Will HP's $200 Stream 11 Make People Forget About Chromebooks? 232
theodp writes With an 11.6" screen, Windows 8.1, and free Office 365 for a year, the $199.99 solid-state HP Stream 11 laptop is positioned to make people think twice about Chromebooks (add $30 for the HP Stream 13). But will it? "The HP Stream 11 is clearly both inexpensive and a great value," writes Paul Thurrott. "At just $200, it's cheap, of course. But it also features a solid-feeling construction, a bright and fun form factor, a surprisingly high-quality typing experience and a wonderful screen. This isn't a bargain bin throwaway. The Stream 11 is something special." The HP Stream Family also includes the HP Stream 7, a $99.99 Windows 8.1 Tablet that includes the Office 365 deal. By the way, at the other end of the price spectrum, HP has introduced the Sprout, which Fast Company calls a bold and weird PC that's bursting at the seams with new ideas, from 3-D scanning to augmented reality. (We mentioned the Sprout a few days ago, too; HP seems to be making some interesting moves lately, looks like they're getting on the smartwatch bandwagon, too.) If you're looking at the Stream as a cheap platform for OSes other than Windows, be cautious: one of the reviews at the Amazon page linked describes trouble getting recent Linux distributions to install.
No (Score:5, Interesting)
Chromebooks are not just cheap, they are very low maintenance and easy to use. If you buy your mum a Windows laptop she will need technical support. If you buy her a Chromebook after the initial set-up you can forget about it.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Install Ubuntu on it and don't give her the root password. Teach her how to access the web browser, email program, and LibreOffice. Problem solved for 99% of mums.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
If so, it might actually be useful.
[boople woople twaddle twaddle, /. says I type too fast.]
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
Sprouts make me fart.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Chromebooks are not just cheap, they are very low maintenance and easy to use. If you buy your mum a Windows laptop she will need technical support. If you buy her a Chromebook after the initial set-up you can forget about it.
This is precisely the reason I recommended my mother buy an Acer Chromebook because after years of supporting her Microsoft Windows-running computer it was definitely a blessing to have a computer which I could set-up for her the features (email, web browsing) she cared about and be done with support. The only support request I get these days, which admittedly is as rare as hen's teeth, occurs when the track-pad mouse freezes - attributable to the suspend mode I dare say. For 99% of the things I use a compu
Cost of data (Score:2)
any software development work can be done on a virtual machine or physical server accessible via SSH from the Google Chromebook
If you're SSHing and VNCing to the server on which you're developing software, how much data would that use per month? At $10 per GB (common price for cellular data in USA) that could get expensive.
Re: (Score:2)
Surely a Chromebook won't prefer wifi when it can get it
Which it can't, as public transit in my home town doesn't offer Wi-Fi. In order to get Wi-Fi on a bus, I'd have to pay a cellular carrier several hundred dollars per year for wireless hotspot service.
CAD540 per year (Score:2)
Why would I run a GUI on a server?
Because you're developing GUI applications and want to test the GUI. Using an actual computer for this would save you CAD540 per year. But then perhaps I'm an outlier because I program on my laptop on the bus ride to and from work.
Re: (Score:2)
Chromebooks are not just cheap, they are very low maintenance and easy to use.
So:
- buy this laptop
- return Windows to Microsoft for a $100 refund
- install Chrome
- profit!!
Seriously - if you can score this hardware for $100 and run some other OS, they'll sell like hotcakes.
Re: (Score:2)
- return Windows to Microsoft for a $100 refund
Seriously - if you can score this hardware for $100 and run some other OS, they'll sell like hotcakes.
Except you'd more likely get around the ~$15 (guesstimate, no citation) OEM unit license cost as a refund. We're not talking the retail license here, and it puts into light what a rip-off the retail license cost actually is (assuming the extra cost of for the "support" that comes with the retail license.)
Re: (Score:2)
Also: Chomebooks are know for very fast boot, and great battery life.
Yo Mama (Score:2)
Is computer illiterate? Buy her or pops a Chromebook and they can't do their taxes on it.
Anyway, computer illiterate parents are not the market where Chromebooks are selling. Most are landing in the hands of computer illiterate children via schools looking for a "cheap laptop." Schools love them. They are inexpensive and low maintenance. You don't need IT with Chromebooks and that's exactly what schools want to hear. Too bad the kids can't really use Chromebooks to learn anything about computers.
