100 Million-Core Supercomputers Coming By 2018 286
CWmike writes "As amazing as today's supercomputing systems are, they remain primitive and current designs soak up too much power, space and money. And as big as they are today, supercomputers aren't big enough — a key topic for some of the estimated 11,000 people now gathering in Portland, Ore. for the 22nd annual supercomputing conference, SC09, will be the next performance goal: an exascale system. Today, supercomputers are well short of an exascale. The world's fastest system at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, according to the just released Top500 list, is a Cray XT5 system, which has 224,256 processing cores from six-core Opteron chips made by Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (AMD). The Jaguar is capable of a peak performance of 2.3 petaflops. But Jaguar's record is just a blip, a fleeting benchmark. The US Department of Energy has already begun holding workshops on building a system that's 1,000 times more powerful — an exascale system, said Buddy Bland, project director at the Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility that includes Jaguar. The exascale systems will be needed for high-resolution climate models, bio energy products and smart grid development as well as fusion energy design. The latter project is now under way in France: the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor, which the US is co-developing. They're expected to arrive in 2018 — in line with Moore's Law — which helps to explain the roughly 10-year development period. But the problems involved in reaching exaflop scale go well beyond Moore's Law."
100 Million? (Score:3, Funny)
Why 100 million processors? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Who's President, Future-boy? (Score:3, Funny)
Forget the president, ask for the winning lottery numbers for the next 20 years!
Re:100 Million? (Score:5, Funny)
Let's just make sure it's 1 000 000 cores and not 1 048 576 cores... let's not make that mistake again.
Why build this monstrosity? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Sorry - I can't help myself (Score:4, Funny)
Only if they run Linux and can render Natalie Portman covered in hot grits faster than my imagination already does....woohoo!
Re:100 Million? (Score:4, Funny)
Let's just make sure it's 1 048 576 cores and not 1 000 000 cores... let's not make that mistake again.
Re:Why 100 million processors? (Score:4, Funny)
It is, if we're talking about cloud processors for running vaporware.
Windows 2018 (Score:2, Funny)
Maybe this thing will have enough power to run Windows by 2018??
Re:How many problems can these systems really solv (Score:2, Funny)
When the comparable multi-processing capacity is in your cell phone, what are you going to do with it?
Stream high definition porn... duh.
Speaking of heat (Score:5, Funny)
(Seriously, how much heat is that thing going to put out?)
Re:100 Million? (Score:1, Funny)
Can you translate that in "Library of Congress's"?
Re:How many problems can these systems really solv (Score:5, Funny)
That's not entirely accurate. HPC systems are designed to solve a class of problems. That's not the same thing as a "particular" problem. Jaguar has, in fact, solved many different problems, including fluid flow, weather, nuclear fusion and supernova modeling. It's not going to run Word any faster than your PC but that's not what you buy a supercomputer to do.
So you're saying that OpenOffice would still take forever to start.
Re:Why build this monstrosity? (Score:3, Funny)
That's the answer though. They're building this thing to find out what the question was.
Re:Who's President, Future-boy? (Score:3, Funny)
***How do we debug a million-core program?***
What is this "debugging" thing you speak of? If you are asking how we will test software for a million core system, we'll do it the same way we always have. We'll get a trivial test case to run once, then we'll ship.
Re:100 Million? (Score:5, Funny)
Can you translate that in "Library of Congress's"?
yes. It generates the same amount of heat as burning 37 Libraries of Congress.
BILL LIVES! (Score:3, Funny)
Re:The Jaguar? (Score:3, Funny)
But did it leak oil?
Re:How many problems can these systems really solv (Score:3, Funny)
Stream it? With that much processing power it should be able to create it on the spot: "Computer, let's start today's scenario with Angelina Jolie surrounded by...."
Re:100 Million? (Score:1, Funny)
I'm still waiting for the hedonistically designed processor.