Farewell To the Floppy Disk 616
s31523 writes "Those of us who have been in the IT arena for a while remember installing our favorite OS, network client, power application, etc. by feeding the computer what seemed an endless supply of 5.25" soft floppy disks. We rejoiced when the hard 3.5" floppies came out, cutting our install media by 1/3. We practically did backflips when the data CD-ROM arrived and we declared: we will never need any other disk than this! It is with sadness that I report the beginning of the end for the floppy: computer giant PC World has announced it will no longer carry the floppy disk once current supplies run out."
Windows installer requires them (Score:5, Informative)
(I bring this up because I had to install a floppy on a computer I was reinstalling XP on the other day so I could use the SATA drive! I kinda felt dirty after doing that!)
Re:Windows installer requires them (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Windows installer requires them (Score:5, Insightful)
Given the abundance of USB-Flash keys, I would hope that most modern PCs can be booted off USB devices.
Re:Windows installer requires them (Score:5, Informative)
Hint: format the USB key as a 1.2MB floppy. If you ask nice, I'll tell you how. If you ask naughty, go Google it yersef. I did. Took me most of an hour to figure it out, and most of a day to get it approved. Slick.
Of course, WIN Server 2K/2K3 and the F6 floppy idea still rots, but it's NOT impossible.
-rick
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
What I ended up doing was just partitio
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Windows installer requires them (Score:4, Funny)
Re:So, XP and below are doomed by this. (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Windows installer requires them (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Windows installer requires them (Score:5, Informative)
Personally, I haven't had a floppy in any of my PCs for at least 5 years. For the odd time I needed a win98 boot floppy or such, then I have floppy images on several bootable DVDs (there's lots of them out there if you're too lazy to do it yourself or don't know how).
However, I still have an old floppy drive (and a trusty LS120) somewhere on a shelf, for the odd time it might come in handy (rescue data, reflash a BIOS from dos - although I prefer to do that from a hard disk as floppies are unreliable, and things like that).
Re: (Score:2)
Though if you want fun I do have a Magento Optical drive and a couple of disks floating around. It uses a SCSI interface so good luck.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Windows installer requires them (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Windows installer requires them (Score:5, Funny)
Ok, so do I invest in 2.5 gigs of memory, or do I use an unused teac and floppy.
Mod storage medium down (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Mod storage medium down (Score:4, Funny)
(-1, Insertful)
Hey I still have punch cards! (Score:5, Interesting)
I well remember moving to 8 inch, then 5.25 inch floppies. My wife made me a few shirts with extra big pockets which could take a couple of 5.25s.
Even with all these fond memories, I prefer CD.
Re:Hey I still have punch cards! (Score:5, Interesting)
Writing and running a program consisted of:
1. Typing out your source code, one line of code per card.
2. Getting the 'compiler/assembler' program card deck out of storage.
3. Reading the 'compiler/assembler' deck into the computer and starting it running.
4. Loading your source code deck as data cards.
5. The compiler/assembler would churn away and then punch out your object card deck.
6. Move the object card deck from the card punch 'out' bin to the card reader 'in' bin.
7. Load your 'object' card deck into the computer and start it running.
For each pass, and each change to your program, the computer would have to punch out a new 'object' deck. There was no other intermediate storage available.
I'm pretty sure I am remembering this right. Dad was a programmer a long, long time ago, and I only know this process from him telling it to me.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
huh? (Score:2)
Also, this is not news.
Re: (Score:2)
Personally, I remember the cases of them that I had for the various software that I used.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Sadly... Good! (Score:5, Informative)
Since '95 the quality control on floppy disks has been so low that it hasn't been worth buying them anyway. At one time a SS/DD 5.25" could be used as a DS/DD reliably for five years or more without errors "just appearing". Maybe a patent ran out or QA began paying more attention to HD and CD manufacturing. Whatever it was, though, after '95 the floppy disks which I've bought have an average lifespan of about three months before random errors begin appearing on the media.
Re:Sadly... Good! (Score:5, Funny)
The !silver lining is that because of their poor reliability and the stress it's caused me, whenever I see floppies (or tapes) I throw them to the ground and stomp them to bits. Even if they're not mine.