20 years ag
Re: (Score:2)
Actually, I think they can, thanks to cloud-based tax software. Mostly because of the rise of OS X which means a bunch of Windows only tax software just won't work for them.
Sure, there are plenty of issues when trust Intuit and others with your tax information (it's web based, after all), but with a Chromebook, I'm sure security of the laptop isn't as big a problem.
And given the way people generally backup, at least use
Re: (Score:2)
Many states have locked PDF forms that can only be filled with Adobe Acrobat. The PDF can't even be saved once filled, so an electronic backup is out. The only backup available is a printed one. You're not going to be able to fill and print them on a Chromebook, even with Linux.
Sorry. I don't trust other people with my tax returns.
Re: (Score:2)
That one is easy: Put a notebook Linux like Mint on it and most maintenance issues go away. Question is, have they made that easy or hard?
Re:No (Score:5, Informative)
Even Paul says its not too good (without saying "its too underpowered"):
Whether the Stream's Celeron process, 2 GB of RAM and 32 GB of eMMC storage will stand the test of time will of course require some, well, time. But I can offer a few quick observations.
First, this configure seems perfectly capable of running Windows 8.1 (and thus Windows 10 as well) and doing well for the types of casual computing tasks one should expect of such a machine. You can run Word and Office 2013. IE. Facebook. That kind of thing. My bloated Chrome configuration, with multiple add-ons, quickly overwhelmed available memory, and while it does run fine, you won't want to run Chrome alongside any other heavy hitters.
so its not really enough to browse the web with the addons one expects nowadays (and I assume heavy javascript web pages) and do anything else, and he goes one to say you have 10gb storage free. You'll have to carefully manage that once you store a load of music or movies on it.
Re: No (Score:2)
Loading movies and music on a computer is something older geeks do but hardly anyone else. Everyone else is using online services like Netflix, Spotify, and Vudu and just renting/streaming. This is especially true for the college age crowd the Stream and Chromebooks are marketed towards. They're sitting on gigabit Internet connections in their dorms so cloud storage is a no brainer for them.
For anyone wanting to use a Chromebooks or Stream PC as a backup laptop it's cheap to pick up a high speed SD card wit
Re: (Score:3)
It's a low cost device for casual use. People who need a lot of heavy Chrome add-ons are not the target audience. The target audience is people who listen to Spotify and other streaming services, or watch Netflix so have little need of local storage. It's basically for people who want something like a tablet but also with a reasonable keyboard so they can type a few emails or letters.
Actually, Yes (Score:2)
It's an incredible (subsidized) value. Not a great main system but still useful in many scenarios.
Re:No (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:No (Score:5, Insightful)
The problem is the system does not see SD cards as a local disk. ITs not a trivial matter you can handwave away. Some programs wont let you install on removable storage. I own a Dell venue 8 32 GB, i will NEVER buy something with that little main memory ever again. I would like to add i have been managing small OS drives for 10 years, starting with a 74 GB Raptor drive. I prepared for this future of small OS storage, what i didnt prepare for is how long OEMs would rape us on memory and no one is saying anything about it.
Too bad that even with 10 years experience, you cannot figure out if a computer/tablet runs Microsoft Windows or if it runs Android. The Dell Venue 8 runs Android, the HP Stream and the Dell Venue 8 Pro both run Windows 8.
I own an Asus T100TA that also runs windows 8 and when I add a microSD, it shows up a drive D in windows. It looks and works like any other drive in windows. I can install programs on it no problem.
However, the Venue 8 is an android machine and with the newer versions of android, Google has really restricted what can be stored on an external microSD card and what each program can access on them. You're talking about restrictions on an Android platform and applying them to a thread about Windows 8 machines. Meh.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
That said, this runs Windows, not Android like your Venue, and it has a USB3 port, so there should be no obstacles to installing programs on an external drive, and it should perform fine.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
You're complaining about the offerings of two entirely different price points. This for $200 versus a macbook air? It's only 5 to 6 times more expensive. For the price point the value is clear here, even if you're blind to price point.
While the AC is a bit silly for comparing any HP Stream spec with the Macbook Air, s/he does make a good point that 10 GB of free storage space is really really low. You need to produce a usable product for people to buy it, regardless of the price point. 10 GB is just too low, and it is pretty obvious IMHO that a 64 GB drive would have made this product far more useful, even if it would have made the product $225 instead of $200.
