AMD's "Black Box" Athlon 64 X2 6400+ 99
MojoKid writes "Rumors of a new high-end AMD Athlon 64 X2 chip circulated in July, but availability and specifics of the chip were unconfirmed at the time. Now AMD has officially taken the wraps off their new Athlon 64 X2 6400+, a 3.2GHz dual-core chipset to compete with Intel's Core 2 E6750 and E6850 series. HotHardware notes that the new 6400+ is still built on AMD's 90nm fab process and has a single 2-GHz HyperTransport link and 2 MB of on-chip L2 cache (1 MB per core), just like its predecessor the 6000+. The new processor is said to be a 'channel only' offering and will retail at $239 or so, in a black retail box (picture here) without a heatsink."
Max thermal power = 125 W (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Max thermal power = 125 W (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
As for low idle power, why this would have lower idle power than a similar, lower rating (5000+ let's say) processor?
This is not for the power efficient minded persons, but for bragging rights.
Re: (Score:1)
Aint Much of a Deal (Score:5, Informative)
E6750:
2.66Ghz
1.30V 4MB L2
1.33Ghz FSB
~$225
E6850:
3.00Ghz
1.35V 4MB L2
1.33Ghz FSB
~$300
6400+:
3.20Ghz
1.35V 2MB L2
2.00Ghz HT
~$240
From what I've read, the E6750 actually outperforms [custompc.co.uk] the E6850 since it ran cooler and with less power. So it doesn't look like AMD has a whole lot to offer given the price. Not to mention it doesn't come with a heatsink and fan, something you'd probably have to dish out another $20-50 for.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Fully Buffered DIMMs are only on the server platform (Xeon), not on consumer platform (Pentium/Core2Duo).
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Aint Much of a Deal (Score:5, Insightful)
Keeps the CPU somewhere in the 30-45C range, and can barely be heard (the rest of the fans (all two of them!) are 120mm, and quite quiet. There is a variable speed 120mm fan in my PS as well (Thermaltake Modular 500w).
I think people who go out and buy gigantic, noisy-assed, obnoxious HSF's are just wasting their money.
Re: (Score:2)
Other than being an AMD, what does this CPU offer anyway? I mean a 200MHz bump is not going to improve performance that much, and now AMD is where Intel was: hot. Heat is bad. I'll be the first to admit that I am in the Intel camp (have been since the 80386DX days), but as someone responsible to their customers I've recommended AMD as a viable alternative to many people. In this case I see no compelling reason to recommend it.
-nB
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
In my experience the boxed cooler is always capable of keeping the CPU temp within spec at fairly high loads. The only reason for not using it would be noise - and in most modern PC's the graphics card will make to much noise for you to notice anyway.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1, Informative)
Also, Intel offers their Extreme processors which blow HT out of the water in benchmarks. Those, however, actually are significantly more expensive.
Re: (Score:1, Interesting)
Typo? AMD's HyperTransport implementation is easily superior to the FSB on any available retail processor. The current Extreme parts are far better than, say, the Pentium 4 with Hyper-Threading, if that's the HT that you meant.
Re: (Score:1, Informative)
Re: (Score:1, Interesting)
Remember that's only in synthetic benchmarks! Real world, AMD's memory bus still shreds anything intel has come up with except maybe their "Quad core" xeons, but even those are crippled by being two dual cores that choke their own buses! Despite the speed they run at, AMD is still king for real world.
If that were the case... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
They're in a lull (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
If that were the case...People would adjust their benchmarks to reflect reality. Since they have not, you are wrong.
Look at Tom's Hardware [tomshardware.com]. They often test products against both "synthetic" benchmarks and "real" off-the-shelf programs. Over the years, I've noticed tests where a product will perform consistently better on the "synthetic" tests while another scores consistently better on the "real" ones. I wouldn't say that makes the benchmarks "wrong", it just means they may not always tell you which product would perform better on a specific program.
Re: (Score:2)
Geez ... only 125W TDP? (Score:5, Interesting)
Personally, I'm happy with my E6600, which bangs along just fine at 2.4GHz and can easily outperform any Athlon at a similar speed [or at least match it].