Floppy disk reliability (Score:5, Interesting)
Floppy drives are rarely used and have outside air continuously drawn through them while the computer is on, collecting a significant amount of dust. When they're called into service again, the vibration of operation drops the dust and debris into the disk, and the full-contact readwrite head ensures that the dust is ground in nicely.
Back in the days when floppy drives were used daily, there wasn't opportunity for this amount of dust to build up.
One strategy to improve floppy disk reliability these days is to pop in a "sacrificial disk" and do a few operations on it before putting in the actual disk you want to read/write. Another alternative is to use a positive pressure case with an air filter on the intake.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
I have 25+-year-old Commodore drives around here somewhere; I haven't looked at 'em in a decade, but I'll bet that they, too, have sacrificial disks in them at this very moment.
The nice thing about my scheme is that whatever dust would fall to the bottom of the drive falls on the disk; you spin the disk every now and then, the dust gets trapped inside the disk; you pop the disk out, boom, the drive is already clean and ready to g
Re:Sadly... Good! (Score:5, Funny)
1999 called.... (Score:2, Funny)
The dawn of time called... (Score:4, Funny)
BIOS Upgrades... (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Old Archives (Score:4, Interesting)
I recently found an old 3.5" floppy with some useless, but nostalgic data on it. So, I dug through my box of spare 'parts' and found an old drive. As I went to install the drive in my desktop machine to pull the data off the floppy I realized an important fact: that box has no floppy controller.
In that sense, the floppy has already been gone for some of us for awhile now.
Floppy's are dying, not dead... (Score:2)
Vista supports other media on that front, but even today, I see people buy the floppy option on even new PE2950 even if they support USB boot. Floppys are fairly gone from desktop, but even I had to install it for firmware updates to my desktop system.
How proper is the way to honor? (Score:2)
Today the clouds are dry, and the birds have deaf and mute.
Re:How proper is the way to honor? (Score:4, Funny)
the only thing that stores more
with a hole in it.
How is this new news? (Score:4, Informative)
I think what should be news is that although everyone is retiring the floppy drive and sending all the disks to the bone yard, nobody has come up with an alternative way to flash device BIOS's. Companies for RAID, Network and other devices sometimes still only release a floppy self-writing image file.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Nobody? Nobody but me apparently. h0 h0 h0. Seriously though, everyone but you has already figured this out. It's a bit of a PITA but all you need to is use vmware (or similar) with an OS that can read your self-extracting-floppy-making image. Write to a virtual floppy file. Now take that floppy image and use it as
Hasta la Vista? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Not for me (Score:5, Informative)
Yes, you can do that with the nifty-keen gaming motherboard on your gaming computer, but my army of Dell Optiplex GX150s and 260s still need me to use floppies (USB sticks aren't allowed in the building for ludicrously retarded "security" reasons).
jokes (Score:2, Funny)
1998 (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Nah, in 1998 CD burners weren't in my college's computer labs. They had CD readers, but those handy US flash drives weren't really around back in 1998. I actually sunk some money into an external zip drive because I could connect it to all the computers that I had access to, and it would wor
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I disagree, especially for typical iMac users in 1998. Remember, this was before CD burners, USB keys, and home broadband were mainstream. If you ever saw an Mac computer lab in those days, you'd have noticed an ugly external USB floppy drive hanging off every iMac.
I thought Apple dropped floppy drives at least a year too early. To move data to
Steve Jobs first tried to kill floppies in 1988 (Score:3, Interesting)
Another of Jobs' projects, the original NeXTcube [wikipedia.org], also came without a floppy drive. Instead it had a cutting-edge but oddball 256MB magneto-optical drive. Too bad disks cost about $100 and pretty much nobody else used them.
I remember that at the time Jobs disparaged floppy drives as "1970s technology," and I thought: Yeah, and keyboards are 19th century technology, but I wouldn't want a computer without one. Eventually he caved and by 1990 the NeXTstation had a 2.88MB floppy drive.
Joy (Score:2)
Non-standard disk drivers and windows installs, requirement - floppy.
That one computer your company has had since the dawn of time that simply sits there and prints data to the screen never being turned off never being replaced because no one really knows how it works but it is "needed".
Geeks will need the sex jokes about floppy drives and hard disks.
