Sandia's Floating, Dust-Free, Spinning Heatsink 307
An anonymous reader writes "Sandia Research Laboratory believes it has come up with a much more efficient solution than heatsink-fan cooling a CPU that simply combines the heatsink and fan components into a single unit. What you effectively get is a spinning heatsink. The new design is called the Sandia Cooler. It spins at just 2,000 RPM and sits a thousandth of an inch above the processor. Sandia claim this setup is extremely efficient at drawing heat away from the chip, in the order of 30x more efficient than your typical heatsink-fan setup. The Sandia Cooler works by using a hydrodynamic air bearing. What that means is when it spins up the cooler actually becomes self supporting and floats above the chip (hence the thousandth of an inch clearance). Cool air is drawn down the center of the cooler and then ejected at the edges of the fins taking the heat with it. And as the whole unit spins, you aren't going to get dust build up (ever)."
Thousandth of an inch (Score:2, Insightful)
It spins at just 2,000 RPM and sits a thousandth of an inch above the processor
What could possibly go wrong? Seems like a pretty tight tolerance with all the vibration that could occur in a server room.
Re:Thousandth of an inch (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
When a spinny HD shuts down, the head moves off the platter first at least.
Re:Thousandth of an inch (Score:5, Insightful)
when we were kids we had to run park.com before turning the computer off to move the head off the platters and we were happy for it!
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
Yeah but is .exe a great idea for a tld or what?
Re:Thousandth of an inch (Score:5, Funny)
Ahh, the good old days - 12 inch 10 MB hard drives, and if you forgot to 'park' the head before shutdown, bad things would happen. And before that, the 'washing machine' Winchester - 5 HP stepping motors to move the heads, the drive could walk across the floor if the heads moved back and forth in resonance. And the IBM 1130, whose 1 MB 14 inch(?) removable drive had a one second mean seek time. ... I know I had a lawn somewhere. Now where did I put it?
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Thousandth of an inch (Score:4, Insightful)
And my PC will have dust plugging that .001 inch.
That's my problem .. I built my PC in a not-at-all clean room and it runs there. Dust rhinos abound.
But if you're Sandia, you probably have air filters, bunny suits, everything to ensure the dust remains far from your spinning heatsink. Because, unlike you and I, Sandia have money.
Re:Thousandth of an inch (Score:4, Informative)
It spins at just 2,000 RPM and sits a thousandth of an inch above the processor
What could possibly go wrong? Seems like a pretty tight tolerance with all the vibration that could occur in a server room.
Read up a little on the science of Hard Disc Drives - heads usually rode on air, just above the platter surface. Same effect could be employed here.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Does it yelp like when you kick a dog?
Re: (Score:3)
Why would it be a problem? The cooler consists of the spinning part resting on a heat spreader plate (it floats just off of the plate when spinning). The plate sits on a standard thermal transfer pad which sits on the CPU. Where are you seeing a problem that every other cpu fan in the known universe doesn't have?
Re: (Score:2)
Actually, it relies on the same aero effects that hard disks do to float their drive head above the disk, so it's pretty well known stuff.
Re:Thousandth of an inch (Score:5, Informative)
Actually read the article, the spinning heatsink is attached to a base plate. It DOES NOT sit directly on a CPU die.
Re:Thousandth of an inch (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, but only nerds read articles!
Re:Thousandth of an inch (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
There's a video too. It has 45 likes and 117 dislikes. Apparently Sandia sucks at making videos. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uGpV_VPUn8g&feature=youtu.be
Re:Thousandth of an inch (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
I read the article, but didn't bother to look at the date. But even though TFA is nine months old, it was news to me.
Shouldn't this tech be born by now?
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Actually it was almost a year ago [slashdot.org]. Consider it a dupe
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
I have a better idea: just spin the motherboard 'round and 'round -- not only will my patent-pending idea cool the CPU it will cool everything else too!
Re: (Score:2)
There will also be microscopic particle buildup inside the air bearing itself, because it isn't a sealed unit.
The surfaces of the heatsink and the CPU are not perfectly smooth, which means tiny eddy currents will form on the surfaces, and trap these particles. This means the heatsink will still require periodic cleaning and inspection in any environment besides an electrostatic cleanroom.
A thousandth of an inch is very huge compared to dust particles.
Re: (Score:3)
Yup. I laughed when I read this part...
