A Server That Can Fall From the Sky, and Survive 91
alphadogg writes "A rugged server from NCS Technologies introduced on Friday can withstand drops, will work in extreme temperatures and can be deployed via parachute into crisis areas or war zones if needed. The Bunker XRV-5241 is a 1U rack server designed for organizations such as the military and first responders that need servers in rugged environments. The server has been tested to meet U.S. Department of Defense specifications for environmental, temperature and shock requirements." Hope they drop some hardened screens, too, to help with setup.
Perfect for me. (Score:1, Funny)
This is perfect for me. When my girlfriend goes nuts, she throws everything around, including computers. She broke a few already. My thinkpad T-43 amazingly survived a few hits from her.
Re:Perfect for me. (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2, Flamebait)
Re: (Score:3)
2.x had a lot of bugs - literally and figuratively. The only one of the version two series that was worth anything, was 2.68. The version 5.x girlfriends are the bestest ever!
Re: (Score:2)
Wasn't 2.69 better than 2.68?
Re: (Score:2)
Lets face it, none of you have even tried any of the girlfriend versions, your still stuck on hand 1.0.
Re: (Score:3)
How did I end up with Toddler 3.0 then? I didn't think Hand 1.0 had that feature.
Re: (Score:2)
Toddler 3.0 has upgraded itself to Motorcycle Racer 1.5 here . . . and Mother is horrified, LMAO!!
Re: (Score:2)
.68 would do you, and let you owe her. .69 insisted on full equality. I guess it's a matter of opinion which was better.
Re: (Score:2)
i guess that would depend on how many non-related females have ever kissed you.
Re: (Score:3)
Crazy doesn't improve with age. Enjoy the ride, do not marry.
Re: (Score:3)
Me too. Sounds perfect for a geek with a small house and young children.
Useless without pictures (Score:4, Interesting)
Needs pictures of the inside so we can see what makes it so rugged, but not even the manufacturer website has internal pictures, and the outside is just a generic 1U server.
Re:Useless without pictures (Score:5, Informative)
Here's a link to the manufacturer's site, with pictures that don't need Javascript or social networking enabled:
http://www.ncst.com/content/bunker-xrv-5241 [ncst.com]
Re: (Score:2)
"This server is suited for submarine and tacked vehicle racks"
Tacked vehicles? Tacked? Forgive me - I'm really not a grammar nazi or spelling nazi, but FFS, you would think that a corporate web page might get things right. WTF is a tacked vehicle? A sailboat? Possibly - but it's pretty certain that they mean TRACKED vehicles, like tanks and command vehicles.
If I'm trying to appeal to medical professionals, I'd like to get my terminology straight, at the least, so that I might actually make some sales.
Re: (Score:2)
As an aside - why does Firefox spell checker tell me that nazi is misspelled?
Because Nazi is a proper noun and should be capitalized, and while that isn't a spelling error, it wouldn't make sense for them to purposely include an orthography error in their dictionary.
Re: (Score:2)
How to make military-grade network gear:
1. Get network equipment.
2. Slap it in a ruggedized box.
3. Slap an extra 0 or two on the invoice.
That said, I wouldn't mind having some PacStar [pacstar.com] gear around for the next disaster.
Re: (Score:2)
I'm waiting for the day (Score:5, Funny)
when one of these things accidentally drops on someone below and the official report is death from "server overhead."
Re: (Score:3)
more like server overload.
Re:I'm waiting for the day (Score:5, Funny)
I have always been sceptical about cloud computing. It's downright dangerous!
Finally, (Score:2)
S.H.I.E.L.D. technology released to the general public.
Re: (Score:1)
Don't worry Iran... (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:3)
Holy shit, I never realized that temperatures could go that high on planet Earth, there is even unconfirmed report of 87 Celsius in Iran:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_weather_records [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
NSW in Australia has just survived a heat wave where there was recorded 50 degree Celsius in some of the bush towns. Where I lived, it hit 46 degree which is the highest temperature ever recorded
And just a bit further north it's all tornado's and flooding http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-01-27/live-wild-weather-queensland-calls-in-army/4486270 [abc.net.au]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
87degC ... I really doubt. It might not be under standard conditions (not that most of the others were me
Re: (Score:3)
I have run regular HP DL360 servers quite happily in various locations around Afghanistan. Heat is a problem, but it isn't the ambient heat that's the issue. The environment is very dusty and moving parts (especially fans) have a very short life. Once the fan is dead, the heat then becomes a problem very quickly.
I notice the TFA doesn't mention any filtration, so these boxes are no better than OTS kit in that respect.
Also, getting blown up and shot at tends to reduce the useful life of boxes too.
Re: (Score:1)
If your problem is "the bad guys are shooting at us" then you don't need servers you need infantry.
It's once you have infantry and the bad guys are (mostly) not shooting at you that you want servers.
An army is a portable civilisation, and that means you've got to bring everything including the kitchen sink, quite literally, but obviously the first people you land are the infantry to fight any bad guys who might object to you putting a kitchen sink in their back yard.
Re: (Score:2)
Why not scatter some Raspberry Pi boards, the working ones that survive the drop can then form a mesh network. No moving parts at all, and so low power that a decent solar panel can make it completely independent off-grid. Being a Pi, somebody will probably hack one onto a Roomba to clear minefields.
Phillip.
Re: (Score:1)
The highest temperature on Earth ever is 55. That's not much bigger.
