Has Lenovo Taken the Top PC Manufacturer Spot From HP? 99
angry tapir writes "Lenovo has taken the crown from Hewlett-Packard to become the world's top seller of PCs, research firm Gartner said in a study released this week. Lenovo took the top spot during a quarter in which PC shipments dropped overall due to a weak economy and pressure from mobile devices. Of the top four PC vendors, only Lenovo was able to grow its shipments. Its PC sales increased by almost 10 percent to 13.77 million units, giving it 15.7 percent of the market, Gartner said." Not so fast, says analysis firm IDC. They say that HP is still in the lead but Lenovo is very close.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Funny they've been saying that for a decade now and it still hasn't happened. Poor Apple doesn't realize they aren't the only one growing.
Re: (Score:2)
And they've already made it to third place. From like dead last.
Re: (Score:1)
Apple doesn't make PCs, it's always yelling about how its products are different than PCs :P
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Apple isn't in quite the same market. Apple computers are high end devices and their business model is based on lower number of units at higher per unit profit. Lenovo and HP are perfectly happy to sell to the people who want a low cost machine and make their profit on units sold. Apple aren't really interested in that area because doing so would damage their image
Re: (Score:1, Troll)
Re: (Score:3)
Now now, "high-end" is too strong of a word for what apple makes. They send expensive boutique computers with a generous markup, but the hardware is far from high-end.
A few years ago I would have agreed with you, but thinks like the iPad 3's screen or the Retina MBP were pretty unrivaled when they were released. In return, you get gouged pretty good on things like RAM or storage upgrades that are bog standard tech.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Apple's not really that 'high end'. They're making sure they release or announce stuff a day before the competition. That's the extent of it. If you want high end you really need to look elsewhere.
Re: (Score:2)
"but thinks like the iPad 3's screen or the Retina MBP were pretty unrivaled when they were released."
No, my Samsung S-IPS monitor was already 'Retina' well before Retina was ever a buzzword. That was a few years before the iPad.
6.3M physical pixels in a 32" screen. 206 PPI.
Too bad it was stuck at 1920x1080 and not 5760x3240, though I bet a firmware modification could give it that performance.
Re: (Score:2)
No, my Samsung S-IPS monitor was already 'Retina' well before Retina was ever a buzzword. That was a few years before the iPad. 6.3M physical pixels in a 32" screen. 206 PPI. Too bad it was stuck at 1920x1080 and not 5760x3240, though I bet a firmware modification could give it that performance.
Uh, so a firmware upgrade would turn your 6.3M physical pixels into a 5760x3240 = 18.7MP display? And LCD panels have only one native resolution, so if it was 1920x1080 then I'm guessing your 6,3 million "pixels" is 1920x1080xRGB? I'm sorry, but that's not the way we count them...
Re: (Score:2)
Sorry, my math went off, too much beer.
Take the monitor, open up paint.
Make a single white pixel on a black background.
Take a microscope to the lit up 'pixel'
See that it's not a single pixel, rather a 3x3 group of pixels lit up. 9 physical pixels (27 RGB subpixels) to make a single pixel.
So, yea, 18.7MP display, not 6.3MP.
Still, a firmware update probably is possible to get that resolution - the hardware is already obviously there, otherwise it couldn't drive all of those pixels.
Re: (Score:2)
A higher res screen doesn't make the laptop terribly high end. It's just a nice advertising bullet point for idiots that pride themselves in having no clue about what they are buying.
Apple is form over function and design that escalates price for no good reason while also reducing maintainability and useful lifespan.
Re: (Score:2)
Ehh... not to back apple or anything, but I thought they always prided themselves on usability, you can't break it no matter how much you click around, and you can intuitively find most things. Having said that, we can use the word "idiots" in a whole different light: those who can't use a PC w/o breaking it.
Re: (Score:3)
There's nothing special about Retina displays. They're not a new technology or anything like that, it's just a marketing label applied to displays with a certain pixel density. Nobody was competing on PPI before that because the market didn't care. It was only after Apple applied their marketing whammy that people started asking for it.
