AirPlay Alternative Mirrors and Streams To TVs and PCs 62
DeviceGuru writes "AirTame has developed an AirPlay-like protocol and HDMI dongle for 1080p video streaming and screen mirroring from PCs to PCs and TVs, and has substantially exceeded its $160,000 Indiegogo funding goal. AirTame streams from Windows, Mac, and Linux PCs to other PCs via apps at both ends, and to TVs via the HDMI dongle, and also offers a multicast mode for broadcasting to multiple PCs and TVs for use in classrooms or conferences. But at least initially, there won't be support for Android or iOS devices in the mix, due OS restrictions. The company says it plans to release AirTame's software, API, and protocol source code under a dual-license enabling free use with GPL-like restrictions, and paid use for commercial applications requiring proprietary modifications."
plex (Score:2)
Video latency (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
AirPlay already does this. The standard seems open enough that there are many 3rd party apps that I use which can broadcast to the AppleTV. Plus, it has all the infrastructure, updates, and support of Apple.
$160,000 for this project? Am I missing something?
Re: Video latency (Score:3, Informative)
Re: Video latency (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
If you are only comparing itunes to music players, then yes, it seems bizarrly constructed. If you just wanted to play music, then even mac users can just point any media player to the itunes directory and play music/videos as normal.
But it is a media management program that interfacese to different portable hardware ( i*(pod,pad,phone) ). And it lets me backup, and update (make playlists), and sync my i*devices just fine.
Re: Video latency (Score:5, Informative)
Re: Video latency (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Maybe, like me, you have an AMD-based video card(s). AMD has yet to release (non-beta) drivers that support Miracast for my video cards. It's been talked about for months on the forums. I believe Nvidia provides the support for the majority of their recent cards already.
Re: (Score:2)
I don't know about "perfectly good option", I hadn't previously heard of Miracast so I did some reading. It look promising but I can't find much in the way of adapters for it and what is out there has pretty hit or miss reviews. Additionally the range of hardware that might support miracast seems a bit limited. I have a PC with an i5 processor with no WiDi and my video card is a GTX 560 Ti that I can't find any information on supporting miracast. I could possibly update to windows 8.1 which is supposed to n
Re: Video latency (Score:3)
Re: Video latency (Score:2)
I'd go for anything (Score:1)
That was documented, open, free, and universally adopted. A woman can dream.
Re: (Score:2)
Android OS rescrictions? (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Android has Chromecast. It's a bit different than AirPlay in that it is designed to let apps on an Android device work together with corresponding apps on a smart TV, and the focus so far has been pulling content from the cloud, rather than playing back local content (even Play Music can only play music that you have stored in the cloud, not locally stored music yet). There are python implementations of the server that work with YouTube, Netflix and Google Play Music.
Re: Android OS rescrictions? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Google (or Samsung or any Android OEM) will never make or ship an app that can send all audio or video from the phone to another device because app developers who make apps where they dont want that to happen (or where the providers of the content for that app dont want it to happen) would kick up a major stink.
Re: (Score:2)
Um, Android does have Miracast support. And Samsung also has their own implementation.
Re: (Score:3)
So clearly I must be imagining the Samsung WI-FI All-Share Cast Hub, Wireless HDMI Display Adapter [amazon.com], which...and I quote, "Mirrors phone screen on HDTV".
Re: (Score:2)
"Mirrors phone screen on HDTV"
Does this work even in applications that turn on LayoutParams.FLAG_SECURE to disable screenshots [android.com], such as client apps for video rental services?
Wireless HDMI (Score:1, Insightful)
Ah ha! $89 (+ $15 outside of Denmark) (Score:5, Informative)
I skimmed through the whole thing, looking for the price. No wonder it's buried at the bottom - this costs as much as an Apple TV!
Re: (Score:2)
Miracast (Score:5, Interesting)
I find it notable that there is no mention of miracast anywhere in the GoGo description. Isn't this what Miracast is supposed to deliver?
Re:Miracast (Score:5, Informative)
Actually there is mention of Miracast, alongside with Chromecast and Apple TV. The section you're looking for is the "Competitors" section.
http://www.indiegogo.com/projects/airtame-wireless-hdmi-for-everyone--2 [indiegogo.com]
I have to say that I haven't been playing around with any of these things yet, but what they (Airtame) are claiming, seems quite cool to me. Especially the part about desktop extension and multicast sharing.
Re: (Score:2)
Perfect (Score:2)
yet another stupid, incompatible protocol (Score:1)
Last century, we had all of this capability, working, as RTP and RTSP. Of course, since that wasn't HTML-based (for very good reasons), we eneded up with DLNA, supported by hundreds, if not thousands, of devices from various vendors. Of course, Apple couldn't do anything already working and standard, which would mess up their revenue model of locking in the fanboys, so they came up with yet another protocol, as did Microsoft. Further, there are a few other minor players (Sonos, for example) that also cre
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
If they'd put a Apple-centric front end on RTP/RTSP, then there would have been compatibility AND interoperability, rather than pure "get the suckers' money".
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, mounted shares (NFS, in particular) are nearly always the preferred solution. OTOH, there are some devices. like a Marantz "Internet Tuner", that do speak DLNA, but not shares. Mostly, though, many of the devices have pointless DLNA quirks and limited codec sets, regardless of access method.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
> but it does solve the problem of in-home media distribution.
No. It does not solve that problem at all. The crapulence of DLNA is why people mess with things like Plex and HTPCs.
DLNA just takes something that's already well established and standardized and ads pointless cruft to it.
Re: (Score:3)
A few issues.... (Score:2)
real man should put screw (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Oblig. XKCD (Score:2)
927
This Shit Pisses Me Off! (Score:2, Interesting)
Yet another one to add to the list.
WiDi, Chromecast, AirPlay, MiraPlay, DLNA and now this all in the already over crowded and virtually unusable 2.4GHz spectrum. Yet I still can't get my Samsung Galaxy S4 to stream to an Android dongle!
Connecting... Single frame... Black screen... wait wait wait... single frame... time out.
Oops, format not supported.
Video blocked due to lack of DRM! Fuck you!
TBH, at $35 Chromecast seems like the best chance at the moment, but I have to buy another dongle that I can't modify