NVIDIA SHIELD Tablet Android Lollipop Update Performance Explored 57
MojoKid writes Last week, NVIDIA offered information regarding its Android Lollipop update for the SHIELD Tablet and also revealed a new game bundle for it. This week, NVIDIA gave members of the press early access to the Lollipop update and it will also be rolling out to the general public sometime later today. Some of the changes are subtle, but others are more significant and definitely give the tablet a different look and feel over the original Android KitKat release. Android Lollipop introduces a new "material design" that further flattens out the look of the OS. Google seems to have taken a more minimalist approach as everything from the keyboard to the settings menus have been cleaned up considerably. Many parts of the interface don't have any markings except for the absolute necessities. While the OS definitely feels more fluid and responsive, the default look isn't always better, depending on your personal view. The app tray for example has a plain, white background which looks kind of jarring if you've using a colorful background. And finding the proper touch points for things like a settings menu or clearing notifications isn't always clear. Performance-wise, NVIDIA's Shield Tablet showed significantly better performance on Lollipop for general compute tasks in benchmarks like Mobile XPRT but lagged behind Kit Kat in graphics performance slightly, which could be attributed to driver optimization.
CM11 users already have the look available. (Score:3, Informative)
In the CM11 themes you can apply the Lollipop theme and pretty much make the whole phone take on the biggest changes of Lollipop without effort.
Plus the new apps are already rolling out so you can have it all today instead of waiting for February to get CM12
Enough already (Score:5, Insightful)
I don't care if we're talking about Microsoft, Apple, Android or someone else. These flat, over-simplied GUIs are making things less intuitive and harder to use.
Don't hide scrollbars because they're ugly, they're there to tell us something can scroll (ex: horizontal scrolling in the iTunes Store). The fact that I need to have my mouse cursor over the area to see it can be scrolled if a failure in user interaction.
Stop with the over-simplified icons that don't mean anything, the lack of button borders that prevents me from knowing the area I can touch to push that button (ex: iOS 8).
Stop with the GUI elements that looks like a blur on regular monitors, the pastel-color-coded shit in 16x16 pixels icons that requires 20/20 vision and absolutely zero color blindness to discern between them all (ex: Finder tags).
The list goes on and on. Hardware people have no business designing user interfaces.
Re: (Score:3)
Here's the thing:
Power users can manage to get through dumbed down interfaces.
Regular users get confused and give up on "smarter" interfaces.
You can see that microsoft doesn't dump their current god-awful interface design choices on Visual Studio, but anything they even remotely imagine a typical user using, they wrap in useless shiny crap.
(None of what you described, however, quite matches the evil of websites that think you want to do anything other than scroll when you scroll)
Re: (Score:2)
It's not about the complexity of the user interface, I'm not talking about the removal of the Start button in Windows, I'm not talking about power users vs regular users here. I'm talking about what the interface looks like. All the problems I see with the modern GUIs are applicable to everyone.
And as you said: to all website coders, programmers and web-monkeys: don't fuck with my fucking scrollwheel or I'll just go to another website.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
As an OpenGL and UI/UX expert "Preaching to the choir!" /Oblg. Windows 1 vs Windows 8.
Fads go in ~20 year cycles. Hopefully the latest UI fad to flatten everything will start to change.
http://charlie.amigaspirit.hu/... [amigaspirit.hu]
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, I hate the flat GUI too. It seems like us, old computer geek/nerd farts hate it?
irrelevant (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Just because there aren't millions of people running Intel Extreme Edition CPUs with water-cooled CrossF
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
My PC is faster than an Xbox One. See you in 7 years!
In seven years, You'll have at least upgrade the processor once, upgrade the ram once, and replace the graphic adapter twice, just to play the same games that Xbox One readily play out of the box, albeit in lower resolution and maybe half the frame rate. Pros and cons
Re: (Score:3)
Why would you say something that's obviously not true except for a subset of PC gamers as if it's a fact? Not all PC gamers are at desks in bedrooms at their parent's house. Some of us PC game from our own couches with XBox 360 controllers. We do it for the much improved graphics and better performance than console games.
