" MacBook's 2304 x 1440 screen.
Three: Remember when laptops were as big as a phone books? Like in the 166 MHz ThinkPad 380 days. BACK THEN, making them thinner and lighter was a worthy pursuit. But bragging that your laptop is 11.9mm thick instead of 13.2mm, and 910 grams vs. 920? WHO GIVES A SHIT! That's a difference of 1.3mm and the mass of two US five-cent coins. Are you fucking kidding me? Ugh. They're thin enough now. Quit making them thinner and put some battery or ports back in. (This goes for all OEMs, and double for Apple.)
Re: (Score:2)
And, for all that is pasta, bring back the damned 17 inch MPB already. The one with the matte screen.
NOT Shiney! Not Shiney!
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Correction....
The MBP is one of the best Windows laptops out there (once you get Win10 loaded).
Re: (Score:2)
Remember when laptops were as big as a phone books? Like in the 166 MHz ThinkPad 380 days.
You must mean back in the Tandy 1400 LT days. Either that, or you must have had a very small phone book in your neck of the woods.
Thunderbolt 3 USB-C Port =... (Score:3, Interesting)
the following connectors embedded/extensible and accessible with dongles - power, 2 X Display Port 4K , multiple 10GE connections, as many USB 3 as you might want as well as extension of the system PCIe to even allow external graphics adapters (Although I think the internal Core i7 Skylake graphics will be pretty good) and huge amount of direct connect NVMe (direct to processor cache) external SSD drive support. That little USB-C port is why you don't need any other ports.
Re:Thunderbolt 3 USB-C Port =... (Score:5, Interesting)
that little USB-C port is why you don't need any other ports.
You shall be strangled in a necklace of dongles. Very slowly.
Re: (Score:3)
It's all about target market. If all you do is write email, use Facebook, browse the web and make Power Point presentations, then you really only ever need one port. If you're reading this odds are you're exactly not in that market. That's fine. Let the business people buy this one.
Have a look at the ZenBook UX305 if you want an ASUS.
Re: (Score:2)
Fuck dongles, I don't want to carry one around or be looking for it in a drawer when I want to charge and use USB at the same time. Just make the laptop 1mm thicker and 10g heaver and a couple of USB ports on there. They can even be type C if you really want.
If you really really want just one port for some reason, get wireless charging working at the very least.
Re: (Score:2)
The whole point of a portable computer is to keep it portable.. The ports should be in the machine instead of the power brick.
Aerospace-grade aluminum (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
A while back some marketing idiot found out that aircraft weren't really make of aluminum foil like his mother told him when he was six.
Since planes are cool and techy and light and strong, 'aircraft' aluminum is cool and techy and light and strong. And cool and techy and light and strong sells.
Re: (Score:2)
It's not like I am planning patching a hole in my airplane or spacecraft with my laptop.
Well, this kind of head-in-the-sand attitude leads to disaster [wikipedia.org].
Re: (Score:3)
Never mind the metal. Can anyone confirm that this laptop comes with military strength encryption? I'd also hope that for that price it's fitted with an ergonomic keyboard made from space age polymers, is protected by marine grade sealing, and features superfast wifi, audiophile speakers, and a True (We Really Mean It This Time) Ultra HD display.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm sure you can get one. It'll have a nice back door for the NSA.
superficial style, useless specs for daily use (Score:2)
Some of us would rather run the Mac OS on a slow fat computer than run Windows on a fast thin computer. The hardware isn't really that interesting for regular folks surfing the net and watching Utube or using MS Office. Just need something to get the job done without any hassles or malware.
There is the issue of fashion however. Slim is sexy. Nevertheless there is only one laptop that makes an impression at Starbucks--it's the one with the lit up Apple logo. The beauty of this is that the mass of humanity ca
No matte finish == no purchase (Score:2)
The glare finish which Apple popularized (thanks, Apple) is profoundly irritating to use under almost any lighting conditions other than complete darkness.
Apples and Oranges ... (Score:2)
ZenBook 3 is better than both MacBook Air and the 12-inch MacBook.
They are not only not in the same league they are not even playing the same game.
I'm tired of this bullshit. The ZenBook does not run OS X. At least not legally. At least it does not come with a disk.
So no one cares if it is "better than < insert your hate Mac >"
As well we can soon compare the next Tesla with a Tada running on natural gas or a plane for a boat for that matter.
