Dell's New Sputnik 3 Mates Touchscreen With Ubuntu 166
ClaraBow writes "I find it interesting that Dell has started selling a thin and light touchscreen laptop called the XPS 13 Developer Edition, which will have Ubuntu Linux OS and Intel's fourth-generation Core processors, code-named Haswell. The laptop, code-named Sputnik, has a 13.3-inch touchscreen and will run on Ubuntu 12.04 OS. It is priced starting at $1,250 and is available in the U.S." One thing I wish was addressed in the blog post announcing this newest entry in the Sputnik line, or its listed specs (bad news beats not knowing, in this case), is battery life.
Why do you find it interesting? (Score:2, Insightful)
What's interesting about it? Usual summary qualities here on slashdot, the editors can't even copy and paste in a useful manner.
Re: (Score:3)
It doesn't come with Windows or OSX.
Not exactly hard to do, but still exceedingly rare for laptops in the US.
Re: (Score:2)
And at $1,250, overpriced. And of course they can then point to poor sales as to why they only sell Windows laptops / tablets at a reasonable price.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
And at $1,250, overpriced. And of course they can then point to poor sales as to why they only sell Windows laptops / tablets at a reasonable price.
It comes with one year support with the option of extending the support. Perhaps this is why Dell is trying out the market with Linux. It is billed as a developer device so one would think that the specs are for those who run and compile software not exactly your average joe consumer. If you notice the price is slightly lower than a comparable Mac Book PRO. The only difference is the screen res as Mac Books have a Retina Display, whatever the hell that is LOL. So this is not designed to be sold in the box s
Re: (Score:2)
Linux has its place, but Windows isn't evil...
Unless you know something I don't of course. :) Maybe Windows turns into SkyNet or something...
Re: (Score:3)
Windows has it's place but it's not because MS has such a clean rap sheet forcing it upon us.
Re: (Score:2)
Windows found it's place in a landfill back in October 2012 when I switched to Linux. So yes, it has it's place. Also, most companies try selling Linux laptops on severely underpowered hardware and then they complain it doesn't sell. But really, it doesn't matter what Dell does, they are old news just like every other PC maker that sells Windows only hardware; which is why Microsoft has a future problem.
Re: (Score:2)
Also, most companies try selling Linux laptops on severely underpowered hardware and then they complain it doesn't sell.
A huge part of the advantage of Linux is not requiring such highend specs to run so that is not the problem, the value proposition is that you don't have to buy such expensive hardware to run it. Otherwise ultimately why switch to Linux? If not for cost then why abandon all your application compatibility on Windows or OSX?
Re: (Score:2)
So, again, what exactly is worth the extra price?
The support? Would a developer really need that? 1 year of support is not worth $500
It sure as hell isn't the specs, you can get a Lenovo ( or HP equivalent ) g500s touch ($550-600ish, either keep the 6GB RAM or spend $60 for 16GB upgrade) as a mobile dev platform for ~1/2 the price. All you have to do is install Ubuntu / Debian / whatever on it - and I would hope devs can do this simple task- and pretty much everything works OOTB. This includes the touchsc
Re: (Score:2)
It sure as hell isn't the specs, you can get a Lenovo ( or HP equivalent ) g500s touch ($550-600ish, either keep the 6GB RAM or spend $60 for 16GB upgrade) as a mobile dev platform for ~1/2 the price.
It's less portable, heavier and with less than half the screen pixels on a larger display making the resolution far less than half that of the Dell, no SSD, far slower CPU, 1 year next day onsite warranty and of course the year of support (whether you need that is a different story). If it were similarly priced to the G500s I would be wondering why the hell the G500s was such terrible value in comparison. What I'm wondering is why you ignored the obvious and non-trivial differences in specifications between
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, CPU wise it's pretty much the same, the i5-4200U gains maybe 2-6% on the i5-3230M.
As for screen real-estate I didn't see the 1080P, and even then it is not worth the extra money. For ~$100 and 1 extra pound you can get a second USB monitor @15" and the same res as your laptop for a mobile dual screen setup. Dual screen would be more useful, especially at the sizes we are talking about.
