Intel Upgrades MinnowBoard: Baytrail CPU, Nearly Halves Price To $99 92
DeviceGuru (1136715) writes "Intel and CircuitCo have revealed a smaller, faster, 2nd-gen MinnowBoard open SBC based on an Atom E3800 SoC and supported by both Android 4.4 and various standard Linux OSes. The MinnowBoard Max, which will ship in Q3 starting at $99, blows past the original MinnowBoard (Slashdot video) on price, performance, and energy consumption. The 3.9 x 2.9-inch Max's $99 starting price includes a 64-bit 1.46GHz Intel Atom E3815 (Bay Trail-T) CPU, 1GB RAM and 8GB SPI flash, and coastline ports for MicroSD, Micro-HDMI, GbE, dual USB, and SATA. Unlike the original MinnowBoard, the Max provides two expansion connectors: a low-speed header, with signals similar to the Arduino's Shield connector; and a high-speed connector, which can support mSATA and mini-PCIe sockets on expansion modules, among other interfaces. Although the Max's design supports CPUs up to Intel's quad-core 1.91GHz (10W TDP) E3845, only two choices shown initially at MinnowBoard.org, with the higher-end $129 model stepping up to a 1.33GHz dual-core E3825 plus 2GB RAM.."
Best MAME motherboard ever? (Score:3)
Powerful enough Intel CPU for MAME and direct Arduino-style ports for all the inputs and outputs of modern, home-made arcade cabinets?
Re: (Score:1)
Re:Best MAME motherboard ever? (Score:5, Interesting)
Trust me ... you're paying the Intel (TM) premium. Someone will do it better, cheaper. Just give it time.
You'd better be certain that you actually need all that power before you go and pay a little less than half as much for a Beaglebone black; but ~$100 is actually pretty much the going rate for a 'dev board' style arrangement with properly punchy ARM application processor, and those tend to have extra happy-fun-dicking-around-with-the-worst-graphics-driver-on-god's-black-earth, as opposed to 'Install Debian, have Intel's nonthrilling-but-endurable and in-kernel driver just work'.
The Intel Galileo seems like a product in pathetic search for purpose (can't bitbang even as well as a 16MHz AVR, rather more expensive than an arduino, weird and limited enough that the slightly less costly BB black or rPi is a better move, etc.); but this Minnowboard revision is markedly more compelling.
If you don't actually need that much power, you can get weaker-and-still-runs-full-linux ARM boards for about half that; but if you want a devboard (as opposed to hacking up some tightly integrated AllWinner SomethingSomething from ebay that may not even have serial debug headers), with a high end ARM application processor, you are looking at about $100 and not wildly dissimilar energy consumption.
If anything, the main competition (outside of space-constrained scenarios), is probably the (surprisingly aggressively priced) full bay trail motherboards [anandtech.com] (some other vendors as well [anandtech.com]). That will be a bit bigger, and you'll need a 24-pin PSU of some kind; but no need for expansion boards just to get PCIe/miniPCIe sockets, more I/O, and enough change to buy a low end arduino to substitute for the low-speed expansion.
I don't know if ARM scared intel good and hard, or if this is some price-dumping long game; but they appear to be practically giving 'Bay Trail' dice away.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
It's about as powerful as a Pentium II, at a fraction of the thermal power. Perfectly fine for 15 year old computer performance. This is probably not the part you are looking for if you are actually trying to make a MAME cabinet, but it's better than the people who were previously using pentium 4's and celerons that had 90 watt thermal power envelopes.
People need to remember the purpose of these things is to go into battery-operated devices, not be some kind of laptop/desktop replacement, because these devi
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It might run an older NES emulator at acceptable speed, or perhaps a native remake of the old game.
It probably depends more on what games you want, and how fanatical about fidelity you are. Reportedly, 100% timing-accurate simulation of even the humble NES is surprisingly computationally intensive, and nothing less will do to hunt down every last oddball that exploited weird edge conditions in the hardware and run it glitchlessly in its original form; but 'usually good enough' emulation was happening back when we were rocking PIII 450s on the desktop and worse than that on the laptop side.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Best MAME motherboard ever? (Score:4, Informative)
I don't understand that netbook meme on slashdot, they were hugely successful and ran real software, not cell phone/PDA/Psion stuff. They made laptops affordable, for the better or the worse. There are probably more people running Photoshop on netbooks than playing with their Raspberry Pee. You're slightly wrong about the CPU power, an old netbook's CPU is around 3x more powerful than a Raspberry's one I think. The newly announced MinnowBoard is perhaps the first "single board computer" that surpasses a first-gen netbook.
