Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop


Forgot your password?
Power United Kingdom News

UK Draft Energy Bill Avoids Banning Coal Or Gas Power 153

Bob the Super Hamste writes "The BBC is reporting that the UK's new Draft Energy Bill (PDF) avoids banning coal or gas powered plants. The bill would guarantee profits for new nuclear and offshore wind plants by putting a levy on people's energy bills. The bill does not mandate a statement that minsters had previously made about having totally clean energy within two decades. The government states that provisions within the bill will ensure a balanced diverse energy mix as well has stating that future emissions from gas powered plants will have to be captured and stored. The bill also aims to increase competition in the UK energy market by making it easier for new competitors to become connected to the grid. Joss Garman of Greenpeace states: 'By failing to set a clear goal for carbon-free electricity by 2030, ministers are opening the door to a dangerous new dash for gas that will put up both bills and carbon emissions, and increase our dependence on imported fuel. This means families and business will be exposed to rocketing international gas prices. The fastest and cheapest way to bring down bills and carbon emissions is by ramping up energy efficiency but Ministers have totally failed to deliver on this.' Additionally it would appear that the guarantee of profits for new nuclear power plants may not be legal as there is a ban on subsidies for nuclear power under European law and the UK coalition government agreement." Note that wind projects are getting profit guarantees and not just nuclear.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

UK Draft Energy Bill Avoids Banning Coal Or Gas Power

Comments Filter:
  • by bigredradio ( 631970 ) on Tuesday May 22, 2012 @11:58AM (#40077247) Homepage Journal
    Since coal [] and gas powered plants are the number one cause of pollution and greenhouse gases, this is a pretty big oversight.
  • Re:Pointless. (Score:4, Informative)

    by vlm ( 69642 ) on Tuesday May 22, 2012 @12:41PM (#40077747)

    shale gas is primarily a way to turn two barrels of crude into one barrel equivalent of natgas. Sometimes its described as a way to turn millions of dollars of capital investment into thousands of dollars of gas.
    It is very similar to ethanol as a primary energy source, in that in rare and unusual geography and situations it is occasionally net positive, but by in large its not gonna work.

  • Not true (Score:3, Informative)

    by Cyberax ( 705495 ) on Tuesday May 22, 2012 @01:37PM (#40078375)
    That'd be true if Cameron at the same time tried to actually do something with the economy, instead of trying to squeeze it as much as possible with new austerity measures. The ones that have already caused a new recession in the UK.
  • by WOOFYGOOFY ( 1334993 ) on Tuesday May 22, 2012 @01:50PM (#40078565)
    And you do not accept AGW as a fact because why exactly? Please tell the world and the world's scientists because they'r anxious to hear your non-expert POV.

    We're mostly engineers here. Some of us are also scientists and scientists are exceedingly cautious and humble about traveling outside their extremely limited domain of expertise.

    So please , tell us why you know better than the world's assembled experts on this topic. And while you're at it, tell us about eh vast left wing conspiracy that keeps the large numb er of legitimate, duly qualified scientist's voices repressed on this topic.

    I love it when deniers attempt to assume the mantle of "reasonable citizen" when in fact along with evolution deniers, two populations with enormous overlap in membership, they're the the living embodiment of anti-rational, reality-denying ideologues.

Q: How many IBM CPU's does it take to execute a job? A: Four; three to hold it down, and one to rip its head off.