MIT-Led Study Says Geothermal Energy Is Viable 291
amigoro writes to tell us about a study for the US Department of Energy, led by MIT, indicating that geothermal energy could account for 10% of energy production in the US by 2050. The study concludes that geothermal is proven, could impose markedly lower environmental impacts than fossil-fuel and nuclear power plants, and is likely to be cost-competitive with the alternatives. This coverage in LiveScience points out how big a player geothermal already is in the US: "The United States is the world's biggest producer of geothermal energy. Nafi Toksöz, a geophysicist at MIT, noted that the electricity produced annually by geothermal plants now in use in California, Hawaii, Utah, and Nevada is comparable to that produced by solar and wind power combined."
Iceland (Score:5, Funny)
You heard it here first (Score:4, Funny)
This sounds dangerous. (Score:1, Funny)
But won't stealing energy from the core [imdb.com] of the earth slow [blogspot.com] it down, causing the planet's electromagnetic field to rapidly deteriorate, killing us all?!
Just wondering.
Re:Nukes are the answer! (Score:3, Funny)
Ahh... I see you suggest modern nuclear power plants.
Did you know that archaic nuclear power plants produce a whole bunch of "unusable" nuclear "waste"? Further, every time we put in a new nuclear power plant a terrorist gets a weapon of mass destruction!
Re:Nukes are the answer! (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Nukes are the answer! (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Yes, yes we have a lot of resources (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Iceland (Score:5, Funny)
It must be nice to live right on top of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge and a volcanic hotspot and get tons of free energy.
Well, except when one of the dozens of active volcanoes erupts, of course...
Re:Believe me ! I am NOT a Google SHILL !! (Score:5, Funny)
As I continue down the long pathway of life, meandering here and there, never knowing what might be around the next bend, I can take pleasure and comfort in knowing that - somewhere out there - there is an anomymous coward that is not a Google shill. Perhaps I shall pass this bit of arcania on to my children - and then to their children in turn - until at some point in the far distant future it becomes a family legend. Thank you, anonymous coward, thank you.
Re:Anti-nuclear bias (Score:1, Funny)
NIABY!
Re:Yes, yes we have a lot of resources (Score:3, Funny)
People like one solution for all their problems. 3000 years ago, folks had to pray to one god for good health and another god for plentiful harvests and good weather. Now-a-days most folks all pray to the same god for everything regardless of the situation, and they like it that way. They don't want to have to weigh benifits of going one route or another. They don't want to have to think about their options at all.
Maybe one day we'll be able to get past the "one solution to all our problems" fixation we have, but it won't happen any day soon.
Iceland will be pissed. (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Unfortunately, there is opposition to this too (Score:2, Funny)
OH NO! (Score:3, Funny)
Then what will we do?
We'll have to have giant heat-exchanger space elevators circulating water/ice to cool the atmosphere back down, and we'll pump all our radioactive waste down deep to warm it back up in there.
er.
Nevermind