Weird Science Offered As University Class 137
ludwigvan968 writes "The ACTLab at the University of Texas at Austin is making waves with its Weird Science class. The link is to the TA's blog with documentation of some of the projects: a laser harp, a 3D environment constructed with fog and an LCD projector, and a 'water bridge' using a 50,000-volt transformer. Next semester, they're introducing a new class called 'Disruptive Technologies.'"
What about the girl (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Women are a Dark Art? (Score:2)
Solomon
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Baseless assertion? (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2, Troll)
Re: (Score:1)
I just watched Blazing Saddles this weekend. I laughed, but no one forced me to. I didn't see any reference to being stick-in-the-mud for not laughing at the racial humor in that movie, but I did see two black people in the mud (along with a hand cart)...pretty funny scene, actually. :) Folks around here need to lighten up.
Hey, where the white women at??Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
But that's half the fun!
corner case? (Score:2)
If this is a rational world, why would rational women read cosmo? Why would rational men read maxim, look at playboy, or watch the man show?
Anyways, time for an assumption, given your wife has a PHD I would postulate that you too, have at least reached some manner of success in your career, education, or business. If not, you're probably good in bed and she's quite a bit older. Presuming gigolo gold diggers post on myspace not slashdot, I guess you both have achieved a nominal degree of success in at leas
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
There is nothing rational about women.
Would you care to support that statement? If you cannot or choose not to, what does that say about your rationality? (It is worth noting I believe you are likely a male rather than a female who writes to degrade and misunderstand members of her own gender.)
In lieu of evidence backing up your claim, I offer my wife as an example contradicting your generalization (even if my assumption regarding your sex is incorrect). A lynchpin of the relationship I have with her is our mutual ability to consistently solve our problems rationally. To reinforce that point, her name is prefixed with the title of "doctor", a respected and enlightened status one does not achieve without the ability to reason.
Not good enough. "Doctor" doesn't automatically equal "rational", in fact in many instances it can mean nothing more than "able to regurgitate and parrot dogma".
Re:Baseless assertion? (Score:5, Insightful)
Can we all join the fun?
My wife is smarter than me, more fit, better educated and a better programmer. I'm just barely more qualified with networks and architecture, and I'm definitely less of a cook. I have an extraordinary amount of respect for her.
But if I ever accused her of being a rational being, she'd break my cranium, and then subtly change something to keep me off balance.
See? Geeks do know about women. Just not very much.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, it is fair enough to say that nobody is entirely rational. As I mentioned in an earlier response, that was not my intention. To clarify the point, it is incorrect to say: a person is irrational because they are a woman. Perhaps we can accurately say: a person may be either rational or irrational, disregarding gender.
Your humility is commendable and something most of the rest of us could learn a great deal from.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
If you think there's anything consciously rational about the way _human beings_ usually make everyday decisions, you really need to go back to school. Even smart people do suboptimal/irrational/dumb things all the flippin' time. But unless you're a
Too much extrapolation. (Score:2)
You are assuming far too much from my comments. What I wrote is what I meant. But I want to be clear, so here I go again.
Re: (Score:2)
Second, you cannot offer contradicting examples "in lieu" of evidence, you arrogant vagina. Your attempt at grammatical decor is so disgusting, so contorted, you could substitute that sentence in for a whole week of pr0n videos at any old BDSM site a
You read too deeply. (Score:2)
The original comment was: “[t]here is nothing rational about women”, to which I made two points in response.
One, that holding such a firm belief (having a vagina instead of a penis disqualifies an individual for rationality) without support is itself irrational.
Two, that the generalization is false because I can provide a single counter-example (“in place” of attempt at proof), which I attempted to reinforce with personal experience (the ability to work out problems rationally
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Garry: That's not a bad idea.
Wyatt: What?
Garry: Making a girl. Actually making a girl. Like Frankenstein... except cuter.
Wyatt: You're serious?
Garry: Look me in the eye. Do I look serious?
Victor Moritz: You're crazy!
Henry Frankenstein: Crazy, am I? We'll see whether I'm crazy or not.
Wyatt: Gary Wallace, that's-that's gross! That's sick! I am not digging up dead girls!
Re: (Score:2)
Wait, didn't they do that movie already? I could have sworn... of course!
Fredrick: Would you mind telling me whose brain I did put in?
Igor: And you won't be angry?
Fredrick: I will *not* be angry!
Igor: Abby Someone.
Fredrick: Abby Someone. Abby Who?
Igor: Abby Normal.
Fredrick: Abby Normal.
Igor: I'm almost sure that was the name.
There you go. I'm sure Frankenstein and Abby would be quite the couple.
Re: (Score:2)
This is science, not fiction, DOH! (Score:4, Funny)
You dumb - any decent slashdotter would know that there are NO SUCH THINGS as girlfriends. Face it, IT'S A MYTH!