I for one am happy to see floppy drives go. I discovered with windows 95 that I am an
Floppies won't be missed (Score:5, Interesting)
Anyone else ever try to download big files from your school's higher speed Internet connection and then use WinZip or PKZIP to try and zip it up over 40 floppies, only to find when you got home, disk #40 had a bad sector in the readme.txt file and the entire archive was bad?
With as many Word documents I had to rescue for friends from those things with ScanDisk, and as many went bad after 6 months or less, I say good riddance to bad rubbish. Of course, the quality went to hell around the era of Windows 95. Before that, companies actually made good floppies that would last on the order of years.
Good bye and good riddance (Score:3, Interesting)
With el Torito and CD-RW's, it is easy to get by without a floppy drive.
move from active-use to shelf-storage (Score:2)
I don't build pc's with floppies in them anymore but I do keep a few at home or around (with cables) just in CASE some wonky install needs one.
but at this point, I even treat cd/dvd drives like that. they don't get used often enough (for me) to justify keeping them installed in a box. more weight to have to lift (every bit adds up in a chassis) and more air blockage and power consuming for no real return (again, in my case)
Save Icon? (Score:5, Funny)
Or shall we keep it around as a memorial (and to confuse the next generation)?
Nah (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Younguns... (Score:2, Funny)
What about 8" floppies!!! (Score:3, Interesting)
Last time I used a floppy disk... (Score:2)
As a result, I could only run my ancient projects by burning them to CD first, then running them from FreeDOS. Kinda cute too, to see what my code looked like back then *shudder*
nostalgia (Score:3, Informative)
Not ready reading drive A: ()Abort ()Retry (Y)Fail?
What's the difference btwn a woman and a computer? (Score:5, Funny)
How is a woman like a compiler? (Score:3, Funny)
In the Good Old Days. (Score:2)
Humph. Those of us who have really been in the IT arena for a while remember when real geeks had 8-inch floppies.
Beginning of the end???? (Score:4, Insightful)
I bet for a lot of us, we've not handled floppies in several years. And, while my computers still have floppy drives, nothing has been in them for quite a while.
It's way too late in the decline of the floppy to call it "the beginning of the end".
Cheers
Plenty of supply (Score:4, Funny)
I've never called the 3 1/2 ones floppies (Score:4, Funny)
I prefer to call the 3 1/2 ones "stiffies".
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Old-school (Score:4, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Those of us who've been in IT for a long while remember when the OS and power application lived on 80 column cards.
(OK, I don't, but my boss tells me about it all the time and I have screwed around with the manual punch machine we still have)
8 in floppy (Score:3, Informative)
The first job I had at Zenith Electronics about 25 years ago had me building a dual 8 inch floppy drive Heath Kit that I had to use. I recall when a single sided, single density floppy for the Commodore 64 cost around $8.00. I had to buy a USB floppy for a system at work because some POS software assumed that data backup went to drive A: and I could not convince the user to use a mapped portion of her hard drive instead.
I remenber several applicatins assuming that drive A: existed.
It's (Score:5, Funny)
about
[INSERT DISK TO CONTINUE]
time.
[INSERT DISK TO CONTINUE]
Anybody
[INSERT DISK TO CONTINUE]
remem
[INSERT DISK TO CONTINUE]
ber the
[INSERT DISK TO CONTINUE]
128K
[INSERT DISK TO CONTINUE]
Mac?
Floppies from Hell (Score:5, Funny)
Who cares what PC World says? (Score:5, Informative)
I hope someone finds this information useful.
When do we get notchable CD's? (Score:5, Funny)
Vista still requires them to back up credentials (Score:4, Informative)
Melissa
The Floppy is not dead (Score:3, Funny)
Comment removed (Score:3, Insightful)
Not dead (Score:3, Interesting)
USB flash is everywhere! (Score:5, Interesting)
To me the best thing about flash drives is that they work almost EVERYWHERE now. There are drivers out there for Windows 95 ("B" version and up), Windows NT, and even DOS! Ok, here's a link [toastytech.com]. They will work on my Mac, Linux and even the eComstation (that's OS/2) demo CD I tried!
I used to think Iomega would rule the world with their Zip drives, but the prices of the disks always remained insanely high and the disks and drives were not as reliable as they should have been. Also, I don't think I ever saw anybody other than Iomega produce zip-compatible drives. Probably patents and BS.
News to me. (Score:3, Interesting)
I understand adhering to requirements. But floppy disks?