Re: (Score:2)
RPi GPU is still a major selling point (Score:2)
The RPi's GPU may not be the top gaming rig out there, but it's fast enough to play 1080p television. For me, that's fast enough that sometime soon I'm going to get around to getting one and hooking it up to my TV, probably to run XBMC as well as using it as a home file server. The interesting alternative would have been the Beaglebone Black, but it looks like the BBB's GPU is more limited, and can only do 1080 at a really low frame rate. (And of course now the BBB seems to be sold out and backordered -
Re: (Score:2)
For inputs, skip the GPIO header and just use HID USB. Less hassle, and they perform wonderfully.
Also, JVS to USB options exist too, if you want to use a cabinet made sometime this century.
Re: (Score:1)
GPIO is for just that: general purpose input/output. You can hook up damn near anything to those pins and easily write code to control whatever device(s) you want. USB isn't quite as simple. GPIO is perfect for what these devices were designed around.
Re: (Score:2)
Unless the GPIO pins are exposed to mame as some sort of controller, you're going to have to write some kind of driver. As it stands now, I can wire up a couple of boards from MadCatz and have it working in under an hour. Well under an hour if I just use two TE sticks.
SPI typo... (Score:5, Informative)
8 GB SPI exists (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Cool but expensive (Score:2, Interesting)
Seems pretty expensive considering you can get a Dell Venue 8 with 2GHz dual core/2GB ram/32GB flash/battery/screen/case for $179. Still, for a lot of projects it would be useful.
Re:Cool but expensive (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
It's Bay Trail.
http://www.dell.com/us/p/dell-venue-8-pro/pd
http://ark.intel.com/products/78416/Intel-Atom-Processor-Z3740D-2M-Cache-up-to-1_83-GHz
http://ark.intel.com/products/codename/55844/Bay-Trail
Dell Venue 8 is Android and is Clover Trail (Score:1)
The Dell Venue 8 is Android and is Clover Trail. The Dell Venue 8 Pro is WIndows 7.1 and is Bay Trail. Happy Trails.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Seems pretty expensive considering you can get a Dell Venue 8 with 2GHz dual core/2GB ram/32GB flash/battery/screen/case for $179.
That really isn't the point. The Venue 8 is a tablet while the minnowboard is made for building embedded systems. Places where the minnowboard would be used would often have no use for the screen on the Venue.
While they have vaguely similar hardware, they are really after very different markets.
Re: (Score:2)
My point is it seems whenever you add the words embedded PC or hobbyist to the description you get an instant 50% bump in cost relative to the same/similar hardware in other uses. Perhaps it's because of the much smaller runs relative to a consumer device, but PCB's aren't really that expensive.
Re: (Score:2)
Beaglebone Black (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
It does, but there are some legitimate uses for a modern embedded x86 board.
Re: (Score:2)
New expansion slot. (Score:3)
From the article, it would seem the new board has a new expansion slot (two actually). I already cannot find any usable expansion card from the v1, it will certainly not help for the v2... By the same logic, in a year, the v3 will have yet-another expansion slot format which is mandates new schematics.
I miss standard expansion capabilities...
Re: (Score:1)
there is a post on the minnowboard mailing list that addresses you concerns: http://lists.elinux.org/pipermail/elinux-minnowboard/Week-of-Mon-20140331/000026.html
Re: (Score:2)
That made me chuckle.
Re: (Score:2)
It appears the expansion headers have been split in two to enable a high speed one with SATA and PCIe and a low speed one for GPIO.
Makes it much more useful, since it can be a 0.1" header for low speed signals, while its still possible to connect PCIe 2.0 devices.
Re: (Score:2)
It has a header with a documented pin-out. If you're among the target audience for these boards, then you'll probably be able to have a board fabricated for your uses.
Then stick with standard hardware.
Re: (Score:2)
MOD PARENT UP PLEASE! (Score:2)
Yeah, that's becoming really annoying for a lot of newer systems. One of the good things about the RPi and Beaglebone Black is that both of them have HDMI connectors for the video, uSDHC storage, and USB for other I/O (SATA would be nice as well, but USB gets the job done.)
Re: (Score:3)
It's quite possible. ARM is a tiny company compared to Intel, and Intel has a history of outspending its opponents by an order of magnitude until they go away. The advantage that ARM has is the ecosystem - companies like Marvell and even Apple can design their own custom ARM-compatible cores, with assistance from ARM, and produce them in any of a number of ARM's partners' fabs. This makes them a bit harder to trample than the other RISC manufacturers.
