Europe Is Testing 12.5 Gbps Wireless 134
Lorien_the_first_one brings word that in Europe, a breakthrough for post-4G communications has been announced. A public-private consortium known as IPHOBAC has been developing new communications technology that is near commercialization now. Quoting: "With much of the mobile world yet to migrate to 3G mobile communications, let alone 4G, European researchers are already working on a new technology able to deliver data wirelessly up to 12.5Gb/s. The technology — known as 'millimeter-wave' or microwave photonics — has commercial applications not just in telecommunications (access and in-house networks) but also in instrumentation, radar, security, radio astronomy and other fields."
fp (Score:5, Funny)
Im already using it. Its awesome.
Re: (Score:1, Funny)
You're right. That *was* fast.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Take the stairs? Take the elevator? (Score:4, Funny)
When we look at how far behind the American wireless industry is compared to the overseas systems, it's not always correct to simply look at the current status. It's much more important to look at the growth over time, because it is only when you do that do you realize that the American system is keeping pace with European and Asian cellular systems.
Yes, at any particular moment in time the American system may seem far behind, but at some point we do upgrade to the latest and greatest. It just takes a lot more time to decide which version of the latest and greatest we will implement.
So it's much more like taking an elevator to go from one floor to another here in the US. We don't bother with every individual step in between and we get to the same place as the stair-climbers eventually too.
Re:Take the stairs? Take the elevator? (Score:5, Funny)
We don't bother with every individual step in between and we get to the same place as the stair-climbers eventually too.
Meanwhile, Japanese are upset because they're getting throttled to 900 Gb upload a month [slashdot.org]. Awful slow elevator, that. Notice how this was 8 months ago.
Re:Take the stairs? Take the elevator? (Score:5, Interesting)
Your analogy would make more sense if America were making big leaps every few years in communication tech. However, just looking at the internet alone, so many people are still left with dial-up and will be there indefinitely while others here have Verizon Fios, the other side of the residential spectrum. Now, the old argument is population density one, but I feel that is a dead horse in many ways, with communities in Europe (Sweden) with comparable or lower density getting top notch speeds. Hell, just look at the gauge of wire for electricity that get to the super high % amount of population except the most, most remote, and also being able to provide telephone service for those same people too - and then tell me laying fiber optic is too expensive.
The only time I saw Verizon move in my area to provide better service the last 10 years (Fios) was when comcast started offering voip phone service (they already have a strong cable internet following). Suddenly Verizon felt threatened. But otherwise they stayed slothful, providing as little service as possible while extracting the greatest price. They only moved when they felt threatened (how Verizon shat itself and went to court when Philadelphia proposed ubiquitous wireless internet). It seems that way with many of the monopolies. Hell, even regular old cellular service is abysmal in this country once you go past the population centers of the east and west coast. Nevermind cellular data service.
Which is too bad. So much of the internet is really hampered by the traditional view of it being on the desktop. In a stationary place. The notebook boom coupled with WiFi spots moved to alleviate that but it really isn't on the go yet. The iPhone was probably the first mainstream product but service is still very expensive and no matter what you choose, pretty slow. Just as the internet was the killer app of the last 20 years, changing how we live; cheap, relatively speedy, ubiquitous wireless internet would probably be the next killer app the next 20 years.
Re:Take the stairs? Take the elevator? (Score:4, Funny)
Too bad if you live in Australia. :(
Re: (Score:2)
yeh, we just get stuff that doesn't break from fire, floods, wildlife, trees... the list goes on.
Re: (Score:2)
The problem as I see it with all these "they are faster than us" studies is the assumption that customers want the more expensive, faster solution in rural areas. I live in a rural state and can tell you that most here don't give a shit about speed and look more at the price because they tend to be poorer than the city dwellers. You can have a service that offers faster than light speed but if it costs an arm, leg and your first born, then people won't bite. Add to that the fact that most rural America sees
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Add to that the fact that most rural America sees a higher price because it is ... usually dominated by a single monopoly ... and there is your reason uptake is slow out here in the boonies.
This is the PP's point. :)
Re: (Score:2)
Sort of....My point added to PP's was that rural people tend to be poorer overall. They also tend to have more of an outside life especially in agricultural areas and have little online usage. This is a generalization based on where I live in WV and totally unsupported with data but is what I see when I look out the window...;-)
Re: (Score:1)
Population density is the wrong measure. Customers per infrastructure dollar is probably a lot closer to being correct. If the rural population of a relatively small country is limited, the country will appear to have a low population density, but most of the infrastructure will serve people living at high densities. The U.S. happens to have a significant number of people living at a low population density, so there are lots of areas where there is a lot of infrastructure per customer.