Re: (Score:2)
SDHC cards are not in the same ballpark where speed is a concern
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Granted it isn't as small as the Stream, but it certainly isn't bulky or heavy. 4GB of RAM is plenty for current apps and storage isn't a concern. I landed up getting two for a friend of mine to replace some really old XP boxen. Performance was good for day to day tasks and the Celeron N2830 has GPU accelerated video for playing 1080p cat videos on YouTube. The only "con" I have with it is that it
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
(I was curious as to weights of various devices. And most of those figures don't include the weight of the charger.)
Re: No (Score:2)
Well let's benchmark these things properly before saying that Chromebooks are fast and celerons are slow. On passmark the celerons have a score close to that of an old core2duo. Are we telling people to use "pay as you go" apps from Google Play instead of Microsoft's Live Essentials and those apps that come with W8 just because we can't compare Celerons with ARM SOC s?
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
So microsoft's relationship with the govt is relavent here but google's is not?
Yeah, the NSA hacked Google to get at their data, Microsoft was a willing collaborator.
Since you so dishonestly quoted text from an article without linking back to it, here is the link: http://www.theguardian.com/wor... [theguardian.com]
This concerns the "Prism" program - which since the initial bruhaha has been revealed to be little more than an automated way to comply with (presumably) lawful requests from law enforcement agencies. (Note: I strongly disagree with the constitutionality of having a secret court issuing secret orders; it totally undermines the democracy)
The participation in the automated system
Re: No (Score:5, Informative)
Chrome Remote Desktop. Full password protected access from anywhere in the world, even if she's NAT'd behind her router. Chrome Web Store [google.com]
Re: It didn't work like that for me in reality. (Score:2, Funny)
Lol, it took you 3 hours to turn a Chromebook on and create a Google account!? You must be a special kind of stupid.
Depends (Score:2)
Office365 for year + 32GB = $70 a year (Score:5, Insightful)
Well Windows uses 24GB after all the patches, so the solid state storage is only 8GB or so. So that requires you use the 1TB online storage.
So you're actually looking at a $200 + $70 a year to continue the Office 365 + storage you filled up in the first year. $99 a year for the professional version. All your files would be online so you'll have to migrate if you ever want to stop paying.
It's maybe better to buy a Netbook and put OpenOffice on it, it will have a 500GB drive, and you can store your docs and files locally.
Chromebooks are for Google fans, its sort of a poor mans Windows, but with only 32GB of flash and Windows taking most of it, this isn't really a Windows laptop.
Re: (Score:2)
It's maybe better to buy a Netbook
I thought netbooks were discontinued in favor of tablets [slashdot.org].
Re: (Score:3)
Whatever. I never use a tablet for computing unless there is nothing else available. My dinky little Acer Aspire One is better at everything than my tablet with the exception of being a smart remote which is what the Samsung 7" tablet I have has become. It makes a fucking fabulous remote control though, I threw the logitech remote in the trash.
Once your netbook dies (Score:2)
My dinky little Acer Aspire One is better at everything than my tablet
I can see how this might be true. But what do you plan to buy once your "dinky little Acer Aspire One" dies?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Long enough. There are plenty of Commodore 64's still for sale.
Long-term reliance on used hardware (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I see old laptops all the time at yard sales for next to nothing. Still I don't really expect to use a 20 year old computer. I used an Amiga 3000 from 94 until 99 and despite the fact it was 10 years old had no trouble finding anything I needed for it at reasonable prices. Still I ended up moving on to a newer much more powerful system because eventually technology moves so far that upgrading becomes irresistible. I didn't leave the Amiga because it wasn't viable anymore but because something far better
Re: (Score:3)
10.1" vs. 11.6" (Score:2)
Maybe some (Score:3)
I for my part consider buying a cheap windows tablet, which includes a office 2013 version.
Answer: No. (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
And it comes in blue and pink.
Re: (Score:3)
I'm still missing codesearch. Luckily Github has improved its search since then.
Re:Answer: No. (Score:5, Informative)
no, true... but then Google doesn't expect you to pay regularly to continue to keep accessing your files (first year free).
I would say that a lot of Google services have not been closed but morphed into a different product - Wave was the start for functionality now in Google Docs for example.
Re: (Score:2)
Google expects you to start paying after 2 or 3 years
https://productforums.google.c... [google.com]
Re: (Score:2)
In Google's case, the "pound of flesh" is a little bit of privacy, for a whole heaping helping of convenience. A lot of people consider that tradeoff OK.
