Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system


Forgot your password?
Graphics Supercomputing AMD Hardware Technology

NVIDIA and AMD Launch New High-End Workstation, Virtualization, and HPC GPUs 95

MojoKid writes "Nvidia is taking the wraps off a new GPU targeted at HPC and as expected, it's a monster. The Nvidia K20, based on the GK110 GPU, weighs in at 7.1B transistors, double the previous gen GK104's 3.54B. The GK110 is capable of pairing double-precision operations with other instructions (Fermi and GK104 couldn't) and the number of registers each thread can access has been quadrupled, from 63 to 255. Threads within a warp are now capable of sharing data. K20 also supports a greater number of atomic operations and brings new features to the table including Dynamic Parallelism. Meanwhile, AMD has announced a new FirePro graphics card at SC12 today, and it's aimed at server workloads and data center deployment. Rumors of a dual-core Radeon 7990 have floated around since before the HD 7000 series debuted, but this is the first time we've seen such a card in the wild. On paper, AMD's new FirePro S10000 is a serious beast. Single and double-precision rates at 5.9 TFLOPS and 1.48 TFLOPS respectively are higher than anything from Intel or Nvidia, as is the card's memory bandwidth. The flip side to these figures, however, is the eye-popping power draw. At 375W, the S10000 needs a pair of eight-pin PSU connectors. The S10000 is aimed at the virtualization market with its dual-GPUs on a single-card offering a good way to improve GPU virtualization density inside a single server." My entire computer uses less power than one of these cards.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

NVIDIA and AMD Launch New High-End Workstation, Virtualization, and HPC GPUs

Comments Filter:
  • by billstewart ( 78916 ) on Tuesday November 13, 2012 @01:55AM (#41964535) Journal

    Server virtualization doesn't really need this - running web servers or databases or name servers, which are all essentially fancy timesharing.

    But "Desktop Virtualization" emulates your entire desktop as a virtual machine on a shared server, graphics and all, and just ships the rendered screens back to your desktop, accessible from anywhere, with RDP or VNC or whatever, kind of like a clumsy version of X Windows except you get to do full-scale graphics acceleration at the server farm instead of at your desktop. The mainframe IT crowd like it, because the PC on your desk can be dumb and low-powered, and the server back in the server farm they get to maintain can be big and fancy, and they can have better control over it than over your desktop, don't need to keep every bit of software up to date on everybody's remote PC, and it's generally easier to manage. And if you're logging into your work desktop from Starbucks, they don't have to protect it as thoroughly from everybody else there, and you can access your work Windows desktop from your personal iPad or your kid's gaming machine or whatever, and the company data's not very vulnerable because there's really nothing running on the remote machine.

    And using this chip, they've got a lot more graphics horsepower available for rendering desktops, so for instance they can provide you with adequate performance for video editing, not just for email and word processing .

  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday November 13, 2012 @01:59AM (#41964557)

    so 375 watts at 12 volts is the same as 375 watts at 120 volts?

    Yes, unless you're talking 375 amps at 12 volts vs 375 amps at 120 volts (which is quite a lot)

  • by knarf ( 34928 ) on Tuesday November 13, 2012 @04:02AM (#41965017) Homepage

    Of course that should read 'November 2001', not 'November 2011'...

  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday November 13, 2012 @04:43AM (#41965157)

    Volts = Difference in height between two water tanks
    Amps = Flowrate in the hose connecting both tanks
    Watts = Number of full water buckets * height difference you'd have to carry _per second_ to do the same
    Energy = Total volume of water transfered * height difference

  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday November 13, 2012 @06:04AM (#41965463)

    I've done several Virtual Desktop projects for "scientific users" using GPU based acceleration on the physical server hosting the VDIs. The benefits of a powerful GPU are many:

    1) You can provide GPU accelerated applications to all or some VDI users (I'm talking about GPU for calculation, not necessarily rendering graphics).
    2) You can provide accelerated rendering by pairing server-GPU with whatever GPU is on the endpoint desktop for a better user experience (especially over limited network bandwidth), using technologies like HDX-3D Pro.
    3) You can share out that GPU in the server to tens or potentially hundreds of users at once, so getter a better return on your capital investment in such a high-price item.

    Since I can have 3 or 4 GPUs in a single server, VDI projects tend to be limited more by memory (we use 1TB VMCo nodes, each can hold hundreds of desktops), or IOPS (rather, storage latency to be accurate), where we use a tier of solid state storage.

    Whether its a good idea or not, there are still loads of scientific users out there who are graduating from using local tools on their local PC (rather than a dedicated compute/rendering farm/cluster) and they like to continue working that way. VDI+GPU+Big memory appliance+Solid State means they dont have to "re-train".

  • by serviscope_minor ( 664417 ) on Tuesday November 13, 2012 @06:38AM (#41965597) Journal

    and efficiency is measured as a ratio between watts and volt-amps.

    No, efficiency is still measured as useful work out / Joule in.

    You are referring to power factor, not efficiency.

    The two are related, since electricity companies bill you on the number of Volt-Amps * Time used, not number of Joules, since it's much harder to do the latter, and the former determines the actual current which determines most of the expensive things, i.e. transmission losses, wire guage (infrastructure costs), etc.

    If you're seriously screwey on your power factor, you can buy a power factor corrector and it will probably pay off quite quickly if you're a big user.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday November 13, 2012 @07:12AM (#41965711)


    Repeat after me, Watt/hour = Amps/hours * Voltage

    Amperage = Current over time
    Wattage = Power over time

    Current(Amp) != Power(Watt)

    Btw, if you don't know, normal electrical devices are measured in hours, meaning X watt usage really means X watts over a period of an hour.

    So 375 watts = total power
    Higher voltage and lower current can equal the same power as lower current and higher voltage. Realistically, certain applications require certain voltages to work (high voltages for ovens as they are basically giant resistors). End result though, 375watts used in a device at 110v is the same as 375w used in say a 12v device. All that means is that the current draw is different.

    Sincerely, a different AC who never bothered to create an account

  • by jones_supa ( 887896 ) on Tuesday November 13, 2012 @07:30AM (#41965793)

    so 375 watts at 12 volts is the same as 375 watts at 120 volts?

    Yes, unless you're talking 375 amps at 12 volts vs 375 amps at 120 volts (which is quite a lot)

    I think it's better to say 31 amps at 12 volts and 3 amps at 120 volts, both totaling to 375 watts.

User hostile.