Leak Hints Windows 8 Tablets May Be Dearer Than Makes Sense 365
MrSeb writes "If, like me, you thought Microsoft would price Windows RT competitively, you were wrong: A leaked slide from Asus says that its Vivo Tab RT, due to be released alongside Windows RT at the end of October, will start at $600. Unbelievably, this is $100 more than the iPad 3, and a full $200 more than the iPad 2 or Galaxy Tab 2 10.1. For $600, you would expect some sensational hardware specs — but alas, that's sadly not the case. The Vivo Tab RT has a low-res 10.1-inch 1366×768 IPS display, quad-core Tegra 3 SoC, 2GB of RAM, NFC, 8-megapixel camera and that's about it. Like its Androidesque cousin, the Transformer, the Vivo Tab RT can be plugged into a keyboard/battery dock — but it'll cost you another $200 for the pleasure. (Curiously, the Transformer's docking station only costs $150 — go figure.)"
Leaked? (Score:2)
Wasn't this an announcement from the manufacturer?
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
"Can't wait?"
"For your Win8?"
"Get ready then."
"To meet your.. destiny"
Burma fuckin' shave!
Margins (Score:3)
Perhaps Microsoft has decided they need to make money instead of doing loss leaders.
Re:Margins (Score:5, Insightful)
Perhaps Microsoft has decided they need to make money instead of doing loss leaders.
To make money, you have to sell product.
Re: (Score:2)
Microsoft have been selling expensive products for years now. They were never a price oriented company.
Re:Margins (Score:4, Insightful)
Ok, I'll give you that. But now they're competing in a commodity market. Microsoft doesn't really understand competitive, commodity markets.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
They will be pushing Microsoft Office and other "solutions" as a reason to buy their more expensive tablets, as well as integration with Exchange and whatever other crappy product they can think of.
We all seen it before. How many people continue using IIS ?
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
IIS is about 13% of the web server market.
Re:Margins (Score:4, Insightful)
I don't disagree as that seems to be how Microsoft has marketed their products over the last bunch of years ... I'm just not sure they fully get that people are looking for devices which do things other than Office documents and Exchange.
I think RIM is demonstrating quite nicely that what consumers want is stuff that isn't what businesses want. And the consumer market is actually quite a bit bigger than the corporate one.
Unfortunately, Microsoft often still sees the world as about being able to access Office and Exchange. And I'm betting far more people don't need that than do in this market -- for me personally, I have no use for that, but I've no doubt that for some people the ability to get their company email or access the TPS report from home is absolutely critical.
I think when Microsoft comes to terms with the fact that a shocking amount of people don't need Office and Exchange, they might figure out what features they should be putting into tablets.
Re:Margins (Score:5, Insightful)
MS never had to be price oriented, they held a monopoly on consumer and enterprise desktops, and had a pretty good market share of servers. To the point where competitors effectively had to be free to compete, not because of technical superiority but because of how the market was stacked against them.
The trouble for MS is it doesn't have that lead in the mobile space. Its now forced, whether it acknowledges it or not to compete on:
Cost and UI matter to regular consumers, Cost and Technical Merit (maybe including a bit of UI as it relates to funcationality rather than prettiness/bragging rights) matter to techies.
MS's problem is the first group aren't going to be impressed with Notro compared to Apple or Android, especially if the devices are going to cost significantly more. The second group remember enough about MS's business practices from the 90's and 00's as to be warey of accepting them.
There is another possibility, maybe it's not the MS license knocking up the price, ASUS might not be expecting big sales from these devices and so are hoping to cover R&D costs with a smaller number of sales by bumping up the unit price?
