US To Send Radiation-Hardened Robots To Japan 183
CWmike writes "The United States is sending specialized robots to Japan to help officials there get control of the Fukushima nuclear power plants damaged in this month's devastating earthquake and tsunami. Dr. Peter Lyons, an acting assistant secretary for nuclear energy with the DoE, said the robots, which could be sent into areas that would be dangerous for humans to enter because of high radiation levels, could begin to give officials readings on the environment inside the nuclear power plants. Lyons told the US Senate on Tuesday, 'We are moving expeditiously to ship not only the robots but also operators who perhaps will be used to train Japanese operators. We don't know yet how close the operators will need to be to the site.' Asked about getting information about the state of the damaged reactors, Lyons said the robots could provide some information. 'Certainly not all we need, but some,' he said."
Mark this one for the history books, folks. (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
Yes, I made a Detroit joke.
What? It's not like there's anyone left there to feel bad!
Re: (Score:2)
I'm sorry, but you are using facts to win over an argument. I urge you to stop it immediately, or we will have to use drastic measures to stop you.
Please consider using alternate tools such as blind faith, empty rhetorics or just plain old FUD.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Re: (Score:2)
I hear you, my cars are korean and I never have to do anything to them besides regular maintenance. My Taurus had to get fixed every 3 months (I gave up after replacing the transmission).
Re: (Score:3)
But US robots can do more than just dance, they can sing badly, too !
Just the thing for the next big craze from the Land of the Rising Fun - Roboioke!
Re:Mark this one for the history books, folks. (Score:4, Informative)
These are radiation hardened industrial robots. Not grandma diaper changing, go playing, receptionist robots.
The iRobot 710 Warrior [irobot.com] isn't interested in managing your manga collection or cooking you ramen noodles.
iRobot also sent a 510 packbot. [irobot.com] In fact, the 710 can carry 510 packbots on its back and deploy they through openings (windows, holes, etc). A little Skynety, but fun.
Sounds like a Truck commercial (Score:2)
It also comes when a HEMI and runs on diesel because our robots are build for the working man, who need to do work.
Ya, its radiation hardened, hard like the folks they buy them, and it doesn't have time to namby pamby about.
Available now at the robotics division of the good folks at Ford...
Re: (Score:2)
Cute, but the one spec they don't seem to list is endurance (battery life)
Clearly we need a version with an RTG.
Re: (Score:2)
Now, if they made the robot penguin-shaped, that would be something!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Osmau Tezuka would be rolling over in his grave if he heard this.....
Re: (Score:2)
.
Re: (Score:2)
Been there, done that: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timothy_Dexter [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2)
I work in robotics research in Japan. The popular research topics are completely opposite to the US.
In the US, if you want funding you use keywords like:
terrorist, warfighter, IED, surveillance, combat
In Japan you use keywords like:
elderly, assistance, safety, entertainment
So we need radiation hardened US robots. After the mess in Fukushima though, I propose to develop a robot to entertain radioactive elderly people while assisting them to drive safely.
This is an obvious ruse! (Score:2)
Re:Big, ugly robots most likely. (Score:4, Funny)
Hey, I think I saw that one. That's the one where the ugly garbage cleaning robot and the elegant, nimble robot fall in love.
Re: (Score:2)
Hey, I think I saw that one. That's the one where the ugly garbage cleaning robot and the elegant, nimble robot fall in love.
And there was not a word of English (except the occasional one spoken by fat people)?
Re: (Score:2)
Hey, I think I saw that one. That's the one where the ugly garbage cleaning robot and the elegant, nimble robot fall in love.
And there was not a word of English (except the occasional one spoken by fat people)?
Yeah, but let's see that little garbage cleaning robot, or the cute little robot clean that mess up. This calls for robotic Caterpillar tractors, backhoes, graders and probably a cute little robotic coffee machine they can all hit on in the break room.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Meh.
Not bad. But can it do the robot [wikipedia.org]?
Re: (Score:2)
That's because American robots watch too much TV and eat french fries instead of rice.
Re: (Score:2)
That's because American robots watch too much TV and eat french fries instead of rice.
Sumo wrestlers eat rice too.
Re: (Score:2)
All sumo wrestlers eat rice, ergo rice makes you fat!
Sorry, gotta go. I got a science paper to write.