Still, the lightly reg
Re: (Score:1)
Now, the old argument is population density one, but I feel that is a dead horse in many ways, with communities in Europe (Sweden) with comparable or lower density getting top notch speeds.
It's not just about population density... it's also about the sheer size of some of our low-density areas. The United States has areas twice the size of the UK with half the population density. Sure, if we were on an island and only had this small area to run wire all over the place, we would, but America is much bigger than the UK if you haven't noticed. It takes a longass time to get places wired, and certain areas have more priority than others in the race to high speed internet.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Sure, if we were on an island
You are on an island. We have several countries on ours too :)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yep, that's another good excuse. But, haven't the telco's already been subsidised to provide the internet connection? I'm not an American, but other posts on /. seem to suggest that they were given the money over a decade ago but haven't yet produced the goods.
I'm still not convinced that the nation that put a man on the moon cannot even get broadband to everyone in the country.
Re: (Score:2)
Unfortunately, that's anecdotal evidence. Mine refutes that, but it's just as invalid as it's anecdotal as well
On my side of things, I live in a small suburb. We're somewhat near a Verizon office (not in town, but not too far away). Yet Verizon was pretty quick to wire us for DSL and later Fios; and DSL w
Re:Take the stairs? Take the elevator? (Score:5, Interesting)
indeed (Score:2)
I'm fairly pro-market, but it's easy to ruin things with simple dogma. A lot of business needs to be able to assume basic things are working to operate. If you spend all your time wrangling about sewer hookups for to your office and your power company is an unregulated free-market utility that can choose not to do business with you if you upset their TOS, you spend all your time on overhead and little time on business. The internet these days is basically a utility: if you want it to spur other economic dev
Re: (Score:1)
I'm fairly pro-market ... The internet these days is basically a utility
This is the problem in a nutshell. Internet service is not provided by a free market. Government has create internet service provider utilities via cable and phone company competition restrictions. Only when we get real choice will the situation improve.
Re: (Score:2)
It seems like there's a bit of a natural monopoly on last-mile pipes, though. To minimize digging up of streets, we really don't want 15 cable companies running entirely separate networks to houses, but instead want one line. Sort of how power lines and water pipes are done, too.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, France had a widespread online service with interactive features, email, etc., long before the United States had similar penetration of similar technology, much less on a shared network, though it wasn't "the internet".
Re: (Score:2)
I certainly agree with you that the source of the disparity is in government policy; but we can't have government "guiding development" in the US, because that would be "socialism".
Re: (Score:2)
Our data travels at the speed of our people. ;)
Fry (Score:2, Interesting)
- 10 thousands satellites beaming down their TV programmes and GPS coordinates
- 1 thousand TV stations beaming up their programmes (that's very high power)
- 500 millions of cordless phone handsets (frequencies anyone ?)
- 100 millions cordless keyboards and mice (ranging from 40MHz to 2.4GHz)
- 2 billions cellphones and millions of related cellular-comms-towers
- billions of wi-fi connections from portable phones, laptops, VoIP,
Re:Fry (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:1, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
it's "flynt".
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Most of us bathe...
Speak for yourself, mate.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Most of us bathe...
Speak for yourself, mate.
Good to see the English (1) are represented on slashdot.
1) By English, I mean English.
The Scotts, Welsh, North Irish, Cornish, Manx, Jersey islanders etc - all know what a shower is.
Aaaaaaaaaaaaah, I love the smell of reverse racism in the morning (or any time of day really).
Re: (Score:2)
The Isle of Man, Jersey Islands etc. are not in the United Kingdom.
Also, when comparing the cleanliness of of different regions of the UK, I invite you to consider this link [bbc.co.uk].
Guess where I live :P.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, washing your hands after taking a dump is for queers!
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Fry (Score:5, Informative)
You're talking crap.
Whilst IR photons have a higher energy than microwaves, so do visible light photons.
On the other hand, opacity and absorbtion of various human tissues, is a complex relationship with wavelength.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
It is all about how people perceive risks and fail to consider them rationally. A bit of a similar example is how a number of people are up in arms about the rates of violent crime, and are willing to sacrifice their liberties and privacy if the government merely suggests it might perhaps help, yet consider the prospect o
Re: (Score:2)
If only Gutenberg had known what a weapon he was creating...