And as the whole unit spins, you aren't going to get dust build up (ever).
I've got a bunch of old, dead fans I'd love to show them...if they could see them through all the caked on dust and dirt!
Re: (Score:3)
From TFA it is clear that the spinning heatsink has a hole in the middle and that it is actually this hole which is situated over the CPU while the surrounding part of the cooler rests on a structure made for that. So the spinning heatsink will never touch the CPU.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
I prefer a "thou"; less ambiguous than "mil", which could be confused for "millimeter" (granted, one should not be shortening millimeter to mil).
Re: (Score:2)
I prefer a "thou"; less ambiguous than "mil", which could be confused for "millimeter" (granted, one should not be shortening millimeter to mil).
I can attest to that confusion. Having been born in a country that uses the metric system, I kept thinking that "mil" must be some kind of slang for "millimeter". (Needless to say, I am not a hardware engineer.) One day, I was touring a chip manufacturing plant, and the "engineer" giving the tour kept referring to "mils". It soon became apparent to me that the unit in question must be much smaller than a millimeter. So I finally burst out with my question, "What's a mil?". He just stared at me blankly, pres
Re:Thousandth of an inch (Score:4, Informative)
I suggest that this is how we managed to put a very expensive and blurry space telescope into orbit.
Not in this case; there was an extra washer installed on one side of the arm mount for the mirror grinder, meaning that the arm was skewed. I agree with your general sentiment of reducing areas of potential confusion, though.
Re:Thousandth of an inch (Score:5, Informative)
I would suggest that one of the major reasons that US still uses Standard measurements in engineering has to do with "network effects" that date to the two world wars. During the second world war, European factories were heavily bombed and after the war they needed to be re-tooled. In contrast, American industry tooled up for the war, (using standard measurements) but was never bombed, leaving a surplus of high quality tools, many of which are still serviceable to this day. When you are making a new mill or lathe, it doesn't really matter whether it is calibrated in standard or metric, but re-calibrating an existing machine for a different system of units is very costly.
On a typical manual mill, for example, turning the traverse handwheel a complete revolution moves the table by an integer number of thousandths of an inch (usually 100 or 200, which are 2.54 and 5.08 mm). To operate the mill in metric units requires either that the operator remember that a revolution is 2540 micrometers (awkward) or rebuild a significant precision part of the machine (the leadscrews and leadscrew nuts). You might think that this wouldn't be a problem with CNC mills, but many use stepper motors to turn the leadscrews. Those stepper motors might have only 200 or 400 steps per revolution (giving a resolution of 1 to 0.25 mils, or 0.0254 mm to 0.00635 mm) which can make it inconvenient to use metric units.
If that weren't bad enough, collets (basically an adapter to hold the "bit" in the mill) come in standard sizes to hold mills (what you call a mill "bit" used on a milling machine. yes, it is confusing) of standard sizes, which are typically fractions of an inch on US equipment. When you are machining a piece of metal, the finite diameter of the mill it usually important. The accessories that go with a milling machine can easily add up to more than the cost of the machine itself. So, to really operate a mill in metric units in a convenient way, you'd also need re-purchase all the little parts that go with the mill.
Someone is probably going to reply that these issues don't apply to modern CNC tools. I'm not familiar with those, but the point is that there are a significant number inexpensive and serviceable tools in the US that can only work with metric units in a very awkward way (or at great expense).
Re:Thousandth of an inch (Score:5, Funny)
No no no, you have to work a factor of 3 in there to be truly english.
So try 1/12/12/8 == 1/1152. And call it an eighth-undergross just to be cretinous.
Re:Thousandth of an inch (Score:5, Informative)
Ask someone who's worked in a USA machine-shop: it's called a thousandth (the "of an inch" part is implied).
Machinists are not programmers, so beyond about 1/64" they switch to thousandths.
Below that, tenths (ten-thousandths of an inch).
Below that, millionths.
Re: (Score:2)
Decimal or binary thousandths, i.e. 1/1024? Since you started with 1/64...
Re: (Score:2)
Sorry, just asking as a European who grew up with only powers of 10 and doesn't understand those weird English units.
Re: (Score:3)
Re:Thousandth of an inch (Score:4, Informative)
Interesting... in electronics design, the 'mil' is a common unit of measure. E.g. a trace might be 6 mils wide. A 'mil' is 1/1000th of an inch. Checking wikipedia, it seems some call it a 'thou' - can't say I have encountered that.