As for the HDD, what the hell are you going to do with 128GB, carry around an external drive everywhere too? There go
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, CPU wise it's pretty much the same, the i5-4200U gains maybe 2-6% on the i5-3230M.
The battery saving is significant and the GPU performance increase of the former is also significant.
As for screen real-estate I didn't see the 1080P, and even then it is not worth the extra money. For ~$100 and 1 extra pound you can get a second USB monitor @15" and the same res as your laptop for a mobile dual screen setup. Dual screen would be more useful, especially at the sizes we are talking about.
As for the HDD, what the hell are you going to do with 128GB, carry around an external drive everywhere too? There goes your weight benefits.
Hang on, so you won't carry a portable HDD if you needed one but you advocate carrying an additional USB monitor?! And no, if you need extra space you could use an sd card or carry a 0.3lb external HDD which makes it still less than the lenovo.
If carrying an extra 1-2 pounds is going to kill you, you have some pretty serious health problems and really should spend the money on a Doctor / gym membership...
Nice argumentum ad absurdum, I shouldn't worry about things unless they are going to kill me.
There also is no reason to need SSD performance when coding into terminals / eclipse, other than e-peen bragging rights.
Right because nobody actually compiles that code or runs programs that act
Re: (Score:3)
It's available in Canada too, at $1289.99 to start....
http://www.dell.com/us/business/p/xps-13-9333/pd?oc=cax13u1238&model_id=xps-13-9333 [dell.com]
For those who don't want to click the link (or if the link is geo-locked)....
Core i5 4200U (2.6GHz)
13.3" 1920x1080 touchscreen display
8GB DDR3 memory (1600MHz)
128GB SSD
Intel HD 4400 graphics
Ubuntu 12.04
Weight: 3.04lbs
Warranty: 1 year Next Business Day onsite support (after remote diagnosis, also 1 year). You can extend that to 3 years, and you can also buy up to 3 year
Re:Why do you find it interesting? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
GNU/Linux as opposed to Android (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Why do you find it interesting? (Score:5, Informative)
It's from a major OEM, it runs Linux which hopefully means it has Linux-friendly hardware and good Linux drivers. That's enough to be newsworthy on slashdot, which still hopes Linux will overtake the market share of such gems as Windows Vista and Windows 8 ;)
Re: (Score:2)
Except Dell have offered products with the choice of running windows for several years now...
Re: (Score:1)
I don't know about Unity updates, but you can install the kernel from 13.10 and xorg from 13.04 w/o voiding the LTS-ness.
Re:Why do you find it interesting? (Score:5, Insightful)
Within no time I'll have a nice KDE desktop installed.
Re:Why do you find it interesting? (Score:5, Informative)
sudo apt-get install kubuntu-desktop ?
Re:Why do you find it interesting? (Score:5, Informative)
But hey, I can install more than one and at the login prompt I select the specific desktop that suits me best :)
Re: (Score:3)
Remember people complaining about Ubuntu because it was "brown" and claiming Mint was better because it was "green"?
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Linux-compatible does not mean anything more than "it works".
And, as far as I've been able to tell over the latest 10 years or so, Linux "works" on basically 99% of machines I've ever touched without having to do anything special (yes, I have jumped through hoops, but that's not the point - here someone else has jumped through those hoops for you).
Whether it works TO ITS FULL CAPACITY is another question entirely. For example, chances are that it's graphics chipset is "supported" but very, very slim that i
Re: (Score:3)
(yes, I have jumped through hoops, but that's not the point - here someone else has jumped through those hoops for you). (...) And we can already do *that* anywhere we like.
Actually that's exactly what you can't do with a laptop, maybe this bit and that bit works great with Linux while others don't work well or at all. Been there, tried that and it had nothing to do with price or quality but simply that some companies cared to support Linux and other's didn't. Same with accessories, one printer worked brilliantly while an almost similar competitor was a paperweight but at least those you can research. And if it doesn't quite work well you've got nobody to blame but yourself, t
Re:Why do you find it interesting? (Score:4, Insightful)
And the answer "The drivers are as supplied on the recovery disk" is not familiar to you?