Re: (Score:3)
This is not true at all. Nearly all markets Microsoft entered they underpriced, usually a lot. Operating systems, server
software, office suites, you name it — MS products were always cheaper than the then incumbent. What MS always
did was to establish a proprietary lock-in by embracing, extending and extinguishing existing standards, so that they
could avoid lowering prices — software having fat margins, former incumbents would underprice MS once they lo
Re:Margins (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Margins (Score:5, Insightful)
I don't know, I paid $40 for DOS 6 when games were $50, I'd say that's cheap, especially since it came with DoubleSpace. Most people aren't Microsoft's customers, they're Asus and Dell and HP customers. I doubt that more than $10 went to MS when you bought a computer. Enterprise customers are their customers, not you. Now, Office seems expensive unless you put it next to Photoshop are worse, SAS.
You're confusing them with Apple. Apple computers are way more expensive than Windows computers, but Apples are percieved to be higher quality. I just don't see how MS can sell a tablet at a higher price than an iPad and expect anyone to buy them. Folks buy Apple to be kewl and show off how much money they have, you can't say that about MS.
Look how the Zune flopped, and it wasn't as expensive as an iPod. There's no way anyone is going to be willing to pay more for a Windows computer than an Apple computer.
Meanwhile, when I get a tablet it will be a cheap Android. Apples cost too much and Windows has too few features compared to kubuntu.
Re:Margins (Score:4, Insightful)
Do you honestly believe that the majority of people that buy Apple products...do so as a status symbol?? I know that is the often quoted opinion on /. , but do people really believe that deep down?
I mean, I own a few apple products. I have an old iphone 3gs, and am likely to going to get the new iPhone 5. but I dunno what a status symbol that is. I mean, it spends most of the time in my pocket, and honestly, when you whip one out...well, it is no big deal as that so many other people out there have them...it is kind of a commodity phone. I'd dare say any smart phone these days is pretty much a commodity object, and seems most people out there have one.
As for a mac computer....well, I do have a macbook pro I bought myself last xmas...but that stays largely at home..I bought it for some stills and video production I wanted to do with my gift I gave myself this year...a Canon 5D3.
Sure, these are both $$$ things...but, I got them because they were perceived to me as being the best I could get for my money I could afford...for some things I wanted to do. Best tool for the job and all.
But really...I don't think that many people even notice if you pull out an Apple product....to most people I think...it is just another "phone", or "laptop" or "tablet".....I don't perceive any social stigma related to them by anyone that pulls them out these days. Does anyone else really see it that way?
I mean, I don't give anyone a sideways glance really if they pull out a computer, smartphone or tablet....today those are all just commodity type gear IMHO....
Re: (Score:3)
Do you honestly believe that the majority of people that buy Apple products...do so as a status symbol?? I know that is the often quoted opinion on /. , but do people really believe that deep down?
Yes.
I'm not knocking the hardware or those that purchase it, but status is absolutely a part of the decision to go with Apple devices. It's much the same as having a nice car versus an old yet reliable Ford Pinto. People want features, reliability, and the "look". Apple offers all 3, and I know it was a factor in *my* purchase. I can be honest with myself, too.
Re:Margins (Score:5, Interesting)
Because Microsoft is charging Asus a lot of money for Windows RT, and that's why the tablet is so expensive? Should Asus maybe sell these things at a loss so that Microsoft can compete against Android?
Re: (Score:3)
Because Microsoft is charging Asus a lot of money for Windows RT
It's $85, and unlike Android they don't have costs associated with customizing the software (because they can't). Aside from the larger (but lower resolution) screen the hardware is much the same as the Nexus 7, so the license cost doesn't explain the disparity.
Re: (Score:3)
I would assume a price sheet from ASUS would contain prices decided on by ASUS. Why are people blaming MS when it's the vendor's choice to go with these price points?
Probably because Microsoft is the sole provider of one of the more expensive items on the BoM, and the one over which there was the greatest price uncertainty and the greatest room for a decision between lower prices or higher margins. A few of the hardware bits are probably more expensive in absolute terms(a good IPS panel with a capacitive sensor isn't cheap, not that 1366x768 is 'good'); but the component vendors have comparatively little margin and less room to move on pricing.
