Fabs Now Manufacturing Carbon Nanotube Memory, Which Could Replace NAND and DRAM 67
Lucas123 writes: Nantero, the company that invented carbon nanotube-based non-volatile memory in 2001 and has been developing it since, has announced that seven chip fabrication plants are now manufacturing its Nano-RAM (NRAM) wafers and test chips. The company also announced aerospace giant Lockheed Martin and Schlumberger Ltd., the world's largest gas and oil exploration and drilling company, as customers seeking to use its chip technology. The memory, which can withstand 300 degrees Celsius temperatures for years without losing data, is natively thousands of times faster than NAND flash and has virtually infinite read/write resilience. Nantero plans on creating gum sticks SSDs using DDR4 interfaces. NRAM has the potential to create memory that is vastly more dense that NAND flash, as its transistors can shrink to below 5 nanometers in size, three times more dense than today's densest NAND flash. At the same time, NRAM is up against a robust field of new memory technologies that are expected to challenge NAND flash in speed, endurance and capacity, such as Phase-Change Memory and Ferroelectric RAM (FRAM).
Re: (Score:2)
Not really. They're manufacturing their devices; all HP ever seems to have done is talk.
Re: (Score:3)
Well to be fair, according to TFS, this company has done nothing but talk since 2001, almost 15 years now. Now it's finally got something ready for production.
How long has HP been talking about memristors? I don't think it's been this long.
I wonder how this (now proven) technology stacks up against (not yet proven) memristors in terms of density and speed.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
The first I heard of memristors was in the mid '80s. I don't recall if it was HP or someone else ballyhooing them, though.
Re: (Score:2)
The first I heard of memristors was in the mid '80s.
Memristors were first discovered in 2007 [wikipedia.org], so you did not hear about them in the 1980s, except maybe as a theoretical concept.
Re: (Score:2)
that same wikipedia article says that they were "Invented" in 1971 (in the same sense this stuff was invented 2001).
it's just that 2007 hp announced they had made a "prototype" of sorts using some physical phenomena known since 1960's.
seriously, I've quite taking hp seriously on the subject already due to them talking like they have a fabrication process in place when they don't.
Re:Reminds me of (Score:4, Informative)
HP/Agilent are quite good at these breakthrough technologies -- do a search for the Champagne Optical Switch -- that was another one that was going to take over the world.
But they have had some successes -- the FBAR filter/diplexer was (and still is) a big deal, in the news recently as some individuals were arrested for trying to set up an offshore source...
FERAM (and the phase change stuff) have been the technology of the decade -- for a couple of decades now.
One of the issues with FERAM is some of the dopants needed are considered contaminants by most folks, which makes it difficult to use someone else's fab... You want to run WHAT through my fab???
Re: (Score:2)
Indeed.... either that, or it will be priced so stratospheric that it doesn't have any chance of catching on in the home computer sector.
It will be news when it's available and affordable.
Until then, it's not really any better than vaporware.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Until then, it's not really any better than vaporware.
Just because something's too expensive for cheap-ass home computer users doesn't mean it's "vaporware". There's a lot of other sectors in the computing market that can afford more.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Not sure if you include all things 'micro' in your general derision, but MEMS [wikipedia.org] devices have revolutionized some areas of electronics, particularly sensors. I bet you've got a MEMS-based accelerometer [digikey.com] in your phone right now, and possibly a MEMS-based programmable oscillator [digikey.com].
If you have sleep apnea or asthma, your therapy device might contain a MEMS-based flow sensor [digikey.com].
Re: (Score:1)
This tech already arrived at Earth from another star system according to Ben Rich(CEO of Lockheed Inc)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]
imagine an iphone (Score:1)
of those
terabytes of data in my pocket
Re: (Score:1)
Costing just as many dollars...
Re: (Score:1)
So, 2 dollars for 2 terabytes?
Sounds like a pretty sweet deal to me.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Burma-Shave.
Stupid nitpick (Score:1)
Schlumberger isn't an exploration and drilling company, it's an oilfield services company. They don't drill the oil themselves, they sell technology, data and engineering services to people who do.
Re: (Score:3)
They also tend to know what they are doing, so this does give some passing credibility to this project.
I've seen a lot of things come and go, be it Tamarak's holographic storage, InPhase's holo storage, bubble memory, digital paper, optical tape drives, and so on. Since this has actual companies signing on, this appears to be more than just hype.
Time will tell though. Lots of innovations have been announced and discussed, and lots have wound up long forgotten.
Re: (Score:2)
Schlumberger is interested in using the devices, that says nothing about if the device exists or actually works.
Schlumberger is primarily interested because of the high temperature capabilities for "down hole" applications, where it can get hotter than an oven. That is a niche market that conventional devices don't address.
Re: (Score:2)
You have to be careful though because I've seen a lot of companies over the years say "Giant Corporation X is testing our product." And what that means is that someone at Giant Corporation X said "yes I'll take a sample and evaluate it." That doesn't mean they are investing any serious resources in integrating it into their roadmap. I've even seen it used when all they had was an informal meeting over drinks only to have a press release pop up "Company Y working with us!"