Re: (Score:2)
There's nothing special about Retina displays. They're not a new technology or anything like that, it's just a marketing label applied to displays with a certain pixel density. Nobody was competing on PPI before that because the market didn't care. It was only after Apple applied their marketing whammy that people started asking for it.
Oh please how many people have we got here on slashdot that cry over 1920x1200 vs 1920x1080? The market didn't care given the ridiculous premiums, sure IBM offered a 4K monitor back in 2001 for $18k - I wonder why people didn't buy it? By your standards Henry Ford did nothing special, the car was well invented before he got involved. Oh and OS support, also had nothing to do with it. It was absolutely all Apple's marketing machine.
Re: (Score:2)
Now now, "high-end" is too strong of a word for what apple makes. They send expensive boutique computers with a generous markup, but the hardware is far from high-end.
A few years ago I would have agreed with you, but thinks like the iPad 3's screen or the Retina MBP were pretty unrivaled when they were released. In return, you get gouged pretty good on things like RAM or storage upgrades that are bog standard tech.
No, a high res screen does not make them "unrivalled".
We gave a GIS (mapping) application running on Ipad and Android. The Ipad may have more resolution but the layers are put together client side (this is so we can update a layer without updating the entire map image) and the 1 year old Acer Iconia is 3-5 faster than the brand new Ipad 3. Screen resolution is a gimmick to disguise the fact that it cant do real gruntwork.
It's the same with the MBP's, My sub $900 Asus has several times the power of the
Re: (Score:1)
I felt the same way, I felt that MBP just cannot compete in terms of horsepower. I bought an Acer 5750G, 2.5GHz i5, 750GB HDD Geforce 630M, 8GB RAM = $1000 NZD
The cheapest MacBook Pro had a 2.4GHz i5, 500GB HDD, no dedicated graphics, 4GB RAM = $1900 NZD. My friend bought one of these thinking he was going to be editing HD videos...
The only real difference that mattered to me was that his screen had 32 more vertical pixels.
Re: (Score:1)
Interestingly my 5750G seems to run Hackintosh quite nicely.
Re: (Score:1)
I give Apple a credit for making hi-res mainstream. I'm typing it on IBM (Lenovo) T60 15'', retrofitted with t61 motherboard, intel t9300 2.5 GHz C2D, and QXGA (2048x1536) 4:3 IPS display, that I recently assembled from 'as new' parts.
Display was made sometime before 2006, so technology was there all the time, nobody just cared to make laptop out of it. Last laptop with this display was made by IBM around 2005, luckily display is compatible with slightly newer T60 laptop shell, which is compatible
Re: (Score:2)
Actually, your options are REALLY limited with a G5 tower.
Since they stopped making them six years ago.
Re: (Score:1)
A Windows based laptop with the same specs would be considered high end even if it did cost less than the Apple equivalent.
Re: (Score:3)
Because Lenovo has never tried to (knowingly or not - I couldn't tell whether it was intentional or just mindboggling incompetence) screw me out of using a warranty I'd purchased by claiming they had no record I'd ever purchased anything from them. Granted, that's because I've never purchased anything from Lenovo, but I don't -yet- have a reason to never purchase anything from them ever again, like I do with HP.
Re: (Score:1)
Calling Lenovo for support gets you someone in Atlanta (IBM call center) that doesn't have to run you through a script. If you tell them what you've tried, they're allowed to cut the conversation short and say, "the prepaid shipping box will be on your door tomorrow".
HP, on the other hand, is a horror show. Work and personal machines have all been serious problems. That includes their servers. And I'd rather get paper cuts on my eyeballs than call their support ever again.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I gather reason you call it a "stink" pad is because it's not a Toughbook? Why didn't you just buy a Toughbook, then?
