In Ireland, All RC and Drones Over 1kg To Be Registered (suasnews.com) 108
New submitter charliehotel writes: The Irish Aviation Authority announced that it will have its drone registry up and running by December 21st this year. This registry will be the first of its kind in Europe, and the Irish Aviation Authority will require all RPA / drones that weigh over 1kg to be registered; this includes model aircraft. I hope that the U.S.'s gathering storm of regulation doesn't start quite that small.
The US will start smaller (Score:3)
According to this story at AvWeb [avweb.com], the US registry will require registration of all drones over 250 grams.
At least it will be free and simple, according to the story.
Re: (Score:3)
that actually seems reasonable to me something over half a pound going 30 miles an hour could do some damage. Simply having to register heavier drones seems like threshold to encourage less hazards in the sky.,
Re:The US will start smaller (Score:5, Funny)
that actually seems reasonable to me something over half a pound going 30 miles an hour could do some damage. Simply having to register heavier drones seems like threshold to encourage less hazards in the sky.,
Pfft This is just step on in taking our drones away from us. Soon the jack booted thugs will be busting into our houses at night to relive os of our rightful property.
Well, they can take my drone when they pry it out of my cold, dead fingers.
Jon the NDA today!
Re: (Score:2)
There is a famous (infamous?) movie where one party was asked to lay down the gun and it answered with:
pry it out of my cold, dead fingers.
The other party answered: "That proposal is aceptable!"
As it had no use for the gun and did not care to wait till the corpse was cold, it just moved on.
Bonus points if you know the movie, I actually liked it ;)
Re: (Score:2)
A lot of things can cause some damage. Like a 80kg guy riding a bicycle on the sidewalk. But we don't require bicycle registration for some reason.
Re: (Score:2)
Ah, but not as much damage as a 80kg guy on a bicycle falling out of the sky!
Nor as much as damage a 120 kg guy to a box of pastries.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
that actually seems reasonable to me something over half a pound going 30 miles an hour could do some damage.
Should I also register a softball or baseball, while they are more like 150g, they can be thrown much faster than 30mph.
(weird that we're mixing two systems of measurement)
Re: (Score:1)
It's all good. The incentive to develop little bitty drones will compensate.
Re: (Score:2)
It's all good. The incentive to develop little bitty drones will compensate.
Indeed. There will soon be plenty of 249 gm drones ... with optional battery packs and cameras sold separately.
Re: (Score:2)
I was under the impression that "drone" is merely the pop-culture term for "R/C", as they were called up to about 5 years ago before the Hollywood Nightly News decided to re-term it.
All of the things that people are flying are RC. I believe a drone would be autonomous. I am not sure if such a thing exists, and if it does, it is probably only in the military.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Wait! Let me get this straight. If you own a 250 gram toy drone you need to register it because it could be dangerous?
But if you own an assault rifle with 100 round magazine you don't need to register it. Yes, only in America.
Re: (Score:1, Informative)
Not many have assault rifles. You know a semiautomatic rifle is not an assault rifle, right?
Re: (Score:2)
You would be amazed how many people do NOT know this. I guess that's what happens when the only things you know about firearms are the sound bites you hear on CNN every time there is a mass shooting somewhere.
Re: (Score:2)
Wait! Let me get this straight. If you own a 250 gram toy drone you need to register it because it could be dangerous?
But if you own an assault rifle with 100 round magazine you don't need to register it. Yes, only in America.
False equivalency. Besides, many argue for even stronger regulations on firearms, they simply are not able to bring those arguments to fruition.
RC aircraft are being regulated because of the abuses that have been carried out through the operation of RC aircraft. The desire to regulate firearms comes from the abuses that have been carried out through the operation of firearms. They do not compare, they are each their own specific situation, with only one well known example of overlap.
Re: (Score:1)
False equivalency.
You can't just spout false equivalency without backing up why that is false equivalency, which you didn't.
Besides, many argue for even stronger regulations on firearms, they simply are not able to bring those arguments to fruition.
People argue for many things, but if they are not in effect they are meaningless. In this case this is a real drone regulation that is coming into effect. I can assure you that in the next 50 years there will still be no gun regulation in America and Americe will still have a lot of school shootings.