Re: (Score:2)
Schlumberger has a bunch of divisions, they aren't just oilfield. A friend of mine works in their IT support division, he's contracted to do IT security for a hospital.
Re: (Score:2)
It would have taken less time, but the engineers kept bursting into flames...
Nantero plans on creating gum sticks SSDs? (Score:5, Informative)
The summary says "Nantero plans on creating gum sticks SSDs using DDR4 interfaces."
TFA says:
(emphasis mine), which is, err, umm, the exact opposite of "Nantero plans on creating gum sticks SSDs" (or even "Nantero plans on creating gum stick SSDs").
As for what's being fabbed:
so, whilst this is better than "we've constructed a 4-bit chip in the lab and, yes, it does reliably store 4 bits of data", let's wait a couple of years before we get too excited.
Re:Nantero plans on creating gum sticks SSDs? (Score:5, Funny)
I am in a constant state of over-excitement. This story doesn't even move the needle.
Re: (Score:2)
Contact your doctor if you have a "state of over-excitement" that lasts longer than four hours.
Re: (Score:2)
Just in time (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
So you work for their competition, then?
Re: (Score:3)
No, he probably just goes to nanotechnology conferences. Nantero does have a pretty well earned reputation for spending a lot of money on not a lot of progress. Read TFA, they're claiming all this stuff in the summary is just "a few years" away, not actually here. This all has to do with Nantero closing another round of funding today not any technical milestones. It is unfair to pick on Nanotero though. There were a generation of Silicon Valley nanotech companies who all did the same thing. Nanotero h
It's great and all... (Score:2)
I think AMD is going to beat them to the punch with HBM and module stacking [amd.com] and is coming out on their next gen videocards, especially since DDR5 is just starting to roll out to the PC market for generic modules. It'll be a hard slog for them to push it in anywhere unless it's price competitive, or it's in highly specialized devices at least in the short term. I'd say 10 years before it rolls out to the general public, for public use. And they'll probably be bought up by someone else in the short term.
Re: (Score:2)
HBM isn't nonvolatile....
Neither is DRAM.
Re: (Score:1)
This story is about non-volatile RAM made from carbon nanotubes, as a flash replacement that's as fast as DRAM (hence your confusion?).
AMD adding a few through-holes to some memory chips so they can stack them is neat and all, but it's not even the same league as this stuff, and it's not relevant to the future of the NVRAM markets at all.
I'd say ten years before this basic distinction rolls out to the general public. No, wait, even my brother in law gets that a USB stick isn't like a DDR stick.
rule of thumb: 2 years away (Score:2)
three times more dense than today's
So according to Moore's law we are about 2 years away from having these in everyday electronics?
Ps /. Mobile is really broken. I had to spoof a desktop browser to post this. Current vrowser: opera mobile 29.0
Re: (Score:2)
I use mobile firefox and noscript turning javascript off. I also have slashdot set to "classic" mode (I remember whenSlashdot 2.0 got as much whining as Beta). Works like a charm.
Re: (Score:2)
I don't know why I am replying to an AC troll...
NRAM has the potential to create memory that is vastly more dense that NAND flash, as its transistors can shrink to below 5 nanometers in size, three times more dense than today's densest NAND flash. .
from the article
Each NRAM "cell" or transistor is made up the network of the carbon nanotubes that exist between two metal electrodes. The memory acts the same way as other resistive non-volatile RAM technologies.
If it looks like a transistor, and it acts like a transistor.....
Someone thinks there is only one type of transistor... Transistor Types [wikipedia.org]
Transistors have been redesigned many times. Oh look! It's happened again!
Carbon Nanotube Field-effect Transistor [wikipedia.org]
Unless your argument is that memory isn't an IC?
Will this make for a single memory space computer? (Score:3)
One where there is no differentiation between "disk" and "RAM"?
Interesting process (Score:5, Interesting)
Looking at the pictures in the slides this looks very similar to a carbon nanotube memory process I worked on at my last job (we might have even been licensing some of the IP from these guys). We were looking for a way to shrink our microcontroller die by moving the EEPROM cells up into the metallization stacks. An additional benefit to this memory was that we would be able to increase the EEPROM memory size 2x (with a second layer of cells) with the addition of just 5 more masking layers and almost no increase in die size.
The process I worked on was nowhere near volume production when I left; but I do know we did have completely functional die with carbon nanotube memory. The one part of the process that was most challenging was dealing with the carbon nanotube spin on process. It took forever to get the right thickness uniformity and once you had it at the correct thickness you were rewarded with a material that had filled in your lithography alignment structures to the point they were almost worthless for the next patterning step. It was pretty cool tech to work on, I am glad it looks like somebody is getting it to work.
one third the size, nine times the density (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, thank you. That was bugging the crap out of me. 3x feature shrink = 9x more devices per area.
Interesting, but... (Score:2)
Interesting quantum effects may come into play... (Score:3)