Re: (Score:3)
I havent been in that business for almost 2 decades now, tho. The wiki article seems to indicate that "thou(sandths)" has become even more common in machinist vernacular.
Contrarian thinking (Score:5, Interesting)
I'm reminded of the rotary engine [wikipedia.org], used in some WWI aircraft. The crankshaft was stationary -- attached to the plane's firewall -- and the entire engine block, including the cylinders, rotated around it. (The propeller was attached to the engine block.) In this way, no flywheel was necessary (the block was its own flywheel), saving weight, and the engine was cooled naturally, by the air flow over the moving cylinders. I don't know how the engines were balanced.
In a similar manner, the Sandia Cooler moves the heatsink through the air, rather than the air through the heatsink. It's solving a different problem, but I've always been fond of contrarian thinking like this.
PC fans too (Score:2)
The stator (the stationary part) of a DC brushless motor found in a typical case fan is the shaft in the center, while the outside (the rotor) part spins the hub of the fan. Not unlike those old aircraft engines.
Re:Contrarian thinking (Score:5, Interesting)
But such a heavy rotating mass makes for very unusual handling. When a small force is applied to a spinning disk in one direction a very large reaction happens in the mutually perpendicular third direction. Some fighter pilots would use it to make very very tight left turns, (or a right turn depending on the spin). Sometimes they would use two banks of cylinders counter rotating. Or two engines counter rotating to balance the angular momentum.
Re: (Score:2)
so the air coming from the giant fan mounted in front of it was not enough to cool it?
Re:Contrarian thinking (Score:5, Funny)
Why not keep the fans still and instead rotate the cpu ? Spinning the whole computer at 2000 rpm would also help with ventilation...
Re: (Score:2)
I believe the team from Gamera II has another radical solution.
Geez, another duplicate? (Score:5, Informative)
http://hardware.slashdot.org/story/11/07/12/1348243/the-fanless-spinning-heatsink
Can we get some new editors??
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Geez, another duplicate? (Score:5, Funny)
That's amazing!
Hey, everyone! We landed on the moon!!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Researchers have made a breakthrough in a new stick-based ignition source. If further development pans out, this could end reliance on foreign lightning strikes as the only source of fire.
FTFY.
You think that's something, wait until you see what futuristic discoveries we've been making in Stick-and-Rock technologies...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
The first one was the article. This one's the ad.
dust (Score:5, Interesting)
But...all my fans get a layer of dust on each fan blade. What are they doing differently that will stop this?
Re:dust (Score:4, Interesting)
But...all my fans get a layer of dust on each fan blade. What are they doing differently that will stop this?
Your blades also have hundreds of millimeters of clearance between them, not fractions of a millimeter. As well, dust requires an electric charge to stick to something... plastic has a very large static charge that 'grabs' the dust... use a different material and the charge is neutral. Problem solved.
Re: (Score:2)
As well, dust requires an electric charge to stick to something...
Or tar, i.e. smoke.
Re:dust (Score:4, Informative)
But...all my fans get a layer of dust on each fan blade. What are they doing differently that will stop this?
If you watch the video, one of the heatsink's designers specifically says that when the device is spinning quickly (at 2,000 RPM), any dust particles that land on the device get flung off by centrifugal force.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
... it spins @ 1.75 kRPM.
That extra 250 RPM does the trick!
Re: (Score:2)
The centrifugal force is counteracted by the fact they're SUCKING AIR IN. Think about it really really hard... If the centrifugal forces keep dust out... why don't they keep the air out? Furthermore, air friction generates LIGHTNING. Well, on a small scale like this, it only generates static electricity. As with any new innovation, say the Microsoft Surface or the Knifork, don't believe it until you can buy it.
I just invented a machine that generates infinite energy! ::tosses a rock into the air::
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
And as the whole unit spins, you aren't going to get dust build up (ever)
none really?
I think not. Dust is not just 1 thing it is made of of LOTS of things. You smoke? Different kind of dust than what you get if you have cats or dogs, or live in a dry dusty area, or a smogy area, or get a lot of pollen ...
Then on top of that it is different sizes. Then different textures... some is gooy other fine powder. Just depends on what the dust is. Then even if you put a filter over it that only works for a smal
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Will it work in laptops? (Score:4, Interesting)
Given the possibility of dynamic movement of a laptop during its use, will the Sandia Cooler work inside of a laptop?