Re: (Score:3)
Seriously, if they'd had a reliable backup diesel generator we wouldn't have these problems in the first place.
Fry: "Oh, the fools! If only they'd built it with six thousand and one hulls! When will they learn?"
It's pretty easy to sit back and do an armchair analysis of the situation after the shit has already hit the fan. The flooding caused by the tsunami knocked those generators offline. I live in an area that's prone to flooding and it's harder than you think to keep even a small generator out of harm's way when the water level starts rising.
Re: (Score:2)
Did they have no method of keeping a spare that's completely water tight? Obviously they couldn't run it like that, but it would've taken a lot less time to get one that was in a sealed container unpacked than what it took them to connect a cord to a different facility.
When a component is that important it's foolhardy to have only one backup. Having three or four is better. I know the building I used to work security at had 3 generators each one was enough to power a small city for a several hours.
Re: (Score:2)
How about fuel, the fuel pods washed away; enough fuel to run a generator big enough to put out 1,000 Amps at 11.8KV for a week, times 6 is what they needed. Fuel is a big problem now, they lost a lot of refinery capacity,
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The reactors scram automatically durring an Earthquake, using the generator to run the pumps is what started the Chernobyl disaster [wikipedia.org].
Store backup generators off sites ... (Score:3)
Seriously, if they'd had a reliable backup diesel generator we wouldn't have these problems in the first place.
It's pretty easy to sit back and do an armchair analysis of the situation after the shit has already hit the fan.
Its not quite armchair analysis when its standard operating procedure at other sites.
The flooding caused by the tsunami knocked those generators offline. I live in an area that's prone to flooding and it's harder than you think to keep even a small generator out of harm's way when the water level starts rising.
And in southern california a power plant on the coast has backup generators in storage farther inland on higher ground. I'm not saying the so cal plant is necessarily better designed or prepared, I'm am just arguing against the armchair claim on this particular backup generator point.
Re: (Score:2)
It's pretty easy to sit back and do an armchair analysis of...
I live in an area that's prone to flooding and it's harder than you think...
Yessit, it is. It is. But no sir, its still their job if not doing so means millions could die an agonising death of cancer.
Your house flooding won't nuke your area.
http://nextbigfuture.com/2011/03/fukushima-tsunami-data-over-10-meters.html [nextbigfuture.com]
They designed for a tsunami of height of between 5-6 meters and put the generators 10-13 meters above sea level. Historically Japan ha
Re: (Score:2)
I live in an area that's prone to flooding and it's harder than you think to keep even a small generator out of harm's way when the water level starts rising.
Two words: inflatable raft.
Now, where do I go to collect my consultant's fee? ;)
Re: (Score:2)
Why not take some of that steam generated by the primary and run a failsafe turbine that doesn't generate electricity. It should just run pumps to keep the secondary cooling system running in the event of electrical failure. This way, even if the system has been flooded, cooling continues AND the hotter the primary gets, the faster the turbine will turn and the more cooling should be effected.
Here's a good question... (Score:2, Interesting)
Oh wait, that would cost money, and the people with the money can just move. Didn't Marx write something about that? Oh well, all anybody can remember about him is that some dictator or another used his books for rhetoric + free advertising.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Remember, we did send them something [google.com] on the day-of, according to Sec. Clinton... who knows what it was, though.
Re: (Score:2)
It wasnt so much us trusting them. as them being willing to accept help.
They weren't willing to accept help, from what I read.
Now they have have majorly crippled their own country, out of pride.
Re: (Score:2)
I so wish I had mod points.
Re:Here's a good question... (Score:4, Informative)
Other American robots were already sent, or it was at least reported, a week ago.
http://articles.cnn.com/2011-03-23/tech/robots.japan.relief_1_packbot-irobot-ground-zero?_s=PM:TECH [cnn.com]
The reason why this or that wasn't done sooner is because the Japanese didn't ask for it, and despite what you may think about American foreign policy, the US isn't just going to muscle into an internal Japanese matter and tell a Japanese utility company what to do.
