E Ink Unveils Color E-Reader Display 164
Kensai7 writes with news that E Ink, the company who builds the displays used in Amazon's Kindle, Barnes and Noble's Nook, and Sony's Reader, has launched a color version of their e-reader screens. It will first be used by a Chinese company called Hanvon Technology. Other companies will be watching and evaluating how well it works before integrating it into their own designs. Quoting:
"Unlike an LCD screen, the colors are muted, as if one were looking at a faded color photograph. In addition, E Ink cannot handle full-motion video. At best, it can show simple animations. These are reasons Amazon, Sony and the other major e-reader makers are not yet embracing it. Amazon says it will offer color E Ink when it is ready; the company sees color as useful in cookbooks and children’s books, and it offers these books in color through its Kindle application for LCD devices. Sony is also taking a wait-and-see approach."
Magazines (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Right. Color charts in "The Economist" are barely intelligible on Kindle.
So Amazon saying color is just for cookbooks/childrens-books is silly.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, they can't list every application they'd use it in. If they mentioned The Economist charts, would someone in turn complain they didn't mention Forbes's pie charts?
Re: (Score:2)
Hows about textbooks? Most of mine have graphical representations trying to depict the math, to give me an idea on how I should be picturing it. Without colour to define one line from another, all you're left with is changing lines into dotted and dashed lines, which is fucking annoying and quickly becomes confusing.
Re: (Score:2)
I took my son sailing on sunday and tried to take a picture in full sunlight with my new android phone. I couldn't see the screen at all. E-paper, even if it is slow and monochrome, would be quite useful in that environment.
Re: (Score:2)
Except that trying to line up a photo on a B&W screen with a 1 fps refresh rate on a rocking-and-pitching boat is easy. Actually, what you needed was an optical viewfinder.
Re: (Score:2)
The problem is the UI. The camera app kept getting itself into a funny mode and I couldn't see enough to reconfigure it. I can point the camera well enough without a viewfinder.
Re: (Score:2)
I can point the camera well enough without a viewfinder.
Then either you're a very good photographer, or a very very bad one who can't tell the difference (or just doesn't care, I suppose).
Re: (Score:2)
I can point the camera well enough without a viewfinder.
a very very bad one who can't tell the difference (or just doesn't care, I suppose).
Sure, its a quick, dirty snap on the boat with stuff moving everywhere. These days you can take ten in sequence and pick the best anyway.
Re: (Score:2)
heya,
You know, I can't tell if you're being ironic (and hence kudos for being funny), or you actually have no idea...lol....
I used to do a fair bit of photography. Sorry, but from everything I've seen, an optical viewfinder still kicks the pants off of every EVF (electronic view finder) I've seen.
And LCD's are notoriously bad in sunlight. And the small CCDs in camera-phones are bad in low-light, and at the opposite tend of the spectrum, in full-sun, tend to produced washed out shots. (Although you probably
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Seriously phones are crappy cameras.
Re: (Score:2)
Less to carry.
No, because they are about vibrant color (mostly) (Score:2)
Most magazines are very, very fussy about color quality. The muted aspect of the Kindle would probably mean tailoring any images destined for it, a lot of work. The iPad LCD display (or other upcoming tablets) is a lot more like a computer display in terms of how you process images.
So I don't know that many magazines are chomping at the bit for devices that use the new eInk either.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
I don't get why the other companies aren't.. (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
..embracing color. Children's books and cookbooks? That's it? Really? What about textbooks? I can see significant increase in e-reader use for textbooks if they had color capability. Not every HS and college student is going to have the luxury of having a pad/slate device. Color provides an extra dimension of information without physical space, pretty useful IMO!
It's because the color is washed out and doesn't look good. You may as well just build an IPad knock-off and have vibrant colors instead. Color eInk just isn't ready for the consumer market yet; it will be, but not this year.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I'd love a device that combines both display technologies. I remember a company called Pixel-Qi working on an LCD that had a backlit and reflective mode. It l
Re: (Score:2)
I don't know about you, but current eReaders just are not conducive to the way I use textbooks. The half second delay to turn a page is nothing if you're reading from start to finish for pleasure, but would be quite painful if you were trying to browse for pertinent information. The delay also makes typing in search queries awkward and tedious. I'd much rather use a full tablet device with the much faster response time and presumably more processing power available, especially if the book and interface w
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Cookbooks are amongst the best-sellers of the publishing world; makes sense that they would be a focus. Anyway, the e-ink display sizes are a tad small for textbooks.