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
I doubt it would even work well on desktops - you think it's bad when some heavy-footed passerby causes your angels foodcake to collapse...
Re: (Score:2)
they haven't been heavy-footed,
since the angels have stolen
my red shoes...
Re: (Score:2)
I honestly hope that within 1 year, we won't need laptop coolers for anything but the desktop replacements.
Re: (Score:2)
This is the normal geek idea of "bump and grind" when they play that song.
Startup/Heat Transfer (Score:3, Interesting)
Maybe I just didn't get the message, but what draws heat away from the die itself? This setup probably does away with thermal paste and similar junctions...
The other thing is that hydrodynamic bearings are only self-supporting and quasi-frictionless after a threshold RPM is reached. Before the whole setup is spinning fast enough for hydrodynamic effects to take over, it's going to grind against the chip die, and unless they came up with something good, it's going to destroy it on startup...
Re:Startup/Heat Transfer (Score:5, Informative)
Maybe I just didn't get the message, but what draws heat away from the die itself? This setup probably does away with thermal paste and similar junctions...
From the video... there's a normal heatsink, and the fan draws the heat from the heatsink through the air bearing.
The other thing is that hydrodynamic bearings are only self-supporting and quasi-frictionless after a threshold RPM is reached. Before the whole setup is spinning fast enough for hydrodynamic effects to take over, it's going to grind against the chip die, and unless they came up with something good, it's going to destroy it on startup...
It's Sandia... I'm sure they've thought of that.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes but the whole point of a heat sink and the reason it works is that heat effortlessly travels up through the specially developed paste/glue and then the metal. It is basically part of it. I do not see how an air bearing could have the needed approximately 0 insulation. To work you need a great heat transforming material to be in contact with the entire chip and at no point have a choke point for this heat.
And air is a great insulator, and by definition an air bearing has a layer of air insulating
Re: (Score:2)
Commonly there's a conventional bearing that disengages once the aerodynamic effects take over (that is, the spinning part lifts off of the bearing).
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe I just didn't get the message, but what draws heat away from the die itself? This setup probably does away with thermal paste and similar junctions...
The other thing is that hydrodynamic bearings are only self-supporting and quasi-frictionless after a threshold RPM is reached. Before the whole setup is spinning fast enough for hydrodynamic effects to take over, it's going to grind against the chip die, and unless they came up with something good, it's going to destroy it on startup...
Take a look at the presentation on the parent site: https://ip.sandia.gov/techpdfs/Sandia%20Cooler%20presentation.pdf [sandia.gov]
There's an underside view of the mechanism, itself. As others have said, it's a spinning heatsink on top of a baseplate, and the presentation includes a visual the thermal interface between plate & die. I imagine arctic silver isn't going anywhere. The airgap is between the spinning heatsink and the baseplate (also well-illustrated in the presentation).
Re: (Score:2)
It's almost as if they didn't bother reading the fscking article. Oh no, it's the editors that ignore minor details like that!
Re: (Score:3)
I don't see anything in the very in-depth video that was linked in the summary that would indicate that no thermal paste would be needed. The air-gap is between the heat sink chassis (or base plate) and the spinning heat sink, and appears to be a very efficient means of expelling heat from the device. However there will need to be some kind of thermal interface between the chassis and the CPU.
Maybe one day we'll see this heat sink assembly actually integrated into the CPU packaging which would eliminate th
Re: (Score:2)
Air is a thermal insulator (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
If your working fluid is moving fast enough, it stops mattering how conductive it is. The Reynolds number starts to dominate all the heat transfer coefficients. The problem with cooling is always the boundary layer, where the fluid stagnates and acts as an insulator. Sandia's found a way to minimize the boundary layer by shrinking the gap between heatsink and fan. Props to them.
2000RPM? (Score:4, Interesting)
Spinning a heat sink that weighs several ounces take a much more powerful motor than a plastic fan. I'd expect it's a to harder on the bearings (i.e. less reliable), and requires a lot more power than a traditional heatsink/fan setup.
Re: (Score:2)
At around 3:50 in the video, they shut down the motor, and the "fan" then becomes very reasonable in sound emitted.
It's an interesting concept, but yeah, with this motor and this type of sound, I wouldn't want it anywhere near me, or I'd get a migraine almost immediately.