Re:Margins (Score:5, Insightful)
(a good IPS panel with a capacitive sensor isn't cheap, not that 1366x768 is 'good')
This is what pisses me off these days: on a 10" device made for looking at kittens on the internet, a 1366x768 IPS screen is considered "bad". But on my 12" notebook, where I actually need a good display for e.g. Photoshop or Lightroom while on the go, a 1366x768 IPS screen would be an *upgrade*. The display situation on laptops is seriously FUBAR...
Re: (Score:3)
Perhaps Microsoft has decided they need to make money instead of doing loss leaders.
Have you seen the price of a full retail copy of Windows? It's almost as much an iPad...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Winning (Score:5, Funny)
I like this plan.
Bye Bye, Microsoft.
Re: (Score:2)
Don't start bolting your chairs to the floor just yet. It's probably just an early tantalizer that they release while they work out the kinks. I would be surprised if you couldn't get a 7" Windows 8 tablet in Q4 2013. The real question is whether they'll be able to release a tablet that can compete with the iPad in the $500-$600 range.
Re: (Score:2)
I would be surprised if you couldn't get a 7" Windows 8 tablet in Q4 2013.
By then it will be up against an iPad3 mini. It would have to be seriously cheap to win that battle.
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, they'll probably have to ship Windows for free on the low-end 7" tablets.
I wonder if Microsoft has failed to realize that in terms of profit the OS is essentially a front-end for the app store and plans to make money on both the OS and on app sales, analogous to a mall owner charging entrance.
Re: (Score:3)
Except they're going to have to charge a lot more money then. Even though Apple gets around $1.2B out of iTunes (for all iTunes sales - apps, music, movies, books), a lot of that is plowed back into servers and into credit card transaction payments (developers are paid out before, but expen
Re:Winning (Score:5, Funny)
Bye Bye, Microsoft.
Now there is a prediction never made on Slashdot before. Why don't you go all the way out on the limb and declare next year to be "The Year Of Linux on Desktops"?
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
No, you have it all wrong.
Now it will be annoying Microsoft fanbois talking about how 2013 will be "The Year of The Windows Mobile Device."
Which we know will never happen, Apple and Android/Linux own that market.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
You sound like you're only a few posts away from talking about how 2013 will be "The Year of The Windows Mobile Device."
Re: (Score:3)
a circlejerking echo chamber
Sounds messy.
Re: (Score:3)
Bye Bye, Microsoft.
Now there is a prediction never made on Slashdot before. Why don't you go all the way out on the limb and declare next year to be "The Year Of Linux on Desktops"?
No, but has been the "decade of unix (now predominantly linux) based mobile devices" so far. Microsoft has been losing on this front, since, well, forever, but the success of the iPhone and Android cemented that fate.
Re:Winning (Score:5, Informative)
I wouldn't laugh too loud. In the last 12 years Microsoft's stock has fallen off a cliff
MSFT $23.73 - Sep 20th, 2002.
.. and that was fucking VERY easy.
MSFT $31.17 - Sep 18th, 2012.
I didn't read the rest of your post because you began with complete bullshit proving that you are completely willing to make up whatever the fuck you want while pretending to be a fucking authority.
I have this awesome idea.. what you don't know what you are talking about, simply don't open your fucking mouth pretending that you do. Its such a simple thing.. even easier than checking the historic price of MSFT
The perfect blend (Score:5, Funny)
So you get software no one likes in hardware no one would pay for. That sounds like a recipe for success.
Re:The perfect blend (Score:5, Insightful)
So you get software no one likes in hardware no one would pay for. That sounds like a recipe for success.
The hardware isn't THAT bad. It's just not particularly great. People would probably pay for the hardware if it had a more reasonable price point.. I'm thinking around $300. You can't fix windows RT without replacing it, though.