Seems like a step backwards (Score:4, Informative)
UX305 [notebookcheck.net]: $699, Core M, 8 MB RAM, 13.3" 1080p matte IPS screen (option for 3200x1800) covering 90% of sRGB, 256GB SSD, 3xUSB 3.0, mini HDMI, 12.3mm height, 1.192kg, 45 Wh battery giving 6+ hours. About the only thing it was missing was a backlit keyboard and a fan.
Zenbook 3: $999, Core i5, 4 MB RAM, 1080p IPS screen (implied touchscreen), 256GB PCIe SSD, 1xUSB 3.1/Thunderbolt, presumably HDMI via Thunderbolt, 11.9mm, 0.910kg, supposedly 9 hour battery though I usually reduce claims to 2/3 which would put it at 6 hours. Backlit keyboard, has a fan.
The UX305 was a worthy ultrabook that I've been recommending to a lot of people who otherwise would've settled for a low-end laptop. Usually their budget was around $500, while the UX305 frequently went on sale for $600 - the size, build, SSD, screen, and generous number of ports made it an easy up-sell for an extra $100. The Core M processor isn't a limitation for most people's computer use.
The new Zenbook 3 comes in at an extra $300 putting it out of reach of budget shoppers. It has a better CPU but lower base RAM, a faster SSD but only people doing video editing will notice the extra speed, loses all those ports (many people I know leave a nano receiver plugged in and use a wireless mouse), shaves a little off the weight and height, and has a backlit keyboard. Honestly, that doesn't seem worth an extra $300.
Read my lips. I want a big fat battery. (Score:3)
Stop trying to make things thinner unless your going to do something with the saved space. If you can't figure out more features then default to big fat battery.
I would carry around one of those 1985 brick phones if it meant I didn't have to charge it all the time.
I have a dream that one day all people will only need to charge their phones and laptops once a week...
Re: (Score:3)
Re:Needs a better screen (Score:4, Interesting)
I care about lighter, but not thinner.
People don't buy Macbooks because they are lighter, or thinner, or faster. They buy them because they run Mac OS X.
Re:Needs a better screen (Score:5, Insightful)
People don't buy Macbooks because they are lighter, or thinner, or faster. They buy them because they run Mac OS X.
But then they have the choice between different models, and buy different models depending on whether they want fast, light, or cheap.
But you are right, this won't move people from buying a MacBook to buying an ASUS laptop. It will move some people from buying a heavy Windows laptop to buying an ASUS laptop.
Re: Needs a better screen (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
People don't buy Macs for the specs they buy it for the glowing Apple symbol when they flip it open. Then everyone can see they have a Mac. Hipster status symbol. I worked previously at Asus and liked the Zenbooks. I actually have a Republic of Gamers laptop.
I think you're painting a lot of people with a very wide brush there.
Some people might own Apple hardware strictly as a status symbol. But most people I personally know buy Apple hardware for one (or both) of two reasons:
1. OS X
2. Hardware quality
By the way, I'm typing this on an ASUS ROG laptop. But my wife has an iMac, and everyone in my family has an iPhone and iPad. The Apple gear keeps on working, and working, and working... Huge bonus: Apple keeps supporting the hardware with OS updates!
It's actually
Re: (Score:2)
I, for one, buy Macs because of:
Not from where I'm looking (Score:2)
Re:Not from where I'm looking (Score:5, Funny)
people (who aren't programmers looking for a Unix that works) buy Mac books because they're a Veblen good. At least that was the reason my college bound kid had when pressed for it.
Well, Macs don't have systemd - so their Unix is obviously broken anyway.
Re: (Score:3)
At least that was the reason my college bound kid had when pressed for it.
Buy him the Macbook. If you don't, he will never get a date in college. My college aged daughter has informed me that all the cool kids use Macs, and the students that use Windows are "dorks". If he is stuck with a Windows laptop, his self-confidence will be crushed, he will do poorly in job interviews, and his life will be ruined.
Re: (Score:3)
I care about lighter, but not thinner.
People don't buy Macbooks because they are lighter, or thinner, or faster. They buy them because they run Mac OS X.
I hate to push back here, but a large number of people buy them because of the glowy apple on the lid. I've had Macs, minis, and a Mac Book Pro (although, I've never actually paid for one of these out of my private funds...) - OS X was/is... not terribly exciting, to me.