Re: (Score:2)
PC gamers hate joysticks.
I'm not throwing hundreds of $$$ into Star Citizen just to fly around with a mouse....
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
No they don't, unless by "Shooters and every other type of game ever made" you just mean Peggle. You're locked into a tiny worldview, and completely fail to see that many other people do not share your narrow preferences. This is far from the first time that you've demonstrated your own limits in your posts.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Shooters and every other type of game ever made needs a mouse.
That must be why nobody plays shooters with controllers...oh wait.
Re: (Score:2)
No, they don't need a mouse. Maybe 20 years ago, when gamepads and the software written for them were clunky and awkward (remember playing FPS games with no response curve applied to the input?), but nowadays lots of folks who are comfortable with a dual-stick controller prefer playing PC shooters with a gamepad. Yes, I might be a tiny bit more accurate with a mouse, but I no longer care about being the world's best Quake player. I play games to have fun, and most shooters are more fun for me if I use a gam
Re: (Score:2)
Shield is compatible with bluetooth keyboards/mice and can be connected to a display panel via HDMI.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
PC gamers hate joysticks.
Joysticks are part of what I love about PC gaming. The ability to use any input device for which someone has been arsed to cook up a driver is a beautiful thing, and it's one of the things I've missed during my latest foray into console gaming. I have an F22 Pro with Stickworks conversion which I'll probably stuff an Arduino into soon so I can make it a USB device finally, two logitech twisty sticks, two cyborg golds, and probably some more joysticks I'm forgetting about. Each of them fulfills a different p
Re: (Score:1)
The real reason why Nvidia tablet is doomed is because of the lack of games written for it. They aren't anywhere near as much AAA games as for Playstation, or XBox.
Re: (Score:2)
No, PC gamers don't hate joysticks; many of them love joysticks and gamepads.
That said, I have no interest in a nVidia Shield. It runs freaking Android. Android is great on my phone, where I also do not play games.
./ Headlines are becoming unparseable (Score:3, Insightful)
Is it a name or an acronym, an adjective or a noun - or maybe a verb. Who the fuck knows. Is it SHIELD or Shield? Is it made by NVIDIA (And should get a possessive 's)? Do we need to know that NVIDIA is the maker at all, or is it important that the Shield (or SHIELD) is the particular tablet (do we need to know it's a tablet?) that you've benchmarked. Should we know what is happening (performance explored - or was it just a benchmark?) and then find out it was under a particular release. And why Lollipop - aren't we past codenames now to understand that this is the official Android 5.0 (pre)release?
If you're going for obscure and useless, you guys are nailing these headlines. Why not take the next step and just pick 8 random words from the summary and post those in any order?
(ob: now get off my lawn)
Re: (Score:2)
Seriously? (Score:2)
SHIELD [wikipedia.org] needs their own tablet?
Re: (Score:2)
Of course SHIELD runs Android, how else could they have gotten Ultron?
I don't think Ultron's too keen on sweets though. Must be a proprietary fork.
Old hardware on the new OS (Score:1)
It is funny with all these new operating systems supposed to be faster on the old devices; yet less and less of these old devices can actually run them.
These reviews claiming otherwise are pure marketing.
OS improvements usually come with a different cost: new bloat. Hence at some point your old hardware will not work good enough with the new OS. Or whoever made the hardware has no desire to support the new OS once they have sold you the device.
It is more obvious with Apple devices, although that can be attr
Name eight unrelated words (Score:2)
"NVIDIA SHIELD Tablet Android Lollipop Update Performance Explored"
This headline has meaning for many of the people reading it on this website, but imagine the average non-technical person trying to parse this.
Re: (Score:2)
"NVIDIA SHIELD Tablet Android Lollipop Update Performance Explored"
This headline has meaning for many of the people reading it on this website, but imagine the average non-technical person trying to parse this.
Do average non-technical people read this site? Rarely... and they do not last long.