Just flying power generators in wouldn't help once they ran out of fuel, thats part of the problem at Fukushima, the backup generators ran out of fuel.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Because in the real world, things take time. I'm sure as soon as this happened balls were rolling and it has just now got to a point where the news is bothering to talk about it
If that's all it took, I'm sure we would have. Hell, they could have just flown them in from someplace in Japan. For that matter they did but their wasn't a way to patch them into the sy
Re: (Score:2)
As for the logistics, well, they're just logistics. And it took days for things to get really, really o
Re: (Score:2)
You can blame TEPCO in that they didn't upgrade the seawalls before. Maybe, you can blame them for protecting the diesel storage tanks with only firewalls, not with walls big enough to protect the fuel tanks against tsunami. They failed at prevention, not at their response at current events. After all, units 5 and 6 will be online in a few months if politics don't get in the way.
But many heads need to roll inside TEPCO because you have proof in the very damaged site and in Onagawa NPS and Fukushima Daini th
Re: (Score:2)
Crisis management is the opposite of normal management and these guys don't understand that. Well, maybe not until now.
Re: (Score:2)
The generators have been on site for quite a while now, long enough for them to have run out of fuel a couple times. I think you underestimate the enormity of the problems encountered. The Generators are on semi-trailers, three to a generator set, they don't fit into a normal cargo plane, you need something like a Lockheed C-5 Galaxy [wikipedia.org] or a Antonov An-124 [wikipedia.org] to do it, otherwise you have to ship them via cargo ship. If the Generators aren't sitting on the dock in Alaska, they take forever to get there. The gener
Re: (Score:2)
If all else really fails, you call in the US Army. And if you have to you PAY for them when it's all over. It could have been done. It would have been a nightmare of logisti
Re: (Score:2)
One problem with GP's plan: Where do you land a Galaxy? Big planes need big runways. So you'd still have to tow the things across whatever ruins still count as a highway system.
I think Fukushima is going to go down as one of those "perfect storm" type disasters where so much went wrong so quickly that no one had ever considered it could ever happen.
Re: (Score:2)
Well that's the whole point, the Japanese were running a race of a hundred heats and losing every one in a photo-finish, it's a testament to their fortitude that they hadn't given up in frustration along the way; and it's amazing that things aren't worse than they are.
Re: (Score:2)
Why wasn't this done sooner? And while I'm asking, how come we didn't fly in power generators to keep the pumps running before things started to melt
Because the generators needed to run those pumps are of a size that can't be sent by any helicopter in existence.
Ice to Antarctica (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1, Insightful)
Yes, you are missing the 'radiation hardened' part, numbnuts.
Re: (Score:2)
So why doesn't Japan already have radiation hardened robots? They have a good number of nuclear power plants, an advanced robotics industry, why the hell didn't the Japanese build any of this type of robot?
This is the second shipment of US robots to go over.
http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9215346/U.S._to_send_radiation_hardened_robots_to_Japan?taxonomyId=12 [computerworld.com]
Re: (Score:2)
Why? It's not like nuclear meltdowns happen every day. This is only the fourth large scale commercial meltdown in the nearly 60 years of nuclear power's history. Odds are pretty good that this will be Japans only such incident for a long, long time.
Re: (Score:2)
Why weren't the Godzilla fighting robots radiation hardened? That doesn't seem very clever.
Re: (Score:3)
On the other hand, though, it isn't a complete surprise that the US might have more radiation-specific robots: Since the
Re: (Score:3)
I think it has to do more with the war on terror. A lot of these iRobot bots are seeing service as IED disarming and cleaning paths. I'm not surprised to learn the US has radiation hardened ones too as disarming a dirty bomb probably will become a necessity some day.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Mod parent up! (Score:2)
From parent's link:
These machines and control systems, using wireless local area networks and global positioning systems, were developed by the Unmanned Construction System Association in Tokyo, a consortium of 15 construction and related companies.
As such unmanned machines can be used in places too dangerous for workers, they have been used at more than 100 sites including restoration work at the Mt. Fugen volcano in Nagasaki Prefecture, which erupted with large pyroclastic flows in 1991, and Hokkaido's Mt. Usu, where a volcanic eruption occurred in 2000.
Strangely, Japan doesn't seem to have such robots (Score:2)
France, Germany, and the US are all sending over rugged robots designed to work in disaster areas, collapsed building sites, and war zones. Strangely, Japan doesn't seem to have those.
I'm amazed that TEPCO hadn't at least brought in a few hobby-type R/C quadrotors or helicopters with TV cameras to get a look at areas they couldn't reach, like the spent fuel pools. For days, they didn't even know the water levels in those pools. Attempts were made to peer through holes in the roof with high-altitude flyo
Re:Strangely, Japan doesn't seem to have such robo (Score:5, Informative)
The problems with TEPCO and the current crisis will continue with or without the former CEO, as they have for decades
Re: (Score:2)
That makes sense, I was trying to figure out what aspect of them was in need of hardening.