They are a big OEM. They don't care about supporting these drivers in anything but an OS they have supplied. Like my last 15 years of putting Linux machines into schools, I would bet that any Linux driver is tied to only a particular kernel, and that without proper source, and that they never update it. They won't support other distros and unless you want to run Ubuntu 12.04 (specifically) for ever, you won't see much action above and beyond telling you to put the machine back into it's factory state (i.e with Ubuntu 12.04 and their driver how it's always been installed).
But more likely, it will have some cheap base hardware that's already "supported" by chance and they do nothing special to sell it as a Linux machine. And you won't get anything beyond the standard binaries.
I will happily still to my "chances" on some random hardware, like I've been doing for over a decade. The examples I cite are few and far between and usually because support for a certain type of machine / hardware was DROPPED from Linux distros rather than anything to do with it not actually being present at all.
I think you've just fallen for the advertising - it says Linux so it must mean ALL Linux forever with open-source code, right? My hardware from pre-1999 that says the same will happily prove you wrong. Sure, if you're lucky it had a 2.0/2.2 driver for it at some point, but you don't stand a chance of getting it working nowadays - and some of those drivers refused to install on anything but the "supported" distro.
The fact that this comes with Ubuntu tells you one of two things:
- They support ONLY Ubuntu
- or -
- Ubuntu does well enough supporting this with no help required.
P.S. I have sent computers back to companies that claimed Linux support, and I made a major UK distributor fight with their suppliers to get me a custom BIOS made for a laptop because they sold it to me as "supporting" Windows XP and then found out it wouldn't boot XP if you had encryption software (required by law in my field) because of a crappy BIOS bug. Literally, I had an AMI BIOS written, just for that laptop, just for me, because of how much money it was going to cost them if I had sent the laptops we'd bought on the basis of XP support back.
Trust me, doing the same for Linux is a LOT harder, especially when they can demonstrate that on ***A*** Linux with ***A*** driver that it works.
Re: (Score:2)
The fuss about Linux drivers is no longer "does it work" (and hasn't been, for a long time) so much as "does it work as fully as possible?". And almost certainly, in a consumer laptop, the answer is no.
Actually, I don't find NO to the answer at all any more. As long as you avoid Nvidia or commit to running their proprietary drivers. The last several laptops I loaded Linux on everything worked, right down to the fingerprint reader. And they could be said to work MORE fully than when they were shipped with window.
All this says is that their laptop happens to work in Linux with a certain configuration. There's no guarantee that it won't include a binary driver and/or only a certain Linux image being "supp
Re:Why do you find it interesting? (Score:5, Insightful)
"For example, chances are that it's graphics chipset is "supported" but very, very slim that it enjoys full acceleration unless we're talking about an Intel chipset or a binary driver somewhere."
It has an Intel chipset, which has full 2D and 3D acceleration.
I have the second-gen XPS 13 developer edition. Every function on the system works. It does not include any binary drivers. Yes, only the supplied Ubuntu install is 'supported', but then, if you buy a Windows 7 laptop and then self-install Windows 8 on it (for instance), your manufacturer isn't going to support that either. I run Fedora 19 on my second-gen XPS 13 and all its functions work fully and correctly.
"try setting up your Linux partitions to mirror those of a Zip-disk on even boot/install USB disks"
What? That fragment does not even make syntactical sense, so far as I can work out.
"having to manually load soundfonts with a script to make soundcards work"
Along with the reference to 'Zip-disks' - 1996 called and it wants its problems back.
"or having to compile for some mini-ITX boards that can barely support the 486 instruction set to get an idea of the sorts of things that can crop up with old / embedded / poorly supported hardware"
So, buying CPUs that 'can barely support the 486 instruction set' is a bad idea in 2013, huh? Thanks for the tip, I never would've guessed.
Re: (Score:1)
Well, that's a big IF. It may depend on Dell proprietary drivers to make this install of Ubuntu work, and so may not be compatible with distros in general.
Take a look through Ubuntu's "Certified Hardware" collection. Note there's two types: stuff that works with the regular download Ubuntu, and stuff that only works with the OEM pre-installed Ubuntu.
Link code not working in preview. He're the raw link
http://www.ubuntu.com/certification/desktop/ [ubuntu.com]
Re: (Score:2)
It won't run a completely standard desktop Linux, there is a PPA with some drivers, the source is available.