Re: (Score:2)
I'd imagine that the person who did a "-1 Disagree" on this post has never lost data due to a web service suddenly being shut down or signifigantly changed.
I'll bet that a bunch of the former Megaupload customers out there have learned this lesson the hard way. Google is likely to give you more advanced warning than that, but it's still something to be concerned about.
Xbox Live for original Xbox (Score:2)
Microsoft has it's issues, but at least they usually aren't forcing you to uninstall products that you already have installed.
Halo 2 multiplayer perhaps?
Re: (Score:2)
Halo 2 multiplayer is integrated into Halo 2 single player. You can still play one of them at least.
Purchased functionality is still permanently missing.
MMO
Which reminds me: There exists a better example in Asheron's Call 2: Fallen Kings, an MMORPG first published by Microsoft in November 2002 and shut down in December 2005.
Windows 10 please. (Score:3)
So is this one of those situations where I have to say, "mod me down all you want.." in ordered to get modded up? Just for the record I have been a huge Linux geek since about 95 with Slackware. Computers, operating systems, and software are tools and I explore all available tools. I've been running the Tech Preview pretty happily. It would make this machine an impulsive buy.
Re: (Score:2)
Read the specs it has a full HDMI port. If you don't like metro, there are several free to commercial options that return the start menu.
The Windows 10 upgrade is the big question. But it's been rumored that it will be a free upgrade for 8/8.1 users. But that's just speculation at this point.
Why? (Score:4, Interesting)
If people buy these simply based on price then most are likely to be disappointed. My guess is they will be marketing these towards students which is probably the best angle. Assuming they sell an acceptable number of them then only time will tell us if these keep customers happy for a reasonable amount of time. They'll need to make the upgrade to Windows 10 (and Office ?) free AND easy. They'll need to "just work" and stay that way. If these things things get easily infected with malware, spyware, or something more costly like Cryptowall then all money saved will be lost and then some. Windows has a reputation to fix and I'm just glad it isn't my job to try to fix it.
Re: (Score:2)
Macbooks aren't as common at my local community college from what I have seen.
Impartial (Score:5, Insightful)
..."The HP Stream 11 is clearly both inexpensive and a great value," writes Paul Thurrott....
Now there's an impartial opinion.
Re: Impartial (Score:3)
Yeah, the guy gets paid to write about Microsoft products for a living. Not exactly a guy to go to for an unbiased opinion.
Re: (Score:3)
Both.
And with colors that ugly... (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Buy a can of spray paint. Rumor has it that Linux will run.
Role reversal? (Score:4, Interesting)
So HP is pushing a souped up Chromebook, and a bare bones PC, along with bare bones chromebook and the usual standard formfactor laptops. Looks like HP is throwing everything on the wall and is waiting to see what sticks. It might drop the bare bones chromebook price down too. Come Christmas I would not be surprised to see same spec chrome book at 99$ or 129$
Basic selling point of Chromebook is not just the low price, it is a low maintenance streaming device, with a full keyboard and better screen. HDMI out, bluetooth keyboard, ... why would I even think of buying Roku or chromecast, or smart TV?
Re: (Score:2)
XBMC on a chromebook, that's a thought.
They did it on purpose (Score:2)
It's ironic that it doesn't run Linux well, given that [a] Linux can be installed on everything from mechanical watches to dead badgers, [everything2.com] and [b] Google insists [acer.com] on the non-release of Windows drivers for their Chromebooks.
Re: (Score:2)
No actually new hardware is often problematic for Linux. It's the driver issues see? New proprietary hardware has to have drivers reverse engineered and that takes time. Give it 6 months to a year then try, by then these will be all over ebay at a fraction of their new prices.
Re: (Score:2)
Next thing you'll tell me is that I can't run Linux on my clockwork zombie badger. That, sir, is the kind of nonsense up with which I will not put!
TBH getting Linux to run on a Chromebook is a bit of a process, too, and some of the drivers just made it to the kernel in 3.17. While we're on the topic of irony, it's strange to think that it's normal for closed-source drivers to be reverse-engineered for Linux, but no one is likely to use the open-source Linux drivers to produce Windows drivers for the Chromeb
Re: (Score:2)
It's that pesky GPL. They can't just take it and run.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, that's true to some degree, but it's still possible to do a "clean room" implementation. These sort of things have been done before, perhaps most notably by ReactOS. It's a hell of a lot better than starting with nothing in any case. I suppose it's less common to have a device for which Linux drivers exist but not equivalent Windows drivers, but it's still a little odd for reverse engineering to be normal in Linux-land and completely unheard-of (by myself, at any rate) on the other side of the fence.