Re: (Score:3)
30x more cooling (Score:3)
My CPU normally runs around 140 degrees so at 30x more cooling I should be well into the -4000F range!
Re: (Score:2)
Sandia Research Laboratory? (Score:2)
no dust? unbeleveable (Score:2)
as the whole unit spins, you aren't going to get dust build up (ever).
That seems like a strange comment, since I get dust build-up on faster spinning (and even larger) fan blades, I also have doubts about the heat transfer across an air gap, no silver thermal compound here.
Re: (Score:2)
Shaking or vibration? (Score:2)
What happens if the computer shakes or vibrates? Is it going to collide with the CPU at any point?
Dust Free.... yeah right.... (Score:5, Funny)
Dear researchers, please notice how dust will cake and adhere to spinning things. Ask the airline industry how dust can cake on even turbine blades.
It's not dust free, please take the marketing people out back and beat them with a sack of doorknobs.
Does it work? (Score:2)
The article sounds like a summary of a patent application. I wonder if this thing actually exists and more importantly, works and if it works does it work well?
Vapor (Score:2)
Patented in 08, article in 11, and 2 slashdot articles and what do we have ... jack shit nothing, its vaporware making outrageous claims and a pretty silly idea to boot. Besides why would you want to listen to a large chunk of metal spinning at 2000 RPM? The thing is full of hard edges, which cuts though the air, which produces .... (wait for it)
MORE NOISE
ugh
Peltier's (Score:2)
Reminds me of an article that was was put on explaining this revolutionary technology where by current was applied to a wafer, making one side cold and the other hot, a remarkable achievement for cpu cooling. Peltier's having been around for ages of course.
I used to do a lot of system building and modding for fun years ago. However OC has gone mainstream and as such has become a bit pointless. With the mainstream and Intel/AMD being well aware of that fact, they price pretty accordingly. Also modern manufac
lol (Score:2)
That thing would get gummed up, off balance, and fail to work in about a week at my house.
Y no water? (Score:2)
I'd rather have IBM's fluid micro channels going through my next Intel or AMD CPU.
I challenge the Dust Free Theory. (Score:3)
My fans spin pretty fucking fast, and yet, they have dust on them (and cat hair, got to love the cat hair).
Let's go for a real world test. Put the heat sink in my computer, and let's see what happens.
Better Article and Interview at ExtremeTech (Score:5, Informative)
See The fanless heatsink: Silent, dust-immune, and almost ready for prime time [extremetech.com], and an interview with the inventor [extremetech.com].
Disbelief of the dust-immune property of this cooler is addressed in the first question of the interview:
Jeff Koplow: I did not mean to imply that there is literally no dust fouling; some dust accumulation eventually becomes visible to the naked eye on the very leading edge of the blades. The point is that dust fouling is reduced to such a large extent that we are unable to detect any degradation of cooling performance operating the device in a relatively dirty environment over an extended period of time. Thus for all intents and purposes the dust fouling problem has been taken off the table. In contrast, with conventional CPU coolers, eventually the entire heat exchanger surface becomes entombed in dust. I suppose there are some applications in which computers are operated in extremely dusty environments that might be too much for the heat-sink-impeller. This is common sense. In trying to figure out a way around the longstanding problem of CPU cooler dust fouling, I was thinking in terms of residential and commercial environments where the vast majority of PCs are found.
Once again, it is disappointing how many people so yearn for the status quo, when presented with clearly superior technologies. Not that they always pan out, but it is disheartening to see such hostility toward progress.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
When your system isn't online and you're only using it for a dedicated task, you quite often don't upgrade shit if it's stable.
Re: (Score:2)
I remember the hard drive of lore: say like a 10MB CDC Hawk drive: 5MB fixed and 5MB removable platter.
The head floated on a cushion of air above the media.
When, for whatever reason, (bump, mild quake, etc.) the head no longer floated on that cushion of air, the resulting crash made a most impressive noise, rather like a freight train through the computer room.
Yep, good old physics. In my green days I was a system admin, for the last few years of a DEC PDP-11/55 with a couple of big ol' RP04 drives. With a sliding transparent top, I could watch the heads go into the disc pack when I spun it up (after swapping out packs OOF!) The field service techs knew something of the physics and explained to me - the heads, when the first are launced into the packs make a very brief contact with the disc surface of each platter before the cushion of air molecules forced th
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
do they even make CPU's with exposed die's anymore?