Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Power Businesses Hardware Technology

Wireless Power Companies Merge, But No Real-Life Devices Yet 48

A hopeful anonymous reader writes "It looks like Splashpower (Or what is left of it anyway) was purchased by the company behind eCoupled. Hopefully this means that interoperable wireless power is one step closer to reality as two of the companies trying to comercialize the technology are now the same." (US readers, read "administration" as "bankruptcy.")
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Wireless Power Companies Merge, But No Real-Life Devices Yet

Comments Filter:
  • please add (Score:1, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward
    vaporware tag to this story
  • Putting your head between your portable kettle and your microwave emitting kettle charger can seriously damage your health.
  • by igb ( 28052 ) on Tuesday May 06, 2008 @10:10AM (#23311578)
    In UK law, administration is closer to US Chapter 11 than Chapter 7; the company is assumed to be capable of being returned to the status of a going concern, rather than a set of assets and liabilities pending liquidation. But in the US the management of the company would normally remain as debtors in possession; in the UK an administrator is more hands-on than a US trustee, has to be agreed by the court, and works for the creditors rather than the shareholders. ian
  • The acquisition reinforces Fulton's industry-leading position in the rapidly growing wireless power industry by expanding both the breadth and depth of Fulton's substantial patent portfolio, comprised of over 250 patents granted or pending worldwide.
    Whaaaa? 250 patents on electromagnetic induction [wikipedia.org]?
  • And around the year 2100 FAA will give the OK for this technology to be used in the planes (but not during landing & take-off).

  • ... is prevent my fillings from lighting up when I turn on my toaster.
  • Having a brick in my pocket with my iPhone will attract the babes. (referring to pic on one of the sites in the article).

    I was expecting something else, like...

    Tesla was focused in his research for the practical development of a system for wireless transmission of power and a utilization system. Tesla said, in "On electricity", Electrical Review (Jan. 27, 1897):

    "In fact, progress in this field has given me fresh hope that I shall see the fulfillment of one of my fondest dreams; namely, the transmission of p
  • by FictionPimp ( 712802 ) on Tuesday May 06, 2008 @10:30AM (#23311786) Homepage
    I thought tesla already perfected wireless power and the US government covered it all up. Didn't he once drive a electric car using a wireless power source he made from a few bucks in parts from a radio shop?
    • by Yvanhoe ( 564877 )
      A radio shop...
    • There is a claim that Tesla drove an electric car powered only by a small device that he made from simple parts purchased from a retail store, yes.

      However, there is no verification of this claim (like many of the other claims of Tesla's supposedly-amazing inventions.)

      While there is a great tendency to credit these claims (I have it too) there is no supporting evidence except one supposed-eyewitness account. The best I would say is that if I would believe it of anyone, I would believe it of Tesla, who saw the design for efficiently producing AC fully-formed in his head while reciting (or was it listening to?) a poem.

    • I thought tesla already perfected wireless power and the US government covered it all up.
      Yeah, but when it comes to wireless power, lightning (and gov't coverups) never strikes twice.

      Didn't he once drive a electric car using a wireless power source he made from a few bucks in parts from a radio shop?
      Ok, now you're telling me the flux capacitor is real?
  • Holy dipshit, batman, wirelesss power? Is this Tesla [wikipedia.org] or PT Barnum? [wikipedia.org] I'd REALLY feel foolish if I actually R this FA, is there some Rube Goldberg explanation of how, exactly, "wireless power" would work?

    I think perhaps you're either a little over a month late [wikipedia.org] or almost a week late [uncyclopedia.org].
    • I like that you post the Wikipedia link which explains that PT Barnum never said that.
    • I'd REALLY feel foolish if I actually R this FA, is there some Rube Goldberg explanation of how, exactly, "wireless power" would work?

      It does work.

      Here is a Popular Science explanation on how it does:

      http://www.popsci.com/scitech/gallery/2008-01/electricity-air [popsci.com]

      And also from another article [popsci.com]:

      The key to wireless power is resonance. Think of a wineglass that shatters when an opera singer hits just the right note. When the voice matches the glass's resonant frequency--the tone you hear when you tap the glass--th

      • by sm62704 ( 957197 )
        So basically it's a transformer with the coils seven feet apart? How much power has to be supplied to the transmitting coils to light the sixty watt bulb?

        And it seems that for resonance to work, the bulb's recieving coil would have to be EXACTLY in the right spot, to at least a half wave of the power source.

        Now, if they were talking about an LCD calculator that was powered by a coil that was inducted by the house current in the walls I might swallow that, but the kind of power they're talking about?

        I'm scep
    • by dwibby ( 1281370 )

      Well, considering it uses something along the lines of magnetic induction--"inductively coupled power circuit that dynamically seeks resonance," as they [ecoupled.com] put it--neither Mr. Barnum nor Mr. Goldberg are very much involved here. They have a few cool prototype they demoed at CES2008 [gizmosforgeeks.com]. It seems that they're aiming at battery chargers more than the power grid. You could probably also read [ecoupled.com] a few of their patent if you'd like a more in depth explanation. It also sounds like [ecoupled.com] it automagically handles charging multiple

    • by kesuki ( 321456 )
      Wireless power has been used as long as I've been alive. Granted, this has been in lighting devices, such as neon and fluorescent lights... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluorescent_lamp [wikipedia.org]

      I mean I'm surprised that you didn't know, that like neon signs don't have a filament, and neither do fluorescent lights... haven't you ever broken one? haven't you ever looked at one up close when it was off?

      And for you lucky Plasma TV owners, didn't you ever wonder, where the wires ended, and where the pixelated happiness
      • by sm62704 ( 957197 )
        The gas is ionized by the electricity, which gets to the gas to be ionized THROUGH WIRES. Haven't you noticed that your forty inch flourescents have WIRES coming from them? No, there are no wires inside the tube, the tube contains the gas that is ionized by the electricalk current. There's no magic there.
  • ... of vapor
  • by hansraj ( 458504 ) on Tuesday May 06, 2008 @10:58AM (#23312158)

    Hopefully this means that interoperable wireless power is one step closer to reality..
    So you mean "one step closer" in a Zeno sense?
  • Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • but how close are they to wireless spell checking?

    companies trying to comercialize the technology
  • What about a microwave frequency laser? Low enough power that it doesn't cook things. But that should allow you to target devices and deliver a much higher efficiency.

    Any thoughts?
  • Really, it's pretty bloody simple. Hook a POE adapter into a wireless ethernet bridge.

    Voila! Power over wireless ethernet.

  • He can editorialize about Britishisms, but he can't correct the spelling of "commercialize?"

Understanding is always the understanding of a smaller problem in relation to a bigger problem. -- P.D. Ouspensky

Working...