Re: (Score:2)
Thin matters to me; it means the laptop easily fits into the hydration pack sleeve in my backpack, and also makes it much easier to remove for airport security. Personally don't need anything thinner than the MacBook Air though.
Re: (Score:3)
What for? At 12.5" diagonal and 1920 columns, each pixel is 1/100" across and subtends at 16" a 0.02 deg angle, which is the angular resolution of a young eye. Going much beyond that is just paying to brag about specs.
Re: (Score:2)
Do not care if it is faster or lighter, as I want the better screen.
Exactly, This is the only reason why I bought the touch edition of the Dell XPS 13, for the 3200x1800 display. I can only assume that ASUS would come out with a near-QHD version. Personally, I like the ASUS products and was going to replace my old HP DM4T laptop with one. At one point ASUS was one of the few manufacturers with thin, light, power laptops, with high end features and displays. But over the last few years it seems that they have lagged behind by a year or so.
Re: (Score:2)
crafted from aerospace-grade aluminum
For people unfamiliar with the terminology being used here, "aerospace-grade aluminum" is just "cheap Chinese-wok-grade aluminum, but anodized black". It's particularly popular in LED torches.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I have fought my IT department to keep my 1600x1200 monitor and not to upgrade to these newfangled 1920x1080 monitor for these fucking 120 pixels. 120 pixels are 8 more line of code on my screen.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
I've done that and learned that some TN panels have their viewing angles biased towards the top, so when you rotate them they look terribad from the side that gets the bottom edge. Maybe IPS looks better but my 30" Dell doesn't rotate - one of these days I'll try laying it on one side.
IPS is fine when rotated; also, try VESA mounts? (Score:2)
I have a cheap (~$200) LG IPS monitor and it's completely fine when rotated vertically, so I'm sure any IPS panel will be fine. I'd bet your Dell has the ability to use VESA mounts, so even if its own stand doesn't support rotation you could probably just get a stand to use instead and mount it using the VESA mount points.
Re: (Score:2)
That assumption is incorrect.
Re: IPS is fine when rotated; also, try VESA mount (Score:2)
Thanks, that's what I thought. I meant a quick test without buying a mount (yes, the stock base uses 100 mm spacing); at 1600 lines I'm not in a hurry for more vertical space (yet).
Re: (Score:2)
Dell monitors can’t be counted on to be VESA compliant, especially in the IPS line - the thin-and-light Dells use proprietary mounts, and don’t give you enough room to get bulky plugs into the video jacks, thanks to a “chin” - and if you do get your Displayport to VGA cable in place, you’re never getting it off again.
My monitor is a Dell S2240M. If you need a similar low-bezel model (I use this because most other monitors won’t fit my desk) I recommend the S2240L - the L
Re: (Score:2)
Can any Apple fans explain why the 12.9" iPad Pro, arguably, is a better computer with a 2732-by-2048 screen, where laptop professionals might benefit from the extra vertical pixels?
Aspect ratios being aspect ratios and all but it seems odd you'd charge significantly more for a computer that didn't have a touchscreen and a detachable keyboard. :)
Re: (Score:2)
What is this old school digital video disc technology you speak of? Is that like a way of storing bootable efi files you normally put on a thumbdrive, but instead on some sort of coaster meant to store old fashioned movies?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Shakespeare didn't need emojis. Neither did Virgil, William Tyndale or Dan Brown.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Don't forget emoticon spam..
Re: (Score:2)
The review said the keyboard was almost useless.
The screen is smaller than the Air, and they are not promoting resolution so it is probably crap.
The Air comes in either a 11" or 13" screen sizes. So you are correct if we specify you mean the 13" model.
The resolution is listed in TFS as 1920x1080 pixels.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
they are still treated as the benchmark by which all other computer products are measured by.
A benchmark and The benchmark are two different things. Given how they get beaten by a lot of products quite easily in benchmarking calling them "the benchmark" is a bit disingenuous.
What they are is a popular device which people know and thus form a comparison. Apple's marketing department is quite awesome at that. Many companies also ride on the cheaper publicity e.g. Apple spends marketing dollars letting everyone know that their device is w by x by y and can do z, another company throws a few marketing
Re: (Score:2)
So basically, this... :)
http://9gag.com/gag/aqZR9XQ/ap... [9gag.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Please, tell me that I can buy it with GNU/Linux pre-installed! Please :)
Wish granted.
System76 [system76.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Oops, I misread your post. {embarrassed face}
Although I have indeed heard good things about System76 gear. :-)