I think a lot of the source is already upstream though (like Linux kernel driver for the touchpad), the drivers were created by Dell or the part manufacturer.
So now the PPA ends up being mostly backports to the Ubuntu LTS.
Re: (Score:2)
I currently have a 14" HP with a i5-2410M, 6GB of RAM and a 750GB/5400 HD. This all comes in at under 2kg. I bought it with the Windows tax and it STILL only cost me 700€, over 2 years ago. I use Ubuntu 12.04 and battery life is crap. I completely disabled the separate graphics card and I still get far lower life than on windows (which I u
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Probably true, just a bit worried since it ships with 12.04 which is almost two years old. 13.10 would be a better choice to get a more useful version of Unity.
12.04 is the current LTS, and will be supprted and patched until 2017. Alternatively, almost any hardware that is supported on 12.04 will run just fine on 13.x, with maybe certain AMD cards as an exception, but that has nothing to do with ubuntu
Re: (Score:2)
Ubuntu maintain backported kernels and Xorg from the later Ubuntu releases, so that current hardware can be supported in a sane manner while keeping the apps stable.
So, my 12.04 laptop is running the kernel and Xorg stack from 13.04 (no doubt 13.10 kernel and Xorg is in the works) all in a 12.04 LTS supported manner.
Re: (Score:2)
For 13.10 kernel on 12.04:
$ apt-cache search saucy
linux-generic-lts-saucy - Generic Linux kernel image and headers
linux-generic-lts-saucy-eol-upgrade - Complete Generic Linux kernel and headers
linux-headers-3.11.0-13 - Header files related to Linux kernel version 3.11.0
linux-headers-generic-lts-saucy - Generic Linux kernel headers
linux-image-generic-lts-saucy - Generic Linux kernel image
linux-lts-saucy-tools-3.11.0-13 - Linux kernel version specific tools for version 3.11.0-13
linux-lts-saucy-tools-common -
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
" In the past, Dell has focused on low-end Linux offerings"
Well, not really, because they've been selling this system for like two years now. This is just the Haswell bump for it.
Re: (Score:2)
There's a higher-CPU higher-disk version for a couple hundred more. I agree about the lack of RAM, though.
Re:Why do you find it interesting? (Score:4, Interesting)
What the hell are you people running on your machines?
I run 2-3 copies of Eclipse, DB/2 LUW, PostgreSQL, and MySQL with a JEE debug server on a 4GB box. I run Oracle, Sybase ASE, and SQL Server on a Windows 7 laptop with a JEE debug server and a couple of other things with 4GB RAM, usually including a couple of java programs that are sucking back 768MB each.
Neither box comes anywhere near thrashing. In fact, they hardly use their swap at all.
Re: (Score:3)
I just run top and sorted by memory usage. I see firefox (with 10 tabs open), thunderbird, emacs, skype, nautilus, dropbox, Xorg followed by many other system applications. I have mysql and postgresql running by the don't make it into the top 50 or something. If I had a ruby on rails application running, or cassandra, they'd be in the top 10. I can run all of these quite comfortably together on my 4 GB laptop, unless something gets unexpectedly too big and I have to kill it. But I'm always a little on swap.
you must not browse,read mail or edit text as well (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Email, browsers, Vuze, etc. are all running as well.
That's why I'm baffled at people who talk about "only" 8GB of RAM.
Re: (Score:2)
Lots of people run multiple VMs on their machine, they just haven't figured out running LXC or even Docker would be a much better idea.
Re: (Score:2)
It's not just what RAM usage is today. It's also what RAM usage *will be* in 2 or 3 years. I certainly want my laptop to still be useful after only a couple of years!
Re: (Score:2)
8GB RAM, i5 and 128 GB storage are low end for a developer laptop
Amazing, isn't it, what people managed to achieve with those paltry 4 GB of RAM ten years ago or so? Oh, wait, I didn't have 4 GB of memory ten years ago...
Also, I believe that large memory on mobile devices eats power. Those extra GBs will cost you. True, this is a particularly pressing matter in cell phones in particular, but with low-power states on modern CPUs and low-power SSDs, according to Amdahl's law, memory becomes a proportionally greater power hog on any laptop.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
I find it interesting that BUY THIS PRODUCT NOW ** Awesome features!! ** Relevant to your audience!!! **
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
So don't use it.