>RC aircraft are being regulated because of the abuses that have been carried out through the operation of RC aircraft. The desire to regulate firearms comes from the abuses that have been carried out through the operation of firearms. They do not compare
No you just compared them exactly right in this sentence.
they are each their own specific situation, with only one well known example of overlap.
They are different yes, just like all things, bu
Re:The US will start smaller (Score:5, Informative)
Wait! Let me get this straight. If you own a 250 gram toy drone you need to register it because it could be dangerous?
But if you own an assault rifle with 100 round magazine you don't need to register it. Yes, only in America.
No all legal assault rifles owned by civilians are registered in the US and require a in depth background check by the FBI and a tax stamp, gun dealer licence, and large transfer fees. Assault rifles are full automatic (pull trigger bullets fly until you let go), what are unregistered is semi-automatic (one pull one bullet) and manual (pump action, lever action, etc), semi-automatic and manual require a background check and often a waiting period, unless you have a concealed carry permit in that state or dealer licence (in which cases you have already passed the background checks). The only firearms that do not require a background check at some stage are black powder firearms in most states.
Additionally we have a constitutional provision protecting right to own firearms. But we have no such constitutional protection for ownership of RC toys.
Re: (Score:1)
I was talking about guns in general
The only mention of a firearm that you made in your post was about "an assault rifle with 100 round magazine". That doesn't sound like "guns in general". It sounds like emotional hyperbole.
a gun is a gun and is dangerous
Yes, but different categories of guns have different tendencies of use. Examples: Manual is justifiable for sport and hunting. A small semi-auto weapon is justifiable for self-defense. A fully-automatic weapon is justifiable for warfare.
Besides you can always add slide fire to turn it into automatic.
Not legally, you can't. At that point, you may as well claim that you can carry a conc
AR vs flying hazards and pervs (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Please provide evidence that everyday people using quadcopters are using them to "look at your daughter".
If we base everything on "what ifs", we'd have absolutely nothing.
Re: (Score:3)
You need a gun to shoot down unregistered drones.
Re: (Score:2)
Wait! Let me get this straight. If you own a 250 gram toy drone you need to register it because it could be dangerous? But if you own an assault rifle with 100 round magazine you don't need to register it. Yes, only in America.
I'm pretty sure that the armed forces DOES register all of their assault rifles.
US regulation? (Score:3)
>> Irish Aviation Authority announced that it will have its drone registry up and running by December 21st
In the US, this would take seven years and $15B to build. And then it still wouldn't work.
“The only thing that saves us from the bureaucracy is its inefficiency.”
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
>> Irish Aviation Authority announced that it will have its drone registry up and running by December 21st
In the US, this would take seven years and $15B to build. And then it still wouldn't work.
Nope, but it will still have worked as intended. It will have funneled millions of dollars to contractors, guaranteed a bureaucrat or 2 a lucrative job after government life, and added a few more dollars to the reelection coffers of a few Congressmen.
Re: (Score:2)
I am so looking forward to this. Finally, a project worthy of my Microsoft Access skills!
I'm going to hunt up the RFP now.
Or should I write it in Lotus Notes?
Re: (Score:2)
Interesting idea, how much would Ireland cost the US? We can probably find enough credit for the purchase.
Re: (Score:1)
I don't let my dog drive, license or no license.
Re: (Score:2)
the net effect however is that the proliferation of heacy dornes will be reduced even iff there are scofflaws. And that's the desired outcome.
Re: (Score:1)
Which is why in many jurisdictions owners of unlicensed dogs are fined many times more when there animals are out of control than owners of those that are licensed. This idea that idiots can fly their drones wherever they want really needs to be nipped in the bud now. And, from the gist of the comments here, the punishments for violations should be extremely harsh if their attitude of entitlement to the skies is to be curtailed.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
that sounds equivalent to never registering it at all.
you could go to a junk yard and buy a scrap car and drive it around without registering it. until you're caught doing so.
Re: (Score:2)
It's like paying a license for your dog; once you license it, they've got you every year.
Or registering a firearm, once they know you have one it makes it easy to confiscate them all later. And you get to pay for the priviledge.