Cookbooks, the code snippets of the food world.
Maybe by not embracing it they mean... (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Amazon Translation (Score:2)
Amazon says it will offer color E Ink when it is ready
AKA, once it can display full-motion videos ^W ADS.
We've heard something similar about today's half-baked HTML5 ^W^W adobe flash replacements from the likes of youtube.
Barking up the wrong tree... (Score:2)
Amazon's interest in the technology involves replacing their current tech which can't do video either. Say what you will about Amazon, but their philosophy and strategy around Kindle is clear and consistent. Battery life and paper-like contrast and visibility are king. Barnes and Noble went LCD, but Amazon so far seems that they are sticking to E ink. The fact they haven't moved is either because there's some unspecified hit to battery life, the black and white contrast is degraded, or the price is too
Re: (Score:2)
That's the single biggest move on B&N's part that has me firmly looking at the Kindle if I finally seriously try electronic reading instead of books. I don't need an iPad alike, I'd want something that stands a decent shot of an enjoyable reading experience even if it conflicts with non-reading uses.
E INK FTW (Score:3, Interesting)
The fact that ANY consumer product (nevermind a whole category) has succeeded with black-and-white screens is remarkable, and points towards to some hard to beat advantages of the E Ink technology: they were strong enough to outweigh the fact that on first impression, the screens looks cheap.
With the addition of color (and the assumption of steady improvement to contrast and color gamut), it's entirely possible that e ink will be wrapped on all kind of things -- dashboards, airport signage, ATMs -- where power is an issue.
Re: (Score:2)
Early e-ink displays might have looked cheap, but current e-ink displays look significantly better than an LCD showing a monochromatic image. It looks much more like printed text, and the lack of a backlight makes it easier to read.
That and the low power requirements are, I think, the two major advantages of e-ink. The lack of colour and the low refresh rate are the only major disadvantages.
Re: (Score:2)
The white is still not as good as real paper. I don't mean anything fancy, I mean normal office paper and normal laser printer.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
But do you want it to be perfectly white? May be a good idea in a dim environment, but step out into sunlight and that white paper becomes overtly bright, almost blinding. I have an eInk reader with the new Pearl screen, and it is very much improved, and offers excellent contrast in low light.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
One thing I have noticed is that office paper and non-fiction books are about the whitest paper commonly seen. Fiction books are less white and newspapers can't really be called white at all. Whiteness makes a document look more professional and is obviously an advantage when printing photos etc but i'm not at all convinced it's needed to make text comfortable to read.
I've even known people who need to have things printed on special paper and/or use filter sheets or filtered glasses because office paper was
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
My son got a new model Kindle on the weekend, I have to say the display is absolutely excellent, way way better than i was expecting. It is easily the best sunlight readable display I have seen.
Re: (Score:2)
My point was that ANY black and white display looks cheap, despite the advantages you correctly note.
Re: (Score:2)
But if you're only viewing black and white content, how does the black and white display look any cheaper than the colour display?
I have a Kindle 3. I use it for one thing and one thing only; reading books. If you looked at me using my kindle, you'd never have any way to know if it had a colour or monochrome display. And yet somehow the mere fact that it's monochrome makes it look cheap?
The lack of colour hasn't held back eBook readers because the vast majority of content that users want to read on them doe
Re: (Score:2)
Well, there is a lot of books and PDF files which are nothing but black and white text, for which the current ebook readers are fine. So it is not a surprise to me that ebooks have taken off.
Re: (Score:2)
This isn't the first time. Remember the original Gameboy? It destroyed pretty much every color competitor that tried to go up against it.
Re: (Score:2)
The basic ones wouldn't have any battery in them just a connection port you plug a laptop or module into to change the picture and then it stays that way until you want to change it again.
The more advanced ones would have some sort of extremely low power standby
Re: (Score:2)
What I want for Christmas (Score:2)
Virtually indestructible waterproof color e-ink tablet with WiFi and replaceable scratchable surfaces, so I can toss it around like a book.
Bonus round: built in drivers to act as a USB display.
Re: (Score:2)
Screw USB, let's use DVI or DisplayPort.
Re: (Score:2)
Removable/replacable surfaces. But then you'd complain that it's the text is too blurry and not worth your time.