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
I bought two Lenovo laptops in the last six months or so (one for me and one for the woman) and I quite enjoy them. Not high-end models, just $400-450 range. The construction quality and finish seems nice, they weren't loaded down with bloatware... I have no complaints at all. The HPs and Toshibas in the same price range that the Office Depot drone was trying to push on me just didn't feel very solid. Cheap plasticy feeling. The sound system on mine (G series) is probably the best I've heard in a laptop
Re: (Score:2)
You are wrong. HP sells pieces of crap. Lenevo has and still does make good computers that have very little crapware pre-loaded. Earlier this year my wife needed a new PC asap, and because we are living in different parts of the country, building her a new one wasn't an option. So, I bought a Lenovo desktop PC and had it shipped to her address. Its a great computer, is reasonably fast for the price I paid ($310 on sale) and it hasn't as much as hiccuped.
I've also recommended them to several clients without
Re: (Score:2)
Never trust Gartner on anything... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Never trust Gartner on anything... (Score:4, Interesting)
Here's what Canalys says (Score:3)
These guys monitor supply chains, and they include tables with PCs, which gives their top spot to Apple, the next to HP, and Lenovo comes in third:
http://www.canalys.com/newsroom/2012-will-bring-new-world-record-pc-shipments [canalys.com]
Re: (Score:3)
The reality is that what they put out is total bullshit. They should only list manufactures, re-badgers should be totally ignored or put up as a completely separate listing. Who cares how many plastic stick on badges HP versus how many computers Lenovo made especially when HP didn't even make the stick on badges. So goes for Apple and all the rest of the re-badgers. So what are the real numbers, where does ACER, ASUS and even Foxcon et al actual come it.
It's about time the lies were dropped about reselle
What's the difference? (Score:2)
As somebody pointed out, they're both really lousy at PCs and sell predominantly to corporate clients. They both use Chinese/Taiwanese components cobbled together in Chinese Factories and then ship them over here. One owns the rights to the old IBM brand and the other owns the rights to the old Compaq and DEC brands, so what's the difference?
Now if only Lenovo would hire Carly Fiorina as CEO, then we'd see a real battle.. Meg vs. Carly and we could host it on pay per view in the Octagon!
Re: (Score:3)
As somebody pointed out, they're both really lousy at PCs and sell predominantly to corporate clients. They both use Chinese/Taiwanese components cobbled together in Chinese Factories and then ship them over here. One owns the rights to the old IBM brand and the other owns the rights to the old Compaq and DEC brands, so what's the difference?
Completely anecdotal, but I think there's quite a difference. Between my wife and I, we've gone through 8 ThinkPads over the years--IBM and Lenovo. My father-in-law has probably used/owned at least a dozen as an employee and self-employed consultant. Other in-laws, too many to count.
Why so many? First, we're spoiled Americans and like to upgrade every 2 or 3 years. Second, we've found them to have decent resale value. And third, we keep going back to IBM/Lenovo because we rarely have issues with them.
Re: (Score:3)
And third, we keep going back to IBM/Lenovo because we rarely have issues with them. To borrow a phrase, they just work.
I've owned an HP (more than ten years ago), a T42 Thinkpad from the time that Lenovo was taking over, and a new T520. The HP was OK, if a bit fragile. The T42, as you say, just plain works. Damn near bulletproof, never a problem -- and it's been in heavy use for seven years.
The kindest thing I can say about the T520 is that it's flaky. Cores randomly, sometimes before it's done POSTing. The wireless networking is up and down, up and down -- unless it's just plain down. It's the kind of intermittent be
Re: (Score:1)
And third, we keep going back to IBM/Lenovo because we rarely have issues with them. To borrow a phrase, they just work.
I've owned an HP (more than ten years ago), a T42 Thinkpad from the time that Lenovo was taking over, and a new T520. The HP was OK, if a bit fragile. The T42, as you say, just plain works. Damn near bulletproof, never a problem -- and it's been in heavy use for seven years.
The kindest thing I can say about the T520 is that it's flaky. Cores randomly, sometimes before it's done POSTing. The wireless networking is up and down, up and down -- unless it's just plain down. It's the kind of intermittent behavior that you can't get warranty service for because it never reproduces when the technician tests it.