Tom
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Comment removed (Score:4, Funny)
Actually... (Score:5, Funny)
A Hibachi Heatsink attachment for frying up some pork fried rice in the evenings.
A Space heater attachment as a fireplace replacement on those cold winter nights.
A blow dryer/curler attachment for the modern day multi tasking lady who needs to look sexy and code at the same time.
A heating pad attachment for the elderly developer whose bad back needs comfort after years of poor seating posture in WoW.....coding sessions.
Re: (Score:2)
You could use it for camping. Run it outside via an extension cord and sit around the CPU warming your hands over it while singing "Kumbaya".
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
http://www.ocinside.de/go_e.html?http://www.ocins
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Speed bump? Yawn. (Score:1)
Taken the wraps off? (Score:3, Informative)
Maybe America is getting behind the times?
Re:Taken the wraps off? (Score:5, Insightful)
Seriously though, America always is behind in technology because there's a lot more red tape, restrictions, and beurocracy involved in American patents. I'm guessing 85% of it is so American lawyers and businessmen can get richer... the other 15% may indeed be for liability.
But if you really wanna see just how behind on the times we are, check out the cell phone technology in Japan or Singapore. I guess they don't have the Verizonopoly over there... They've had a wider range of way cooler phones for as long as I can remember. You usually don't see any of their newest features hit the American markets until at least 6 months later...
I guess that's also the case with computer processors.
Re:Taken the wraps off? (Score:4, Interesting)
According to this article [msn.com] other reasons include our not using GSM as a standard system, our fragmented carrier market, and our low demand for text messaging and other functions that we can already do on PCs (i.e. web browse).
Black edition? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
will NOT retail for $239 (Score:5, Interesting)
Newegg will probably retail it at $350 to $390 IF they buy a thousand of them. Most companies dont want to stock that much of a processor as the price drops so fat you are stuck with overpriced stock on hand.
About stocking things (Score:5, Informative)
Same goes for most products for a restaurant I used to run. We would buy a lot of milk, and if we had any milk go bad due to low latte sales, we would get a full refund for any milk we didn't use, they would just take the bad milk back. I know this is not the case when dealing imported goods, but not all chips are imported, so maybe some merchants do get compensated for overstocking.
Re: (Score:1, Insightful)
I buy 100 42" tv's at $1300.00 my cost. 10 days later the distributor drops the proce to $800.00 I dont get to send them back and get a credit of $1300.00 each. I get a credit at the price they are selling at.
No electronics distributors give you any buyback deals on parts or items. If the price drops 3 days after you buy it, then it sucks to be you.
that's why in electronics you MUST buy the minimum you think you will need and use JIT suppliers so that you never have mo
Re: (Score:2)
Am I the only one? (Score:1)
When's the U2 edition come out?
Re:Am I the only one? (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
GO r - Unconditional jumps to the value stored in register r
IO x,r1,r2 - Performs memory IO. Reads from the memory location x and stores the result in register r1 and writes r2 to x
LETS r1,r2,r3 - Performs a Less or Equal to Signed comparison between r1 and r2 and stores a 1 in r3 if true and a 0 in r3 if false
The instructions for the program of a blitzkrieg of NOP goes like this:
IO LETS GO IO LETS GO IO LETS GO IO LETS GO
If you have read this far and you still don't get it, here you go [lyricsfreak.com].
Re: (Score:2)
Good thing Johnny wasn't a programmer. "0 1 2 3!" doesn't have the same ring to it.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Intel's been doing this for years, and with good results. Finally AMD was squeezed enough to hire some real marketing people. Let's just hope they don't drop this when/if their products are back to being competitive, so they can again put some pressure on Intel (instead of being fscked by the Intel marketing d
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
That's probably because they like to change the OEM coolers randomly. I remember building some Athlon XP systems with the same processor, but assembled at different times. I bought the retail chip each time, and all three times it came with a different heatsink! None of them were particularly quiet, and one of them was downr
Re: (Score:2)
At least... (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
It's nothing but a heatbox.
Every chip is not a chipset. (Score:1)
Socket 393? (Score:2)
>.<
Re: (Score:1)
Is that means another delay (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)