No full motion video... (Score:2)
TSA bans Color E-Reader on domestic flights (Score:4, Funny)
This just in to the /. news room; The TSA has announced that E Ink Color E-Reader Displays are now banned from domestic flights worldwide. The little electronic eInks might be related to toner in toner cartridges and thus a threat to the safety and sanity of the worldwide local traveling community, at large. A spokesman for the TSA had this to say; "I don't know what all is in there, but those colors could be made to look like a powerful explosion or some such thing, or another. Heck, I just don't like the look of that contraption. It looks like some sort of controller for human zombie robots or somethin'."
Color before speed? (Score:2)
FTA:
“Color is the next logical step for E Ink,”
Really? I'd have thought that "refresh rates that aren't measured in epochs" would be the next logical step.
Perhaps they've improved since the last time I picked one up, but it was depressingly unresponsive. That, and the poor contrast ratio, was not really grabbing my attention.
I love the idea of e-ink; using ambient light is both low-power and easier on the eyes. But I don't feel the urge to get one with the current state of the (commercially a
Re: (Score:2)
Speed is really a minor issue. It only needs to be as fast as flipping a page for a reader. Color and IMHO resolution is a major issue.
I subscribe to Motorcyclist, Cycle World, Rider, and Classic Motorcycle. They are about the only magazines I still read.
Without high resolution color screens they are not going to be on an Ereader. Same for Car and Driver, Road and Track, Popular Science and so on.
Re: (Score:2)
Been thinking about it, how fast?
Can one flip the page when you get to the bottom or is it still flip at the midpoint?
Are they Nook and Amazon ebooks cross compatible?
Re: (Score:2)
Been thinking about it, how fast?
Can one flip the page when you get to the bottom or is it still flip at the midpoint?
Are they Nook and Amazon ebooks cross compatible?
You are asking if the Kindle is compatible with the Nook ebooks? If you want compatibility with a bunch of stores, get an iPad instead then get an anti-glare screen protector for it. Adjust the brightness to your preference and then download the book store apps.
Re: (Score:2)
Support when ready? (Score:2, Insightful)
From what I know, B/W E-Ink doesn't do smooth animations and full motion video either, so I don't understand why Sony or Amazon are not jumping on using color E-Ink displays.
I think you got to understand the target market better. If you want full color, high resolution, smooth animation/video displays, then use LCD or OLED technology. If you want an e-book reader with color graphics and simple interactive graphs, then use E-Ink.
I think the biggest failure of E-Ink will be to try and compete with LCD. The
Muted colors might be the reason (Score:3, Interesting)
because I doubt consumers will accept colors that don't jump out at them having been used to color LCD screens for so long.
I guess it really depends on how muted those colors are, if its like the screen is always dark or fuzzy its DOA.
I won't touch the new Nook (color LCD) or an iPad simply because battery life and usability out doors is so compromised.
Perfect for arcade cabinets. (Score:3, Interesting)
Make the damn thing so that we can cut it to a desired size and easily control it without needing an expensive built-in or external controller and everyone who builds arcade cabinets will finally have dynamic marquees that looks almost as real as the real thing.
LCD panels may be more bright, but you can't easily cut that. Normal marquees may be backlit but it's not quite the same as LCD.
Plus, we'll be able to have slightly rounded dynamic marquees, instead of being limited to flat ones like with LCD.
Re: (Score:2)
I don't think E-ink displays can be cut any more easily than LCDs. Similarly, wishing to 'magic away' the controlling electronics doesn't seem a feasible request.
Ultimately, I doubt any of these technologies would be a convincing replica for backlit colored plastic if you are going for accuracy, though LCD might come closest by virtue of being the only one to be based on translucency rather than emission or reflection, though I don't think it would mimick it accurately anyway.
Re: (Score:2)
All I'm asking for is an interface that can be used by hobbyists with a low-cost micro-controller.
Re: (Score:2)
There's quite a few projects about dynamic arcade cabinet marquees on Arcade Controls forums [arcadecontrols.com].
Disappointed that e-paper printers never worked (Score:2)
Although I love my Alex eReader [springdesign.com], I am little disappointed that e-paper is being used as a display instead of being used like paper like it was originally conceived.
The basic idea was that you'd get a special electrostatic printer that you'd load with a ream of e-paper and print out your documents as usual, then, when you're done with a document just return it to the hopper so that some other document could be printed on it. It was supposed to be the ultimate recyclable paper.