I have a feeling they're including it because a 13.3" 1920x1080 screen with touch is cheaper than one without, due to economies of scale, and the fact that Windows is going in the direction of touch screen mandatory.
Besides, if it's being marketed as a developper system, having the touch as an option for one more thing you can test before your users do is a good thing.
Relevant because Dell went private (Score:5, Insightful)
I am guessing microsoft upsetting people with surface has thawed large companies to alternatives.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
This isn't their first Linux offering, they previosly sold desktops with Ubuntu preinstalled under the moniker "N Series".
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
This isn't their first Linux offering, they previosly sold desktops with Ubuntu preinstalled under the moniker "N Series".
I bought a Dell Vostro 15" laptop with Ubuntu on it earlier this year for about $450. Nothing super fast, but I needed a laptop to code & test on when I travel.
I think it's great that Dell is offering a top of the line hardware product with Linux, but starting at $1,250 is ridiculous. Not as ridiculous as Google Pixel for that price, but still.
Re: (Score:2)
The Pixel has a _really_ nice screen. The resolution of this one is what I'd consider a bare minimum for a developers machine.
Re: (Score:3)
And they've already been selling this system for like two years. This is just a spec bump.
Dell can't vow only wintel (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, they can.
We've watched our server purchases go from 100% Dell to 50% Dell/ 50% HP to 100% 3rd party in the
last four years as Dell has become 100% wintel and HP has ratecheted up their pricing without a
commensurate increase in performance or reliability.
This happened despite our being a Dell Premiere client, having "direct access" to get bulk deals,
delivery, and sometimes even pricing. Dell turned into a Microsoft shop around mid-2012 -- long
before it was clear they would eventually be seeking Microsof
OR System76 (Score:4, Interesting)
https://www.system76.com/laptops/model/daru4
a bit cheaper
Re: (Score:2)
I didn't happen to see anything under 14.1", 0.9" thick, and 4.6 lb there. That is a completely different class from 13.3", 0.7", and 3.0 lb. I own two systems (13.3 and 14.1) that differ in physical dimensions by approximately the same amount, and believe me, it is like night and day.
The 14.1" is GIGANTIC and weighs as much as a LOCOMOTIVE. That would be your reaction after coming from a 13.3" lightweight.
For real portability, the 13.3" is the sweet spot - if you can read the screen - which, sadly, I can't
Re: (Score:2)
I agree. I didn't see the point of an ultrathin for a workstation so I got a System76 "Gazelle", Ubuntu 13.x, 15 inch, i7 Haswell, 16GB Ram, 500GB dual SSD that cost me $1.6K shipped.
Re:OR System76 (Score:4, Informative)
Expandable at least. You can plug in two standard SO-DIMM chips, one m-SATA drive and one 2.5" 7mm drive. It also has 14.4" full-HD screen, big enough to use its full resolution (not retina-like ultra-high pixel density where image has to be enlarged 2x, so you get half the resolution). I'm curious about its reliability.
I'm using Asus UX-32VD which has similiar characteristics (notably it has one standard SO-DIMM slot and one standard 7mm 2.5" drive, despite its slim ultrabook-like look). Sometimes I need a bit more power and bigger screen (being "in the field", not at my desk), so standard PC does not count. I would like to see expandable 15"-16" ultrabook with 2576x1600 resolution (three columns of code plus sidebar!) and quad core processor. Ideally with one or two mSATA slots and one 2.5" bay and at least two SO-DIMM slots. Pixel density would be the same as in UX-31, so with good quality IPS display one would use every last bit of it. Something like Asus UX-51 but with better resolution and expandable. This would be terribly setup for techies, programmers in particular. Unfortunately, I'm not aware of such product - unlike desktop PCs where one can built one's own system from scratch, everyone is on vendors mercy when it comes to notebooks or ultrabooks.
This is neat and all (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Not almost, you can. The cheapest MacBook costs just $999, so you even get a little over.
