Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop


Forgot your password?
AMD Graphics Stats Hardware Linux

28-Way Radeon GPU Comparison Under Linux 85

An anonymous reader writes "Phoronix has conducted a 28-way Radeon graphics card comparison under Linux that illustrates the differences among the open-source and closed-source graphics drivers."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

28-Way Radeon GPU Comparison Under Linux

Comments Filter:
  • don't bother (Score:2, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 20, 2011 @08:32AM (#37455040)

    30+ pages filled images or graphs. The gist of it: 3D capabilities of open source drivers still suck, and the newer cards suck worse.

  • Re:I like... (Score:3, Informative)

    by jedidiah ( 1196 ) on Tuesday September 20, 2011 @08:54AM (#37455268) Homepage

    Just use Nvidia.

    Better 3D performance.
    Better monitor support.
    Stuff like VA-API is actually supported.
    Stuff like CUDA and OpenCL if you tend to blither on about Beowulf...

  • Re:I like... (Score:3, Informative)

    by Tomato42 ( 2416694 ) on Tuesday September 20, 2011 @10:24AM (#37456338)

    Open AMD drivers are actually usable: KDE4 composing, XV acceleration, not to mention 2D performance.

    In fact, I'd say that the OSS drivers have (or at least had 8 months ago when I still struggled with fglrx) better 2D performance, If you have a 4096x1536 desktop you could actually count the seconds it took to move a window. So I'd say that 2D performance is actually more important than 3D performance. If I want to game I run the gaming OS anyway (for 3D intensive stuff).

After the last of 16 mounting screws has been removed from an access cover, it will be discovered that the wrong access cover has been removed.