I suppose that it was never rea
Re: (Score:2)
The problem with e-paper's original vision is that printouts would likely get bent or torn or whatever, and then put back in the printer, which would then jam on the damaged paper. I like the idea, but I don't think it's practical.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
color e-ink killer app: digital picture frames (Score:5, Interesting)
I've been waiting for years for color e-ink to mature enough to make a good digital picture frame. Something cheap, lightweight, with great viewing angles, daylight readable, non-reflective, awesome resolution, takes no power in between refreshes - heck, you could set it to only switch 1x day and run it for a year on a small battery.
Sounds like they are getting closer - keep at it, guys!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
THIS IS GREAT!!! (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I've been waiting for this for ages (Score:4, Insightful)
I like the idea of having a light weight e-Reader which I can carry reference books on. But most of my reference books have colour diagrams, illustrations and figures. They really don't work in black and white - or at least are not as visually appealing, which is important when you're reading something.
I'm not sure why the NYT thinks not being able to play FMV is a problem. I don't want to watch video on an E-Reader; I want to read books. I've already got devices which I can use for watching videos while on the move - though I seldom use them for that - but they suck for reading because of the glossy reflective displays. I just want a device for reading books on the move. In colour.
If Amazon were to bring out a new Kindle with a colour display I might actually buy the damn thing.
Re: (Score:2)
Those all use black and white(more accurately not quite white) display. This may not be the clearest writing ever, but it indicates a reason why they are not rolling out color eInk in their products.
Re: (Score:2)
That was precisely my point - "cannot handle full-motion video" is not a reason to not use color EInk when you already use B&W EInk in your products, because the latter has the exact same limitation.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
The quality of the colour is why they're not using it yet. Black and white e-ink is significantly better than the original versions of the product. Only in the last generation or two has it approached print quality in terms of contrast ratio. Undoubtedly, the same will be true of colour e-ink for a while. Presumably, Amazon and others will wait for a generation or two for the technology to improve sufficiently.
Re: (Score:2)
How is the contrast ratio on a recent one?
The latest sony I saw was maybe phonebook quality in that respect. The nook I saw in B&N also looked worse than $7 paperback.
Either way until ebooks cost less than paperbacks I am not interested.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
How is the contrast ratio on a recent one?
For "Pearl" displays (which is what the recently released Kindle 3 and Kindle DX Graphite use), the claimed contrast ratio is 10:1. For paper, it all depends on the quality of both paper and print, but I've seen numbers for books (which are higher than newspapers and the like) which go from 1:10 to 1:15.
Neither Sony nor B&N use the new screens yet. For the older stuff, the contrast is 1:7, IIRC.
Either way until ebooks cost less than paperbacks I am not interested.
They usually cost about twice as cheap on Amazon store - at least those few titles which I've bought there.
Tha
Re: (Score:2)
What books were these that were 1/2 the price?
I just looked for a random selection and it seemed that the ebook and the paperback are the same price.
Re: (Score:2)
You need to go to the Kindle store section [amazon.com] to see the "special Kindle price". For example, here [amazon.com] is a book for $10 in digital download which goes for $14 in hardcover. Here [amazon.com] is another, with similar savings.
I'm not certain if it applies to all or even most books (the above is also just two random clicks), but it did apply to all books which I've purchased so far. Granted, my selection is mostly the classic sci-fi of 60s-70s, and they may be keeping the prices low for that entire category.
Re: (Score:2)
Ah, old books. You mean books I could get used for $0.02 + shipping.
If I am going to lose the ability to resell and the ability to lend I am sure as heck not paying those prices.
Re: (Score:2)
Um, the links that I gave in my post are not to old books. They're both published in 2010.
What I said is that I personally mostly buy old books, so that's where the bulk of my experience with the store comes from.
Oh, and ebooks you can get for $0 and no shipping, if you know where to look (hint: #bookz @ irc.undernet.org). Of course, the author doesn't see the money, but then he doesn't see it when you buy a used one for $0.02, either. I usually try to find an official digital edition online, but if there's
Re: (Score:2)
best thing about the kindle version is the author (or copyright holder, depending on how bad the author's deal is it could be the same thing) gets 70% of the money if they price it according to Amazon's price point, 30% if they decide to set their own price.
Re: (Score:2)
Of course, the author doesn't see the money, but then he doesn't see it when you buy a used one for $0.02, either.