I guess the real lesson I'm learning so far is that some people will force you to use stupid old methods or standards or media because they said so and for no other good reason. Might as well tell me to submit it on five-and-a-quarter, it would the same inconvenience at this point.
Re:It was just their time, it was just their time. (Score:2)
BTW: Since availability is going to be short, everybody had better stock up now!
No replacement, but most don't care. (Score:5, Interesting)
I used to keep stacks of floppies sitting around, mostly ones conveniently sent to my home by the kind folks at America Online, to give to people when they needed some document or other. I rarely got them back, and it was understood that discs just sort of circulated around, like some sort of valueless currency. When you needed one, you just looked around until you found one (that looked disused) and did whatever you had to do.
Email has really replaced floppies. Not just email as a service, because obviously email has been around for decades, and floppies didn't decline in popularity until the last few years, but near-universal access to email, with the capability of receiving nontrivial attachments (greater than a few K but less than a few MB), and always-on connectivity. Before you had that, giving someone a floppy with a document was the most convenient method. Now, email is by far easier. If I was working on something, and needed to give someone a copy, using removable storage wouldn't be my first thought: instead I'd just send it to them.
The kind of removable storage you're talking about is only necessary for a few cases, either where the file is too big to be practically attached to an email, or the person doesn't have an email address (rare, these days) or other internet access to receive it. So in those cases, CD-R or CD-RW are made to suffice.
Overall, mini CDs or business-card CD-Rs would be a good candidate for replacement (and it's really not hard to put them in a little vinyl sleeve to keep them from getting scratched; 5.25" floppies didn't last long outside a paper sleeve either), but the market for them is just so limited that the economies of scale don't exist to make them as cheap as floppies were.
Re:Still no working replacement (Score:4, Interesting)
From a technical standpoint, Minidisc is exactly that.
Unfortunately, Sony has pretty successfully killed their own format.
They're too afraid of piracy, to actually sell decent products. Instead they always offer too little, too late.
Re:Still no working replacement (Score:4, Interesting)
I liked floppy discs, but the reason that the 3.5" 1.44MB floppy survived so long was that no-one came up with a truly universal successor (the Zip disc had some success in its day, but never became "standard"). Guaranteed bootability, universal support, etc... made it a near-essential even in the face of more advanced technologies that would otherwise have killed it far earlier; but you can see why no-one wanted to pay much for one.
I would say that its day was over, but people were saying that 2 years back. Truth is, despite PC World's attention-whoring announcment, the floppy won't die suddenly, it'll just continue fading away.
LS-120 and 250 (Score:5, Insightful)
The 250 drives went even further, by allowing you to format regular floppies to some ungodly (and ultimately unreliable) capacity in the range of 30 MB. This typically left them readable only by the original drive, even other LS-250s tended not to be able to read them. Also, they had just a wee problem with bit rot. But they could still use 1.44 MB disks in the conventional manner as well, and the older 120 MB disks, and their own 250 MB disks. They were just too little too late -- by then, CD-RW had far surpassed them in the bang-for-the-buck department, as well as the raw space department. CD-RW discs (why the spelling change? I don't know) had dropped below $1 apiece by then, and the 250 MB media were still in the $12-15 range. If you didn't think the disc was ever coming back, CD-R blanks were about 35 cents.
Mal-2
Re: (Score:2)
but I'll go with "Put in disk 3 and press enter."
Or in case of Monkey Island 2: disks 1 through 11.
Not too late. (Score:5, Insightful)
I wouldn't waste too much time before you archive them, though; drives are only going to get harder to find, and the media itself that you have stuff stored on ain't getting any younger.
A slight bit of irony, though: years ago, when I first got an Iomega Zip disk, I was sure that it was going to replace floppies completely. (And for a while it seemed like it; there were some Macs in the late 90s that shipped with Zips in place of the FD drive.) So I dutifully backed up all my old floppies onto Zip disks. Not that long ago, when I decided it was time to retire the Zip for good, I went to pull the data off of its cartridges and back them up on CD-R...only to find that the disks were plagued with the "clicks." I had to go back to the floppies to get the old stuff again.
