3D Self-Replicating Printer to be Released Under GNU License 313
Rob O'Neill writes "A Kiwi open source developer is working on a self-replicating 3D printer, RepRap, to be made available under the GNU license. 'The 3D printer works by building components up in layers of plastic, mainly polylactic acid (PLA), which is a bio-degradable polymer made from lactic acid. The technology already exists, but commercial machines are very expensive. They also can't copy themselves, and they can't be manipulated by users, says Vik Olliver. RepRap has a different idea. The team, which is spread over New Zealand, the UK and the US, develops and gives away the designs for its much cheaper machine, which also has self-copying capabilities. It wants to make the machine available to anybody — including small communities in the developing world, as well as people in the developed world, says Olliver. Accordingly, the RepRap machine is distributed, at no cost, under the GNU (General Public License).'"
GNU license? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Real headline (Score:1, Interesting)
Re:Really? (Score:5, Interesting)
Also, it sounds like it would be trivial to build a PC "board". It wouldn't have to be flat, and you wouldn't need to etch it. You could have places on your device to surface attach ICs.
copy of a copy of a copy? (Score:4, Interesting)
And would interesting mutations get in, like in DNA replication, I wonder?
Re:GNU license? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:It doesn't really self-replicate (Score:5, Interesting)
And $650 $45000.
Missing the forest (Score:5, Interesting)
However, in my opinion (such a rare thing on the internet) they are so enthralled with their grand ideas that it prevents them from actually getting anywhere. From their point of view, any design that can not replicate itself (except the metal) is an inherent failure. The other properties of the machine only start to matter once that is achieved.
While there is nothing wrong with the goal, it means that there is almost no drive at all to produce a machine that is practical for anything BUT duplicating its own plastic parts. Their design calls for basic, lumpy plastic bits and so there is no emphasis on better precision. They are only willing to use materials that can be made yourself, and so there is no chance of it working with better quality plastics. They have designed a machine that needs no small parts or detail work and so there is no emphasis on getting a print head design or motors that supports a better resolution, not that the current plastic could support a better resolution.
Five years from now they are going to announce they they have been able to successfully create a machine that can cheaply and easily replicate itself and that now they will work on making it better. And not even
Re:Really? (Score:3, Interesting)
Currently it only builds things out of extruded thermoplastic. But it would certainly be possible (and this is a future plan) to use other materials. From the plastic extrusion they're doing now, it's a relatively small step to add a solder-extruder as well, allowing for circuit boards to be assembled.
Actually manufacturing semi-conductors is, granted, a little further off.
Re:Really? (Score:2, Interesting)
Mod Parent up (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Really? (Score:4, Interesting)
Rapid prototyping and even direct-to-manufacture with the selective sintering machines is becoming much more accessible and widespread.
Think of it as mimeograph and dot matrix from 20 years ago vs the mundane throwaway photo-quality walmart variety printers now.
"Hang on, mama, I need to print out a new carburetor before we can go to the tractor pull!"
Re:The singularity (Score:1, Interesting)