Oblig. Tripping the Rift (Score:2)
Chode: Yeah, because you can't! You can't afford the banging attachment!
Gus: [ Sighs ]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Somebody has to die first..
Consider that several people on Slashdot have called the Fukushima accident the second worst nuclear accident, ignoring that the current second place is occupied by a Soviet accident which is thought to have killed 200 people directly. There are even several medical radiotherapy accidents which have killed people and hence, are worse in relevant ways than Fukushima. Perspective is needed.
It looks like they're handling the homeless situation even worse, or about as well as FEMA
We ignore, of course, that FEMA is pretty good at its job. The failure from the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina occurred b
They have those (Score:2)
And will use precisely for what you are proposing
http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/dy/national/T110330005766.htm [yomiuri.co.jp]
Top that, Commies! (Score:1)
Why, yes, Billy, not only will we fly our cars to the moon for lunch, but we will have robots. Radiation-fighting American robots!
Re: (Score:2)
high radiation now outside the evac zone (Score:2, Interesting)
Latest news is that things are progressively becoming worse. Radiation OUTSIDE the evac zone is now exceeding the safe limits in some towns.
People in towns outside the evac region are being told to prepare to leave if conditions worsen.
This disaster appears to unfold like many others, with repeated assurances that things are OK and will be contained at this point, followed by failure and progressively worse conditions.
Radioactivity in the seawater outside the Fukushima plant continues to increase, and is n
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
This disaster appears to unfold like many others, with repeated assurances that things are OK and will be contained at this point, followed by things getting better.
FIFY. I notice also how your language is vague, in terms of "worst levels" rather than a concrete measure. Seawater is considered to be radioactive here because they just dumped a bunch of it on melting cores and some of it came back out.
Tepco is accused of covering up the worst problems.
It fits the Narrative. Of course, they're accused. But there's a big gap between being accused of something and actually committing the deed.
Re: (Score:2)
This disaster appears to unfold like many others, with repeated assurances that things are OK and will be contained at this point, followed by failure and progressively worse conditions.
Yes, you are correct. When we look back on *DISASTERS*. Often they appear to be ok and then failures lead to worsening conditions.
There's not reason to suggest that there is a cover up going on. The radiation levels were much lower before. The fact that things are getting worse only proves that attempts to end the crisis haven't been successful.
US to send robots to Japan? (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Sounds like the plot of an Anime movie...
Sigh. If only Godzilla were real he could pop up right now, waggle a clawed finger at the Japanese, as if to say "See what you get playing around recklessly with the atom?", pick up the reactors and take them to the Moon (unless you're one of those fans who see Flying Godzilla as the greatest sin perpetrated by Toho.)
Re: (Score:2)
Actually Fukishima is the soon to be birthplace of Godzilla.
Re: (Score:2)
My father works in the nuclear power industry. Back when I very young, I was still in elementary school because this took place before 9/11, the power plant my dad worked at had a "bring your son to work" day. I got to drive a robot around the power plant, that was really neat. They used them to work in hot rooms all the time, some tasks are easier to use a robot since there aren't any regulations on how long a robot can stay in a hot room.
The nuclear industry loves robots. These will probably help with the
Re: (Score:2)
Actually, no, the gear does not exist to keep people safe. Gamma rays go through anything but lots of lead, and there's a limit how heavy you can make a suit before it is unusable. The gear you see all the responders wearing does not protect against gamma at all.
what is Japan in a robot crisis? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I heard France was even sending robots, the only question is are they to help aid or fight the malfunctioning Japanese robots?
I'm impressed France is that forward thinking and Japan is that unprepared. Not quite the image we expected, was it?
Japan would be full of clever robots which could do almost everything and France wouldn't have any because the robotic robot assemblers trade union is on strike.
So it turns out Japan has been trying to perfect a bunch of utterly useless, but highly marketable robots to beep, boop, dance and look cute, which France have been making industrial duty do-the-dirty-work jobs.
Obligatory (Score:3)
Big Dog (Score:2)
19 days in (Score:3)
Yay for urgency. Fresh water is finally being hauled in by the US navy as well ... about two weeks after they ran out of coolant inventory.