Re: (Score:2)
...but this is somewhat more powerful, and a better form factor. The XPS 13 is significantly smaller than the MBA 13"; I know, I've made a stack out of an MBA 11", an XPS 13, and an MBA 13". The XPS 13 is barely larger than the MBA 11", and a lot smaller than the MBA 13".
And I mean, yeah, obviously this is aimed at people who want a Linux laptop. If you want a Linux laptop you probably don't want to buy a Macbook. You can make it work, but it's a giant PITA. I'd much rather buy one of these.
Re:This is neat and all (Score:4, Insightful)
I just bought similar hardware from Sony in order to run Linux. I would have considered this one if it had been available three weeks ago.
Some of us really don't want a Mac. Obviously we're a niche market, but presumably Dell thinks there might be enough of us to justify one or two models.
Re: (Score:3)
"I would have considered this one if it had been available three weeks ago."
It was available three weeks ago, albeit in its previous Ivy Bridge form. I don't know why Slashdot is reporting this as if it were a new model rather than just a spec bump.
Re: (Score:2)
Then it's not really similar hardware is it :-).
My requirements were: light, long battary life, at least 8Gb RAM, at least Full HD screen. The Vaio was the only ultrabook I could find that fit my criteria and was available in Canada when I needed it.
Re: (Score:2)
This had the same weight, RAM and display. Only difference in the new model is the CPU and video chipset. Of course, that does make a significant difference in battery life, but then it's pretty much a given that every Ivy Bridge laptop is getting a Haswell bump, so it wasn't particularly difficult to figure out that this one would...
Re: (Score:2)
The MBPs are significantly heavier - there's definitely a distinct sub-3lbs weight class where this, the Kirabook, the MBA and so on all play.
Re: (Score:3)
But first we'll have to see the full specs.
Re: (Score:2)
You can pour a beer through a 1200$ Thinkpad or drop it on a concrete floor without killing it, I know, mine stood up to both. With the quality of Dell hardware I would be afraid to use harsh language around it. Unless their build quality has jumped recently I wouldn't want to spend that much on a "disposable" product.
On quality, Dell, and IB-^W Lenovo (Score:1)
To get anything redeeming out of Dell, you have to order from the business-oriented laptops - such as their Precision line. The biggest drawbacks are that you end up having to pay more to get the same feature set, have to go through a bureaucracy to transfer ownership for support, and have the same problems with support as regular Dell machines. The only upside is that some
On the other hand, Lenovo still has the service and support, but is bastardizing their Thinkpad line in every way possible. Buying th
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It has a nicer screen than a Macbook Air, at least.
Re: (Score:2)
The two are very similar in hardware and form factor, so I don't know why you'd call this a 'turd'. I'd expect them to post very similar battery life figures, given that they're based on very similar hardware. There's nothing magical about the new Macbooks' battery life; it's just thanks to Haswell's significant improvements in power efficiency. Every laptop that's got a Haswell bump has posted similarly impressive improvements in battery life, and this one will likely be the same.
The XPS 13 has a better sc
$110 Windows tax (Score:5, Informative)
The cost of the machine is $110 less than an otherwise identical XPS 13 with Windows 8.
Same price as for Windows (Score:5, Insightful)
It's the same price as the Windows 8 version. [dell.com] (That's listed at $1299, but scroll down for the "$50 off coupon".) This is progress for Dell; most of their previous Linux offerings cost more than the comparable Windows machine.
Re: (Score:2)
Developing and testing drivers takes time and money, which needs to be recouped somehow. They also offer support. People at support need proper instructions how to deal with customers and their problems (on Linux).
It's a developer laptop, so most of the time it probably means at least it is a technical customer making the call.
I do see they now sell it in my country too, not just in the US anymore. Kinda cool.
Re: (Score:2)
Good point, but I think you meant to post this under How Big Companies Can Hamper the Surveillance Infrastructure [slashdot.org].
Battery Life (Score:3)
Funny how the battery life, which just happens to be the single most important criteria for laptop buyers, is not listed... It's like they don't expect anyone to even consider buying it.
Re:Battery Life (Score:4, Informative)
No. (Score:1)
Re:No. (Score:4, Insightful)
Sorry, that's not the world I'm travelling in.