Re: (Score:2)
Oh yes, Queen's English is not dead yet and Great British cusses can hold their own against the cultural imports like "MoFo", "bee-atch" and "Ho's". Small victories indeed.
I want a mythbusters class as well (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:1, Funny)
And I want a Real Genius class (Score:4, Informative)
And popcorn. LOTS of popcorn!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
(You'd be amazed how long it takes some people to catch that one)
Re: (Score:2)
Seriously, you would spontaneously explode.
Re: (Score:1)
Re:I want a mythbusters class as well (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Disruptive? (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
No, that would be the EMI/RFI emissions from the water bridge. That's probably where they got the idea. :-)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Chris Mattern
Re: (Score:2)
It goes something like this:
9V battery
Relay (naturally-on or 2-way variety)
Button
Couple of wires.
Wired like this: Battery->Button->relay coil->relay switch->battery
The dangerous points are the connections either side of the coil on the relay.
Because it's a naturally-on switch, that will be a circuit. It will power the relay's coil, causing it to flip the switch, breaking the circuit. The coil is now charged, but can't discharge because the circuit is broken. If
The next logical step... (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:1, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Great (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Cool Stuff (Score:3, Insightful)
Heard in class (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
We are sick and tired of having to replace the floor every time one of you little fools creates an ICBM instead of a woman!
Obligatory --and how! (Score:3, Funny)
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0090305/ [imdb.com]
Truly one of Canada's great contributions to the rest of the world. Kelly ROCKS!!!
Re: (Score:1)
Or was that my dreams? Sorry...
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Huh?
FTFIMDB:
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Fine (Score:2, Funny)
former actlabbie here (Score:3, Informative)
http://home.actlab.utexas.edu/~charlesv/ [utexas.edu]
Re: (Score:2)
Laser harp? (Score:3, Interesting)
Truly disruptive technology might be an "intestinal auger" with rheostat. Somehow, I suppose the FDA won't allow that piece of equipment to be added to the body...
Re: (Score:1, Redundant)
Thanks!
Let's call the product "AnuAug"....
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Skip the dining hall (Score:2)
Anthony Michael Hall (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
The problem with that is that he'll know your grade before you even take the class. [imdb.com]
3D Fog Environments (Score:3, Interesting)
Eventually, I'd love to see a way to do this that doesn't require the fog, like maybe using lasers to intersect at a single point in 3D space in such a way that the polarization reflects the light back to the viewer at that point, while remaining invisible elsewhere.
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Photons don't interact with photons. It doesn't matter whether it's lased, polarized, or whatever; two or more beams of light will just pass through each other.
(This is also, btw, why photons aren't regularly used as qubits in a quantum computer
Re:3D Fog Environments (Score:4, Interesting)
On a different note, what you can do is have the beams have enough energy density to be close to breaking down the air. Then where they intersect there will be enough energy to break down the air and create a plasma. This will be a reflective point. It's kinda loud though.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Now I do theoritical particle physics. Most I have to worry about it dropping a heavy book on my foot.
education revolution (Score:2)
I'd like to see projects like this trickle into the anemic science materials at the highschool level and make learning science fun. Hopefully they contribute their materials to one/some of the several open coursework sites.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
That would complete the circle ... since most of these projects were 'lifted' from youtube in the first place.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lMLop6MIwUU [youtube.com]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FhBn1ozht-E [youtube.com]
I have some teachers that would love this - "OK kids, go to youtube, steal an idea and make it. I'll be in the chemistry cupboard.
Re: (Score:1)
Fixed it for ya.
At least when I was in high school.
Disruptive techonogies is a real area of study (Score:3, Interesting)
Just to name one kind of such technology for computing, if someone could get automatic parallelization to work reliably, that would be a very disruptive technology. (20 years of research has yet to achieve this, but people keep trying)
Oh, sorry. (Score:2)
Interesting Science Courses Online (Score:1)
I really enjoyed watching the Physics for Future President's course from UC.
http://webcast.berkeley.edu/course_details.php?seriesid=1906978373 [berkeley.edu] or http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ysbZ_j2xi0 [youtube.com] (if you don't like real player!)
Kind of lightweight and zero math involved but entertaining for non science nerds.
Nothing new, move on (Score:1)
Center for Weird Science (Studies) and pencil (Score:2)
Taught by Al Williamson? (Score:2)
Colleges are Businesses (Score:2)
If you'll pay to take the class, they'll offer it. There's not much mystery there.
nobody said it? (Score:2)
Wonderful! Show the world that science IS exciting (Score:2)
This will bring the "Marty" out in all the potential future engineers out there, it may seem like a joke to many - but its dead serious! Weve had a decline in general science interest amongst kids these days - too much effort and too little actual "fun" - thats how they perceive science, but science is so much more - and anything WORTH doing costs patience and dedication.
The weird science classes will hopefully be a "springboard" for many students to "leap" into science and be fun enough to un
Sounds like "Magic Shows" at RPI (Score:2)
Laser Harp (Score:3, Funny)
First day... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)