Taught me two good lessons: 1) always roll backups onto new media whenever possible (I should have backed those Zips up to CD-R as soon as I got a disc burner), but more importantly 2) don't ever trust that the new media will be more robust than the old. Even now, I still have the floppies stored along with the CDs (and now DVD+Rs), because I'm not sure which will last longer. Might as well cover all the bases.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
ZIP disks WERE poised to take over the floppy market, as an alternative to LS120 and Syquest cartridges.
CD burners DID come out at around the same time -- but back then, a Sony Spressa 2X read / 1X burn was worth $2500 and blank CD-Rs worth worth $20 each (figures in Canadian dollars). CDs were also quite finnicky back then, and SCSI controllers for the burners weren't exactly cheap, either (you needed something like an Adaptec 1542, worth about
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
The network stack for dos has been available free from Microsoft for years.
Basic Netbios & IPX/SPX are pretty easy to setup. (Surely I wasn't the only one to play Doom and Duke Nukem 3D on a LAN.)
TCP/IP is also doable but is quite a memory hog; you'll definately want to setup a custom boot sequence to boot with or without network support.
I'm not sure how well DOS networking plays with domains, and active directory; it *used* to work a
Another publicity stunt from the Dixons group (Score:5, Informative)
(1) Death of video recorder (i.e. VCR) in sight [bbc.co.uk]
(2) Dixons to end 35mm camera sales [bbc.co.uk].
In the case of the VCR, their announcement was misleading at best, and more likely just a pack of lies. Dixons.co.uk (and the large-format Currys stores) *still* each sell a wide range of standalone VCRs, over 2 years later. (Visit dixons.co.uk [dixons.co.uk] and search for "video recorder").
IIRC the high-street Dixons stores (now called "Currys.Digital", ugh) still sold them long after the supposed phase-out date. I don't know about the 35mm cameras, but even if they were telling the truth in that case, it was a nice publicity stunt for them. Even more so for the floppy discs; you're stopping selling floppy discs and you felt the need to make a big announcement about it?!
Of course, the intention behind these announcements- besides the straight publicity- is to give the impression of Dixons and PC World as hi-tech, cutting-edge type places. When in fact they're mediocre at best; sometimes competitive, but just as often overpriced- particularly for more humble items such as USB and Ethernet cables, staffed by salespeople who like to pretend they know more than they do, flogging overpriced warranties and with a poor reputation [ciao.co.uk]. Online shopping is much cheaper, and with a better selection.
They got a mention on /. too... (Score:5, Informative)
(1) "The UK's largest retailer of electronics is phasing out VHS VCRs." [slashdot.org] (Note that as I pointed out then [slashdot.org], Dixons' "discontinuation" of the VCR took place before DVD recorders (*not* playback-only devices) and HDD-based PVRs had taken off.
(2) "Digital Cameras Force Film Off Dixons' Shelves" [slashdot.org]
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
8" disks are commonly called floopy disks.
5.25" disks - mini-floppy disks. (unless they were the Lisa ones which were Twiggy Floppys)
3.5" disks - micro-floppy disks.
(though micro-floppy was widely used for other formats like the 3 and 2" versions as well.)
Cassette tapes were just Cassttes - or in Commodore speak 'datasettes' (I think Adam cassettes were data-packs).
Then there were the exatron tapes which were stringy floppies.
And the tinly Sinclair QL tapes were micrdodrive cartridg
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
I got an email about this (Score:5, Funny)
Re:thinking of the children...... (Score:5, Insightful)
That's right! It doesn't seem silly at all when you think about it. My mom's a writer and routinely sends manuscripts, articles, etc to different publishers. One particular publisher insisted that she send a printed copy, refusing email attachements, CDs or any sort of soft copy, citing that 'the paper medium has been proven to be much more reliable than digital, yada yada..." Ridiculous, what a bunch of luddites I thought.
I was already thinking of asking giving them a piece of my mind about that when it occured to me even I couldn't even open my old 1990s files anymore. Not only were some of them in Iomega Zip disks, they were in old proprietary formats. (Well, that's another topic altogether.)
Another case more to the point: About a decade ago, my family decided to cobble together some sort of "time capsule" to be opened in about 50 yrs. It had several items including some files on 3.5 floppies. My dad asked me how were my grandkids supposed to read those things by then?
I guess the moral is, I shouldn't have been tied down to any (digital) storage medium, arrogantly thinking it'll always be the standard.