Scientists Build Three Atom Thick LEDs 54
minty3 tipped us to news that UW researchers have built the thinnest LEDs yet: a mere three atoms thick. Quoting El Reg: "Team leader Xiaodong Xu, a UW assistant professor in physics and materials science and engineering, and his graduate student Ross, have published the technique in the latest issue of Nature Nanotechnology. They report that the LEDs are small and powerful enough to be used in optical chips that use light instead of electricity to shuttle signals and data through a processor, or they could be stacked to make new thin and flexible displays."
Insulation... (Score:4, Insightful)
And how many atoms thick does the insulating layer between adjacent photosensitive or photoemitting structures need to be to prevent light emitted by one pair's LED from unduly influencing the state of an adjacent photodiode/phototransistor?
What, exactly, is the benefit of building a chip whose internal connections are basically all optoisolators?
Re:Insulation... (Score:3, Insightful)
He is just making a couple of questions. I don't see him shitting on other people's work(whether this was his intention or not, IDK). Your too fast in to jump in conclusions. If I had an account and mod points you'd definitely get a "flamebait" -1 mod.
Re:Insulation... (Score:2, Insightful)
No, he's not asking questions, he's making insinuations. Like clockwork, in every single discussion on some new technology, there will always be at least one jackass trying to seem smart by suggesting that those idiot scientists missed something important. Every. Single. Time.
Functional sub-nanometer LED? Pfft. No wireless. Less space than a nomad. Lame.
Re:In this case, UW == Univ. of Washington (Score:4, Insightful)
Not to mention University of Warwick, University of Wales, University of Worcested and University of Warsaw all of which use UW to various degrees.
Re:Insulation... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Insulation... (Score:3, Insightful)
As other people have said, the advantage is speed.
Of course nobody is expecting this tech to replace silicon based chips anytime soon. There's obviously a lot of R&D to be done and, let's face it, nothing may EVER come of it. That's just how science is. We don't know in advance what theories and tech will pan out.
As for leakage between structures? I'm willing to bet we don't need perfect isolation. Just enough isolation that the interference is predictable. (Much like electrons in silicon...)