(hopefully people recognize hyperbole when they see it)
Why? (Score:2)
How does it benefit you not to have regulations that prevent devices from buzzing about over your head? In my mind there should be no weight minimums. I simply do not want these things flying around without well enforced rules.
Dead Wrong (Score:4, Insightful)
Also, there are people like me who use them more for the photographic and video opportunities. Not spying on people like some pervert. That is like saying we should register cameras cause some sickos use them to take spy pictures in bathrooms. That is the vast minority. Do you want to know what most of us do? Here is a great example and explain to me how I could ever catch this scenery any other way:
Drone Flight in Utah Desert [youtube.com]
It is just like any hobby. There will be people who abuse it, and the vast majority of people who are just having fun. I am not that paranoid about people spying on me with drones to ban the entire hobby. The real point is registration will do nothing to stop it. People like myself already put their phone numbers on their planes so if lost, there is a chance they will come back to me. The people who are the problems will not do anything. More tax dollars to a solution to nothing.
Re: (Score:2)
I think we're past the point of registering just cameras. What we should instead be doing is requiring and enforcing registration of smartphones and any devices with a camera, and requiring any video recording device to watermark incoming images so that you can identify exactly which device took a particular picture. This would solve all sorts of problems from photo copyright to child pornography. You would be able to tell exactly which device was used to take a picture and find out who the first distrib
Re: (Score:2)
Why not, when we catch one of those Child Molesting perverts simply toss them into General Population ? Instead we protect them from the consequences of their own actions by giving them "special" treatment. I have no problem letting prison justice work itself out.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
How does it benefit you not to have regulations that prevent devices from buzzing about over your head? In my mind there should be no weight minimums. I simply do not want these things flying around without well enforced rules.
Safety culture is strong in you.
Re: (Score:2)
But Regulation also stops amazon from using them with rules or can lead to a big fine if they try to by pass the Regulations by using 1099 workers
Re: (Score:2)
No, regulation makes sure that only qualified (see Government / Corporate) uses are allowed. People for gun control aren't against guns, they are against normal people having guns.
Re: (Score:1)
It is the drone owners who are forcing this on all of us, so the costs should be totally placed on them with licensing fees and fines for violating property and privacy rights. Really, none of this would be necessary if drone operators would just fly under the conditions you specify. So many though seem to think that they are entitled to fly their toys wherever they like.
Re: (Score:2)
How does it benefit you not to have regulations that prevent devices from buzzing about over your head? In my mind there should be no weight minimums. I simply do not want these things flying around without well enforced rules.
So.. You want to force the registration of paper airplanes in the office now? I understand your idea, but I'm a bit confused as to how you intend to write a law that's reasonable and meets your criteria.
Re: (Score:1)
Companies can fire people for such absurd behavior, regular homeowners can not.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Why? (Score:4, Insightful)
How does it benefit you not to have regulations that prevent devices from buzzing about over your head?
It benefits me because I like flying 'em.
Re: (Score:2)
in my country making paper plane is illegal (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Name one
In Ireland third party insurance will be required (Score:2)
You'll be able to meet all these requirements by handing over a tidy sum of money to companies set up by friends of the politicians bringing in these drone laws. This is how Ireland works. Behind every law there is a backhander and a gravy train.
Not Going to Fly... (Score:2)
Where I applaud the Irish for their effort (and whiskey and red hair), I'm not sure how this is really going to work.
1. Having a registry available by December 21st seems very aggressive.
2. The privacy concerns of those registering seems to be an unaddressed concern with the whole process.
3. I'm not aware of any penalties for not registering, or violating any of the IAA rules.
4. Who knows how much this will cost? Are there registration fees? Is it per aircraft or per operator or what?
5. Who's got th
Re: (Score:2)
>> What you really need is ENFORCEMENT
What the government would prefer is an orderly cash flow from the millions sheeple who register so they can spend it on something else.
It's not like any local police department will ever get involved in enforcement of unlicensed drones. They already have the tools they need to deal with nuisance situations, of which "being a dangerous ass with a drone" is just a particular type.
