OLPC's XO As a Wireless Hacking Tool 66
twistedmoney99 writes "InformIT.com has a whimsical yet intriguing look at the OLPC in an article series titled "One Leet Pwning Child — Give one, Get Owned". Part one details how to upgrade the core system with some extras, but part two is where the fun begins as the author converts the OLPC into a lean green hacking machine to enable wireless sniffing, setup the OLPC for vulnerability assessments, and stage the device for a little autopwning with Metasploit."
Re: Screw the OLPC (Score:5, Insightful)
I'd say the OLPC project [laptop.org] has succeeded in a technical respect. It produced a computer that's rugged, cheap, power-efficient and flexible. And for the combination of properties, better than what existed before. What's more, if it didn't break open the market of cheap, ultra-mobile machines like the Asus EeePC, then at least accelerated that. Causing millions of people to use smaller, more eco-friendly computing devices than before.
From the education side, success needs more time to show, if it will happen. But progress is blocked here by political or market forces rather than technological options.
So even if the OLPC project hasn't (yet) succeeded in helping poor kids to connect to the rest of the world, and improve their education, it has done 2 things: a) realize part of that dream, and b) bring that goal closer.
-- Oh and btw. it's Nicholas Negroponte
Re: Screw the OLPC (Score:4, Interesting)
A dream can be a dangerous thing. The dream of nuclear energy can all too easily be perverted to the quest for nuclear weapons.
The dream of the OLPC was powerful, but it has been perverted into a Microsoft market development system.
Re: (Score:1)
Sugar, in its current state, is holding back the capabilities of the xo. Seems fitting that the devs jumped ship after all the big pieces were finished and it was down to the grueling and monotonous (yet very necessary) polishing of all the small stuff.
I'm not a fan of MS, but if the Sugar proponents can't g
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Mission Accomplished.
XFCE (Score:1)
su
yum install xfdesktop xfce-utils xfce-mcs-plugins xfce4-session
yum install xfce4-mixer system-config-date xfce4-genmon-plugin xfce4-systemload-plugin
yum install wifi-radar
(Edit
Once that's done, you'll have a much more useful XO.
Sugar is nice, but it just isn't ready yet.
That method is easier than putting Ubunut on the XO.
http://olpcnews.com/forum/index.php?topic=1435.0 [olpcnews.com]
and
http://olpcnews.com/forum/index.php?topic=1436.0 [olpcnews.com]
Shou
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Symbiosis. It is perfectly reasonable for two groups with different goals to help each other out, especially if it has the potential to benefit both groups.
Re: (Score:1, Offtopic)
Re: (Score:1, Offtopic)
I'm not sure I agree, obviously, because I think, and wouldn't you agree, that the mission of the OLPC is inseparable from how we evaluate its success, failure, or functionality?
Also, before you say calling Negroponte an ass was name calling, I would submit that it would be hard to find people who would disagree with it as a general purpose title.
Re: (Score:1)
Regardless, calling someone an ass is flamebait even when it's true.
Using his words to describe the mission was off-topic because the topic is: "OLPC's XO As a Wireless Hacking Tool."
Re: (Score:1, Flamebait)
Oh, that's just not fair. Surely "flaimebait" must follow the same legal restrictions for slander or libel, i.e. if its true, it isn't.
Re: (Score:1)
From the Slashdot FAQ:
Offtopic -- A comment which has nothing to do with the story it's linked to (song lyrics, obscene ascii art, comments about another topic entirely) is Offtopic.
Flamebait -- Flamebait refers to comments whose sole purpose is to insult and enrage. If someone is not-so-subtly picking a fight (racial insults are a dead giveaway), it's Flamebait.
Troll -- A Troll is similar to Flamebait, but slightly more refined. This is a prank comment intended to provoke indignant (or just confused) responses.
We've wasted enough electrons here, I think.
Re: (Score:2)
1 page link (Score:5, Informative)
and the google cache [64.233.183.104]
Re: (Score:1)
Awwwwwwesommmmmmme. (Score:1)
lovely... (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
I will not tolerate such bullshit, last week I helped a friendly African president transfer all his money to my account because of some conflict... or something like that.
Re:lovely... (Score:5, Funny)
Autoconfig? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Autoconfig? (Score:5, Interesting)
Hello. I am the son of Mgumbe Kwnzalangahara (Score:1)
Neato! (Score:2)
Wasn't it the whole point? (Score:3, Interesting)
Wasn't it the whole point behind these things---to make kids more technical/geeky. It would've been a complete waste if everyone just used it for email and word processing.
Now if only actual kids in 3rd world countries did cool things with these laptops---like coding/hacking/whatever.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Now if only actual kids in 3rd world countries did cool things with these laptops---like coding/hacking/whatever.
From this Heise article [heise.de] you can read:
Since mass production of the first generation XO kicked off in November 2007, 600,000 units have been manufactured and distributed to Peru, Uruguay, Mongolia, Haiti, Rwanda, Mexico, Cambodia, Ethiopia, Ghana, Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as in the USA and Canada.
I assume you're thinking most of those 600,000 XO laptops will NOT be used by actual kids to do cool things with?