Re: (Score:2)
I think you have failed to include the increased risk of being hit by a car. It only has to happen to you once, and you will probably not be willing to ever ride to work again, even if you weren't injured. Heart disease it distant and uncertain, any kind of exercise can prevent it. Getting hit by a car while you're riding you bike is a real wake-up call
Resonance (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Resonance (Score:5, Informative)
A resonant process is one in which the photon has the right energy to trigger a particular transition. Ionising radiation (UV, x-rays, etc.) works by a resonant process, and depends on the quantum of radiation having enough energy to eject an electron from the molecule. As you go down in energy from there, you have enough energy per photon to resonantly electronically excite molecules (visual light, used in the eyes to detect light) or vibrationally excite (IR), or down at the bottom, to rotationally (microwave), and then translationally excite molecules.
Correspondingly, it gets harder and harder to cause any chemistry with those photons. It's trivial to break up a molecule by shifting its electrons around or ejecting them altogether, or to a lesser extent it's possible to chop something up by exciting a particular molecular stretching vibration such that the bond(s) dissociate(s). However it's a serious challenge to cleave a bond with a rotational excitation alone.
So, how could a microwave do any chemistry, and thus damage, to your tissues? It's a simple thermal process. When you rotationally excite a molecule, in the gas phase, the molecule, or part of it, changes its rotational motion in some way. There are couplings between rotational and vibrational motions, and upwards to electronic excitations. In the solution or solid phase, there are also couplings to the translational motion of the molecules, meaning that ultimately the energy from the microwave can end up speeding up the molecule's motion, which is plain old heating.
So the energy you dump in with the microwaves becomes "thermalised", spreading over the whole range of states evenly, with a pretty huge chunk of it going into heating up the material. That heat lets you do old-fashioned collision-activated chemistry. What the anti-EM movement don't want you to think about is that this thermal process is entirely dependent on your exposure. It's like standing next to a furnace. A foot away, you're toast. Six feet away, you're warm. One hundred feet away, you don't know it exists.
In summary, it is not possible for radio to cause you thermal damage because the exposure is simply too low. No non-thermal, resonant process for damage has been shown to exist, and trivial physical chemistry makes it clear that one probably never will be found.
Re: (Score:2)
Cut a grape into quarters and put one slice in the microwave for ten or twenty seconds. It will do something "interesting".
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
It depends what you mean by "no chance". Nothing we've learnt scientifically to date suggests this would cause cancer. Of course that doesn't mean there is "no chance" since we may learn something new that does suggest it would cause cancer.
And if you retreat to the position that something must create absolutely zero risk to be worth doing, then absolutely nothing is safe enough for you. Going out in the sun and breathing carry a risk of causing cancer.
From our current understanding, there is absolutely no
Re: (Score:2)
While we're at it: Folding. (Score:2)
Folding might be an issue, too, where a short-term exposure could have long-term effect.
= = = =
That said: The move to everything-spread-spectrum would help to reduce the ability of microwave photons to gang up by resonance, potentially increasing the threshold of exposure necessary for an effect (though simultaneously eliminating the abi
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It's the reason why a microwave oven is tuned to 2.4GHz, as that is the frequency at which water molecules, including those in your body, resonate.
Water doesn't have a sharp absorption peak, and 2.4GHz is in fact picked to NOT absorb too efficiently. At some frequencies water would absorb the radiation so well that only the outermost layer of food would be heated.
Re: (Score:2)
It's the reason why a microwave oven is tuned to 2.4GHz
No, it's not. You can use just about any frequency for RF heating. The reason 2.4GHz is used is because it's cheap and easy to make cavity magnetrons that produce a hell of a lot of power in a compact package, and 2.4GHz has a very wide ISM (Industrial, Scientific and Medical) band where no licence is required. They need quite a wide band, because the magnetrons aren't very stable and drift a lot.
You could make a UHF "microwave" oven using the 433MH
Re: (Score:2)
That's right - stay the heck out of the Amateur radio bands! We've got specially-resonant pitchforks ready, just in case. 8-) The 433 MHz ISM band is supposedly available in region 2 only [wikipedia.org], which does not include the US. Also, it's not listed in CFR Title 47, Part 18 [gpo.gov].
There's an exception for Part 15 devices to use 433-434 MHz [gpo.gov], but that's for shipping container ID devices only.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
I don't see how photons of lower energy could be causing us problems.
And so the question inevitably arises:
Do you in fact know enough about photons and radiation for your failure to see any problems to imply with any degree of probability that there are no problem problem?