Re:Wow (Score:5, Funny)
http://www.apple.com/ [apple.com]
No pic, {satisfaction} didn't happen (Score:1)
PC World has the same press release, but with useless exterior pics of the pizzabox. It's captain-obvious that all 1U servers look pretty much the same outside. Guess those are good for a primary audience that finds servers exotic, but where's the article-relevant innards? And the drop case.
http://www.pcworld.com/article/2026354/new-server-can-be-parachuted-into-war-zones.html [pcworld.com]
The rugged server is fine... (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Enhanced Administration (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3)
Where is the news for nerds here? (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
Just a few years before you were working there, I was using the previous gen of deployed gear, Unisys/BTOS big green machines, and all that. We found that BY FAR the biggest problem was cabling. I'd like to see wartime deployable cabling, now that would be interesting. "We" tend to baby our gear, but you can imagine what UPS/FEDEX/DHL do it it before we get it, so a durable version of the shipping package isn't all that hard to make.
Re: (Score:3)
You'd like to see wartime deployable cabling? I have a better solution. No more wartime. Just stay home and stop sending your soldiers to play in the sand. Then take all that research money and spend it in something worthwhile. I want to see mars-landing deployable cabling.
Re: (Score:2)
Absolutely, I'm with you. now go convince the other guys.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah but I bet you still have the same problems we did... "Whoops dropped the connector end in a mud puddle" "The humvee just snagged a cable and destroyed it" and practical concerns like kinks in the cable damaging the innards. Oh and it always seems to be too short. And lightning. Holy cow how can I forget lightning. In fact pretty much all the typical outside plant problems, except we didn't have "real" outside plant telco/cable guys so we had a rough time of it. And we had it "easy" sorta.
XRV-5241 a better model than the XRW-5241 (Score:2)
No screens but don't worry: it comes with SIRI!
Who uses a screen? (Score:2)
> Hope they drop some hardened screens, too, to help with setup.
Sorry but what about disk images with ssh all set up and ready to go before throwing it from the plane? Most servers I have root on are thousands of kilometers away. The closest is about 600km from this screen and keyboard.
Re: (Score:2)
SSDs wouldn't be damaged as much by an impact after a long drop. HDDs would, though.
As for getting it running and on the internet automatically, I don't think it quite does that yet. Do you want it to be a robot server, seeking its own internet and power cord?
Fallout (Score:2)
Ah, so these are the servers behind those still-functional-after-hundreds-of-years terminals in our future post-apocalyptic nuclear wasteland!
Movie anyone? (Score:3)
W00t! (Score:2)
Finally, S.H.I.E.L.D. technology released to the general public.
Nice Slashvert. (Score:4, Informative)
I see fans and a more-or-less standard case.
So fucking what? Build it like a tactical radio, with a cast. finned case with no vents and passive cooling then I'll be impressed.
The Ballad of the Rack Server (Score:1)
Falling servers from the sky
Fearless LANs with bandwidth high
PCs link by night and day
Rugged racks in a tough array.
Comment removed (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1)
Cloud computing (Score:1)
argh! (Score:3)
Guys, I wanted you to build one thing, ONE thing only and you screwed up!
I wanted server capable of running SkyDrive, not one capable of Skydive!
Doesn't even meet Mil-810 (Score:3)
I was going to post that the military shock requirements for transport are MIL-810 and that's only a 2m drop on any surf/edge/corner without operational damage, but it turns out, it doesn't even meet that spec without requiring extra packaging:
"The Bunker XRV-5241 can withstand a free-fall drop of around 1 meter, but for parachute deployment it needs to be packaged into the case for additional protection."
You know, we can package inertial guidance mechanisms (some of the most shock sensitive components you're likely to ship, which have about 1/5th the shock resistance of a china plate) to meet MIL-810, so if you're going to require that we add special packing to meet the basic transport spec we may as well not spend $4k on this and save the money for packing.
Re: (Score:2)
Good Comments (Score:1)
Parachute? (Score:3)
Dropped from the sky by Parachute is supposed to tell me it's rugged? We had about 300 kids design systems at home to protect eggs dropped from a helicopter when I was highschool. I do not find this impressive.
Is it bulletproof? (Score:2)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O7aP5iqZRfY [youtube.com]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gnjb1WVkhmU [youtube.com]
Maybe Dell would be interested? (Score:5, Funny)
Can't wait to see the "2-hour delivery" radio button on their checkout page.
I only care about cat pee. (Score:1)
That's a big PSU (Score:2)
Why do they need 500W for a 1U chassis that accommodates only two low voltage (60W for 6 core, 70W for 8 core) Xeons, 4 2.5" drives and 8 DIMM's?
That's only ~250W of peak load.
Re: (Score:2)
Why do they need 500W for a 1U chassis that accommodates only two low voltage (60W for 6 core, 70W for 8 core) Xeons, 4 2.5" drives and 8 DIMM's?
That's only ~250W of peak load.
TFA says 750 watts? Then again, going by the second site listed, it's redundant, and the exact configuration is probably configurable.
It was probably cheaper to over-spec - IE a 250W PS would cost more than the 500W, plus the 500W is probably more efficient/requires less cooling.
If it's 750 watts total, that's 325 per redundant PSU, which is a 'comfortable' but not excessive margin for the peak load you quote. It'd also be about the peak efficiency curve.
Re: (Score:2)
It says 700/750 hot swap redundant or 500W non-redundant.
Dell desktop worked after thrown out 2nd story (Score:1)