Scientists Build Three Atom Thick LEDs 54
minty3 tipped us to news that UW researchers have built the thinnest LEDs yet: a mere three atoms thick. Quoting El Reg: "Team leader Xiaodong Xu, a UW assistant professor in physics and materials science and engineering, and his graduate student Ross, have published the technique in the latest issue of Nature Nanotechnology. They report that the LEDs are small and powerful enough to be used in optical chips that use light instead of electricity to shuttle signals and data through a processor, or they could be stacked to make new thin and flexible displays."
I'll believe it... (Score:5, Funny)
Only three atoms thick! (Score:5, Funny)
Unfortunately, that means they have to be several kilometers in width...
Re: (Score:2)
New use for the term "chip real estate".
Think of the foreclosures!
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Yes, but it's "waffer-thin" !
Insulation... (Score:4, Insightful)
And how many atoms thick does the insulating layer between adjacent photosensitive or photoemitting structures need to be to prevent light emitted by one pair's LED from unduly influencing the state of an adjacent photodiode/phototransistor?
What, exactly, is the benefit of building a chip whose internal connections are basically all optoisolators?
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
He is just making a couple of questions. I don't see him shitting on other people's work(whether this was his intention or not, IDK). Your too fast in to jump in conclusions. If I had an account and mod points you'd definitely get a "flamebait" -1 mod.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
No, he's not asking questions, he's making insinuations. Like clockwork, in every single discussion on some new technology, there will always be at least one jackass trying to seem smart by suggesting that those idiot scientists missed something important. Every. Single. Time.
Functional sub-nanometer LED? Pfft. No wireless. Less space than a nomad. Lame.
Re: (Score:1)
Pfft. No wireless. Less space than a nomad. Lame.
I think transmitting information via light actually counts as wireless, at least with sufficient power and no line of sight issues. Definitely less space than a nomad though. :P
Re:Insulation... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3)
What, exactly, is the benefit of building a chip whose internal connections are basically all optoisolators?
Besides omnidirectional communication without the need for direct pathways. Oh...not much.
Re:Insulation... (Score:4, Informative)
We've had that for years already, and no, its not all that useful in computer chips. You need very specific directed communications almost exclusively except for the clock pulse.
Re: (Score:2)
We've had that for years already, and no, its not all that useful in computer chips. You need very specific directed communications almost exclusively except for the clock pulse.
Sure, it's not useful in modern chips however. Following the theories on optical chips however, you don't need it to be directed when banks are set projected.
Re: (Score:1)
What, exactly, is the benefit of building a chip whose internal connections are basically all optoisolators?
Light travels faster than electricity, and with less interference. Since a critical limitation of modern chips is that it takes more than 1 clock tick for data to travel from one side of the chip to the other, this is of mindblowing importance.
And how many atoms thick does the insulating layer between adjacent photosensitive or photoemitting structures need to be to prevent light emitted by one pair'
Re: (Score:1)
Modern CPUs are starting to face a bandwidth and power limitation for their interconnects. One solution that is being investigated is using photonics, because light can carry much more data (several THz of bandwidth) vs electrical interconnects (10s of GHz). An on-chip light source would be an important component for this.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
As other people have said, the advantage is speed.
Of course nobody is expecting this tech to replace silicon based chips anytime soon. There's obviously a lot of R&D to be done and, let's face it, nothing may EVER come of it. That's just how science is. We don't know in advance what theories and tech will pan out.
As for leakage between structures? I'm willing to bet we don't need perfect isolation. Just enough isolation that the interference is predictable. (Much like electrons in silicon...)
Didn't Stop At One? (Score:5, Funny)
I'm impressed that they didn't just build one one atom thick LED, but three of them. Was it to prove they could reproduce it?
Re: (Score:3)
Re: the most dangerous LED displays... evar (Score:3)
Always wear your iGlove protective gear when taking your iPhone 7n out of your iPants pocket.
If an accident does occur you can treat small injuries with your iMedkit. More severe injuries you are contractually bound to seek service at your local iCare medical facility. There you can be assured prompt professional service from a certified Apple iDoc.
In this case, UW == Univ. of Washington (Score:5, Informative)
To be clear, only two authors are from the University of Washington. They have many collaborators, including from Univ. of Tennessee, Oak Ridge NL, Germany, Japan, and Hong Kong.
Submitter: University of Wisconsin and University of Waterloo are also known as "UW". It's worth expanding on first use.
Re:In this case, UW == Univ. of Washington (Score:4, Insightful)
Not to mention University of Warwick, University of Wales, University of Worcested and University of Warsaw all of which use UW to various degrees.
Re:In this case, UW == Univ. of Washington (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
If only Slashdot had editors.
p-n junction? (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
If it isn't sexy enough, Imagine a beowulf cluster of these.
Scientists Build Three Atom Thick LEDs (Score:1)
Why didn't they just build one ?
Really (Score:1)
Does anyone else remember when IBM would be the one to do something like this?
Re: (Score:2)
They still do, but just not this one.
Not the only group to have achieved this (Score:1)
There are two other publications in the same issue of Nature Nanotech., both of which also report the creation of similar systems also utilizing monolayers of WSe2: this one [doi.org] from a group at the Vienna University of Technology and this one [doi.org] from a group at MIT.
Moore's Law(s) (Score:2)
We can observe clear evidence that Moore’s Law is ending, because we can point to a pattern that precedes the end of exploiting any kind of resource. But there’s no reason to panic, because Moore’s Law limits only one kind of scaling, and we have already started another kind.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
That said optical communication does open up a lot of advantages including (potentially) reduced signal latency, denser and thus higher bandwidth chip I/O and other effects that will (if practically usable) increase performance of computers. But transistor scaling? It's dead.
Re: (Score:2)
What about the solder joints? (Score:1)
What does it mean? (Score:2)
Is it a single LED that is three atoms thick, or are there 3 individual atom thick LEDs?
If the latter, 1 atom thick is just an atom. So these guys are claiming to have invented an atom.