I'm not sure how MS expects to compete here. Every competitor in this field charges $0 for the OS. MS is selling ONLY an OS. I guess they expect hardware manufacturers to eat the cost? It would be a little intriguing if RT and Windows 8 were binary level compatible, but they're not - they just look similar.
Re:The perfect blend (Score:4, Interesting)
Every competitor in this field charges $0 for the OS
Well, kinda. Most Android manufacturers are already paying MS $15/device for a promise not to sue. Paying $15/device to actually get an OS might be worth it. And, sure, you can get the Android software after release for free, but to have access to the under-development versions you need to pay Google. You also need to pay Google if you want to ship their apps. Plus you need to pay your developers to get Android ported to your device, and to keep drivers up to date as kernel interfaces change if you want to allow users to upgrade. Customisation also costs money if you want to differentiate your product at all.
Re: (Score:3)
So you get software no one likes in hardware no one would pay for. That sounds like a recipe for success.
MS Office outsells any other retail software product you can name.
It is the tail that wags the dog. Currently holding 11 out of the top 25 slots at Amazon.com alone. Home and Student for the PC will typically rank 1 or 2 anywhere you look.
Re:The perfect blend (Score:4, Insightful)
People buy office because they think they have to. Little trolls like you feed the fear. People don't buy it because they actually like it.
It's still "software no one likes".
Nothing wrong here (Score:5, Funny)
If you really want to use Windows, you need to pay up for the privilege. I think it's too cheap; they should start these Windows tablets at $2000. I'm sure millions of people will be lining up to buy these things.
(Hopefully Steve is reading this.)
Re: (Score:2)
(Mod up...)
Re:Nothing wrong here (Score:4, Funny)
(Hopefully Steve is reading this.)
Nope, he is dead.
Oh, you meant the other Steve.
Nope, he is a zombie.
Re: (Score:3)
No he isn't. Zombies go around looking for brains.
Re: (Score:2)
This isn't Apple
Re: (Score:2)
If you really want to use Windows, you need to pay up for the privilege.
Even though you meant it in jest, there's actually something to that. There's something that Microsoft brings to the table that no one else can really say. They have an overwhelming majority presence in the business end-user arena. End-user business software runs on Microsoft, period. To be able to seamlessly untether them from the heavier form factors is a value that neither Apple nor Google can offer.
Right now if I want to deliver mobile solutions to the end-user I have to compromise with HTML5/JavaSc
Re: (Score:2)
Microsoft Office is _terrible_ on the new Windows mobile devices.
They really just slapped it up.
MS vs OEMs (Score:4, Interesting)
Pre-loaded Office 2013 (Score:2)
What is this? I don't even... (Score:2)
MS Still doesn't get it... (Score:3)
The price difference is probably in the MS software license. IIRC, the OEM license cost for Windows CE in the late 90s was $50. I imagine Windows RT is around $100.
Compare that with Google who pays YOU to run Android.
In some universe, this makes sense (Score:5, Funny)
This all pencils out. Everyone wants Microsoft Windows on a tablet. They're already lining up for it. It's Windows -- the same interface, the same applications, compatibility with all the Microsoft back end processes, and all documents of any type made by Microsoft products will open on it. Regular security releases and bug fixes will keep it in great shape, and Internet Explorer is a joy to use. For all that, of course people will be willing to pay a premium price for the product. This isn't arrogance, it's due recognition of our own excellence. We've owned the desktop for decades; this obviously means we have a superior product.
Additionally, charging a higher price creates a mindset of a premium product. Charging a price competitive with those made-in-China boxes running not-Windows will make us seem as useless as them. People are willing to pay for excellence.
(Please mod this funny so I don't lose all faith in humanity...)
Re: (Score:2)
Sadly, I think you're perfectly right about some of that. Windows 8's UI is built for a tablet, so it can look and function the same everywhere (ideally). There are still sites that only work on IE, and they mostly show up in the corporate world, where IE still reigns supreme. Anything non-Microsoft is a loose cannon, that you can't just expect to connect with all the existing legacy software from the 90s.
