Robot Throws First Pitch At Phillies Game 92
RedEaredSlider writes "The first ball at the Phillies-Brewers game will get thrown by a robot — but Roy Halladay's job is still safe. As part of an outreach program and the Phillies' 'Science Day At The Ballpark,' the University of Pennsylvania's School of Engineering and Applied Science is showcasing a robot made from a Segway and featuring an arm that acts more like a human throwing than an ordinary pitching machine. A pitching machine functions more like a gun, firing a baseball in what amounts to a straight line. But the robot has an armature connected to a hand that was specifically designed for throwing. Another thing the robot can do is identify the strike zone."
Hrmmm... (Score:5, Funny)
baseball
robot
not Japan
Interesting...
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Why exactly do we need an outreach program for robots?
Are they feeling alienated or excluded from general society in some way?
If so, might I suggest that instead of trying to make them smarter and follow the 3 laws of robotics, or something like them, we pack C4 around the CPU of each robot so when they go berserk, we can remotely destroy their CPU.
I hope this will help put down the coming robot revolt.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
baseball
robot
not Japan
Interesting...
Considering that the "robots = Japan" meme is bogus, there's no surprise at all.
Pitching machine (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
So traditional pitching machines that have thrown balls just fine and are more efficient at doing so don't count?
My thoughts exactly...
I went to the article expecting to see a robot walk out on the field and/or standing on it's own and throw a pitch to the strike zone.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Wheel/tread based systems have many less points of failure, require less resources to maintain balance, and are generally more stable. They can also be designed to navigate obstacles with minimal energy for balance.
Or throw a ball across the plate. As you stated, wheels can be far less prone to failure and they've been using wheels to propel balls across plates for years.
This robot was clearly designed to throw balls (with a Lacrosse like attachment on the end of the arm... or what were those toys that had the long scoop like throwing tool with a ball?), but it does it in the most inefficient way. It has no hands.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, I couldn't remember the name of that sport and the quick search I did didn't help me out.
Re: (Score:2)
I think it's be interesting if the machine could throw various types of pitches - sliders, curveballs,knuckleballs, etc. That would probably require a more handlike gripper.
Re: (Score:2)
To make it more lame, of course.
Re: (Score:2)
They don't really, no. They cannot throw a breaking ball. Practice with the machine until you can hit a home run with every single ball and then go face a real pitcher. He will embarrass you every time. He'll do that through a combination of aerodynamic effects from spinning the ball and by tricking you into thinking he threw it faster or slower than he actually did. A proper arm robot has some chance of managing that.
Of course, the robot still won't be able to choose pitches strategically based on sizing u
Re: (Score:2)
replying to self, I just watched the video, and that robot will never strike anyone out.
Oh well.
No, make robot football players. (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Prior art? (Score:1)
First thing that came to mind: Base Wars [wikipedia.org]
(I thought it was a horrible game, but I had a friend that played it far too much)
Set in a 24th century wherein baseball team owners have grown tired of paying outrageous player salaries, they decide to replace their rosters with robots.
Not a bad idea, really...
It throws like a girl... (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
Philadelphia fans ...
They boo Santa Claus [snopes.com]
But I'll admit, that was a pretty sad pitch.
Plus high standards at Citizen's Bank Park
Re: (Score:2)
And Gob Bluth.
Video (Score:1, Informative)
Youtube link (Score:4, Informative)
video was unavailable. This worked though:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ShId-vZ-ZEY [youtube.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Well that was hopefully the lamest thing I'll see all day.
Re: (Score:1)
Well that was hopefully the lamest thing I'll see all day.
ya, I hesitated posting the link.
Re: (Score:1)
Oh, great. (Score:5, Funny)
Now we're replacing politicians with soulless automatons?
Re: (Score:2)
FTFY.
Re: (Score:2)
But robots are not greedy, deceptive, addiction-prone and power-hungry. Thus it is a major upgrade.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Couldn't have been worse than when we went bowling somewhere in the midwest during his election campaign. I think he bowled a game in the 50s or 60s. It's hard to do that badly.
Re: (Score:2)
"we went bowling" should have been "he went bowling".
like a human ? you mean like a trebuchet ? (Score:2, Insightful)
This does not attempt to throw like a human. Watch the video.
Science day yields a trebuchet with a remote control.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Slightly [youtube.com] indeed... although the Mariah Carey is a bit more advanced, since it only needs to be guided by men in giant costumes, not directly controlled.
