Linux For Navy Drone Ground Stations 78
garymortimer writes "Raytheon will help the U.S. Navy transition to using Linux software at ground control stations for unmanned air vehicles, the Defense Department announced Wednesday. The company's intelligence and information systems unit won a $27,883,883 contract to implement the tactical control system software, used for directing vertical take-off UAVs."
What if? (Score:2)
Will the GPL allow any code changes to be classified? If the end user is the DOD or other entity with access to that level of classified material and they get the source code I believe that is correct.
Re:What if? (Score:5, Informative)
IIRC the GPL only stipulates that you provide the source code to whoever you give the binaries to. If they don't release it to the public, then they don't have to release the source to the public either.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
That's interesting, because there's a JSF debacle over not including the source code with the British jets. Maybe it's common to supply binaries and not source when equipping allies. It's unlikely, but it'll be amusing if an ally sues over the GPL at some point to get the source for some kit.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Been that way for the F-16 for decades. IIRC, when the Japanese wanted to develop the F-16 into their F-2, source code for the flight control computers was a huge sticking point.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Its worth noting, US legal precedence says the government is except from copyright for matters national defense. Whle they do make an effort to comply, the fact is, if they decide they are exempt, they'll simply do whatever they want. Code licenses such as the GPL are very likely ignored daily in the US by the US government.
Re: (Score:2)
So... they have money to burn in rewriting existing software that is freely available, and probably has been developed by people with a passion for what they're doing and thus have spent more time gaining expertise in the area, and probably has been available for a number of years and thus has had many people test it, uncover bugs, and fix them? Not to mention money to burn in trying to replicate the amount of testing needed?
Seriously, they need a clue transplant. I thought the corporate lawyers at $my-
Re: (Score:2)
Anecdote is data. its not proof, or statistically valid research, but it most certainly is data.
Pick a different sentence coward.
Re: (Score:3)
Re:What if? (Score:5, Funny)
All you have to do to comply with the license is include a copy of the source code with each device. If you put it on a TF card and attach that to the explosive, no problem :)
Re: (Score:2)
All you have to do to comply with the license is include a copy of the source code with each device. If you put it on a TF card and attach that to the explosive, no problem :)
Hmmmm... I think I'd like a dud, please.
This reminds me of an old joke: what did the irish man think when he learned a nuclear bomb cost millions to build? "I hope they'll drop one in my backyard; either way, I'll have enough money for whiskey my entire life"
Re: (Score:2)
I would argue that is only applicable to paying or authorized distributees, throwing them at someone ... I am ambivalent.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
...Oh wait, other than inventing computers, the internet, and the funding, research, basis and advancement of every technology your using right now, they should just "code their own shit".
You mean... the military invented the wine I'm drinking or the glass I'm using right now?
Somehow, ah don' believe you... but y'know wot?... jus' you waait-acouple o' glasses moar an' (hips... pardon me)... maaaybe I'll fiiiind'you riiight... cheers
Stallman is against that and so is the OSS people (Score:3)
the typical F/OSS line is that they practice 'non discrimination' in what 'field of endeavor' their licenses cover.
you can see it in the official open source defintitions, its one of their top rules.
the reality is that GPL and F/OSS software have always been closely linked to the high levels of the military industrial complex. the biggest funders of linux are big corporations with huge defense contracts. universities in the CS field are all closely linked to the military. For @#$ sake, Internet used to be D
Re: (Score:2)
And hear I thought Linux was a penguin in a nice Che hat. Damn you for spoiling my delusions.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Flamebait)
There is such a difference, but the military escapades of the US are well on the murder side, and have been since WWII.
Re: (Score:2)
There's courses on ethics. Take one. Its actually fascinating.
Re: (Score:1)
Re:What if? (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:3)
Well, we can always hope that some Chinese hacker will prove to be a kind soul and release them for everyone's benefit.
Exactly so.
Just because Raytheon is likely using an off-the-shelf Linux release as the platform for their Ground Control Software, that doesn't specify which shelf it came off of. IIRC, 'Red Dragon' is the vetted official People's Republic of China release of Linux.
That makes the jobs of the repo (re-possession) men contracted to the PRC to help settle the USA's massive sovereign & trade debts that much easier. (And don't think That Isn't Coming. If so, you're in denial.)
OTOH, I am familiar with another
Re: (Score:2)
Just because a Linux distro might be heavily customized by a subcontractor of Raytheon does not make it, or the networks of Raytheon or the subcontractor, impenetrable to Chinese (or other) hackers.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:What if? (Score:5, Informative)
As AlphaWolf pointed out, that clause only has to do with distribution.