All together, corporate managers will say that the extra cost for the Windows tablets (and Windows desk
Re: (Score:2)
We have lots of different sources to thank for that. We perhaps have Apple to thank for the marketing, although that has its upsides and downsides.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, but no one turns on a tablet and expects to see a windows desktop.
With Windows 8, users will turn on a desktop and see a Windows tablet! That's just as good!
Re: (Score:3)
Then they should release "Windows Live Xbox Office"...I'd buy that out of morbid curiosity.
Target market? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Unless they've backed down on Active Directory on Windows RT, Team corporate IT is going to avoid these things like the plague unless specifically forced by user demand...
Re: (Score:2)
Looked good on an MBAs spreadsheet (Score:5, Insightful)
In order to switch from an iPad to a Windows unit it would have to be so much better, so way much better, way way better. So unless it unfolds into a private jet that then flies me to my private island that comes with it I will predict that they will jig the stats on sales (force people to warehouse them and then prebook the sales) and in the end it will be Zune 2.
Right now there are two ways to sell a tablet to consumers, sell them an iPad or sell them something that looks exactly like an iPad for way less. The only possible third way would be something way better; thus MS will have had to vastly improve upon technologies that are near the leading edge of what is possible. So better than retina? Better battery life without making it an inch thick? Thinner/lighter electronics? Vastly better GUI? Vastly better Processor? Better Apps?
If MS were really lucky and had the best engineers on the planet and could get their first effort perfect I could see slight improvements on all of the above but not enough to touch Apple's marketing or enough to justify a monster price.
My prediction is that MS is going to make this all enterprisey. It will tie into office and other MS crap in a horribly incestuous way. They will provide white papers to the CTO types saying how this can improve data security and fine grain control over the user experience. What they are forgetting here is that one of the reasons for Apple's ability to break into the Enterprise market is that they don't cater to the enterprise market's OCD about ruining the user experience. I am sure that this is what killed the BlackBerry; those phones are actually pretty good. But RIM gave the telcos and sys admins too much say over what could be turned off on the phones. Many a corporate user had a complete dud of a phone after all the good bits were turned off in the name of security and productivity. Apple looks at this and just asks "Why would we allow you to ruin our phones?" Over the last few years the better companies have had a policy of BYOD that is a real winner among the employees who are the reason the company exists and a real pain among old school admins.
So basically crappy companies are going to buy a handful of these new tablets and their employees are going to put them into the microwave hoping that if they ruin enough of them they will get an iPad; or at least not have to suffer the Metro UI.
Re: (Score:2)
I figure any company with a concern for managed tablet access to Windows will just buy iPads and leverage their virtualization for VDI.
Capacity? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Well, here's the thing: Nobody I know buys anything but the cheapest iPad. So for the majority of those customers would compare any tablet against that price and fearure set.
Re: (Score:2)
So let's go out on a limb and say the $600 Asus tablet is 32 gb. So that leaves a void for a $500 tablet that again, *someone* in the market will produce. This is the joy of not relying on a single hardware vendor.
Re:Capacity? (Score:4, Informative)
Vivo Tab RT | iPad
Resolution: 1366×768 | 2048 × 1536
Screen Size: 10.1" | 9.7"
CPU: 1.4 GHz quad-core ARM Cortex-A9 | 1.0 GHz dual-core
GPU: 12-core ULP GeForce | quad-core PowerVR SGX543MP4
RAM: 2 GB | 1 GB
Rear Camera: 8 MP LED Flash | 5 MP no Flash
Front Camera: 2 MP | 0.3 MP
Sensors: Mag, Accel, Gyro, Light | Mag, Accel, Gyro, Light
Wireless: 802.11 a/b/g/n, Bluetooth 4.0 | 802.11 a/b/g/n, Bluetooth 4.0
Expansion: USB port | Apple 30 pin + $30 dongles Office: Office RT (Word, Excel, Powerpoint, OneNote) | None Storage: 32GB | 32GB
Price: $599 | $599
So the iPad wins on the screen and that's about it. Now, the iPad is about 6 months old, so it's a bit of an unfair comparison, but this is the comparison people will make until the iPad 4 is released. This particular tablet has more horsepower, better cameras, equivalent sensors and storage, included Office, native USB port.... What's left to know is size/weight/battery, but those should be comparable as well. All for the same price as the iPad.