Re: (Score:1)
Er... No. (Score:2)
13.3-inch touchscreen .... starting at $1,250
Er... No.
Quite what's the selling point here? A Linux-based touchscreen (can already get Linux-based tablets that size for much less)? Or a powerful laptop (can get much better laptops that don't cost that much even if you put a touchscreen onto them)?
Who's the customer here?
Re: (Score:2)
"can get much better laptops that don't cost that much even if you put a touchscreen onto them"
Like what? in the 13" ultraportable (i.e. sub-3lbs) weight class, what is 'much better'?
The Macbook Air 13" is broadly comparable (slightly cheaper, slightly worse hardware). Whatever model number Asus is on right now, it'll be broadly similar in hardware terms but inferior in build quality while being a bit cheaper. The Thinkpad 13" model is lower-specced with a worse screen (though probably better build quality
So its an MS Surface... (Score:2)
...but more expensive, with less features and running Ubuntu.
Its another step in the right direction but it is still a long way from bumping MS and Apple from the "full featured" consumer computer market. As much as I hate marketing, it needs to be marketed. Linux doesn't sell itself to the average person, it has to be made to look like the better alternative before any one other than techies will buy it.
Re: (Score:2)
Oh sure, you can cherry pick hardware and find stuff that works great, but frankly you can install Windows 7 on ANY PC that is less than 8 years old and it will work. You can buy almost ANY computer add-on in the past 8 years and Windows 7 supports it.
No you can't. You can install Windows 7 on any PC which was designed to run Windows (which is most of them), sure. But try sticking it on a Mac or a System 76 PC or one of those Asus touch-screens-with-keyboards that run Android. Oh, you might say, you didn't mean any of those- you just meant the Windows 7 compatible ones! But that's sort of the point.
That's not to say Windows users aren't spoilt for choice, obviously- you can run Windows on a huge variety of commodity hardware. But then the lack universal
Designed for developers. How? (Score:1)
"The XPS 13 laptop comes preloaded with Ubuntu® 12.04 LTS, a basic set of developer tools and utilities, as well as access to two beta projects: the cloud launcher and the profile tool."
Dell slaps an outdated version of Ubuntu onto a £1k+ laptop, markets it as "Designed for developers" and its news?
Any creditable Developer with experience, Would not:
1. Buy a Dell (which has a well known reputation for cheap parts/failures)
2. Use Ubuntu as their Linux distro (from experience, the slowest/bloated l
Re: (Score:1)
I guess those schlubs at Google are not credible developers by your definition: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goobuntu
Also, Dell monitors and workstations are the bread and butter of large software companies. Their high end workstations are absolutely fantastic.
If you are talking about Dell consumer products, then yes. They also cost /thousands/ less than the professional equipment they offer.
If you don't consider this ( http://configure.us.dell.com/dellstore/config.aspx?oc=cap3610w7p0078ps&model_id=prec
Re: (Score:2)
12.04 LTS isn't outdated- it's the current Long Term Support version (which is the stable version which is supposed to compete with Windows and Mac on the support front). The non-LTS versions are just a politer version of the Debian Testing release.
Next LTS version comes out April 2014, so if they're still flogging 12.04 in 6 months then you'll have cause for complaint.
No ethernet (Score:2)
If it's anything like the last xps 13 (Score:3)
Hope the keyboard is better (Score:2, Interesting)
I had the previous gen XPS13 for a bit, including a long work trip. It got great battery life even then, but the keyboard was miserable. PgUp, PgDn, Home, and End required a function keypress. The tactile response was weak and it felt like a cheap model, despite the price. The 1 year warranty was lacking too. Ended up handing it off to a coworker and now running a Latitude E6430U for the same money - much better keyboard and tactile qualities, and no question it is more robust with a 3 year warranty. You pa
Dell hides its linux lineup... (Score:3)
Wish the screen was high DPI (Score:2)
2003 called and wants it's 1600x1200 laptops back (Score:2)
labeling a box with 16:9 aspect ratio a "developer edition" should be a crime
Re: (Score:1)
Sir,
I find your contribution here somewhat off-topic, and bid you --frosty
such as it may be-- warmest regards,
Mr.Liberty