Or should our conclusion be simply "no, you don't, do you?".
Your implicit assumption that higher energy photons are universally more dangerous than lower energy photons would seem to speak for the latter.
Re:Fry (Score:5, Informative)
Your implicit assumption that higher energy photons are universally more dangerous than lower energy photons would seem to speak for the latter.
This has been experimentally verified in experiments on the photoelectric effect [wikipedia.org]. Indeed, Einstein was awarded the Nobel Prize in physics in 1921 "for his services to Theoretical Physics, and especially for his discovery of the law of the photoelectric effect" (emphasis mine; notice that Einstein did not win the prize "because of relativity", as many would assume). Below a certain energy level per photon, nothing happens no matter how intense the light. Above the threshold, something happens (with the rate dependent on the intensity of the light).
Of course, thermal warming can also happen. In recent years, microwave-assisted organic synthesis was a big fad. But the most careful studies have demonstrated that the so-called "microwave effect" is simple thermal heating in all known cases, and despite theoretical explanations for why a non-thermal microwave effect might exist (going so far as to predict the types of reactions for which the largest effect might be found) and papers claiming the discovery of such effects, effects seen to date are purely thermal. See this J Org Chem paper [acs.org]. Any effect we see from a cell phone in the pocket would appear to be the same effect as simply warming our thigh a miniscule bit.
Re:Fry - not (Score:1)
These systems typically have short range in air and thus require many antennas closely spaced. The consequence is that distances are smaller and therefore, due to the inverse square law, the power needed at each antenna is much smaller and the average power in the environment will be much smaller.
Re: (Score:2)
Dear sir:
I wish to protest in the strongest possible terms your implication that there is a health hazard from using 4G communication devices. Many of my friends use them and only a few have had their heads explode.
Sincerely, Brig. Gen. Brian O'Connell (Scanner). P.S. And don't call me baby
Re: (Score:1)
What are you, a vampire?
Ah, the sun, the sun, it is irradiating me!
did anyone read the summary and think (Score:2)
"Smooth move, Ex-Lax!"
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, as soon as I connected "millimetre" & "radar". I wonder how long the thread can go without actually mentioning the book & the author. /me gets his glass knife ready.
Re: (Score:1)
Siebel will break it! (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Yikes, you can't compare this to 4G (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
<sarcasm>Well I am truly sorry that someone outside the US is trying to do research. I'll stop mine immediately and wait for our benevolent super power for life to do the research and give me what I need. I'll just be over in this cave eating raw animals. I wouldn't want to be the reason for another US "bashing".
</sarcasm>
This post was tagged to comply with the Sarcasm-impaired Aid Directive (SAD)
Sorry you didn't get the point (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Sorry you didn't get the point (Score:5, Funny)
You're missing the point.
We don't need another clueless USA bashing headline.
Europe Is Testing 12.5 Gbps Wireless
What exactly could be done to the headline to mollify you?
Godless Communists in Europe Testing Unwholesome, Anti-Family Services
This is not a criticism of America, though the comments make some still-valid criticisms of US telecoms services.
Re: (Score:2)
There are multiple problems with this statement.
1. "Europe" isn't doing the research, some European researchers are.
2. It's not a valid comparison of technologies.
You're making it sound like I'm bashing Europe when I've said no such thing. Europe (along with the US and many other countries produces very good research. I didn't even mention godlessness
Re: (Score:2)
Well, with that kind of grasp of satire at least we know for sure that you're American.
Re: (Score:2)
Given the way things are going, it looks like the mental abilities of AIs and the average person will converge in a few years time
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
1. "Europe" isn't doing the research, some European researchers are.
It's EU funded and coordinated research. It should have been "EU is testing...", because Europe is a continent, but otherwise it's correct.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
These 30GHz+ links operate over a very short distance, less than 1 Km, and must have a cl
great....overage-city in no time. (Score:3, Funny)
12.5Gbps which means 1.5625GBps and the data transfer limits we have in the states here, it will take 3.2 seconds to be in overage-city.
Hmmm...isn't that faster than a Porsche's or Ferrari's 0 to 60 speed?
[sarcasm]The good thing is....it'll be at least 5 years since they have it in Europe until we have it here[/sarcasm]
Whoa, This Can Be Big (Score:2, Interesting)
Imagine no more ISPs. Netflix can stop throttling. Computers only need RAM and boot from the cloud.
Will my 4G Google phone need a small power station or will a standard adapter do?
Re: (Score:2)
I swear that could be a mantra for some new geek religion...