Additionally, just because they make software that runs on Linux, doesn't make everything fall under the GPL.
If they modify the Linux kernel or similar parts of Linux then yes the modifications fall under the GPL but they are probably using off the shelf Linux and putting their own apps over the top.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I'm sure it's actually RTLinux a custom flavor used by DOD and NSA and OGA for hardware.
It doesn't have to be GPL because they're not releasing it for use.
Linux makes money (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Linux makes money (Score:5, Informative)
I know already three countries in three continents which have moved their Navy's (bespoke) SCADA and ship and control systems from Windows to Linux. A fourth country is already in the planning stage. How do I know? Because I ported the software, created a custom Linux distro, etc. Years of work.
Fun fact: at the beginning we charged a premium for the Linux version. Customer's answer? We want Linux. Windows was deprecated 3 years ago for this software due to no demand. But it's also understandable: I can tell you at least three countries which had to put their frigates and submarines in "manual sailing mode" due to Windows viruses (!!!). Not to speak of many countries not trusting the US more-than-influence on Microsoft, and also some features which were simply impossible to support on Windows due to Windows limitations.
Re: (Score:2)
But wouldn't your enemy's weapons be pointed at you? *shrugs* depends upon the nature of the "malfunction" i guess.
Re: (Score:2)
I dunno, after using both I still trust Windows more than Linux. That being said, Windows had loads of problems in the past so it's not surprising that governments moved away from it in their weapons.If you were implementing a Solaris based solution or something custom based on a real-time OS I could understand wanting to use a UNIX based system. However, it's possible for someone to submit a slightly broken feature as part of a patch and insert a backdoor into a linux system; you're assuming that you'll ac
Re: (Score:3)
If you were implementing a Solaris based solution or something custom based on a real-time OS I could understand wanting to use a UNIX based system.
I was talking about supervision (SCADA) and control, not about weapons. Combat systems run on real-time operating systems such as VxWorks or QNX.
Re Solaris: there are several major reasons this kind of customers do not trust Windows:
1. Developed by a US company (Windows: check, Solaris: check)
2. Source code not available (Windows: check, Solaris: check)
3. Suppor
motherboards are made where now? (Score:2)
considering that most motherboards are made in china now, i find it laughable that so many people think their systems can be 'secured' because its running 'intel/amd and linux'.
Re: (Score:2)
... you're assuming that you'll actually bother to look through all the code eventually or that you'll know the security holes when you see them.
Aaahhh... but there's a solution for that... release your source code in open source. You know... "given enough eyeballs, all bugs are shallow"?
Re: (Score:2)
You don't follow the Linux mailing lists at all, do you? Source code makes a huge difference in bug detection and fix development time. For the record, I'd likely use OpenBSD over Linux for audited releases, but Linux does have better hardware support.
and then there was tunisia (Score:2)
where Bill Gates himself signed a deal with the government, claiming that all the linux computers they were using were being re-installed with windows, and then allowing Tunisia's dictator to modify the acceptable-cert-list in IE (and giving access to the source code of windows to the dictatorship).
Re: (Score:2)
That's like saying "there are people who don't understand that with little rubber feet for appliances you can make good money". It's rubbish. The expertise here lies in the specialized domain of providing complex control and management systems - the OS is almost irrelevant, as it's something small shops and startups don't have.
Re: (Score:2)
Whats with the 883 (repeated) (Score:2)
Is this some kind of mystic number in contract value?
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Windows 98?
Re: (Score:2)
nevermind! for some reason i was thinking about the subs/ships from the earlier threads. Not the flight control software : /
Re: (Score:2)
In your anti-defense industry world, linux would be the OS of death.
Why Linux? (Score:1)
Surely there will be several reasons, but I think these people think on strategic terms: fixes in battle times. A professional contracted support simply won't do in battle time. They need something that can close a vulnerability in Free Software time -- in one to two days -- instead of next Patch Tuesday, next month or next release (which might happen in 3 years from now).
Where I work, people get the wrong idea that paying more will change reality...
Porting away from Solaris (Score:1)
Hey i.. maybe I can get a Job there ? (Score:1)
what about LPS the US Air Force linux Distro (Score:1)
http://www.spi.dod.mil/lipose.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lightweight_Portable_Security
http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=LPS
LPS is designed to serve as a Secure End Node. It can run on on almost any Intel-based computer (PC or Mac). LPS boots only in RAM, creatin
End the Dell Blacklist of Linux NOW... (Score:1)
"Pre-Installed Linux | Ubuntu | Fedora | OpenSUSE | Multi-Boo