Re: (Score:2)
The biggest reverse engineering project I remember was the one where the original PC bios was reverse engineered thus creating the clone market.
Interesting devices (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
If these devices are backwards compatible a Stream 7 would be an ideal device to replace my Mac.
Well, they probably won't run XP properly. Anyway, you're better off keeping that stuff in a VM, and not letting it autoupdate. That way it never bones itself.
"... solid-state HP Stream..." Solid-state?! (Score:5, Funny)
Hell no! I want the vacuum tube version. Better yet, get me a steam powered version with 1.2 cycles per second pistons.
Seriously, since when is 'solid-state" anything but all-pervasive in the world of laptops?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
No, but schools will take a second look (Score:2)
We test piloted Chromebooks vs Windows laptops last year, and the decision was made to go with Chromebooks by the district's tech committee over the summer. 700 Chromebooks were purchased and rolled out to a complete grade level plus classes in other grade levels.
The decision to go with Chromebooks was purely political. There was a staff member on the committee (who is no longer with the district) that hyped Google Apps, but when September came, everyone found out you could not run Office on them, and many
Re: (Score:3)
They'll take a second look, and the smart ones will go with chromebooks. The chromebook world is full of boxes which perform acceptably at a low cost. They have no recurring costs. They're disposable. When one is smashed, you can use can replace it with without any setup at all. Work is never lost due to a disk crash.
The kids can install Linux and mess with that on these things. It runs reasonably well.
You can still have some Windows or Macs around to do the hard-core crap (that wouldn't work on under
Re: (Score:2)
> Students can write their reports and essays using LaTex
Good luck getting anyone outside CS to do that. Even if the student learns LaTeX, he/she won't likely be able to collaborate with other students/advisers easily. Exporting and importing into/from PDFs is not really a solution when edits are involved.
> I cannot think of a valid reason students should be learning a proprietary application.
The most common and valid reason is when other people you work with want to use a proprietary application and
Re: (Score:2)
> Students can write their reports and essays using LaTex
Good luck getting anyone outside CS to do that. Even if the student learns LaTeX, he/she won't likely be able to collaborate with other students/advisers easily.
Even for my CS thesis, the professor wanted word files (annotate feature).
But I used lyx/klyx to write it and so he got PDFs, which he printed.
Lyx was wonderful, allowing me to concentrate almost exclusively on the text itself and not worrying about formatting. p I wish they would teach actual typesetting skills in school (because producing a document is a bit more than just filling a page with letters and spaces and a few pictures)!
Or for twice that I can do actual useful work (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
Or you can buy a refurb'd Thinkpad for $125-150 with specs and durability that will blow away these toys. Works just fine.
Re: (Score:3)
Or you can buy a refurb'd Thinkpad for $125-150 with specs and durability that will blow away these toys. Works just fine.
I do the majority of my work on a thinkpad that matches that description. It was ~2 years old when I bought it used and it's still humming along just fine 2+ years later. I've had previous ones meet those kind of reliability numbers as well, and I'm not exactly easy on my hardware.
Frankly it baffles me how much people will pay for hardware that won't last this long.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm still using a T42 that I bought new ~11 years ago. Granted, I don't use for any heavy work, but with Arch Linux and XFCE, it handles basic everyday tasks just fine.
The battery is down to ~10-15 minutes of runtime by now, it's heavy, the screen resolution is low, some of the plastic has broken off one of the corners and I'm on the third (IIRC) mini-PCI WLAN adapter. Firefox/Chrome really doesn't like more than about 10 tabs open at any one time, multitasking in general is not advised.
But it plays 720p vi
No one can catch the ginderbread man! (Score:2)
Is anyone else amused by the rapidity of this race to the bottom?
Enjoy bankruptcy.
Re:No one can catch the ginderbread man! (Score:4, Interesting)
But personally I think Meg's ideas are mostly working...the split puts both sides in better shape, faster reactions as a corp, and a finer tuned "vision". Of course I'm unhappy seeing some of my friends loose their jobs but that's just corporate life ESPECIALLY in IT and from what I've seen no one was "singled out" it is pretty random. Even while some divisions are laying off people others are hiring...we lost some help desk people but are adding mainframe operation techs and they get paid almost twice as much! Honestly I'd much rather see HP having more "mainframe" level activities going on than expanding contracted help desk operations but we have to leverage the capabilities we have in-office.