The big problem for Intel is the same as for Micros
Re: (Score:2)
Not really. Intel CPUs were inferior to the likes of Alpha, POWER, and even MIPS and PA-RISC quite a lot of the time, but they could sell them for a lot less because of their economies of scale. When Intel was welling 100 times as many processors as their closest competitor, they could sell a processor that was half the speed for a quarter of the price and still make more profit. As the PC market grew and the workstation market shrank, that became Intel selling 1,000 times as many as their nearest compet
Comment removed (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Can you run Windows on this? (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
A smart move by Intel. They need to grow the mindshare of hackers - much like the beagleboard made OMAP a popular choice for people hacking on smartphones.
For the poweruser an Intel smartphone can then multi-boot Windows 7/Ubuntu/Firefox OS/Android according to their whim.
i.e. develop a community with Android & FFOS mature on a single board computer and the results will flow to x86 phones and tablets. With Intel favouring Intel HD over PowerVR solutions, mature FOSS drivers are an advantage over the ven
Re: (Score:2)
only pci-e X1 2.0 will likely hurt raid IO maybe if you can find an board with an E3800 and a full X4 slot.
http://www.portwell.com/produc... [portwell.com]
at least a X4 slot is at X2 so it's better then boards with only an X1 bus open.
Re: (Score:2)
Why go to great lengthes to find obscure industrial mobos on websites where the price is "fill a form to ask for a quote"?
Here's a list of easily available stuff (sadly all the Intel stuff is crippled to having a PCIe 1x or PCI slots, except for server grade Atom stuff with 4x or 8x PCIe)
http://www.ldlc.com/informatiq... [ldlc.com]
Or PCIe 2.0 1x is a limit you can live with (500MB/s theoretical)
Crashplan appliance? (Score:1)
Re:Crashplan appliance? (Score:4, Interesting)
Do what you want to Servo... (Score:3)
Do what you want to Servo...never liked that guy anyway, but you better leave Crow alone!
Dual interface ? (Score:2)
All these SBC are nice, but I would really love one with two network interface. So far, my quest has not been successful. I'm not looking to route 1Gbps, but "normar" traffic. I know of the soekris & alix, but I would prefer an ARM based model. I was hoping to find an expansion board that would do the job, but still no luck.
Does anyone know any which would do the job ?
Re: (Score:2)
If you're not routing gigabit, get a usb network port or configure it to have two IPs for its one port and route between.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
The "pro" model is a bit expensive ($220 or so, plus shipping), but it has 2xGbE, wifi, bt, quad ARM.
Or you could just add a USB network interface to something like Odroid U3: http://hardkernel.com/main/pro... [hardkernel.com].
(I have both of above.)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I have no idea about availability, but they're around, Jake Appelbaum was playing with one the other day in a recent talk.
Re: (Score:2)
All these SBC are nice, but I would really love one with two network interface. So far, my quest has not been successful. I'm not looking to route 1Gbps, but "normar" traffic. I know of the soekris & alix, but I would prefer an ARM based model. I was hoping to find an expansion board that would do the job, but still no luck.
Does anyone know any which would do the job ?
Conveniently, most home routers are ARM (sometimes MIPS) based embedded devices with plenty of NICs (100mb in the cheap seats, GbE doable). Find one with good OpenWRT support, ideally a USB port because they never come with enough storage, and you are ready to rock.
Re: (Score:1)
ARMs are a distant second in the segment. (Again, in my experience.)
MIPS is a bizarre architecture. I can't really see why it gained so much traction in the embedded market, short of much higher power than ARM devices at the time when embedded SOHO routing solutions exploded.
Re: (Score:2)
Price is ambiguous (Score:2)
It appears the price is $99 for the board with slower CPU, and another $99 if you would like to have memory with that board...
Pricing (Score:1)
The price at the European distributor (listed on http://www.minnowboard.org/) is 199EUR. That's for the cheaper model that is supposed to sell for 99$.
Re: (Score:2)
$99 USD is without memory, it looks like, so the article is extremely misleading. I always ignore any product that the company feels requires misleading advertising to promote - and that seems to be most products lately...
Re: Pricing (Score:1)
The 199 is for the CURRENT model, the new Max is not released yet (sometime in June I read).
Could be useful for hosting Arduino development (Score:2)
Just saying...
TFA Down (Score:1)
HDMI CEC (Score:1)
Does it support HDMI CEC? I would love this as a HTPC, with XBMC/Plex client
Re: (Score:2)
I'd love to see a home router based on this (Score:3)
Might be worth cost over RPi (Score:2)
I've been really impressed with my Baytrail powered Windows tablet, and this might not be a bad option to turn an old monitor into an all in one PC(it looks like Windows 8 is doable as well as Linux in general) for most tasks that aren't too intensive like gaming. Though if my tablet is any indication, the dual core version with 2GB of RAM should be able to hand Civ V to an extent.