Will there be a reckoning for this foot dragging? No one responsible for Fukushima has acted with anything like the urgency we should expect of companies and governments that operate these reactors.
Hardened robots mean we may soon learn how much spent fuel got lofted by the fires. Brace yourself; every power reactor incident in history has surprised the engineers when they finally got eyeballs on the problem. Credible and well meaning people denied major core melt at TMI-2 for six years until the first camera was lowered into the RPV.
TEPCO officially announced they're scrapping reactors 1 through 4. This is a formality really; recovering those reactors is not feasible. The important thing to notice is that this omits 5 and 6. Those reactors will be put on-line again, just like TMI-1 and Chernobyl 1, 2, and 3. They know, however, that it is much too early to float that balloon.
I am a nuclear advocate. I just don't defend incompetence, poor judgment or neglect. There just isn't any room for it if you're going to burn matter and expect the trust of the people that grant you the liberty.
Re: (Score:2)
Will there be a reckoning for this foot dragging? No one responsible for Fukushima has acted with anything like the urgency we should expect of companies and governments that operate these reactors.
What foot dragging? All backup power aside from batteries got knocked out. They had to do a hell of a lot just to restore cooling to six reactors and their fuel ponds. Also nuclear rods which come out of the reactor don't instantly cool off. The radioactive heating is going down over time, but it takes a little while. That's tough to deliver when your infrastructure outside of the plant has been wiped out. While it looked hairy for a while, things have been getting better since March 24.
TEPCO officially announced they're scrapping reactors 1 through 4. This is a formality really; recovering those reactors is not feasible. The important thing to notice is that this omits 5 and 6. Those reactors will be put on-line again, just like TMI-1 and Chernobyl 1, 2, and 3. They know, however, that it is much too early to float that balloon.
Why not keep reactor
Re: (Score:2)
Second paragraph indicates that the power plant was supposedly hooked up to the grid on the 16th. That's pretty good time and supports my assertion in my earlier post that these guys were moving fast.
In the third paragraph, TEPCO management says stuff. I don't see it as relevant especia
Red Whittaker and the robots that helped clean TMI (Score:2)
I helped a tiny bit with the WorkHorse version a quarter century ago as a volunteer hanging out in his lab back then:
http://www.new.ans.org/pubs/magazines/download/a_671 [ans.org]
Obligatory ST Reference (Score:2)
.
OMG, I can see the plot unraveling... (Score:2)
So, the rad-hardened robots will have a gap in their rad-hardening, and will slightly mutate. Then, they will start feeding from the radiation sources, and keep mutating. Three months from now, we will find a spontaneously-generated Mazinger. Which will be quite handy, FWIW, as lizards have already started mutating into little Godzillas by now.
It had to happen in Japan. They don't have animators - They have prophets.
Not a surprise... (Score:2)
Not particularly surprising when you consider that Japanese robot manufacturers have generally focused on manufacturing, healthcare or the consumer sector. And they produce legions of relatively worthless robots. I'm not sure why they haven't quite linked their prowess to more practical applications. At least they make them prettier than the robots Americans produce.
damn.. (Score:2)
I'll racking my brain trying to figure out how to insert a quip about sharks and lasers, but I'm drawing a blank. Ah well.
Robots? (Score:2)
To me, robots have to be at least semi-autonomous. These are really just really advanced remote controlled cars. Am I wrong?
C'mon! Is Japan! (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
I think they're out of options by now. Man I hate groupthink .. err.. I mean "culture", sometimes.. there are many aspects of Japanese culture that I find interesting and enjoyable, but a lot of the "honour" stuff has always seemed a bit much. Especially if it causes nuclear materials to blow around the rest of the world.
Re: (Score:2)
They are out of options of being able to approach the reactor site for any length of time without basically sentencing people to death.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Even if you were willing to offer them rewards sufficient to obtain their cooperation, you might run into some trouble getting them up to speed on what needs to be done in the time available.
Re:robot boner (Score:4, Informative)
I can't tell if you're serious or not, but here goes..
IC are sensitive to external radiation. rad-hardened robots use circuitry and components that have been rad-hardened.
That's why, for example, you can't just throw the latest Pentium Whatever into the Space Shuttle's avionics, because a stray alpha or beta particle, and ZAP -- the chip ain't working right.