I for one (Score:4, Funny)
welcome our new 12.5Gbps brain tumor inducing overlords
wrong link in article (Score:4, Informative)
the correct link is http://www.ist-iphobac.org/ [ist-iphobac.org], not http://www.iphobac-survey.org/ [iphobac-survey.org]
Association with 3G misleading (Score:5, Informative)
We'll Need towers on ever street-corner! (Score:1)
One reasons the 60ghz(5mm) mentioned in TFA is so great is that it won't make it from the living room into the bedroom so you don't get interference when you use it to go from the ps3 to the wall mounted flatscreen.
1mm(300ghz) is well into the water absorption band, to get out of it you'd need to get up around to 10 *micro*meter wave lengths. EHF for cellphones would require towers all over the place, the range wouldn't even be as good as wifi unless you jacked the power high enough that it would scare me
Re: (Score:2)
Wouldn't that be actually a good thing from the safety point of view? That would mean it has very bad depth penetration, and if it damages anything, it'll be the most easily replaceable part of the body. It's also one full of nerves, so you're likely to notice that something's wrong soon enough. Something that penetrates deeper could quietly cook the brain instead. While I'd certainly prefer neither, if I have to pick one, I'd certain
Re: (Score:2)
I'm not sure if you're getting what I mean.
What I'm saying is that people fear radiation because it can cause damage that accumulates unnoticeably over a long time, until you suddenly realize you have cancer several months too late.
A type of radiation that is tuned to trigger the pain receptors in the skin would be much safer because you'd notice it much faster and at lower intensities, and the damage would be done to something that quite easily and constantly regenerates.
Death of Cable (Score:2)
This technology could drive all the nails in the coffin lid for cable TV. At these download speeds one could download all of the programs for all of these channels in a minute or two. The only reason for further contact that day would be news updates. Of course we will need some type of hard drive arrangement that can record 12.5Gps..
Environmentally friend? (Score:2)
Second, will the new technologies be more environment friendly for production and disposal?
What about energy consumption?
And finally, do the pros surpass cons?
Zero to... (Score:2, Funny)
Imagine a Beowulf cluster of these. (Score:2)
.......ups wrong technology.
But anyway imagine a Beowulf cluster of these!
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah: I'm imagining opening the pantry door and the popcorn starts popping. B-)
Logarithmic relation between usefulness and speed (Score:1)
One of the boundary conditions of internet speed is the size of the material being sent over the wireless network. If all you have is small sound files, then you'll need to be sending over years of music to fully use the 12.5 Gbps. The usefulness of internet speed increases only logarithmically. There is almost as much use for 1000000 Gbps as 100 Gbps. Only a small portion of the people actually using the internet would see any difference between the 1000000 and 100 Gbps. Once you hit the critical valu
What "Europe"? (Score:2)
Editors, please be a bit more sensitive. There is no country "Europe", and most of us on the continent Europe do not want it to become a country. :)
We are only stuck with some assholes that we did not vote for, that created a "government" that we can't really vote for, and that we explicitly can't vote not to exist in the first place.
Americans who were stuck with an asshole President, should understand this.
So don't say "Europe", as if it were a single country. It's like calling North-America a country, and
Re: (Score:2)
Editors, please be a bit more sensitive. There is no country "Europe", and most of us on the continent Europe do not want it to become a country We are only stuck with some assholes that we did not vote for, that created a "government" that we can't really vote for, and that we explicitly can't vote not to exist in the first place. Americans who were stuck with an asshole President, should understand this. :)
We've understood it fine since at least the Civil War.
(In case you're not familiar with the real i
Re: (Score:2)
"Flyover country" isn't, and hasn't been, in third-world status, and isn't the part of the country that tried to secede, anyway. And the principal policy that the Confederate States (their name for themselves, as opposed to the made-up poppycock label you'
IPHOBAC (Score:3, Funny)
Fear of Anonymous Cowards is a serious issue. They should get help.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
At 30-300 Ghz wireless toasts you!
Not if there is a wall between you and the transmitter though.
Re: (Score:2)
You mean the prices where you live?
Well, we got better prices. Partially because the EU bureaucrats made monopolies mostly a thing of the past (except for the owner of the last mile, who still has a monopoly, for which Germany actively has to pay fines).
(I know that this is not yet totally true for other things like gas/power yet. But for mobile phones, it worked out pretty well so far. We can get nearly the latest phones including a 20 euro a month plan, with a flat rate, and actually get 200 euro or more