I bought the T42 because I knew literally hundreds of engineers from semiconductor companies who put hundreds of thousands of miles on theirs every year and they did, indeed, just plain work. And that's just what it did for me until it got too long in the tooth to handle the current workload. But if I could get a halfway modern laptop with the quality of that T42, I'd scrap this Lenovo POS for it in a hartbeat.
I disagree that you can't get warranty service. I've had many warranty calls where I say it's an intermittent issue, and they send me a prepaid warranty box and say "Check the intermittent box on the form and send it in". Even if it passes their pre-tests, they replace the motherboard anyway. One time, we even sent in the wrong laptop which had NOTHING wrong with it, and they STILL replace the motherboard because we checked the "intermittent" box on the form! Try it and see, I've had nothing but good exp
Re: (Score:3)
I'll second the notion that Lenovo's are NOT IBM.
I worked for a company that was a warranty self maintainer for IBM, and then Lenovo Products. The difference was night and day. IBM spent stupid amounts of money to make sure that their laptops could take abuse after abuse after abuse. I've seen anything from candle wax spills to systems run over by cars that would still boot. Lenovo's QA went downhill somewhere around the T400 /R400 Series. We were averaging at least 2 R400 boards a week on just USB tabs Bre
Re: (Score:3)
I agree with you mostly, but the Lenovo W and T series is pretty solid. It may not be as solid as the T600 and T4x line, their T4xx and W5xx line is really good and blows away anything HP or Dell has to offer.
Re: (Score:1)
I've used thinkpads exclusively for small business and personal use since the early noughties. In this time I've bought roughly 30 machines every three years, so three or four generations. The ones I had the most problems with were T40-T42, still practically from the IBM stable, but compared to anything else (NEC, Acer, HP) I encountered they were literally streets ahead. The current generation we have is X200-220 and T400 series. I wouldn't touch anything that's Lenovo by Lenovo like the L or W series. Of
Re: (Score:2)
Servers were mostly IBM's rebadged to Lenovo
Meanwhile lots of IBM servers have been rebadged from other people, like MSI...
Re: (Score:1)
Yeah, I'm slow getting to this thread, but I had to reply to this one. Beating on Lenovo because it's not IBM misses some of the spectacular disasters that IBM put out in the last year or so before they sold the ThinkPad brand to Lenovo. We were an all-ThinkPad shop at that time and had great luck with T2x and T3x models. Then we got some T50s They all died within a year due to bad capacitors on the boards. That was at the same time that IBM hard drives were known as DeathStars...
Lenovo, of course, wan
Re: (Score:2)
You realize Lenovo is a Chinese company right?
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
The big difference is that Lenovo makes their own laptops in their own factories -- whereas all the others make them at an outsourced factory. And I don't care where the factory is, quality always seems poorer at an outsourced plant.
Re: (Score:3)
Comment removed (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1)
Lenovo is the only half-decent manufacturer left (Score:2, Interesting)
That is in the top 10 'manufacturers'. While everybody has cut corners over the years HP, Dell, and others went too far. With falling prices in the lat 15 years even the poor can afford top quality systems. People are realizing that Dell and now HP are shipping crap. IBM/Lenovo has been going downhill all along although the difference is the company has made sure to release slightly better quality products than the rest. So it is no wonder people are going Lenovo.
Personally I would not buy Lenovo. They ship
Tim Cook says count tablets too (Score:2)
Bloatware turds with stupid keys (Score:4, Interesting)
A while back I gave my family a very short list of computers that I would help them with. HP is not on that list. They buy something off the list and they are on their own. Sign number one that a computer company hates their users is when they put that crap Norton Trialware on the computer.
People keep blah blahing about a Post-PC world coming due to tablets and smart phones. I say it all started to die the day that some MBA came up with the business model of selling a computer really cheap and then trying to screw the customer with all he money / time sucking bloatware.
Another good example of where HP went wrong was with their printer drivers. I print maybe once a month. Thus I don't want the driver running full time in the background. It should be about 3 megs of software that takes my document and prints it. I don't need to manage the print jobs, redirect them, manage supplies, or anything else. These should be optional programs that I could install on say a machine that prints all day long. But no they want me to download 200megs of crap that then installs all kinds of document management crap. This just drives me to make sure that I buy an older used printer that has drivers built into the OS.