True. The difference is that the supply of used books is finite, the supply of unauthorized e-copies is effectively infinite.
Up to a point either helps an author by making readers aware of his work, and perhaps encouraging the sale of other titles by that same author. (The whole point behind the Baen Free Library.) Past that point well, it's gonna start hurting.
(There's also the concern that if
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, but the paperback is that cheap.
Re: (Score:2)
I just looked for a random selection and it seemed that the ebook and the paperback are the same price.
As a rule, publishers are still wary about undercutting their paperback sales. They've already paid to print those things, after all. Exceptions may be for special offers to get new readers into a series, etc. They're less worried about cutting into hardback sales because the profit margin on those is higher and they do smaller print runs, and it's a slightly different market. (Those who buy e-book edit
Re:"... are not yet embracing it" (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, that is correct. I just haven't kept an eye on new Sony Reader releases lately, so I didn't know they refreshed the line. Nook will probably follow soon as well.
Re: (Score:2)
Doubtful. The new Nook uses an LCD screen.
Re: (Score:2)
My price point was hit for the device when it hit $189. I wanted it because of the convenience to carry books and it is easier for my to hold (low tonality in my hands makes it stressful to hold a book open)
Re: (Score:2)
You can get ePub books cheaper than paperbacks, as long as you stick to public-domain books. Project Gutenberg has them available, and there's something like a million from Google readily available for the Nook, and B&N typically has lots on sale for $2.00 or less (what I'm willing to spend on an eBook, all things considered - offer me something reliable and/or tangible, with full First Sale rights, and I'll raise that limit).
I find my Nook very readable, and an excellent way to read a whole lot of
Re: (Score:2)
Why? You're paying for the words, not the media. Personally I love my Kindle. Some of the books I read are pretty large (I'm looking at you Peter F). My Kindle fits in my jacket pocket.
Re: (Score:2)
While you're right that it's the words not the media you're paying for, the problem is the lack of resale/giving away--it's effectively a sizeable price increase even if the nominal price is constant.
Re: (Score:2)
They have lower value since I cannot resell them nor can I lend them.
Remove the DRM and I will gladly pay paperback prices.
Re: (Score:2)
I've seen the screen of the new Kindle 3, and the contrast is very nice. Noticeably better than my old Sony 500 or my Astak EZ-Reader. I haven't seen any of the newer Sonys.
If the Kindle did EPub, I'd grab one. If the Nook upgrades to Pearl, I'll probably jump on it. Not interested in an LCD reader, though, so the color Nook won't attract me.
Re: (Score:2)
The Sony Reader, Nook, Kobo and Kindle all use the exact same display and therefore provide the same quality
Sorry, this just isn't true. My housemates have between them a Sony PRS300 and a Kindle 3, and the quality of the Kindle's display is markedly superior.
Re: (Score:2)
"Cannot handle full-motion video" may, though, be a reason (along with price) that, where companies determine that the demand for color is sufficient to drive a decision to produce an e-reader product that does not use B&W e-Ink, the choice is color LCD, not color e-Ink.
The reason not to choose color e-Ink over B&W e-Ink is probably just cost (thou
Re: (Score:2)
E Ink cannot handle full-motion video. At best, it can show simple animations.
That's true, and it applies to EInk in general, not just color EInk, so...
interestingly, ink (of the non "e" variety) also cannot handle full motion video, At best, it too can show simple animations.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
The article is not currently behind a pay-wall, and does not currently require registration. But then, you knew that, because you only complained about this after trying to access the article, right?
Re: (Score:2)
I hit the "registration required" wall when trying to read the article, which is weird, because as far as I know I haven't viewed any Times articles in - well, ages. I guess that's not the pay wall, but I definitely couldn't access the article. Clearing/refusing cookies didn't resolve it either.
As far as I can tell, the article does in fact require registration to read.
Re: (Score:2)
You clicked the link? HERETIC! Get thee from our midst before we burn you as the INTARWEBS demand!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
The thing about e-ink is it only draws a charge when it changes something on the screen, if you don't update any pixels you don' draw any current. For reading static text that means once a refresh every 1..10 minutes, but if you stick video on the display causing 30 frames per second refreshes to be drawn you can kiss the battery life goodbye.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Color would be "nice." But only nice. I could see the covers of the books in color. Other than that, it wouldn't mean much to me, and certainly not enough to get me to spend a big premium to get it.