Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Hardware Science

Researchers Create Silicon-Based Quantum Bit 46

angry tapir writes "Researchers at the University of New South Wales in Australia have created the world's first working quantum bit based on a single atom in silicon. The research team was able to both read and write information using the spin, or magnetic orientation, of an electron bound to a single phosphorous atom embedded in a silicon chip. In February, UNSW researchers revealed they had successfully created a single-atom transistor using a single phosphorous atom in a silicon crystal."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Researchers Create Silicon-Based Quantum Bit

Comments Filter:
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 20, 2012 @05:29AM (#41396911)

    Seems like a bit of waste !!

  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday September 20, 2012 @06:29AM (#41397121)

    No, they've demonstrated a single Qubit.

    TFS makes things mucky by mentioning single electron transistors too, which are a completely different beast.

    The problem with quantum computing isn't demonstrating single qubits though. The problem is in getting a reasonable number in a superposition. Most I've ever seen in a QC that actually does computations is 7 qubits.

    Just to get an idea of the scale we need, Shor's algorithm, the one which we could use to crack RSA encryption in polynomial time, needs 2*N qubits minimum. So to crack RSA1024 we'd need 2048 qubits all in a state of superposition.

    I'm of the opinion adding more qubits to a superposition is going to be an exponentially hard problem.

  • by jamesh ( 87723 ) on Thursday September 20, 2012 @06:39AM (#41397153)

    can you run linux on it?

    Nope. Linux requires at least a two bit computer to run.

  • Re:payback (Score:5, Funny)

    by wonkey_monkey ( 2592601 ) on Thursday September 20, 2012 @06:48AM (#41397181) Homepage
    First Evidence of Quantum Tunnelling Slashdot Post Dismissed as Human Error.
  • by QilessQi ( 2044624 ) on Thursday September 20, 2012 @08:46AM (#41397713)

    ...or some other quantum computer programming language.

    (Of course, I suppose that to really do quantum software development correctly, you have to learn to be great at it and totally suck at the same time. Well, at least while no one's watching...)

The only possible interpretation of any research whatever in the `social sciences' is: some do, some don't. -- Ernest Rutherford

Working...