The Replicants (Score:2)
Then replace the audience with robots.
And then nuke the whole ensemble from orbit, and our baseball problem will be solved!
Oh..whats that you say...it wasn't a problem...?...I just really despise this sport. I am pretty sure you could write baseball AI in a couple lines.
while(
Re: (Score:2)
...I just really despise this sport. I am pretty sure you could write baseball AI in a couple lines. while(FansNotBored)
{
If (IHaveBall)
ThrowBall();
else
StandStill();
}
If baseball is so easy, then why are you posting on /. instead of, oh I don't know, raking in millions of dollars with the Yankees?
And in case you claim that human's aren't fast enough to efficiently execute your algorithm, I think that's rubbish: Evaluating whether or not the fans are bored can be easily checked by just having your coach yell at you (a callback method, if you will...nyuk nyuk). Evaluating whether or not you have the ball is trivial. Throwing the ball takes no arguments, and I assume yo
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
while !(*FansNotBuzzed)
{servebeer(FansNotBuzzed);
}
Blernsball (Score:1)
the 3rd wheel? (Score:2)
I like how they used a Segway, then added a 3rd wheel to it.
Re: (Score:2)
In the Ivy League, they call the training wheel "daddy".
Identify the strike zone? (Score:2)
- sad Mets fan
Re: (Score:2)
I was at the Thursday double-header the other week and was highly amused by the fan attempting to start a "Bernie Madoff" chant.
Maybe the Wilpons will be forced to sell...
The Doc (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
but he has flesh and blood over top of the robot skeleton...that's more like a terminator...
Story/Video was better yesterday (Score:2)
"Cannon throws first pitch at game; Catcher still in critical condition."
Hmmm! (Score:4)
Way back in 1959 I worked as a teen in a batting cage. The machines actually did throw much as a human does with an elbow and forearm type of mechanism. It was very realistic as no two balls would ever leave the gutter shaped hand the same way due to starting with the balls laces in different positions. So you could get dusted off or even hit by a ball and curves and balls slightly high or low were also thrown. We had three machines. One was little league speed. One for minor league and the final machine was set up to act like a pro pitcher in the world series. Actually I believe that machine was throwing just a bit faster than any pro pitcher could throw although it was supposedly identical to a hot, fast ball. That machine was actually a bit frightening. A mistake in that cage just might get you hurt. The New York Yankees team members used to drop by and smack balls around. They really do hit balls further than normal people can. I know as I was the kid that had to pick up the balls and we had a full size ball field to cover. At night it took some skill not to be slaughtered by a line drive while gathering balls. Keep in mind that there were three batters firing at me. Those days were pre OSHA and I suppose I was taking on a serious risk. Life was different back then.
Bender (Score:2)
Ran out of time? (Score:2)
It's great that the Phillies sponsored a Science Day at the ballpark.
And the robot is a pretty cool part of that -- but given that the pitch didn't get even close to being over the plate, I wonder if the students working on the project ran out of time to get things working well for the demo?
Re: (Score:2)
What?!?! (Score:1)
and so it begins (Score:2)
Pfffft (Score:1)
throws like a girl robot
Sure, but... (Score:2)
Sure, but can it love?
Obligatory Geoff (Score:1)
Balls!
Am I... (Score:1)
You don't have ball throwing machines? (Score:2)
The local cricket club has a machine for pitching cricket balls. You drop a ball in a hole at the back and it flies out a hole on the other side. I assume it gets squished between two rotating wheels. Don't they use these in base ball?
Re: (Score:2)
The local cricket club has a machine for pitching cricket balls. You drop a ball in a hole at the back and it flies out a hole on the other side. I assume it gets squished between two rotating wheels. Don't they use these in base ball?
We do, but as mentioned in the summary this was supposedly more like an arm throwing a ball that a gun-type device firing a ball.
Same result, but 2 different ways going about it.
The gun-type device (that we use for batting practice) is probably more efficient and easier to fix / maintain.
This is closer to what a thrown ball behaves and I guess serves as a decent little experiment in trying to replicate human actions in similar ways. The wind-up, the pitch, trying to hit the strike zone, etc. In the end it
Re: (Score:2)
Cricket balls would do more damage ;)
I guess... (Score:1)
I have been playing to much portal 2 as when I first read the summery I read "Applied Science" as "Aperture Science"
but the idea of using a robot was interesting...how soon till we have a robot baseball league?
Meh (Score:1)
Meh (Score:1)