Hasn't hit Slashdot yet, anyway (Score:1)
Eventually, we'll also be hearing about some of those kids doing geeky-cool stuff with their XO, but AFAIK no story like that has hit Slashdot.
what about aircrack? (Score:4, Insightful)
On an active network, with a bit of patience, aircrack & wireshark can get you all the information you need without leaving a trace, (granted if its a WPA network with a good key its a lot of patience).
Why is this noteworthy? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Give a man a fish and he'll eat for a day (Score:4, Funny)
News Flash (Score:4, Funny)
Obviously this must be stopped now! Think of the children.
Once they gain this forbidden knowledge, they'll threaten the social order in the god forsaken dirt hole where they live.
1. Distribute computers.
2. Children become L337 H4X0RZ
3. ???
4. Cthulhu
Irony (Score:3, Insightful)
Am I the only one who finds that more than a little amusing?
Sheldon
In other words (Score:3, Insightful)
Teach a kid to fish, he eats for a lifetime.
Give a kid a laptop, and he empties your bank account.
Teach a kid to program, and your job is outsourced to him.
Just tweeked my XO (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Too costly (Score:2)
*G1G1 price. I know they were alleged to be paying for additional laptops for impoverished children in foreign countries, but that seems really difficult for an outside party to audit, to me.
It does disappoint me that Negroponte doesn't want to think of the laptops as
Eee PC (Score:2, Insightful)
Why not just use an Eee PC, it's a solid computer, and with the price you end up getting significantly more. Coming from someone who owns an Eee and has used an XO several times; I can tell you that the XO is inferior in so many ways. Not just with little things either, anyone who has tried using that screen in non-ideal conditions knows what I mean.
Re: (Score:1)
The only real trouble I had was a stuck key that I fixed by peeling up the contact surface and sticking a tiny piece of double sided tape in there to act as a spacer.
Re: (Score:2)
XO screen is often poorly used by software, especially when displaying thin lines at an angle and colored text, so it may not be the best for perfect viewing conditions. However it's far superior to most small laptops when those conditions are bad (ambient light from sun or close sources and such).
Re: (Score:2)
- Extremely good wifi range (far better than the Eee)
- Very long battery life (again, better than the Eee)
Both of these features in a small, highly portable machine are perfect for extended wardriving, sniffing, etc.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Dear god I'm turning into an Eee fanboy
Brightly colored plastic != Stealth (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
A slightly different take on this ... (Score:4, Interesting)
Specific example: One of my other toys is a Mac Powerbook, which talks to the Airport that's attached to our local LAN (with a linux firewall/router). Yesterday was a very nice day, and I did as I've often done on other nice days: I carried the Mac out to the patio and tried to work from there. Without much success.
While I've done this a lot over the past few years, this time the wifi went into its "fluctuating access" mode. The wifi signal strength, according to the Mac's little wifi icon, changed on a time scale of seconds from near full strength to various intermediate valued, to no access at all. I grabbed my OLPC, carried it out to the patio, and it reported a constant near-max signal level from the Airport. But I can hardly do any work on the OLPC, because of the crippled Sugar GUI. The two laptops have nearly the same pixel count on their screens, but the Mac lets me have 3 or 4 non-overlapping Terminal windows open at the same time, while the OLPC only allows one.
Anyway, since the OLPC seemed to have no problems with the wifi, I'm wondering if I could use it somehow to diagnose the problem. The few times I've asked about such things on a Mac forum, the responses could be summarized as variants of the "It Just Works" mantra. I shouldn't worry my little head about things like this that are beyond my ken; I should just accept what's given to me. No clues about how I might diagnose such problems. Either that, or I should just pay for new hardware, which might not have the same problems.
Now, I'm quite aware that to the media, the very fact that I'd consider installing software to analyze local wifi transmissions immediately puts me into the "hacker" category. I try not to tell them that I've been known (and paid) to write such software. ("What sort of shady corporations would pay a hacker like you to do their dirty work?" Dirty as in diagnose and fix problems.
But it does occur to me that people here might be a bit more sympathetic. And it seems to me that if the poor kids in remote places can learn to use their OLPCs to "hack" the network around them, they could be a real service to their communities. The commercial folks aren't supplying their communities with service, and probably never will. Here in the US, the comm companies can't be bothered to supply decent service to remote areas, and never will unless those evil government regulators force them to.
So maybe we need an open project to take tools like the OLPC, the EeePC, and others like them, and turn them into good "hacking" platforms. That way, people in poor and rural areas can support their own comm system.
To me, this article just tells me how the media will spin it, to make such self-help efforts look criminal and subversive. But I can't even find decent diagnostic help for a wifi problem here in a Boston suburb from the makers of the equipment. Maybe it's time we get serious about finding ways to fix such problems ourselves.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
You've just encountered one of the big differences between a Mac and the XO-1. The Mac has an average wifi
I'm confused... (Score:2, Insightful)
News Flash! (Score:2)
Film at 11.
Well, people keep saying OLPC... (Score:2)
Sounds like a great educational opportunity, indeed!
Might be doable (Score:2)
It would be better to see this done on something like an E, at least that you can actually buy.