I think though that my location might be a "special case" since we're the site of IBM's 360 SABRE location and this system can't be "moved" easily. It's all underground, multiple bubble doors, iris scanners, password-of-the-day stuff. I work a few hundred feet away for almost two years and haven't seen the inside of it but walk around the top of it during my smoke breaks every night...yet I have worked deep inside the Cherokee Data Center for months on end so I have whatever "clearance" to be inside of it technically. Our location is quasi-government entangled and is kinda it's own entity inside of HP lol.
HP Split-up (Score:2)
ExplorerBook (Score:3)
Another HP 2000 (Score:5, Interesting)
Awhile back, HP made the HP 2000 Laptops running low end AMD Processors and sold them at Walmarts at $279.
Piece of Crap doesn't even describe this PC. These are easily the slowest PC's I have touched in years, and it's not because of Windows 8. (Hell, I think Chrome OS Would struggle on these things.) It's the Hardware components they chose to use with them. Using Low end AMD C and E processors coupled with hard drives with embarrassing slow speed and latency times, it's built to be as cheap as possible and it shows. HP seems to have a track record with this as well, Slipping Tablet, Phone and NetBook Components in full size laptop form factors to convince Granny that she's getting more Laptop than she actually is.
I constantly get these in the shop and I tell the customers there's nothing I can do to them speed wise to make them any faster. Even if you reset them to factory (Which Amazingly removes all of the bloatware down to only essential Hardware necessary items) it's takes practically 30 minutes to boot before you can actually use it. Patching it takes about 1 full day between waiting an hour for it to actually register updates, to installing Windows 8.1, which takes 4-5 hours, and another 6-8 hours installing the Windows 8.1 patches. With just about any other laptop (short of the Toshiba's that follow this same Price model) I can go from windows 8.0 factory to fully 8.1 patched in under 3 hours.
If $279 Gets you crap like the HP 2000, I can't imagine what these $199 systems would be like, Unless MS is seriously giving HP Money each time they sell one of these.
Links? (Score:2)
What's up with the Amazon links? HP doesn't have product pages anymore?
I'm still waiting (Score:2)
Seriously, I have been waiting for years for the 'Lovecraft' model from HP.
*runs* *ducks* *hides* :)
How can you forget something you never heard of? (Score:2)
No. Chromebook is actually the better package. (Score:4, Interesting)
No. Chromebook is actually the better package for most people.
8 hrs. battery time. Boots in 8 seconds. Zero maintenance. Zero worries about backups. Zero worries about installing programms. Zero virii. Zero synching your photos, videos, audios, whatnot with your tablet and/or phone. Everything in the cloud. Drop your laptop, have it stolen, pour coffee into it - no problem. Order a new one, log on, all your stuff is there and you didn't even have to archive. While the the one is being shipped you can use your friends computer or your cellphone to do the most important stuff until it arrives. I gave my fiance a laptop (IBM Thinkpad, Ubuntu 14.04, all ready and set up) and an android tablet. She used the laptop once. The tablet she uses constantly. Just watching her is a real eye opener.
Anther Point in case:
I'm your type A slashdot computer geek and even *I* would prefer a chromebook over a windows laptop (typing this on Linux btw.)
I'm quite convinced that my next portable computer will either be an android tablet with an extra bluetooth keyboard or a chromebook - routing a chromebook with crouton and installing linux on it is quite easy, and 8 hrs battery time for 299 has a nice ring to it.
The truth is: Google is set to bring the second half of humanity online. They are basically the budget Apple. You pay significantly less with at least as much convenience, if not even more. Google takes care of you and all your computing stuff for free and in turn the may observe you 24/7. That's the basic deal and there is no upside MS can offer to that.
With MS it's pay premium, and get observed, and functionality degraded over time and virii and we want to know all your details before you can use windows unencumbred. Oh, and MS Office is a subscription now. ... Who the eff wants that? ... MS only has a chance to do that for historical reasons, and those are wearing off quickly.
No one I know would want this ugly laptop with windows on it.
My 2 cents.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Can I run 1080p porn on it?
32 gigs ain't exactly a lot of porn to torrent, but I can set up a wireless seedbox for that.
"seedbox"
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)