Despite FTC Settlement, Intel Can Ship Oak Trail Without PCIe 140
MojoKid writes "When the Federal Trade Commission settled their investigation of Intel, one of the stipulations of the agreement was that Intel would continue to support the PCI Express standard for the next six years. Intel agreed to all the FTC's demands, but Intel's upcoming Oak Trail Atom platform presented something of a conundrum. Oak Trail was finalized long before the FTC and Intel began negotiating, which means Santa Clara could've been banned from shipping the platform. However, the FTC and Intel have recently jointly announced an agreement covering Oak Trail that allows Intel to sell the platform without adding PCIe support — for now."
Re:Am I the only one who is confused... (Score:5, Informative)
A little more digging brings us [computerworld.co.nz]
The FTC site adds that [ftc.gov]
Seems to have been part of a broader move against Intel at the time, I admit I don't remember it very clearly, but Reuters adds [reuters.com]
Oh and that case can be found here [ftc.gov]
Re:Am I the only one who is confused... (Score:5, Informative)
Here is a good article [arstechnica.com] about the original antitrust settlement.
Basically, Intel refuses to license it's new DMI or QPI bus protocols to NVIDIA, so they can no longer make chipsets for intel processors (like nForce). Furthermore, it has been feared that with the push towards systems on chip, that Intel would eliminate the PCI-e bus as well leaving no way for any graphic company to supply a discrete graphics chip for netbook or notebook computers.
Re:Please explain. (Score:3, Informative)
Please re-read, it's Intel, not IBM... and there's lots of useful info in the comments.
Comment removed (Score:5, Informative)