I always laugh at those pictures of Jumbotron screens where a Norton AV subscription reminder has come up mid game but that is not so much the fault of the Jumbotron people as it is the greed of companies like HP.
But this crap is now creeping into smartphones. Rogers even put McAfee AV on his Android smartphone.
Re: (Score:2)
I automatically nuke/pave/clean install every machine I buy or work on for relatives.
It's fast, it's easy, and I don't have to care about what was on it out of the box.
Re:Bloatware turds with stupid keys (Score:4, Insightful)
So I insist that they get a machine that works out of the box. I have a very short list of machines that I will help with. At first they laughed got crap machines and then when they hit even the smallest hiccup like a printer jam I would just say, "Good luck with Google" Otherwise I just go over and start getting annoyed the first time I go to hit the left shift key. Now they spend a few extra bucks get the right machine and oddly call me a whole lot less.
Call me overly sensitive but if I could repair cars and you bought a Daiwoo I wouldn't fix that either. I would again make a list of cars that are good value and hand that out.
I use a mac and generally recommend those. I set my mother up with a Linux box (locked down so grandkids don't wreck it). One sister is a Lawyer so I told her to go with Windows as it is inevitable that there will be some Windows only app LawMaster2000 or such. So I am very much the right system for the right job. But when it comes to the machine don't buy it from a company that seems to hate their customers. I find HP machines are like companies that pay minimum wage; they are basically saying if it were legal they would pay even less. HP seems to be saying that if they could get away with it they would sell even worse machines.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I just bought my first bilingual keyboard laptop and it is driving me nuts. I'm getting used to the Enter key placement, but that shift key is a pain. I came across this program which lets you remap the bottom-left backslash to shift.
http://webpages.charter.net/krumsick/ [charter.net]
It isn't perfect. It works well when typing words and paragraphs, but doesn't work for highlighting or some other functions.
Re: (Score:2)
So don't install the whole HP printer suite. Go download just the print driver and be done with it. Best best is to get a printer with an ethernet port that support tcpip printing which doesn't force you to have usb-only drivers. Uninstall all the crapware they install, or better yet nuke and reinstall from known good sources so you don't even have to worry if it came pre-rooted.
Personally, bragging that you are elitist about what brands of computers you'll help your family makes you seem like an ass. S
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I occassionally help some cow-orkers and friends out with their personal computers as well. Usually the problem isn't the pre-installed trialware or hardware faults. It's virus and toolbars, etc. Sometimes I'll take the time to clean it up, and sometimes I tell them just to copy off their data and then restore it with the recovery CD or partition (assuming it has one). When they ask my advice on what to buy, I usually steer towards a decent brand and if possible to buy a few steps up from the bottom of
Thinkpad still the best laptop (Score:5, Informative)
I've bought many laptops, and thinkpads, even recent ones, are still clearly the best laptops on the market.
Great build, great keyboard.
Pricey, but has all the best hardware possible, and it works well on linux.
Everything a demanding software engineer might need.
Re:Thinkpad still the best laptop (Score:4, Insightful)
I dont have mod points, so let me just repeat that, "Great Keyboard!". They simple have best tactile feedback I have seen.
Re: (Score:3)
You can switch them in the BIOS.
Every single one of my Lenovo Laptops kicked ass (Score:4, Interesting)
All of them. They remain useful until they are completely broken, thrashed, just worn the fuck out dead.
That's why they are doing well. I pay a lot for mine, run them hard, and when they are behind the curve, they get cycled home for various things, until they finally just don't work, and that process is generally painless too.
I like the matte black finish. It's not sexy, but it endures way better than the shiny, "please don't scratch it" finishes on so many machines do. Maybe starting out a little less sexy has it's advantages. Black is damn cool in my book, and there is always that little brightly colored something on the machines, sort of like a great tie on an otherwise boring business suit. Perfect.