16:9 10.1" screen is useless for any serious work (Score:4, Interesting)
A 15.6" 1080p 16:9 screen is nice. 14" is pushing it. 13.3 gets annoying. 10.1 is fucking ridiculous, aren't Windows 8 tablets meant to be productivity devices? Why the hell do they all (including the MS surface) have stretched out 16:9 screens that are awful for doing any real work in landscape mode with a keyboard attached?
Apple are the only ones who understand this, which is why all Apple laptops except the 11.6" Macbook Air (I guess it needed to be wide enough for the keyboard to fit, and even 11.6" 16:9 is nowhere as ridiculous as 10.1" 16:9) come with 16:10 screens, the ONLY manufacturer that I know of who still sell 16:10 laptops.
Take these prices with a grain of salt though, OEMs have a habit of pricing products rather hopefully before cutting prices to the point where stuff sells. I guess a Windows license costs a bit more than Google apps/Google Play license + Microsoft tax on Android devices (ALL major Android tablet and phone makers except Motorola and Sony pay Microsoft for every Android device they sell). But Android tablets with similar specs from Lenovo etc. are selling for $300 and even less with cash backs etc. A mid range Win RT tablet should be available for $400-450 in the market.
Dear Microsoft. (Score:2, Insightful)
I've used Windows 8. It's not that great. Nobody will pay extra for it despite what the consultants told you. Your "surface" will be a loss leader designed to gain market share or it will simply fail. Thank you for your attention.
Cheers!
Mr. ColdWaterOfRealityMan
Dear Slashdot (Score:5, Informative)
Second, you may have noticed that "Sebatian Anthony" is the author of the article (he probably gets paid by ExtremeTech according to the number of pageviews he gets). You may have also noticed that the submitter for this article is "MrSeb" and if you follow the link it leads back to Sebastian Anthony. Yup, the article's author is the same person who submitted it to Slashdot so that he could make money. This wouldn't be so bad if the article wasn't so horribly written. Just take a look at the comments in the article (mostly negative about Sebastian's leaps of logic) and compare them to the comments on Slashdot (mostly positive, probably because Slashdot loves bad press about Microsoft). Stop getting this shitty article-writer paid.
On a side note, I happen to remember seeing Sebastian Anthony on the old (now gone) "Download Squad". He was a huge advocate of piracy and used all kinds of crappy logic to justify piracy. I'm glad to see his lack of intelligent reasoning extends to his other articles as well.
Re: (Score:2)
Do see how the article compares this tablet to another tablet from the same manufacturer with the same specs but running Android instead of Windows RT? How else do you explain the price difference?
Re: (Score:2)
How else do you explain the price difference?
Everyone knows people are happy to pay $200 more for hardware with a Microsoft logo on the front.
Re:My god, slashdot editors are retarded (Score:5, Informative)
Re:My god, slashdot editors are retarded (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Real Trash?
Reused Technology?
Redundant technology?
Ring Token?
Rubbish Tin?
Rubber Tit?
Rectal Thermometer?
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Runtime [wikipedia.org]
I've never met a group of people so boastful
Re:Windows RT + Office (Score:5, Insightful)
"Dearer"? You mean more expensive?
Re: (Score:3)
Re:Windows RT + Office (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe it meant that in the 1950s...
I think MrSeb is showing his age as well as his location.
