From "Happy Hacking" to "Screw You" 243
tquid writes "Trying to bridge the digital divide in Canada's poorest postal code, a principled group of hackers adopt "open source"-based technology spun off from an MIT project. Then the terms on the hardware are changed, and changed again, and then firmware to lock out the frustrated group's software is installed, screwing them out of their investment and many hours of development work."
Anyone know the details of the MIT agreement? (Score:5, Interesting)
So talk to them? (Score:2, Interesting)
You didn't disable the auto-update? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Anyone know the details of the MIT agreement? (Score:4, Interesting)
EULA doesn't apply (Score:2, Interesting)
I was considering Meraki... (Score:5, Interesting)
Please forgive my English, it's Monday.
Re:Anyone know the details of the MIT agreement? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:I used to work a couple blocks from there (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:I don't think they are viable (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Illegal? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Anyone know the details of the MIT agreement? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Vendor lockin is a myth (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:I was considering Meraki... (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Vendor lockin is a myth (Score:5, Interesting)
The bottom line is that Meraki has a losing business plan, and that's why we're seeing all this thrashing. There's no way they can make money fast enough to satisfy their investors at $50/pop, they need to monetize their dashboard system, they need ads, and that's just not what most end-users want. All of this stupid price model tweaking stuff they're doing is almost certainly motivated by promises they made to investors that they subsequently couldn't keep.
If they are in fact poisoning the firmware (I have two Meraki minis, but haven't had a chance to confirm that their firmware is poisoned), I'm pretty sure this is a felony, but I'm not sure it's worth the trouble to prove it and fix it. Given that the open mesh boxes are $50 each, I can just buy two and replace the two Merakis I bought as a test project, and I'll come out ahead. It's too bad for the people who bought hundreds or thousands of these devices, though. For them, it might be worth consulting a lawyer.
Re:OT: Corollary to Tiller's Rule (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Vendor lockin is a myth (Score:3, Interesting)
Markets with rational actors may function perfectly, but markets rarely provide everyone with sufficient information to act rationally -- and something that tends to be ignored by much "textbook economy talk" is how often it can be in one actor's best interest to try to prevent other actors from obtaining sufficient information to make informed choices. Consumers benefit from a wide choice of producers, but producers benefit from consumers only being able to choose their product.
It's easy to talk about "two way streets," but very often our business transactions aren't that at all: the companies we buy from set all the terms of our sales, and as consumers, our only option is to accept their terms or walk away. (For many workers, this is true of employment contracts, too.) In the case of this article's subject, Meraki essentially changed the terms after the sale, making actual changes to the router which changed the viability of the "micro-ISP" business model they were explicitly selling their product for. If it was truly a "two way street," it wouldn't have been in Meraki's self-interest to screw a percentage of their customers -- the conditions that allowed them to make that business decision include the difficulty in their customers switching to another competing service. And despite what the Big Golden Book of Economics might suggest, this is not some kind of strange and wild condition like nothing we've ever seen before in the business world.
Re:EULA doesn't apply (Score:1, Interesting)
As someone has pointed out, GPL v2 doesn't have any non-Tivo-ization clauses, but the combination of points (1) and (2) make it hard for them to lock things down. (of course, they could always do what a cell phone company does, and sign you up for a service contract rather than selling a product. I wasn't willing to put my credit card details in on their website to see which it would be...)
I'm rather bummed about these developments personally, as some of my colleagues have done some cool mesh networking research at UMass with these devices, and it sounds like it won't be possible anymore.