The keyboards are a bit noisy, but I like that too. Always have. I can type and type and type until the buttons are all worn, and they just keep going great, no worries.
Heavy little buggers, if you buy the more powerful ones. If I need to clock somebody with my laptop, Lenovo is there! No worries, and I can probably post to Facebook after doing it too.
Linux is well supported across most of the machines. I love that. A Think Pad was the first machine I ran OS X on too. Worked amazingly well, and was faster than the Mac I ended up getting soon after. Gotta admit, the touch pad on the Mac is better tho, but not by much. Some Think Pad touch pads need to be worn in. Once that has happened, they work much better. Weird.
By and large, I leave most of the value added software on the machines. It works well. HP is noisy, Dell just horrible, etc.... I get a competent disc burning kit, defrag tools, etc... Nice package that actually has some real value. On my latest machine they even tossed in the nVidia 3D licenses. Didn't know that, until I connected up to a new TV for some 3D CAD tests. Nice!! That's $14.99 for most of you out there.
Funny thing is I was not a fan early on. One ended up at the house, and I started using it. By the time I got it, the machine was a bit dated, but damn if it wasn't just great to use. When it outlasted some HP thing or other, I was sold. Typically, I get a top machine for work purposes. Need big RAM / CPU, nVidia, etc... Once it's done, it goes home for micro-controller related projects. Long life cycle on these. Worth it.
And... matte finish displays that are typically nice, bright, with fine dot pitches. They've wavered a bit on these on some models as of late. Gotta be a bit picky about that, but so has everybody else. Get the better display they offer, and it's no worry.
The few times I've ordered replacement things under warranty, they shipped 'em, the work wasn't hard. Once the machine ends up at home, I find I can service it much easier than I can the HP machines, which incorporate all manner of fiddly components, glue, buttons that fail, etc... Ugh. Dell sometimes does better, and is in my mind, competitive on this front. Apple? Difficult, but then their stuff works a long time too. Fair game they are playing, but HP is just losing big on this front. Get an HP, and you better hope it works, or service might be very difficult no matter who does it.
I expected some of this to fade when IBM let go to Lenovo. Very pleased to see they've kept the bar high so far. Hoping they continue.
I'll withhold my judgement (Score:2)
Of course they're losing market share. (Score:2)
One day they're at the top, the next day they say they're getting out of the PC business, then they say they were just kidding about that and they're back in the PC business. If I were purchasing equipment for my company, there's no way in Hell I'd buy HP. I'm not buying computers from a company that can't decide whether or not they want to be in the business of selling me computers.
I saw Apple mentioned above so I'll touch on my feelings about them. They've made it very clear the last few years that the
Re: (Score:2)
Absolutely right about HP. I wouldn't buy anything from them until they decide what kind of company they want to be and start showing us some of the great products they used to make but somehow lost their way.
As for Apple I can't quite figure out what they are doing with their laptops these days. I've got a MacBook Pro that's about 4 years old (still running Snow Leopard) and it's hands down the best laptop I have ever owned. But you know what? I don't want to buy a new one. They are nice machines but you c
Selling themselves up the creek (Score:1)
HP is shit. (Score:2)
I had a business-class HP 17", an EliteBook no less. It had the QuadroFX die bonding failure. In spite of it having a replaceable video card, HP had no replacement. (If you design a machine with an MXM slot, you are a stupid fuck. What a waste of money. Put the GPU onboard.) HP sent out a contract tech twice. Failed to fix it the first time, machine wouldn't even boot after his second visit. Took over 24 hours on the phone total to get a replacement machine. They sent me a significantly upgraded machine. I
Good fucking riddance (Score:1)
A lot of verbiage (Score:2)
A lot of verbiage to say something simple. Lenovo controls a slightly smaller percentage of the market, but their shipments increased 10% while HP's decreased 16% (info somewhat from memory, read an article about this earlier today). So make your own conclusions. This "not so fast... this other guy says..." nonsense is just silly.
Dell (Score:2)
Repairs (Score:1)