Apple Not Disabling OS X Atom Support After All 275
bonch writes "Contrary to previous reports, Atom chip support is working fine in the latest 10C535 build of OS X 10.6.2. Apple's EULA still states that OS X is licensed to run only on Apple hardware, but it looks like OSX86 hackers can breathe easy ... for now."
What a wonderful opportunity! (Score:5, Funny)
Goody! Now we can post another 500 messages arguing about whether EULAs should be enforceable or not. With luck, this time we can finally finish the argument and come to a conclusion that brings peace to all. I hope Apple and Psystar are prepared to follow the decrees and rulings of the best minds of the Slashdot community.
+5 Comments, search in vain (Score:5, Funny)
--> Could not find text "+5 Comment"
Though, it was with Opera, maybe I need FireFox?
I did find a +5 Comment in this thread though: [slashdot.org]
The dogcow says Moof not wolf (Score:5, Funny)
The dogcow says Moof not wolf
Re:WOLF! (Score:4, Funny)
Man, stop trying to buz-kill my rumor mill. Trolling slashdot is all I got anymore. :)
So nerds screeched for nothing (Score:2, Funny)
Conspiracy Theory: Atom will power new tablet (Score:3, Funny)
I know MainStream Media pablum when I hear it... you guys are missing the real story: Apple broke Atom support to make it less likely that people would suspect their new Tablet will be running... an Atom! These guys are geniuses, that's for sure!!! (or I'm off my medication again).
Re:Don't count on Atom support... (Score:4, Funny)
Face it peeps, only Linux or Windows are man enough.
Well. Except for Windows.
Re:Don't count on Atom support... (Score:3, Funny)
Linux is too mainstream to be man. Try OpenSolaris.
Re:The dogcow says Moof not wolf (Score:4, Funny)
Sosumi.
Re:Atom (Score:3, Funny)
WTF? this is madness! I hate microsoft even more now.
Ballmer: Madness?? THIS . IS . MICROSOFT!!!