>> It won't force anybody to register
They won't go after consumers, any more tha
Re: (Score:2)
Pretty much this. The elephant in the room is DJI - the manufacturer of the Phantom series of drones, arguably the most popular drone around. And one which weights 1.3 kg with battery and rotors. DJI has a lot of money invested. They want to play nice and would fall over themselves to force a registration at time of sale. They would even pay for it themselves.
Set it up in Ireland, debug the issue and now you can register (most) drones without even thinking about it.
'Pssst, buddy.... wanna buy an unre
Re: (Score:2)
For lots of things we don't have a real enforcement in europe.
You get cought sooner or later, and if the problem is server enough they proclaim, you are violating rules since you started having the device. Then you have to show that you did not.
E.g. you have to declare that you are brewing beer, 200l per year is tax free.
You did not declare it and you are brewing provable more than 200l this year. By checking your machine building year they figure you own it minimum 5 years.
So you get fined for not having d
Re: (Score:2)
If the Aviation Authority is responsible for the implementation, then copy and paste your questions to any other regulations in place by the same organisation and you will have your answers.
Implementing new regulations is not new to them. This is their job.
When drones are criminalized... (Score:2)
When drones are criminalized, only criminals will have drones...
Therefore, open season [onenewspage.com], bitches!
*grin*
Pffft (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Model rockets over 1.5kg have to get a specific wavier with location, time of flight, size, impulse and receive a specific waiver (and have a NOTAM filed) from the FAA every single time we fly. Suck it up, buttercup.
Model rockets that weigh over 1.5 kg (hopefully) go much further than the 400 vertical feet drones are limited to. And they go much faster. Yes, in those cases it is definitely appropriate for the rocketeers to tell other people using the airspace that something is going up very quickly. For the smaller drones, not so much.
Re: (Score:2)
Drones are not limited technically to 400 feet. Many of the more advanced (but still reasonably affordable) drones can easily do 500+ feet without much effort. The 400 foot "limit" is FAA guidance that doesn't constitute legal advice - if you're being an idiot at 100 feet, the FAA can still prosecute you for reckless flying. (Including flying your drone into people)
Re: (Score:2)
We had 2000' of string and flew it once in a dust storm.
Good, it's a big f-ing drone (Score:2)
If a 1kg drone falls on my head, it will likely kill me. I am very much interested in knowing who has these, where they are allowed to fly and what is the maintenance record.
Re: (Score:1)
If a 1kg drone falls on my head, it will likely kill me. I am very much interested in knowing who has these, where they are allowed to fly and what is the maintenance record.
Dear Paranoid Sir:
May I interest you in the latest bit of drone protective gear [wikipedia.org]? In the constant see saw between the Evil Forces and your physical integrity, this impressive device will completely shield you from their nefarious antics. The classic styling will fit in with any decor or occasion. For added protection, an aluminum foil EMF shield can be added to keep those unwanted thoughts to a bare minimum (if you get my drift...).
Re: (Score:2)
Legislating on a phantasm (Score:2)
At the same time about a million and a half people die each year in traffic accidents. http://www.who.int/gho/road_sa... [who.int] About 20 million wounded. These are the figures of the World War 3, and they continue to grow. And what we see - cars and motorcycles are getting even more overpowered and overweight. Streets and roads are overcrowded by cars.
At the same time delivery by drones could free roads a
What does the registry do? (Score:2)
What is the point of the registry?
Is it better for me if the person using a drone to spy on me mowing my lawn has a registered drone? Is my privacy being invaded more if it's not registered?
If you're going to say that we would be able to track down the person responsible if a drone is used to take down a plane you're lying. A drone used in such a manner would be homemade, unregistered, stolen or the registration markings would have been removed. The registration database would be completely useless.
The regi
Does this mean that... (Score:1)
...people are safe from being murdered by a US drone in Ireland?
Re: (Score:3)
This legislation is only necessary because the day of the responsible RC pilot are now gone. Now we have irresponsible RC pilots (because they aren't drones, they are RC craft) who want to fly their toys around airports, in other people's yards, interfere with emergency operations, and any number of other intrusive and dangerous behaviors.
They believe that people in public (ie, their own backyard surrounded by a privacy f