Re:Windows RT + Office (Score:4, Insightful)
As soon as I saw the word Dear in the title, I knew that people would come out of the woodwork complaining about it because they didn't know the definition of a word they have used most of their lives. The real question is... What do THEY think the word "Dear" means?
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Windows RT + Office (Score:5, Funny)
'dearer' = 'more expensive' in real Engrish as well.
Re:Windows RT + Office (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Windows RT + Office (Score:5, Informative)
high or exorbitant in price : expensive "eggs are very dear just now"
Re: (Score:3)
Webster (a US dictionary) shows the 4th definition of the adjective dear:
high or exorbitant in price : expensive "eggs are very dear just now"
Yes, but it just sounds better when it is said in an English accent.
Re: (Score:2)
In Italian, both "expensive" and "dear" are translated with the same word, "caro".
So, "more expensive" -> "piu' caro" -> "dearer".
I had no idea that /. titles were written by Italians anyway.
Re:Windows RT + Office (Score:5, Informative)
"Dearer"? You mean more expensive?
In NZ and Oz, "dear" is more commonly used than "expensive".
Re:Windows RT + Office (Score:5, Funny)
"Dearer"? You mean more expensive?
In NZ and Oz, "dear" is more commonly used than "expensive".
For example,
I don't mind venison, my only problem with venison is that it's a bit deer.
Re:Windows RT + Office (Score:4, Insightful)
Windows RT will come in Office 2013 Preview which would also be up-gradable to the final version when it launches.
Inconveniently, though, Office 2013 matters somewhat less to home users and Windows RT(since it can't be bound to a domain or controlled by standard group policy for any price) is of somewhat less interest to business users...
I'm not saying that they won't sell any; but by gimping AD in favor of some goofy 'Yeah, sure, go ahead and pretend its a smartphone or something, I hate you.' management 'app', they've substantially spoiled the appeal for the IT-heavy we-cannot-use-any-software-not-feature-identical-to-Office-and-ideally-compatible-with-IE6-so-we-can-still-get-to-our-cutting-edge-'intranet portal' segment, and at $600 for mediocre specs(2 GB of RAM is high by tablet standards; but cheap shit by Windows-machine standards) they'll need a pretty compelling argument that I need 100% Office, rather than the Office-compatibleish offerings on iDevices or Android things, since the same $600 will get me a shiny new 32GB iPad or a Transformer prime infinity from Asus' android side...
Re:Windows RT + Office (Score:5, Funny)
I'm totally looking forward to creating Excel spreadsheets on a touch screen.
Re: (Score:2)
Did you look at the pretty picture in the article?
Re: (Score:3)
Did you look at the pretty picture in the article?
Yes. Was there a point to your comment?
Hint: if you mean the docking keyboard, who's going to pay yet another $200 on top of the enormous tablet cost in order to turn it into a crappy laptop?
Re: (Score:3)
The update is free. (Score:5, Informative)
Trialware is great and all, but I'd hardly call it a feature if you have to pay for the 'upgrade'
From the MS "Office Next" blog:
Getting Office Home & Student 2013 RT
Office Home & Student 2013 RT is only available on Windows RT devices and is not sold standalone. The Windows RT devices available at Windows RT General Availability will include preview editions of Word, Excel, PowerPoint, and OneNote. After the final edition of Office Home & Student 2013 RT is released in a customer's language, their Windows RT device will be automatically updated with the final edition for free via Windows Update (Wi-Fi connection required). Customers can expect to get these updates starting in early November through January depending on their language. We'll publish the specific update schedule on October 26 on the Office blog.
Office Next [office.com]
Re:The update is free. (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:3)
So, your tablet can only join domains if it has one of those processors that the manufacturers already anounced that can't stand to compete with ARM.
Is The Onion writting MS's strategy?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
This must be a tech support thing. I wonder if it's on their scripts. I work with a large number of Indian immigrants in academia and have never heard this phrase.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Dearer? (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:3)